Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

People from Northern Ireland are not British!

1235»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    lugha wrote: »
    It didn’t exist as a political entity in any meaningful way. Much of the rest of your post is predicated on this.

    And how could it, under the control of a foreign Government?
    lugha wrote: »
    Yet nationalists have a valid claim to control the affairs of Irish unionists?

    No, Irish people had a valid claim to control the affairs of Irish people. The 1918 elections gave them the mandate to do so - which was unfairly taken from them under duress.
    lugha wrote: »
    Your argument about the flaws in the creation of a Northern state are, to use your own words, a red herring. Nationalists insist that Ireland should not have been partitioned at all, not that it wasn’t portioned very fairly.

    No, that's actually your argument. I was merely responding. You are attempting to make the claim that Unionists were merely being accommodated. They were not being just accommodated - they were being given privileges over counties that they did not even have a majority vote in.

    The fact that Ireland was partitioned, is proof in itself that Ireland was a single entity. Even Britain considered it as such when it titled the Union as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, rather than the Untied Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern and Southern Ireland.

    And no - I don't believe that Ireland should have been partitioned at all. I've made this very clear to you on a number of occasions. There was not a mandate to do so and it caused more harm than good.
    lugha wrote: »
    I don’t believe the decades of conflict would necessarily have been avoided. There was going to be problems no matter what was done 90 years ago.

    Ah yes - but so long as it's the nationalists who have a civil war - then it's all hunky for Britain, right?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭lugha


    ardmacha wrote: »
    For inhabitants of a country to expect a democratic majority to prevail is simply the normal conduct of modern society at this point in history.
    Ah but you are avoiding the point of contention. You assert that the country of Ireland (a geographical single entity but not a political one) is the "rightful" constituency. Not the larger one of GB + I, nor the smaller one of NI.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    lugha wrote: »
    Ah but you are avoiding the point of contention. You assert that the country of Ireland (a geographical single entity but not a political one) is the "rightful" constituency. Not the larger one of GB + I, nor the smaller one of NI.

    GB is an Island, consisting of England, Scotland and Wales. Hence the title at the time - The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

    Northern Ireland did not exist prior to partition. Ireland however as a country did exist. Just like Wales, Scotland and England existed.

    Your point is irrelevant. Ireland was a single entity. You're trying to excuse the partition of Ireland, which was done under duress - under the pretense that Unionists were just being accommodated. You're doing a very poor job of it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    dlofnep wrote: »
    GB is an Island, consisting of England, Scotland and Wales. Hence the title at the time - The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

    Northern Ireland did not exist prior to partition. Ireland however as a country did exist. Just like Wales, Scotland and England existed.

    Your point is irrelevant. Ireland was a single entity. You're trying to excuse the partition of Ireland, which was done under duress - under the pretense that Unionists were just being accommodated. You're doing a very poor job of it.

    The irish news channels etc seem to use different terms to in the uk and ni, we don't call it "the north" and we don't say "derry" either (i don't like the idea of londonderry even though my family worked in the london companies, i see it as biogted but anyway), aswell as not using "great britiain and northern ireland"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    This thread's moved to the usual single entity or not thing that we've had many many times before as well as other things that are completely off-topic. Life support ended, it's no longer anything tangible to do with the original point of the thread and it was generous to let it live for this long. The irony of course is that some of you people know this but you're still toddling down that well-worn yellow brick road, despite the thread title. No points for you, if there was a "list", you'd be on it.

    Locked. I suggest kicking a football or something instead.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement