Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

No Boland in 2010...how about in 2011?

2»

Comments

  • #32
    wonderfulname
    Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭wonderfulname


    randylonghorn, I think we're kind of saying the same thing, or close enough anyway.
    It is the SEC who became predictable in the first place though. If the poets which appeared on the paper was truly random, say they were known to be computer selected, nobody would dare learn only the female or Irish poets, and by extension no one would then feel that they could chance their arm and learn only one of the two.

    And nobody believes the SEC should follow the predictions, they just find it hard to take responsibility.

    On a lighter note if i have to repeat again it will be in 2012, well like them poets!


  • #33
    wonderfulname
    Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭wonderfulname


    Jack Leahy wrote: »
    WRONG! Look at your past papers before posting, PLEEEEEEEASE! :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

    Read the rest of the thread before posting too... PLEEEEEEEASE..


Advertisement