Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Israel attacks Aid Flotilla. At least 2 dead

1118119121123124147

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Jakkass wrote: »
    Israel has no comparison to South Africa. Palestinians had free movement within the State of Israel before 2002 as I've just said. The deterioration this situation is a result of a deterioration of trust. This is down to those Palestinians who attacked Israel as well as the Israeli's being overly suspicious.

    I was referring to Israel supplying an apartheid South Africa with nuclear weapons. You obviously missed that memo.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-weapons

    I don't want to go entirely off-topic. This is in context to monitoring of aid/weapons going to and from Israel. What's good for the goose and all that..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    If you're referring to me I've said that the assault was illegal and if this was the only issue of this thread it should have been closed eons ago as it's not debatable, Israel were 100% in the wrong. But the conflict is still a two sided conflict and the side takers have perpetuated this thread as they do the conflict itself.

    Actually I wasn't and you have engaged here in a very intelligent fashion and I agree with you 100% that the conflict is the fault of both sides and is perpetuated because of the 2 sides.

    As for the thread I disagree with you. I have learnt a hell of a lot because of this thread and I am still learning from it.

    It has been a very useful exercise for a lot of us here including communicating with our Israeli spokesmen ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Nodin wrote: »

    We could, but we could also discuss the Israel - Palestine conflict on its own merits rather than invoking other situations with differing circumstances.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    alastair wrote: »
    It's pretty hard to see how activism to end a blockade on aid (deemed illegal by the UN no less) perpetuates any hatred or conflict, if I'm being honest. The 'sides' in this particular debate have Israel on one side, and eh, pretty much everyone else on the other. Given that you can either support the restrictions on aid, or oppose them, it's pretty hard to sit on the fence.

    I'm not sitting on any fence, I oppose the blockade and occupation but this doesn't make me pro Palestinian because I can't support either side as both have committed atrocitites.

    Someone said the blockade won't end the terrorism. I agreed with this and added that terrorism won't stop the blockade. What part of that statement do you disagree with?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Someone said the blockade won't end the terrorism. I agreed with this and added that terrorism won't stop the blockade. What part of that statement do you disagree with?

    I don't disagree with it, but it's besides the point - No-one has suggested that terrorism would end the blockade - they've disputed the rationale for the blockade as presented by Israel, and supported an endeavor to undermine/break that blockade. There's no need to extend the context into taking sides on the broader conflict - I doubt there's much unanimity amongst the flotilla people as to the possible strategies for ending the broader conflict - let alone here - so the 'taking sides' thing is well off the point.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Someone said the blockade won't end the terrorism. I agreed with this and added that terrorism won't stop the blockade. What part of that statement do you disagree with?

    I agree with both statements.

    However you have to agree with me that the blockade will drive more people towards those who practice terrorism. Far from being a mechanism to tackle extremism it is a catalyst to more getting involved in terrorism.

    With regard to the illegal assault on the convoy earlier this week it has turned more people and countries that Israel would have counted as sympathetic to them against them and provided a massive PR coup to their enemies.

    The policy of illegal blockade is terminally damaged, lets hope the Israeli authorities end it soon and save the people of Gaza any more suffering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    glaston wrote: »
    I agree with you on this.

    However the plight of people in Gaza is due to the actions of both Israel and Hamas.

    Israeli pulls its citizens out of Gaza and the the rocket attacks only intensify.

    glaston banned for a week for a hugely off-topic video post. Please follow the mod warnings in effect, people.

    moderately,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭Byron85


    Following the take over of the vessel, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement saying: 'Forces used the same procedures for Monday's flotilla and Saturday's sailing but was met by a different response.
    'On today's ship and in five of the six vessels in the previous flotilla, (their boarding) procedure ended without casualties.
    'The only difference was with one ship where extremist Islamic activists, supporters of terrorism, waited for our troops on the deck with axes and knives.'

    I must give it to the Israelis, they're quite good at twisting the facts to suit themselves. They used the same procedures today as they did on Monday?? I didn't realise that boarding a ship in broad daylight in Palestinian waters without helicopters was the exact same procedure as the boarding that took place on Monday. Then again, what do we know eh? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Netanyahu needs a new speechwriter. The better approach would have been "Monday didn't go well though we're not admitting blame. We used a different approach today and it went OK".

    You mightn't agree with the sentiment there but it would have been a better statement. The MV Rachel Corrie people effectively claimed to be an unstoppable force, the IDF claimed to be an immovable object - while science is still out on whether these two things can exist in one universe and which would win given that there wasn't a practical demonstration today, at least no-one got shot this morning.

