Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Criminal records and mma

  • 25-03-2010 4:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭


    I just want to see if this is the same with all clubs and promoters, I have a friend in his 30s that trains in mma and was with a small club but then got approached by a bigger club that could further his career but they found out he had a record for violent offences when he was in his late teens and early 20s he never went to jail or anything just fines and stuff but they said they didn't want to take him on then because of his past, so my question is this are people with records for violence allowed to compete in mma or is it just down to trainers if they let people train and compete?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    I just want to see if this is the same with all clubs and promoters, I have a friend in his 30s that trains in mma and was with a small club but then got approached by a bigger club that could further his career but they found out he had a record for violent offences when he was in his late teens and early 20s he never went to jail or anything just fines and stuff but they said they didn't want to take him on then because of his past, so my question is this are people with records for violence allowed to compete in mma or is it just down to trainers if they let people train and compete?


    what i want to know is what they where doing poaching another clubs fighter like that-thats not on, a record does not stop you competing in MMA unless you need a green card or something, its up to a trainer if he takes on a toerag or not, sometimes people need a chance in life too.

    it really depends on wheter they want to do good, or wheter there still toerags who have no intention of been good people wheter i would take them on, i've seen people go from bad to good with the discipline and respect they get through sports such as Boxing/MMA and confidense aswell is not to be underestimated on how behaviour can change for the better.

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭mmmm...not sure


    cowzerp wrote: »
    what i want to know is what they where doing poaching another clubs fighter like that-thats not on, a record does not stop you competing in MMA unless you need a green card or something, its up to a trainer if he takes on a toerag or not, sometimes people need a chance in life too.

    it really depends on wheter they want to do good, or wheter there still toerags who have no intention of been good people wheter i would take them on, i've seen people go from bad to good with the discipline and respect they get through sports such as Boxing/MMA and confidense aswell is not to be underestimated on how behaviour can change for the better.

    I didn't know him when he was in trouble but over the past few year I have know him he doesn't seem the type of fella that would be a violent person outside of the cage and he has a decent job now and everything that happened was years ago. The smaller club he was with has no problem with fighters moving to bigger clubs as said they want the best for their fighters and that they can get more oppurtunites at the bigger club.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭Barry.Oglesby


    Who gives a **** about the past? I would train anyone who had served their time and was now on the level. Prison is supposed to be the punishment, not the rest of your life. Excluding guys on the basis of their past won't get them any more accepted back into society.

    Training and physical exercise is a positive influence on a guy, exclude him from that and you push him away from starting a new life.

    (Obviously, sex offenders I would exclude)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 364 ✭✭Mrs Lynch


    A lot of ppl have changed their lives through MMA. I know a lot of work has been put in by particular clubs (in the North) to help guys which I can only whole heartly commend.

    I have spoke with guys who have admitted their mistakes but as I have said to them their lives are changed and they are now better for leaving their past in the past. However if a person is still continuing with illegal acts/ activities they dont have a place in Irish MMA. There is enough barriers we constantly face without this.

    Example Paul Cowzer been in court for GBH and goes about beating people up every Friday after clubbin this I would think would be totally unacceptable and he would not only risk losing his club/ promotion but the respect of the MMA circle. (Sorry Paul I know you would never do this in a million years:cool:)

    Urs
    x


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭Martin Walker


    We wouldnt even think of asking lads if they had been in trouble with the law.
    Its none of my Business. However if a lad was training with us and got jailed or fined for serious violent crimes he would be kicked out of the club. We dont need that publicity.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 364 ✭✭Mrs Lynch


    We wouldnt even think of asking lads if they had been in trouble with the law.
    Its none of my Business. However if a lad was training with us and got jailed or fined for serious violent crimes he would be kicked out of the club. We dont need that publicity.

    Wot if their mistakes wer young and foolish????

    I totally think if they are "currently" on wrong side of law then they should be kicked to the kerb until they show they hav changed their ways:)

    Urs
    x


  • Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭mmmm...not sure


    Mrs Lynch wrote: »
    Wot if their mistakes wer young and foolish????

    I totally think if they are "currently" on wrong side of law then they should be kicked to the kerb until they show they hav changed their ways:)

    Urs
    x

    Yeah I think he was young and foolish he's not the same person he was back then as he is now he's now such a decent lad.

    Thanks for all your feedback on this it's really helped get a clear picture of what opinions from promoters and fans are like and my mate will be glad to know not all trainers or shows will hold anything against him from his past and it's gave me a clearer picture as I thought it was a rule or even unspoken rule so thanks for clearing that up for me aswel


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,258 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    I would find it very strange for gyms not to let a guy train with them due to a criminal past.

    Every time i watch boxing, it's "a young thug from the streets.... boxing saved him and made him a contributing member of society".

    Why should MMA be different?

    At the same time, i suppose each story should be taken on it's merits. Someone mentioned sex offenders, that's a whole different ball-game.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,478 ✭✭✭Bubs101



    (Obviously, sex offenders I would exclude)

    Not trolling here just genuinely curious. You'd be more willing to train someone with a history of abuse in a fighting style like Muay Thai (no idea what you teach just a guess) than a sex offender. Surely the person with a history of assault would be the worse person to teach


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭Peetrik


    Bubs101 wrote: »
    Not trolling here just genuinely curious. You'd be more willing to train someone with a history of abuse in a fighting style like Muay Thai (no idea what you teach just a guess) than a sex offender. Surely the person with a history of assault would be the worse person to teach

    Maybe its more akin to teaching web security to some kid previously convicted of making a computer virus because he was bored versus teaching hypnosis to a paedophile


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 859 ✭✭✭BobbyOLeary


    Excluding guys on the basis of their past won't get them any more accepted back into society.

    (Obviously, sex offenders I would exclude)

    It's funny, I'd agree with you on this but at the same time I can see the glaring hypocrisy in it.

    As for your mate with a violent past. I dunno, not that I train anyone or anything but it'd really come down to the person in question whether or not I'd work with them. Though as Martin said the publicity from it could be bad. The News of the World would go mad for that sort of thing. "Breeding Super-thugs" or something...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭Barry.Oglesby


    Bubs101 wrote: »
    Not trolling here just genuinely curious. You'd be more willing to train someone with a history of abuse in a fighting style like Muay Thai (no idea what you teach just a guess) than a sex offender. Surely the person with a history of assault would be the worse person to teach
    I grew up in a nice area with a stable family, however a lot of my friends were not so lucky. They grew up with instability and violence as the norm in areas where you had to take or be taken from. They made mistakes and stole or were violent and were punished for them by the justice system.

    Against that, sex offenders by and large suffer from a psychological condition, not a social one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭pablohoney87


    Bubs101 wrote: »
    Not trolling here just genuinely curious. You'd be more willing to train someone with a history of abuse in a fighting style like Muay Thai (no idea what you teach just a guess) than a sex offender. Surely the person with a history of assault would be the worse person to teach

    When you're talkin bout bjj id be cautious of teaching a sex offender too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,126 ✭✭✭✭calex71


    "Breeding Super-thugs" or something...

    Careful , if they stumble across this thread they'll steal that for the front page for sure :D


Advertisement