Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Anyone sitting BS2 Exams?

12357

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    one question per topic but lectures one through four cover 2 questions right!? i will probably pass the exam with this yeah!? wish i knew my CA too, kinda makin me more nervous not knowing it

    yeah that should be fine, i'd say he's not a bad marker, he's hardly gonna expect too much knowledge. Anyway best of luck!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    Good luck :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Hey, hope Industrial relations went well for everybody. Sooo happy to have them two exams out of the way, its such a weight off! Anyway need to get down to business with this Financial management, so damn tough with this weather :( Just wondering what exact theory stuff do we need to know coz apparently one of the long question will be theory so could be a great way to pick up marks. Should we just know pretty much all the theory that is on the slides?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    hey, yeah just five more days and its summer :) hopefully the sun will stay!!!
    I would learn all the theory, i don't think there's really that much and once you give it a read over ya pretty much know it. I'd especially do WACC theory and Capital Market efficiency is practicaly guarenteed considering he emailed us about it after we finished! Don't think we covered preference shares and a few other things in section 3- I'm not sure exactly what, do you know? Anyone know if this years grades count for our final degree??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    hey, yeah just five more days and its summer :) hopefully the sun will stay!!!
    I would learn all the theory, i don't think there's really that much and once you give it a read over ya pretty much know it. I'd especially do WACC theory and Capital Market efficiency is practicaly guarenteed considering he emailed us about it after we finished! Don't think we covered preference shares and a few other things in section 3- I'm not sure exactly what, do you know? Anyone know if this years grades count for our final degree??

    Yeah learning this theory is really nothing compared to the content of stuff we have had to learn off for out last 2 exams so i'll be doing it all. Capital market efficiency is certainly gonna be on it as you said and will probably appear as a short question. The longer theory could be more IRR, NPV, Payback, WACC etc. I'm really hoping one of section B will be about calculating one of the above as well but I never learned how to do that 'cash flows' question where you have to leave out certain costs like sunk costs etc.

    It just confuses me and I reckon one question in sec.B should be one stuff like NPV/Payback/IRR of projects so I should be able to answer this much better than cash flows. As for section C then, there should be one question on theory. I need like 33%/100 to pass so I'm hoping I should be ok. Still confused over a couple of the short questions but will work on these over the next few days. Apparently the project appraisal question that we did for quiz 2 are not gonna be asked so we don't have to know these.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    Ok cool. Yeah I'm a bit sketchy on the cash flow q and I went to that class!! I don't think it's even mentioned in the notes! Today I'm working on Market Research and Organistions, wanna have something done! you covering all of each or any tips?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    Butters111 wrote: »
    hey, yeah just five more days and its summer :) hopefully the sun will stay!!!
    I would learn all the theory, i don't think there's really that much and once you give it a read over ya pretty much know it. I'd especially do WACC theory and Capital Market efficiency is practicaly guarenteed considering he emailed us about it after we finished! Don't think we covered preference shares and a few other things in section 3- I'm not sure exactly what, do you know? Anyone know if this years grades count for our final degree??

    No, only your results in final year count towards your degree. Your results in first and second year are only really important when it comes to applying for graduate programmes when you're in final year and when looking for summer internships.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    Ok cool. Yeah I'm a bit sketchy on the cash flow q and I went to that class!! I don't think it's even mentioned in the notes! Today I'm working on Market Research and Organistions, wanna have something done! you covering all of each or any tips?

