George Hook

terrlobe

I don't know if it is a conceited Cork thing but i sent GH below email as a complaint but never got a reply.




George,
At around 4:55pm yesterday I went completely off you and won't listen to NT again as a protest.

Here's why: around this time you were talking to a lady who gave details about the pervert from Midleton who downloaded illegal images of kids to his computer and you both concluded that the suspended sentence was lenient. Then you made the comment "and he was single" as if to suggest that made him a flawed character even more and inferred he was the "type" you'd single out to be at it. When the archetypal paedophile/predator is quite often married with children. Check out www.justin.tv where you can watch reruns of the NBC show "Dateline - How to catch a predator"

Anyway I was disgusted and still am and it all harks back to your socalled revealing interview with a counsellor where you consider yourself to be a hit with the ladies and how important it was to you to be seen like this in public. Am I right, that you view singletons with contempt?


Regards

tbh

thread renamed. read the charter op if you want to keep posting here.

who what when

terrlobe wrote: »

I don't know if it is a conceited Cork thing but i sent GH below email as a complaint but never got a reply.




George,
At around 4:55pm yesterday I went completely off you and won't listen to NT again as a protest.

Here's why: around this time you were talking to a lady who gave details about the pervert from Midleton who downloaded illegal images of kids to his computer and you both concluded that the suspended sentence was lenient. Then you made the comment "and he was single" as if to suggest that made him a flawed character even more and inferred he was the "type" you'd single out to be at it. When the archetypal paedophile/predator is quite often married with children. Check out www.justin.tv where you can watch reruns of the NBC show "Dateline - How to catch a predator"

Anyway I was disgusted and still am and it all harks back to your socalled revealing interview with a counsellor where you consider yourself to be a hit with the ladies and how important it was to you to be seen like this in public. Am I right, that you view singletons with contempt?


Regards

You obviously have very little to be doing with your time!

fontanalis

who what when wrote: »

You obviously have very little to be doing with your time!

I think the give away was the word singleton.

tbh

I'm struggling to see how those posts are relevant folks.

terrlobe

who what when wrote: »

You obviously have very little to be doing with your time!

Meaning what that you are beacon of how the noble man spends his time. Pity about your inability to intellectualise because if you cannot see how strongly i feel about this matter then you got no backbone.

terrlobe

fontanalis wrote: »

I think the give away was the word singleton.

You mean Who What When is a bit slow?

tbh

forget it.