Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Nuts High in Protein Low in Cals

2»

Comments

  • #52
    ANSI
    Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭ANSI


    rubadub wrote: »
    That is not what I was saying though. I was saying if indeed they are 2 completely separate studies he still could have used info he gained in the first study to carefully select which 7 he picks for the second. I don't know enough about them, just made sense to me if they were both different studies I would imagine they might have similar info, enough to make an educated guess as to which 7 would skew results his way.
    ok


  • #53
    ANSI
    Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭ANSI


    Thomas Magnum wrote: »
    The data for the 22 country study was from a statistical compilation by the FAO. Much of this data was flawed. The 7 country study was begun to investigate Keys' concerns, data was collected using uniform standards unlike the 22 country paper, and was the first study of its kind so it was not as refined as those that followed.
    That does not mean he could not have used the data from the 22 to put a spin on the second
    have you read the great cholesterol con?
    Do you have qualification in this area to contradict what you call confusionists


  • #54
    Thomas Magnum
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Thomas Magnum


    ANSI wrote: »
    That does not mean he could not have used the data from the 22 to put a spin on the second

    How could he have used the data from the 22 to put a pin on the 7 country study? Explain why you think this is so.

    ANSI wrote: »
    have you read the great cholesterol con?

    No I have not read Colpo's book.
    ANSI wrote: »
    Do you have qualification in this area to contradict what you call confusionists

    What I have written here in respects of Ancel Keys is historical fact and not opinion. The Confusionists are the ones who have misled.


  • #55
    ANSI
    Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭ANSI


    Thomas Magnum wrote: »
    How could he have used the data from the 22 to put a pin on the 7 country study? Explain why you think this is so.




    No I have not read Colpo's book.



    What I have written here in respects of Ancel Keys is historical fact and not opinion. The Confusionists are the ones who have misled.
    so you have no qualifications to contradict Colpo? Maybe you should read his book

    Why call them confusionists then....?


  • #56
    Thomas Magnum
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Thomas Magnum


    ANSI wrote: »
    so you have no qualifications to contradict Colpo?

    Nice appeal to authority there.

    ANSI wrote: »
    Maybe you should read his book

    If it's anything like cholesterol skeptic-in-chief Uffe Ravnskov's work then no thanks.
    ANSI wrote: »
    Why call them confusionists then....?

    Because they're being dishonest.


  • #57
    ANSI
    Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭ANSI


    Thomas Magnum wrote: »
    Nice appeal to authority there.
    you have no autgority and so i am not interested in your claims. My own interest is personal and not int in your confusionist talk when you have no education is this area

    Between Colpo and you i would favour Colpo and will not respond until you state your qualifications.. which you do not appear to have


  • #58
    Thomas Magnum
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Thomas Magnum


    ANSI wrote: »
    you have no autgority and so i am not interested in your claims. My own interest is personal and not int in your confusionist talk when you have no education is this area

    Once again, what I have written here in respects of Ancel Keys is historical fact and not opinion or claims.

    ANSI wrote: »
    Between Colpo and you i would favour Colpo and will not respond until you state your qualifications.. which you do not appear to have

    Your confirmation bias is showing.


  • #59
    ANSI
    Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭ANSI


    Thomas Magnum wrote: »
    Once again, what I have written here in respects of Ancel Keys is historical fact and not opinion or claims.




    Your confirmation bias is showing.
    you have no qualifications and your bias shows. Bye you are on my ignore


  • #60
    Thomas Magnum
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Thomas Magnum


    ANSI wrote: »
    you have no qualifications and your bias shows. Bye you are on my ignore

    I thought you weren't going to respond again?

    So you couldn't tell me where I was wrong ( must be those pesky facts ) and now you've spit the dummy and run. :D


  • Advertisement
Advertisement