    For marketing research, just read the slides and do the topics that came up on the sample paper. Stuff like Questionnaire design (10 steps), comparative & non-comparative scaling techniques (be able to identify the type of measurement used in a sample questionnaire that he may put on the paper) and Survey methods are the topics which I have highlighted in my notes as being the most commonly asked stuff. For this exam I need to get 16%/100 minimum so just reading slides on the topics should do it and being able to list things, and write briefly about them. If I manage to fail this one I really shouldn't be in college ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    For marketing research, just read the slides and do the topics that came up on the sample paper. Stuff like Questionnaire design (10 steps), comparative & non-comparative scaling techniques (be able to identify the type of measurement used in a sample questionnaire that he may put on the paper) and Survey methods are the topics which I have highlighted in my notes as being the most commonly asked stuff. For this exam I need to get 16%/100 minimum so just reading slides on the topics should do it and being able to list things, and write briefly about them. If I manage to fail this one I really shouldn't be in college ;)
    Thanks :) Ha yeah I need somethin round that too. It's just that tutor Joanne talked as if it was really difficult and that loads a ppl didn't make up the 10% or whatever little amount they needed! and I know they probably didnt even glance at the notes but still... it freaks me out a lil bit!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    Thanks :) Ha yeah I need somethin round that too. It's just that tutor Joanne talked as if it was really difficult and that loads a ppl didn't make up the 10% or whatever little amount they needed! and I know they probably didnt even glance at the notes but still... it freaks me out a lil bit!

    Yeah this really bugs me coz I emailed the lecturer Darach about two weeks ago asking about this and here is the response I got. I only got this reply the day b4 the exams started so forgot to mention it here.

    "I didn't teach this course last year so I'm completely unaware of what may have happened. I'm also a bit puzzled regarding what was supposed to have been said in the tutorials as neither of the tutors were here last year either. I think you're asking me if it's possible to pass the exam without reading the text. The best answer is maybe, I suppose. There really should be no problem about this as most of the slides are based directly on the text with the exception of the readings on focus groups and interviews. Yes, last year's paper and the Christmas paper are good indications of the style of questions that appear for this subject.

    Best of luck"

    He is obviously referring to what is required to pass the the paper, i.e, 40% or over, I didn't exactly want to ask him what do I need to do to get 16% as I didn't think he's be too receptive. Anyway I dunno what the hell that tutor one was on about but if I had to guess I'd say she was just a gob****e!:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    Yeah this really bugs me coz I emailed the lecturer Darach about two weeks ago asking about this and here is the response I got. I only got this reply the day b4 the exams started so forgot to mention it here.

    "I didn't teach this course last year so I'm completely unaware of what may have happened. I'm also a bit puzzled regarding what was supposed to have been said in the tutorials as neither of the tutors were here last year either. I think you're asking me if it's possible to pass the exam without reading the text. The best answer is maybe, I suppose. There really should be no problem about this as most of the slides are based directly on the text with the exception of the readings on focus groups and interviews. Yes, last year's paper and the Christmas paper are good indications of the style of questions that appear for this subject.

    Best of luck"

    He is obviously referring to what is required to pass the the paper, i.e, 40% or over, I didn't exactly want to ask him what do I need to do to get 16% as I didn't think he's be too receptive. Anyway I dunno what the hell that tutor one was on about but if I had to guess I'd say she was just a gob****e!:D

    Yeah she wasn't the best! For the CA result, for group questioning she gave us something in the 60's but i dunno how she came to that consideringg she never took down what was asked and by what group!? but anyway i will be doin the slides for this! thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Anyone know what to do here for financial management Q:

    "Richard is a brewer and wants to start a new line with cost of plant of €200,000 and net revenue from sales at €30,000 per annum for 20 years by which tastes will have changes and the value of the brewery and plant will be zero. If Richard's cost of capital is 7%, calculate NPV of the project and decide whether the project should be undertaken"

    So my attempt at this is NPV = -200,000 + 30,000/1.07^20 = €7,752.57

    I think I am way off here though and I should be using PV of annuity or something, I dunno question is confusing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    Anyone know what to do here for financial management Q:

    "Richard is a brewer and wants to start a new line with cost of plant of €200,000 and net revenue from sales at €30,000 per annum for 20 years by which tastes will have changes and the value of the brewery and plant will be zero. If Richard's cost of capital is 7%, calculate NPV of the project and decide whether the project should be undertaken"

    So my attempt at this is NPV = -200,000 + 30,000/1.07^20 = €7,752.57

    I think I am way off here though and I should be using PV of annuity or something, I dunno question is confusing.

    All you've done there is calculated the Present Value of €30,000 in 20 years, discounted at 7%.

    He receives €30,000 per annum for 20 years which makes it an annuity.

    20 year annuity factor @7% cost of capital (from tables) = 10.59401

    NPV = -200,000 + 30,000(10.59401) = €117,820.30


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 74 ✭✭kdave


    all exams are bs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    kdave wrote: »
    all exams are bs

    Thanks for that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    An Citeog wrote: »
    All you've done there is calculated the Present Value of €30,000 in 20 years, discounted at 7%.

    He receives €30,000 per annum for 20 years which makes it an annuity.

    20 year annuity factor @7% cost of capital (from tables) = 10.59401

    NPV = -200,000 + 30,000(10.59401) = €117,820.30

    Cheers, appreciate it. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    For Financial management do we have to know the theory on Debt financing and Venture capital as sources of long term borrowing? This was asked as a question on one of his papers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    Hey, I've written in my notes 'know the characteristics of debt and the difference between debt and equity' so he must have said to know it. Not sure about venture capital.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    Hey, I've written in my notes 'know the characteristics of debt and the difference between debt and equity' so he must have said to know it. Not sure about venture capital.

    k thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    How you tackling Org theory? I'm just reading stuff from the book on previous questions and hoping that I will be able to absorb enough info to get me my 16% and send me packing. So damn hard to study this crap though, I feel like the exams are over, I don't think I've ever wanted to finish so bad!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    yeah its funny! i was sittin in the IR exam the other day and I honestly felt so lazy doin the exam, it was like an effort to put pen to paper! i dunno what's gotten in to me, i just wanted to leave! it must be all the sunshine!! For org did the notes bar the very last one. It took me quite a while to get through them so I just didnt bother with the book, she also has extra notes under a lot of the slides which give you the extra info you need. I looked at the book at one stage and she had literally taken the notes word for word in a lot of cases! I havn't gotten to the short Questions of finance yet, are they the same as what we did for the mcq's? or does it take much more learning?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    oh and for org you dont have to look at the extra things she had under some lectures!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    yeah its funny! i was sittin in the IR exam the other day and I honestly felt so lazy doin the exam, it was like an effort to put pen to paper! i dunno what's gotten in to me, i just wanted to leave! it must be all the sunshine!! For org did the notes bar the very last one. It took me quite a while to get through them so I just didnt bother with the book, she also has extra notes under a lot of the slides which give you the extra info you need. I looked at the book at one stage and she had literally taken the notes word for word in a lot of cases! I havn't gotten to the short Questions of finance yet, are they the same as what we did for the mcq's? or does it take much more learning?

    yeah I think you just reach a point where you don't care about the exams any more and also the fact that it is so late on the year to be even doing exams makes it worse. Anyway only a few more days to freedom. Yeah I had stuff written out for Org theory from a few weeks back but this was before I knew what I needed to pass. I'm just gonna read over the slides, I mean how can hard can it be to get 16% out 100, i'm so sick of learning off pages of info, so for once I think I will just read and try to actually "learn" some info. Marketing is pissing me off though, was just trying to do that part B from the first question on the sample paper and dunno what to do. It seems like a really basic question where you just need to identify the type of question asked on a sample questionnaire at the bottom of the exam. I reckon this will probably come up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    Hey,

    does anyone know how to answer this question please:

    'Eddie is a farmer thinking of spending €2,000 on a storm-warning device since he has been plagued by floods recently. He hopes to save €500 per annum in perpetuity from using the machine. Calculate the NPV if his cost of capital is 10%.'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Sorry for FM short questions, just go over the 2008 papers and problem sheet 1. These will be a mix of everything from the course. Usually there are about 4-5 short theory Q's and the rest problems. I can do most (I think) but some time value of money still confuses me so I'm sure I will be stuck on one or two in the exam.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    Marketing is pissing me off though, was just trying to do that part B from the first question on the sample paper and dunno what to do.
    yeah I think you literally just name each type of technique it is, pretty much know it from stats last semester too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    Sorry for FM short questions, just go over the 2008 papers and problem sheet 1. These will be a mix of everything from the course. Usually there are about 4-5 short theory Q's and the rest problems. I can do most (I think) but some time value of money still confuses me so I'm sure I will be stuck on one or two in the exam.
    ok thanks. yeah for the first mcq test we had I was so sure I had the right answers! then I clicked the button and i got 2/5 right, I was shocked!! haha i seriously was though I really thought i had done them right, I still don't know what I did wrong and its crap because we can't go back in to see them. So i probably have a totally wrong idea of how to answer the Q's! and maths and finance stuff is usually my strong point!!:(


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 45 cartman555


    does anyone know how to do q12 b on the 2008 repeat paper:

    Cost of capital 15%, project investment 75000. Project will produce net cash savings of 30000 per annum for 4 years. Ignoring tax find the NPV and the IRR.

    I know how to calculate the NPV but im completely lost for IRR. The formula he gives is:

    IRR= A+[NPV(of A)/(NVPa-NVPb)]*(B-A)

    Any help much appreciated, I've been at it all day!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Butters111 wrote: »
    ok thanks. yeah for the first mcq test we had I was so sure I had the right answers! then I clicked the button and i got 2/5 right, I was shocked!! haha i seriously was though I really thought i had done them right, I still don't know what I did wrong and its crap because we can't go back in to see them. So i probably have a totally wrong idea of how to answer the Q's! and maths and finance stuff is usually my strong point!!:(

    Yeah i'm the same and personally FM drives me crazy because the lecturer seems to assume everybody is competent and can follow everything he does without having to explain further. The problem of course is that some of us are not as good as other with maths and can't pick this stuff up as easy. He is also one of these lecturers that wants the students to "think for themselves" so is not putting up any examples. I guess he is really opposed to the whole systematic way of passing exams. For example the stats lecturer seemed to be the opposite and basically let us access the information outside of the lectures through moodle. I was really expecting the FM lecturer to do the same closer to the exams after lectures wrapped up but obviously not. Still though I can see his point and I honestly don't think the exam will be much different from the 2008 as he has said. He is a fair guy so study all the theory and past question and I's say we'll be fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,200 ✭✭✭hots


    cartman555 wrote: »
    does anyone know how to do q12 b on the 2008 repeat paper:

    Cost of capital 15%, project investment 75000. Project will produce net cash savings of 30000 per annum for 4 years. Ignoring tax find the NPV and the IRR.

    I know how to calculate the NPV but im completely lost for IRR. The formula he gives is:

    IRR= A+[NPV(of A)/(NVPa-NVPb)]*(B-A)

    Any help much appreciated, I've been at it all day!


    Would love to know too!! Wrecking my head


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Would love to know too!! Wrecking my head

    This question was posted on the facebook page and this is his response as to how to find the IRR,

    "guess one rate, find NPV, guess another, find NPV and apply these values to the formula.

    In this case, NPV = -30 + 75 (Annuity Factor) = 0
    So find annuity factor which = 2.5 over 4 years..."

    As usual I am lost, where is 2.5 coming from?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,200 ✭✭✭hots


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    This question was posted on the facebook page and this is his response as to how to find the IRR,

    "guess one rate, find NPV, guess another, find NPV and apply these values to the formula.

    In this case, NPV = -30 + 75 (Annuity Factor) = 0
    So find annuity factor which = 2.5 over 4 years..."

    As usual I am lost, where is 2.5 coming from?

    Cheers, must have missed it today, been searching for the right way for aaages!! :) i'll have a go now :)


    EDIT** just lookin at it 2.5 multiplyed by 30 gives you 75 so i assume it comes from dividing across in some way, guess though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Cheers, must have missed it today, been searching for the right way for aaages!! :) i'll have a go now :)


    EDIT** just lookin at it 2.5 multiplyed by 30 gives you 75 so i assume it comes from dividing across in some way, guess though

    If you figure it out do you mind posting some feedback on how to do it, any help would be much appreciated :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Ok now i'm freaking out about marketing research, I've been trying to study it over the past 3 hours and I just cannot understand anything. There is way too much detail in the slides and so many illustrations and examples. Like its so hard to just write sample answers coz its all points. Its like a different language this crap, I hope the tutor wasn't actually right when she said the exam is hard! :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    :confused:
    DeadMoney wrote: »
    This question was posted on the facebook page and this is his response as to how to find the IRR,

    "guess one rate, find NPV, guess another, find NPV and apply these values to the formula.

    In this case, NPV = -30 + 75 (Annuity Factor) = 0
    So find annuity factor which = 2.5 over 4 years..."

    As usual I am lost, where is 2.5 coming from?


    why when calculating the NPV is it multiplied by an annuity factor? Should it not be multiplied by the PV factor like the equation: 'NPV= Co+C1_yr_PV_factor)+...' ??? I'm really confused!! And should the first cash flow not be -75 because that's the first cash flow, the initial investment? and then : -75 + 30(PV factor)+ 30(PVfactor)+ 30(PV factor )+ 30 (PV Factor) Please help!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    The IRR equation in simpler terms is:

    Lower interest rate +[NPV of Lower interest rate/ NPV of lower interest rate- NPV of Higher Interest rate] x (Higher interest rate - Lower interest Rate)

    You randomly guess interest rates E.g: lower interest rate 12% and Higher 18% and then put them into NPV formula etc.

    I think the 2.5 is the result of a figure he guessed and that's why its not clear where it came from?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    cartman555 wrote: »
    does anyone know how to do q12 b on the 2008 repeat paper:

    Cost of capital 15%, project investment 75000. Project will produce net cash savings of 30000 per annum for 4 years. Ignoring tax find the NPV and the IRR.

    I know how to calculate the NPV but im completely lost for IRR. The formula he gives is:

    IRR= A+[NPV(of A)/(NVPa-NVPb)]*(B-A)

    Any help much appreciated, I've been at it all day!
    DeadMoney wrote: »
    This question was posted on the facebook page and this is his response as to how to find the IRR,

    "guess one rate, find NPV, guess another, find NPV and apply these values to the formula.

    In this case, NPV = -30 + 75 (Annuity Factor) = 0
    So find annuity factor which = 2.5 over 4 years..."

    As usual I am lost, where is 2.5 coming from?

    The bolded bit is wrong. The initial investment is €75,000 and the annual saving are €30,000, so it should read:

    Step 1
    NPV = -75 + 30(Annuity Factor) = 0

    Rearranged to find the annuity factor,

    Annuity Factor = 75/30 = 2.5

    Step 2
    You know the annuity factor is 2.5 and the length of the annuity is 4 years, so by looking at the PV of an Annuity tables, you can see that the cost of capital at which NPV=O (ie. the IRR) is somewhere between 21-22%.

    Step 3
    Calculate the NPV of the project using a cost of capital of 21% (NPV = €1,200) and then again using 22% (NPV = -€180)

    Step 4
    Insert these into the IRR formula. I've no idea what formula is used in your notes but they're all variations of the same one. The one I use is:

    IRR = Rate1 + NPV1(Rate2-Rate1)/NPV1 - NPV2

    =) IRR = 21% + 1,200(22%-21%)/1,200+180 = 21.87%


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    DeadMoney wrote: »
    Ok now i'm freaking out about marketing research, I've been trying to study it over the past 3 hours and I just cannot understand anything. There is way too much detail in the slides and so many illustrations and examples. Like its so hard to just write sample answers coz its all points. Its like a different language this crap, I hope the tutor wasn't actually right when she said the exam is hard! :(

    Maybe forget doing sample answers and just read through the slides. probably be easier when you've an understanding of everything in general. I think the q's might be prashed a bit awkwardly but they actually are askin for simple systematic answers!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    An Citeog wrote: »
    The bolded bit is wrong. The initial investment is €75,000 and the annual saving are €30,000, so it should read:

    Step 1
    NPV = -75 + 30(Annuity Factor) = 0

    Rearranged to find the annuity factor,

    Annuity Factor = 75/30 = 2.5

    Step 2
    You know the annuity factor is 2.5 and the length of the annuity is 4 years, so by looking at the PV of an Annuity tables, you can see that the cost of capital at which NPV=O (ie. the IRR) is somewhere between 21-22%.

    Step 3
    Calculate the NPV of the project using a cost of capital of 21% (NPV = €1,200) and then again using 22% (NPV = -€180)

    Step 4
    Insert these into the IRR formula. I've no idea what formula is used in your notes but they're all variations of the same one. The one I use is:

    IRR = Rate1 + NPV1(Rate2-Rate1)/NPV1 - NPV2

    =) IRR = 21% + 1,200(22%-21%)/1,200+180 = 21.87%


    Hey, where does the '15 % cost of capital' come in to it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    Butters111 wrote: »
    :confused:


    why when calculating the NPV is it multiplied by an annuity factor? Should it not be multiplied by the PV factor like the equation: 'NPV= Co+C1_yr_PV_factor)+...' ??? I'm really confused!! And should the first cash flow not be -75 because that's the first cash flow, the initial investment? and then : -75 + 30(PV factor)+ 30(PVfactor)+ 30(PV factor )+ 30 (PV Factor) Please help!

    You're right on both counts!:)

    The reason you use the annuity factor is just to make it easier and quicker for yourself. You can discount the individual cash flows if you want and you'll still get the same answer. It's grand if the project only lasts 4 or 5 years but would be fairly time consuming if you were discounting cash flows for 20 years.

    If the annual cash flows are the same and for a specified time period, use the annuity factor.

    If the cash flows are the same and expected to continue forever, divide the cash flow by the cost of capital to calculate the PV of the perpetuity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    Butters111 wrote: »
    Hey,

    does anyone know how to answer this question please:

    'Eddie is a farmer thinking of spending €2,000 on a storm-warning device since he has been plagued by floods recently. He hopes to save €500 per annum in perpetuity from using the machine. Calculate the NPV if his cost of capital is 10%.'

    The savings that the farmer will make by buying this machine will remain the same indefinitely, so you need to calculate the PV of the perpetuity and subtract the initial investment:

    NPV = -I + C/r

    NPV = -2,000 + 500/0.1 = €3,000


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    Thanks a million! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    Butters111 wrote: »
    Hey, where does the '15 % cost of capital' come in to it?

    The 15% is the company's current cost of capital. It's the current weighted average cost of debt and equity finance used by the company (WACC). It's used to calculate the NPV of the project. This is the first and most important part of the investment appraisal. If NPV > 0, accept project and if < 0, reject.

    The IRR is really just used to help management decision making and to show them what kind of breathing room they have should the company's cost of capital rise in the future (eg. by issuing new equity or by securing new loans at a higher rate of interest than their current loans).

    In this example, the IRR is 21.87%. This means that as long as the company's cost of capital is below 21.87%, the NPV of the project will be positive and will increase the value of the company.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭An Citeog


    Butters111 wrote: »
    Thanks a million! :)

    No problem! If you've any more questions on FM, just fire away.:)

    What day is your Financial Management exam on?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 45 cartman555


    An Citeog wrote: »
    The bolded bit is wrong. The initial investment is €75,000 and the annual saving are €30,000, so it should read:

    Step 1
    NPV = -75 + 30(Annuity Factor) = 0

    Rearranged to find the annuity factor,

    Annuity Factor = 75/30 = 2.5

    Step 2
    You know the annuity factor is 2.5 and the length of the annuity is 4 years, so by looking at the PV of an Annuity tables, you can see that the cost of capital at which NPV=O (ie. the IRR) is somewhere between 21-22%.

