Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Smallest 130bcd chainring possible?

  • 09-05-2010 8:40pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭


    Greetings from abroad,

    Anyone know what the smallest possible chainring is for a 130mm bcd crank?
    I'm guessing somewhere around 40t.

    Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,059 ✭✭✭victorcarrera


    39 is the smallest I have seen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,142 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    FSA and SRAM do 38T, presumably others too.

    According to this 37T is theoretically possible with mucho faffing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,234 ✭✭✭flickerx


    Lumen I think that link is wrong...

    So what bcd then are other cranks? Ones that have a smaller chainring than 38t?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,038 ✭✭✭penexpers


    110mm is common too (compact road). The inside of a triple is usually 74mm (again road).

    For MTB, it's usually 104mm outer and 64mm inner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,142 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    flickerx wrote: »
    Lumen I think that link is wrong...

    Ah yes, should be this.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement