Reasons for having a Rifle Scope ??????

Tackleberrywho

ezridax wrote: »

The false declaration or "your neck on the line" i think rrpc is referring to is the fact the the "sights" box when ticked refers to one of the the following:

A) telescope sights with a light beam
B)telescope sights with an electronic light amplification device
C)an infra-red device.

If the Garda (or you) ticked the box and do not actually have one of the above (just a standard scope) then technically you are applying for one of the sights mentioned above and not the standard scope. ie. a false declaration/application.

For a standard scope you do not tick the box. Also do not allow anyone to alter your application. The onus is still on you as its your application.

Can we all agree that this thread has run it's course now
We do not tick the box for sights!

Cass

This thread ran its course after Rovi's post (#15, page 1) explained what was meant by the "sights" box. The fact that another 6 pages were squeezed out of it baffles me, other than the fact of 2 pages of argunig why you use binoculars and the same question being asked over and over.

Myself, rrpc, Rovi (and i'm sure a few others) have already explained that the form has no legal standing. After that its up to the individual to act on it or not.

That being said, i'm out, because its like being on a roundabout with no off ramp.