Over rated women

upandcumming

funk-you wrote: »

Massive tinker head on her. She looks like she'd try and sell you some old carpet any minute.

She could sell me her carpet any time.

Distorted

bronte wrote: »

I thought Megan Fox was a lot prettier a few years ago.
Seems very sharp featured now or something.

That would be because Megan Fox had a lot of plastic surgery to make her look the way she does now. Good result though.

In my (a woman's opinion and therefore purely aesthetic):
Katie Holmes
Colleen Rooney
Myleene Klass
Scarlett Johannsson
Billie Piper
Nadine Coyle
Cameron Diaz
Diana Vickers
Georgia May Jagger
And the most overrated of all: Christine Bleakley (glamouress yes, good presenter, maybe, but stunningly beautiful no. Quite odd features, mishapen nose and lots of lines for her age).

hinault

Tess Daly's a looker.

Dudess

Deleted User wrote: »

Holly Willoughby She has a mad gammy face.

Lol. Just because you personally don't find her attractive doesn't mean she has a mad gammy face.

PanchoVilla

Did anyone mention Uma Thurman yet? That is one butt ugly, non-acting, skinny ass bitch. I can't stand her. It's not just because she has a horse face, it's because she's a complete moron with no talent whatsoever. I hope she falls into an open manhole, gets covered in piss and shíte, then eaten alive by sewer rats.

Anne Robinson from the Weakest Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHXwqLqeZuU

Jesus Wept

My name is URL wrote: »

Jean Byrne, Weather Woman

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055898180
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055858202
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055848877
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055067546

I mean seriously.. wtf is going on

Word is spreading. She's a fox.

KnifeWRENCH wrote: »

I never got the big deal with Halle Berry either. She's not unattractive by any means, but I never thought she was particularly hot either.

Looks better with her hair long, but still.
Being a complete lunatic doesn't help either imo.

Dudess wrote: »

Audrey Hepburn another. I'd wager these have more female/gay male admirers than hetero male ones.

We are the wrong generation to care. Our experience of her is seeing her on the late late as an old woman.

we'llallhavetea_old

now i love kylie minogue but did anyone see her on the xfactor on saturday? she's lookin pretty rough tbh. she seems to have destroyed her lovely face with too much botox/surgery. shame really.

ch750536

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

now i love kylie minogue but did anyone see her on the xfactor on saturday? she's lookin pretty rough tbh. she seems to have destroyed her lovely face with too much botox/surgery. shame really.

See how good you look after 8 months of chemo.

Gunsfortoys

Cheryl Cole and most Irish women.:o

Distorted

PanchoVilla wrote: »

Did anyone mention Uma Thurman yet? That is one butt ugly, non-acting, skinny ass bitch. I can't stand her. It's not just because she has a horse face, it's because she's a complete moron with no talent whatsoever. I hope she falls into an open manhole, gets covered in piss and shíte, then eaten alive by sewer rats.

I agree with you and would add that she manages to be skinny but saggy at the same time. But when she was younger she was quite unusual and had a certain "look". I would Cameron Diaz in that category too. Neither of them have aged well though. Maybe quite big, slightly unusual features are good for Hollywood films but don't necesssarily age well or look good off screen? Neither of them are that old either so it can't all be down to ageing.

W123-80's

Probably not so relevant these days, but maybe 5 or 6 years ago... Kylie..

I never have and never will get the attraction.

Even after watching her in the knicker advert riding on the rodeo.

Kinetic^

perri winkles wrote: »

Pippa O'Connor


What is the obsession with this girl ? ? Face like a slapped arse.


Attachment not found.

You know when you've been tango'd!

we'llallhavetea_old

ch750536 wrote: »

See how good you look after 8 months of chemo.

nyeah, that was four/five yrs ago...

kylie, just after chemo looks pretty fresh faced to me?

not a bad pic, but you can see the pinching from botox

when you see her moving her face it's more obvious.

uch

hinault wrote: »

Tess Daly's a looker.

She's a Head on her like a Bucket of Maggots

jackiebaron

Angelina Jolie -- pouting, fish-faced nutcase.
Demi Moore -- bland, forgettable


Gimme Shakira anyday!

pablomakaveli

Kate Moss - who in the name of god would find her attractive. Also she has no rack.

Never got the hype over Angelina Jolie either.

sbsquarepants

Naomi Campbell is one of the ugliest women i've ever seen.
How she made millions as a model i will never understand

colc1

Burning Eclipse wrote: »

Megan Fox...

I'm not saying she's a bad looking woman, but she is hugely over-rated!!

Totally agree shes good looking but thats it.... I hear there are a few birds in pricewaterhouse who'd wipe the floor with her

rossie1977

isis the amazon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISqy5kuXgMw

Dudess

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Naomi Campbell is one of the ugliest women i've ever seen.
How she made millions as a model i will never understand

Lol

People here seem to be confusing "Someone I don't fancy" with "ugly".

She made those millions because of an amazing body, skin, and to many, face.

Pace2008

95% of Hollywood actresses. A five-minute walk through Dulbin city centre and I’d have spotted about 50 chicks more suited to giving me a shtalk.

But then, I’ve always thought cuteness trumps hotness, and the former isn’t nearly as sought-after in the world of cinema.

Auvers

isnt it all eye of the beholder when it comes down to attractiveness

I would say if any of you guys ever saw some of the women in the flesh that ye are slagging off all the pimples on yer faces would spontaneously erupt

Gunsfortoys

Dudess wrote: »

Lol

People here seem to be confusing "Someone I don't fancy" with "ugly".

She made those millions because of an amazing body, skin, and to many, face.

She made money being a clothes hanger. Big deal!

She isn't the best looking but her personality makes her ugly as sin.

Since you seem to know what men like, think and feel, perhaps you could enlighten us as to who is overrated for us?

gent9662

http://www.advertiser.ie/images/2009/04//10464_thumb.jpg

Dudess

Gunsfortoys wrote: »

Cheryl Cole and most Irish women.:o

Irish women are over-rated...?
Or if you're imbuing it with your own meaning - i.e. those you personally don't fancy... you've met most Irish women...?

Gunsfortoys wrote: »

She made money being a clothes hanger. Big deal!

She isn't the best looking but her personality makes her ugly as sin.

Somebody said she is really ugly looking (no mention of personality) which is just laughable http://images.askmen.com/galleries/model/naomi-campbell/pictures/naomi-campbell-picture-1.jpg. That person may not fancy her, but that still doesn't mean she's objectively ugly. I don't fancy George Clooney but I know he's obviously not ugly.
That person also asked why she made so much money as a model - I offered a not particularly obscure explanation, never said it was right or wrong. Looks like you're just looking for an argument. She's very tall, leggy, slim, great bone structure, very good skin and teeth - this is why she's a model, this is why she's made millions.

Since you seem to know what men like, think and feel, perhaps you could enlighten us as to who is overrated for us?

Could you point out where I said I know what men like, think and feel?

I don't see the need for acting the dick and taking out your obvious issues with women on people on a message-board.

Maddison

Glenda Gilson, complete and utter minger....has she only the one facial expression she uses in photo shoots rather than just raising her eyebrow

Kelly Brook is sh*t hot, as is Kimberly from Girls Aloud.

gent9662

Kate Hudson...Pig!

http://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/celebrities_without_makeup_14.jpg

bonerm

rossie1977 wrote: »

isis the amazon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISqy5kuXgMw

Agreed. There's no way she'd beat the Undertaker.

Idbatterim

that is a bad picture of kate hudson alright!

Saermegil

Most famous people are overrated - the very concept on being famous for looks is strange, as no-one is universally attractive.

So people like Megan Fox CAN be said to be overrated -although almost all straight men would!

Feeona

Saermegil wrote: »

Most famous people are overrated - the very concept on being famous for looks is strange, as no-one is universally attractive.

So people like Megan Fox CAN be said to be overrated -although almost all straight men would!

Totally agree.

This thread seems to have descended into the usual male insecurity though, lets bash some women because we'd never have a chance with them in a million years, typical AH fare with posters calling people like Naomi Campbell physically ugly. As someone else pointed out, if any of the posters who called a woman ugly was actually face to face with that woman, they wouldn't know what to do with themselves.

Distorted

Dudess wrote: »

Also, I already did say on this thread I personally think Julia Roberts is over-rated looking.

I'd agree with you on that. She simply has a very large mouth and dazzling smile, which otherwise excuses quite bland and not particularly symmetrical features.

I do think though that to meet many of these women in person would be quite different. A lot of the stars mentioned apparantly have great charisma - Uma Thurman is purported to be one.

uwala

Dudess wrote: »

I don't see the need for acting the dick and taking out your obvious issues with women on people on a message-board.

I don't see the need for acting the cnut and taking out your obvious issues with men on people on a message-board.

Dudess

If defending a post from trollish, argument-seeking, presumptuous comments makes me a cunt, then so be it. Here is a compass: go find examples of my obvious issues with men.

Feeona

uwala wrote: »

I don't see the need for acting the cnut and taking out your obvious issues with men on people on a message-board.

I don't think Dudess has issues with men. I think she has issues with women begin called physically ugly, as do I. She has entered into the spirit of the thread by talking about female celebrities who are over-rated (which is what the thread is about, not about how ugly some women are).

I think you have an issue though with Dudess in that she is not acting like either the quiet, meek woman without an opinion; or a man-hating 'feminazi' on her high horse.

We are allowed to say that saying women are ugly isn't right or fair without being shouted down for having 'issues'.

Dudess

Feeona wrote: »

I don't think Dudess has issues with men.

Of course I don't. Uwala obviously has issues with women though, as has Gunsfortoys. And two other AH regulars. They are the kind of people who consider a woman who objects to their hateful crap a man-hater though, even if she has never shown any inclination of hating men.

I think she has issues with women begin called physically ugly, as do I. She has entered into the spirit of the thread by talking about female celebrities who are over-rated (which is what the thread is about, not about how ugly some women are).

I wouldn't say it's a gender thing Feeona - I just find it hilarious to read actual adults referring to anyone who clearly isn't ugly (male or female) as ugly (thought that was more of a 13-year-old thing?) Of course they may not personally find them attractive, but nobody's saying they're not supposed to, just that not finding someone attractive is a very different thing to them being ugly. It seems more like resentment that they're successful and wealthy.

We are allowed to say that saying women are ugly isn't right or fair without being shouted down for having 'issues'.

Or men - although I know this thread is focusing specifically on women.

itsallaboutheL

what a load of bollox.

uwala

Dudess wrote: »

Of course I don't. Uwala obviously has issues with women though, as has Gunsfortoys. And two other AH regulars. They are the kind of people who consider a woman who objects to their hateful crap a man-hater though, even if she has never shown any inclination of hating men.

You obviously have issues with men though. You are the kind of person who considers a man who objects to your hateful crap a woman-hater though, even if he has never shown any inclination of hating women.

Here's a compass: go find examples of my obvious issues with women.

Dudess

Like the sports reporter thread, where you pounced upon opportunities to use the expression "feminazi"?

Dudess

itsallaboutheL wrote: »

what a load of bollox.

It would be bollocks for me to say Brad Pitt is hideously ugly just because I don't fancy him.

itsallaboutheL

Dudess wrote: »

It would be bollocks for me to say Brad Pitt is hideously ugly just because I don't fancy him.

That's nice dear, but i was just addressing my comment in the general direction of the thread as a whole.

Dudess

Oh right, so there was no need for the passive-aggressive "That's nice dear" comment then - thanks for clarifying. :pac:

I suppose though, you could elaborate on "What a load of bollox" in order to prevent confuzzlement.

itsallaboutheL

Dudess wrote: »

Oh right, so there was no need for the passive-aggressive "That's nice dear" comment then - thanks for clarifying. :pac:

I suppose though, you could elaborate on "What a load of bollox" in order to prevent confuzzlement.

Dear thread,

What a load of bollox.

Yours etc.

L

evolutionqy7

Yeah they are.

sh1tstirrer

Lady gaga she needs to be put out of her misery.

Cheryl Cole pity she didn't die during the summer with that malaria or what ever she had, if she ever had it. It seemed more like a publicity stunt :rolleyes:

Gunsfortoys

Dudess wrote: »

Irish women are over-rated...?
Or if you're imbuing it with your own meaning - i.e. those you personally don't fancy... you've met most Irish women...?

Somebody said she is really ugly looking (no mention of personality) which is just laughable http://images.askmen.com/galleries/model/naomi-campbell/pictures/naomi-campbell-picture-1.jpg. That person may not fancy her, but that still doesn't mean she's objectively ugly. I don't fancy George Clooney but I know he's obviously not ugly.
That person also asked why she made so much money as a model - I offered a not particularly obscure explanation, never said it was right or wrong. Looks like you're just looking for an argument. She's very tall, leggy, slim, great bone structure, very good skin and teeth - this is why she's a model, this is why she's made millions.

Could you point out where I said I know what men like, think and feel?

I don't see the need for acting the dick and taking out your obvious issues with women on people on a message-board.

You used the term "LOL" to first respond to the post, obscure enough for me anyway. I could not be arsed going through your 20,000 odd posts to find were you seem to think you know what men like, think or feel. You seem to have quoted a number of them on this thread and dismissed their opinions and told them "the right way of thinking". Just because a bloke has an opinion of a woman does not give you the right to claim you know better.

As for saying I am "acting like a dick", again this proves my point.

Dudess wrote: »

If defending a post from trollish, argument-seeking, presumptuous comments makes me a cunt, then so be it. Here is a compass: go find examples of my obvious issues with men.

Trollish? Again your obvious issues with men shine through whenever an opinion of a woman is shared.

Dudess wrote: »

Like the sports reporter thread, where you pounced upon opportunities to use the expression "feminazi"?

Or how about the Kevin Myers thread were you painted every bloke in there that disagreed with you and the rest of the feminists as misandrists? No, sure you know best.

Dudess

Oh dear. I'd engage with you if you were actually able to argue without resorting to: twisting what I say, cherry-picking/ignoring, making stuff up (the Kevin Myers thread - wtf?), wildly exaggerating. All that stuff trolls do.

Oh yeah, feminist as a perjorative - instant dumbness alert. I'm not a feminist by the way.
It's only you who made it a gender thing - if a woman said Brad Pitt was hideously ugly, same thing would apply. Oh wait, I said that, but you, in your quest to find man-hating where there isn't any... ignored it. What was so obscure about my model explanation btw?

As also said, a woman not sitting there quietly doing her nails while a tiny but miserable contingent of men spew venom about women... is not a man-hater.

Gunsfortoys

Dudess wrote: »

Oh dear. I'd engage with you if you were actually able to argue without resorting to: twisting what I say, cherry-picking/ignoring, making stuff up (the Kevin Myers thread - wtf?), wildly exaggerating. All that stuff trolls do.

Oh yeah, feminist as a perjorative - instant dumbness alert. I'm not a feminist by the way.
It's only you who made it a gender thing - if a woman said Brad Pitt was hideously ugly, same thing would apply. Oh wait, I said that, but you, in your quest to find man-hating where there isn't any... ignored it.

As also said, a woman not sitting there quietly doing her nails while a small but miserably contingent of men spew venom about women... is not a man-hater.

So someone who disagrees with your regular spewings of crap is a troll?

Anytime I have seen you quoting what some men think of women, you either say they are wrong or they are a woman hating misogynist so no you made it a gender issue.

Gunsfortoys

Dudess wrote: »

Oh yeah, feminist as a perjorative - instant dumbness alert.

Your attempt to appear somewhat intelligent is hilarious. If you want to be condescending, at least try not to make up your own douche bag phrases. "Instant dumbness alert".