    Any confirmation on whether the 550 tonnes of cement (for example) on board the Corrie will actually be allowed through to Gaza from Ashdod, given the shifting sands of statements on allowing the aid through versus allowing the allowed aid through?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    If they let the cement through, I'd be very surprised.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Ben Hadad


    Ironically the Gaza flotilla and the founders of Israel have alot in common.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Exodus
    Exodus 1947 was a ship that carried Jewish emigrants, that left France on July 11, 1947, with the intent of taking its passengers to Mandate Palestine. Most of the emigrants were Holocaust survivor refugees, who had no legal immigration certificates to Palestine. Following wide media coverage, the British Royal Navy seized the ship, and deported all its passengers back to Europe.

    A telegram written by Jewish leaders of the camps on 20 October 1947 makes clear the wishes and determination of the refugees to find a home in Palestine.

    "Nothing will deter us from Palestine. Which jail we go to is up to you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    dlofnep wrote: »
    If they let the cement through, I'd be very surprised.

    Not a hope, ill, it will be impounded and utilised in the construction of more illegal walls.

    Wasn't Irish cement a player in the Palestinian wall in the first place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 ZakaiNaaman


    How are these Peaceful Aid ships if they were armed?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    How are these Peaceful Aid ships if they were armed?
    You are looking at too much Israeli propaganda, :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    How are these Peaceful Aid ships if they were armed?

    Armed with what exactly? There was nothing onboard, that would not otherwise be onboard a ship of that size.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 ZakaiNaaman


    You are looking at too much Israeli propaganda, :rolleyes:
    I have seen video's man of Arabs attacking IDF soliders with poles and I'll be happy to provide you with links.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl4kmiOCjQE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,241 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    How are these Peaceful Aid ships if they were armed?

    Mork calling Orson


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,321 ✭✭✭IrishTonyO


    I have seen video's man of Arabs attacking IDF soliders with poles and I'll be happy to provide you with links.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl4kmiOCjQE
    maybe you should read through the thread first.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 ZakaiNaaman


    3,600 replies and you want me to read through them? Just tell me who here supports Israel and wy is there so much Anti Semitism here. Your all acting like Nazi's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭youcrazyjesus!


    Zakai, you devalue anti-Semitism and make it difficult to identify true bigots by slandering people who are protesting because they have a conscience. It does nobody any service.

    You referred in another thread to "these Arabs". I suggest you look at yourself in the mirror before making charges.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 ZakaiNaaman


    Zakai, you devalue anti-Semitism and make it difficult to identify true bigots by slandering people who are protesting because they have a conscience. It does nobody any service.

    You referred in another thread to "these Arabs". I suggest you look at yourself in the mirror before making charges.
    Whats wrong with calling an Arab an Arab?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    3,600 replies and you want me to read through them? Just tell me who here supports Israel and wy is there so much Anti Semitism here. Your all acting like Nazi's.

    If you see anti-semitic remarks, report the post. O, and quote them to back up your accusation.

    How does one 'act like a nazi', btw?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭youcrazyjesus!


    Whats wrong with calling an Arab an Arab?

    If I said "these Jews" what would you say?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 ZakaiNaaman


    If I said "these Jews" what would you say?
    Jews aren't a race of people, anyone can become Jewish because it's a religion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    I have seen video's man of Arabs attacking IDF soliders with poles and I'll be happy to provide you with links.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl4kmiOCjQE
    So, they were only defending themselves and their property against unauthorised pirates in international waters of which they were entitled to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,302 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    3,600 replies and you want me to read through them? Just tell me who here supports Israel and wy is there so much Anti Semitism here. Your all acting like Nazi's.
    I support Israel, but the way this attack was handled leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Someone f**ked up in the IDF intelligence. Badly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭youcrazyjesus!


    Jews aren't a race of people, anyone can become Jewish because it's a religion.

    It's not the point.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    3,600 replies and you want me to read through them? Just tell me who here supports Israel and wy is there so much Anti Semitism here. Your all acting like Nazi's.
    If you haven't read the thread, how can you know any of the above?

    Anti-Zionism does not equal anti-Semitism


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 ZakaiNaaman


    taconnol wrote: »
    If you haven't read the thread, how can you know any of the above?

    Anti-Zionism does not equal anti-Semitism
    Yes it does, because if you are against The Zionist then you refuse The Jews a homeland, thus you are an anti Semite. A Zionist is A Jew that believes in A Jewish Homeland. Return to Zion. Get it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    3,600 replies and you want me to read through them? Just tell me who here supports Israel and wy is there so much Anti Semitism here. Your all acting like Nazi's.

    Ah grow up ..... this forum is for thinking people, just because posters oppose the Israeli outrage they are Nazis.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement