Europa League quarter final first leg: Benfica v Liverppool

Pro. F

Des wrote: »

nothing wrong with a bit of cynacilaty at the right times, it's obviously frustrating you lot anyway

fùck that. It has to be a good thing that the predominance of fouling/injuring players out of games is a thing of the past imo.

bohsman

mayordenis wrote: »

There were alot more than those decisions that went against us,

but yes of course the commentator must be right, congrats on being able to form your own opinion.

What? I said not even the Liverpool supporting commentator could defend Liverpool, the ref had a good game, Insua could easily have got a 2nd yellow for the penalty and no idea how Agger didn't get booked for his non stop whinging.

Mr Alan

lol at the Rafa out comments sent in! ha ha

"tyical Rafa changing the team from the weekend after out best performance, he should be sacked"

emmmm, the only change was cause Maxi isn't eligable.

"go one up & then get all defensive, typical Rafa, he has to go"

nothing to do with getting sent down to 10 men away from home you ****ing spa


"if Rafa doesn't win the Uefa Cup, he has to go" from Geraldine O'Donohue

Geraldine, less texting & more cooking, ****ing wimmin

Kingdom

The refereeing was shocking throughout the game, and I have to say it's the first time I've thought of a bit of "buying" of officials. However, all three big decisions were spot on I reckon.

yom 1

Could have been a lot worse. 2-1 is a result we can come back from
Refereeing was disgraceful.
Babel is an idiot. I hope he gets a b0llocking from the players.
Insua was woeful, stupid tackle for the first peno aswell.
Gerrard started well but was anomynous after Babel was sent off.
Torres was kicked all over the pitch.....looked knackered for his chance
Kuyt had a great game.

Mascherano was immense tonight........fcuking outstanding performance from him.......and we needed it from him too

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

There were alot more than those decisions that went against us,

but yes of course the commentator must be right, congrats on being able to form your own opinion.

and you were also awarded an offside goal, swings and roundabouts

RasTa

lololollolololol that is the worst red card decision I've ever seen. What a disgrace

Mr Alan

bohsman wrote: »

the ref had a good game

holy ****.

Mr Alan

ntlbell wrote: »

and you were also awarded an offside goal, swings and roundabouts

wat are you talking about?

we actually had a good goal disallowed by the officials tonight.

Jazzy

brought to you by Muppet Enterprises. Number 1 in bridge building.

Ryan Babel:


Emiliano Insua:




and those are this weeks idiots.




Sponsored by Muppet Enterprises

kingshankly

I am super confident of doing them over big style next week

mayordenis

ntlbell wrote: »

and you were also awarded an offside goal, swings and roundabouts

How was it offside? remember Kuyt didn't interfere with play, so do tell me how it was offside?

NukaCola

ntlbell wrote: »

and you were also awarded an offside goal, swings and roundabouts

Do you understand the offside rule?

Mrmoe

Very disappointing result but still in with a great chance. I can see us scoring at home but the problem I think will be in defence and whether we concede or not. The refereee and his assistants were a joke. Torres was being kicked all over the place all night, soft decisions went for Benfica and against Liverpool. Benfica have some righ handy players though.

mayordenis

BumbleBee123 wrote: »

Do you understand the offside rule?

Clearly he does not.

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

How was it offside? remember Kuyt didn't interfere with play, so do tell me how it was offside?

how is standing a yard or so away from the keeper not interfeing?

christ all mighty.

Dcully

ntlbell wrote: »

and you were also awarded an offside goal, swings and roundabouts

The goal was not given :rolleyes:

Splainc

Torres should file a complaint with the police after that. Insua simply is out of his depth the poor lad.

mike65

Look I thinks its clear enough what we have here.

What we have here is a "lets yank the Liverpool suppoters chains they are feeling a bit sore" committee visiting us once again. (Its amazing how you guys never show after a nice hearty win like the Sunderland match thread for example - don't worry we don't miss you)

mayordenis

ntlbell wrote: »

how is standing a yard or so away from the keeper not interfeing?

christ all mighty.

What are you on about, he in no way interfered with the keepers vision and in no way blocked a defender or made a movement towards the ball.

You are so wrong, but anyway keep trying your pathetic behaviour.

Jazzy

hahahaha

i see ntlbell is getting in on the action. what happened your old tag partner in Boggles? The Muppet is barely half the man he is

ntlbell

mike65 wrote: »

Look I thinks its clear enough what we have here.

What we have here is a "lets yank the Liverpool suppoters chains they are feeling a bit sore" committee visiting us once again. (Its amazing how you guys never show after a nice hearty win like the Sunderland match thread for example - don't worry we don't miss you)

Lol, i haven't commented on a liverpool loss for a long time.

stop with the generalisation

Mr Alan

even if Kuyt was interfering, there was no daylight between him & the line, he was ahead, but there has to be daylight, there wasn't.

Dcully

mayordenis wrote: »

What are you on about, he in no way interfered with the keepers vision and in no way blocked a defender or made a movement towards the ball.

You are so wrong, but anyway keep trying your pathetic behaviour.

This is the typical drivel ive seen from him over the years here, i wouldnt worry about it.

kingshankly

Who for left back next week ? Carra?

ntlbell

Dcully wrote: »

The goal was not given :rolleyes:

huh? agger's goal was given?

what are you talking about?

Kent Brockman

ntlbell wrote: »

and you were also awarded an offside goal, swings and roundabouts

Is there a "NO thank you" anywhere:rolleyes:

RasTa

mike65 wrote: »

Look I thinks its clear enough what we have here.

Who is in this committee you speak about? Also you do have some sense of self importance if you think we won't be talking about that game after the decisions that were mentioned throughout the thread.

mike65

kingshankly wrote: »

Who for left back next week ? Carra?

Agger will play there. Soto and Carra in the middle. The left wing can be filled by Reira Yossi. Its not a disaster, merely a set back. Did Liverpool ever win a cup in a straightforward fashion?

Jazzy

ntlbell wrote: »

huh? agger's goal was given?

what are you talking about?

see this muppet? this is how you do it. really old school right here with ntlbell. see the way hes purposely acting dumb just to further rile up the blood after tonights defeat. effortless presentation that leads to many followups on how he can annoy people after.

hes an old master is our bell

Dcully

ntlbell wrote: »

huh? agger's goal was given?

what are you talking about?

My bad i assumed you were on about the offside goal that was disallowed and you were just being stirring, wouldnt be the first time eh

Or maybe im spot on and you are indeed on a trolling and wind up mission, again thats nothing new is it.

SlickRic

lads, if you don't like them, ignore them.

RasTa

NTL is so good he gets me riled up when commenting on a Liverpool defeat

Iago

Frankly I thought both the goal that was given and the Torres chance that was ruled against were both offside. Of course the issue is that they've managed to make such a balls of the offside rule that next week and identical goal will be disallowed and the week after an identical goal will be given.

An away goal and single goal defeat away from home when down to 10 men for 55 minutes in a European quarter final really isn't a bad result. I think Liverpool are more than capable of winning next week, but they'll need to be more clinical in front of goal and a lot tighter at the back.

NukaCola

Benitez "The sending off changed everything"

Jazzy

RasTa wrote: »

NTL is so good he gets me riled up when commenting on a Liverpool defeat

leaps and bounds ahead of the muppet tbh. like comparing dirk kuyt to iain dowie.. ill leave you to sort out which is which :pac:

ntlbell

BumbleBee123 wrote: »

Benitez "The sending off changed everything"

i thought it was the two benfica goals.

mayordenis

ntlbell wrote: »

i thought it was the two benfica goals.

Seriously what do you get from posting this absolute nonsense?

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

Seriously what do you get from posting this absolute nonsense?

Are you suggesting goals don't change games?

really?

come on?

mike65

[ignore on]

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

Seriously what do you get from posting this absolute nonsense?

Also, why don't you question Iago on why he thinks the goal was offside?

it's only an a crazy accusation because I suggested it?

?

mike65

Stop quoting him! :pac:

mayordenis

ntlbell wrote: »

Are you suggesting goals don't change games?

really?

come on?

Are you suggestion early sending offs don't change games?

Is your brain really not capable of understanding that the Sending off was before the 2 penalties. Do you get that?

The sending off was first, then the 2 penalties.

How else can I put it?

First there is a sending off, then the game changes, then around 30 minutes later Benfica score.

Is that getting into your head? probably not, but I will always try to improve people.

mayordenis

ntlbell wrote: »

Also, why don't you question Iago on why he thinks the goal was offside?

it's only an a crazy accusation because I suggested it?

?

Because Iago tries to get his point however incorrect across in a reasonably impartial manner, he is certainly wrong, but at least trying to add to debate.

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

Are you suggestion early sending offs don't change games?

Is your brain really not capable of understanding that the Sending off was before the 2 penalties. Do you get that?

The sending off was first, then the 2 penalties.

How else can I put it?

First there is a sending off, then the game changes, then around 30 minutes later Benfica score.

Is that getting into your head? probably not, but I will always try to improve people.

and the offside goal happened before the sending off? :rolleyes:

mayordenis

ntlbell wrote: »

and the offside goal happened before the sending off? :rolleyes:

Yes the legitimate goal happened before the ridiculous sending off, you should post more than a sentance and try and get your point across because to anyone with functioning brain that 1 sentance doesn't actually have a point.

Pro. F

RasTa wrote: »

NTL is so good he gets me riled up when commenting on a Liverpool defeat

Me too. I'm just glad that I'm a Man Utd fan so I don't have to put up with his shìte so much - he hardly ever posts in United threads.

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

Because Iago tries to get his point however incorrect across in a reasonably impartial manner, he is certainly wrong, but at least trying to add to debate.

but you don't debate with iago, you just choose to try and be little my opinion.

nice one.

missingtime

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

ntlbell

mayordenis wrote: »

Yes the legitimate goal happened before the ridiculous sending off, you should post more than a sentance and try and get your point across because to anyone with functioning brain that 1 sentance doesn't actually have a point.

raising your hand on TWO occasions in the same instance?


redic.

right.