    Step 3
    Calculate the NPV of the project using a cost of capital of 21% (NPV = €1,200) and then again using 22% (NPV = -€180)

    Step 4
    Insert these into the IRR formula. I've no idea what formula is used in your notes but they're all variations of the same one. The one I use is:

    IRR = Rate1 + NPV1(Rate2-Rate1)/NPV1 - NPV2

    =) IRR = 21% + 1,200(22%-21%)/1,200+180 = 21.87%

    Thanks a million spent HOURS on it!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    An Citeog wrote: »
    The 15% is the company's current cost of capital. It's the current weighted average cost of debt and equity finance used by the company (WACC). It's used to calculate the NPV of the project. This is the first and most important part of the investment appraisal. If NPV > 0, accept project and if < 0, reject.

    The IRR is really just used to help management decision making and to show them what kind of breathing room they have should the company's cost of capital rise in the future (eg. by issuing new equity or by securing new loans at a higher rate of interest than their current loans).

    In this example, the IRR is 21.87%. This means that as long as the company's cost of capital is below 21.87%, the NPV of the project will be positive and will increase the value of the company.
    An Citeog wrote: »
    No problem! If you've any more questions on FM, just fire away.:)

    What day is your Financial Management exam on?

    Thanks really appreciate the help. It's on wednesday! and thanks I'll probably be back with more!:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,200 ✭✭✭hots


    An Citeog wrote: »
    The bolded bit is wrong. The initial investment is €75,000 and the annual saving are €30,000, so it should read:

    Step 1
    NPV = -75 + 30(Annuity Factor) = 0

    Rearranged to find the annuity factor,

    Annuity Factor = 75/30 = 2.5

    Step 2
    You know the annuity factor is 2.5 and the length of the annuity is 4 years, so by looking at the PV of an Annuity tables, you can see that the cost of capital at which NPV=O (ie. the IRR) is somewhere between 21-22%.

    Step 3
    Calculate the NPV of the project using a cost of capital of 21% (NPV = €1,200) and then again using 22% (NPV = -€180)

    Step 4
    Insert these into the IRR formula. I've no idea what formula is used in your notes but they're all variations of the same one. The one I use is:

    IRR = Rate1 + NPV1(Rate2-Rate1)/NPV1 - NPV2

    =) IRR = 21% + 1,200(22%-21%)/1,200+180 = 21.87%

    This man deserves a medal, after many hours spent chasing my tail someone finally explained it in a way even a simpleton like me could understand... thankyou!! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 105 ✭✭Butters111


    An Citeog wrote: »
    If the cash flows are the same and expected to continue forever, divide the cash flow by the cost of capital to calculate the PV of the perpetuity.
    The concept of perpetuities confuses me! I just don't understand why PVP= C/r...! Cashflow dived by one single discounting rate, because they change over time, in reality does a perpetuity eventually reach 0? It's probably not necessary to know for the exam I just find it really confusing!!

    Anyway i should probably focus on the method rather then ask the reason! say for NVP of the NVP and IRR q, would NPV be calculated like this: -75+30(30/15)
    = -75+30(2)
    NPV = -15 ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    Citeog you're a hero!! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭DeadMoney


    An Citeog wrote: »
    Step 2
    You know the annuity factor is 2.5 and the length of the annuity is 4 years, so by looking at the PV of an Annuity tables, you can see that the cost of capital at which NPV=O (ie. the IRR) is somewhere between 21-22%.
    [/B]

    Sorry where did you get 21%-22% again?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement