Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

new world order!!

13»

Comments

  • #102
    me_right_one
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    Does anybody else think a NWO would be a good thing? I do! Look up the Georgia guidestones people, it makes sense to control the way the world is run, instead of letting the population, resources, etc cause the demise of ALL of us!


  • #103
    espinolman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,205 ✭✭✭espinolman


    Google : CIA Denver .


  • #104
    vampire of kilmainham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,048 ✭✭✭vampire of kilmainham


    TA SIAD A TEACHT. SO WATCH YE ALL FOR YOU KNOW NOT THE DAY NOR THE HOUR:eek::eek::eek:


  • #105
    GerardKeating
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,753 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    davemc180 wrote: »
    there no need to have huge storage rooms with strange sprinklers in the roof ( gas chambers )

    Or just fire sprinklers...


  • #106
    davemc180
    Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭davemc180


    GerardKeating wrote: »
    Or just fire sprinklers...


    but why would you need fire sprinklers in a bare concrete room?

    theres nothin there to burn


  • #107
    Audiomad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭Audiomad


    The new world order are real just different names Bilderberg is another.

    here are some Video's

    Russia Today :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmM61kSMTR0
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4UJRF0YM_M
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wxIPccqWzU

    The symbols in films and where the Saying new world order came from " World leaders saying it" :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvnNAzCgd5E

    The independent :
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/what-are-the-bilderberg-group-really-doing-in-spain-1991021.html

    Bilderbergs in Dublin :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D5imvMAuLM


  • #108
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Would Russia Today be a reliable source on this type of stuff? I've watched it a few times and they seem to have their own agenda, though make some good points.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #109
    Audiomad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭Audiomad


    K-9 wrote: »
    Would Russia Today be a reliable source on this type of stuff? I've watched it a few times and they seem to have their own agenda, though make some good points.

    They question a lot of stuff like the Bilderbergs, even global warming and wars. I trust them a lot more than the RTE. Max Keiser is also good he criticizes the banks in America and other countries.


  • #110
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Audiomad wrote: »
    They question a lot of stuff like the Bilderbergs, even global warming and wars. I trust them a lot more than the RTE. Max Keiser is also good he criticizes the banks in America and other countries.

    He seemed good, but biased again. Seem no different to Fox, CNN, Sky etc, they all have their own agenda. RT just appeals to another type of agenda, but it interesting, al the same.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #111
    Audiomad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭Audiomad


    Fox & Sky are sister companies they never talk out against their own Governments, Russia Today, Press TV & Al Jazeera all do and openly question other Governments too.

    CNN I watch too they are good but some topics they do hold back.


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    Audiomad wrote: »
    Fox & Sky are sister companies they never talk out against their own Governments,

    Yes Fox news that bastion of support for the Obama administration....
    Russia Today, Press TV & Al Jazeera all do and openly question other Governments too.

    Russia Today is a state run media. Its insanely biased.
    CNN I watch too they are good but some topics they do hold back.

    So lets be clear. Murdoch bad? Turner good?


  • #113
    Audiomad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭Audiomad


    Di0genes wrote: »
    Yes Fox news that bastion of support for the Obama administration....

    They don't like Obama!
    Russia Today is a state run media. Its insanely biased
    .

    And other news agencies are not?
    So lets be clear. Murdoch bad? Turner good?

    What? who said CNN where bad?


  • #114
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    Audiomad wrote: »
    They don't like Obama!

    So you've flat out contradicted yourself within two posts. Bravo.
    .
    And other news agencies are not?
    Other news agencies aren't run with the express intention of spreading their government line.
    What? who said CNN where bad?

    Oh Christ. You said you liked CNN, I pointed out that CNN is run by a media tycoon Ted Turner, while you don't like Fox which is run by a media tycoon Murdoch.

    Simiplies.


  • #115
    Audiomad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭Audiomad


    Di0genes wrote: »
    So you've flat out contradicted yourself within two posts. Bravo.
    .

    ???
    Other news agencies aren't run with the express intention of spreading their government line.

    Yes they do, all governments own or have a major say in media!
    Oh Christ. You said you liked CNN, I pointed out that CNN is run by a media tycoon Ted Turner, while you don't like Fox which is run by a media tycoon Murdoch.

    Simiplies.

    And? I know who owns them so what?

    you might want to go back and read what I actually said!!


  • #116
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    Audiomad wrote: »
    ???



    Yes they do, all governments own or have a major say in media!

    Facts source links?

    And? I know who owns them so what?

    Because the level of control different. For example I worked in sy news for 4 years and never saw Murdoch once.

    you might want to go back and read what I actually said!!

    Yeah I did.


  • #117
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Di0genes wrote: »
    Facts source links?




    Because the level of control different. For example I worked in sy news for 4 years and never saw Murdoch once.




    Yeah I did.

    You can't discredit claims by spouting your own.. Want proof-linksers.. lol?

    Guessing you meant Sky, btw... So where's your Linkedin page.. etc?


  • #118
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    You can't discredit claims by spouting your own.. Want proof-linksers.. lol?

    Oh dear see now I make you look silly
    “The pressure of the state on the Russian mass media is still mounting,” Ms. Bonnamour goes on. She calls the setting up of the round-the-clock English-language Russia Today TV channel “another step of the state to control information”. The denial to extend the accreditation for ABC and “an enormous fine” that the Court of Arbitration charged from Kommersant Daily to satisfy Alfa Bank’s suit are measures of the same kind, according to experts of Reporters Without Borders.

    That'd be reporters with out borders who rate russia 138 out 167 in countries with a free media

    http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?idr=530&id=619775

    Guessing you meant Sky, btw... So where's your Linkedin page.. etc?

    Yes because a linken page is proof of a career. :rolleyes: I've also worked for Al Jazeera and CNN


  • #119
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Di0genes wrote: »
    Oh dear see now I make you look silly



    That'd be reporters with out borders who rate russia 138 out 167 in countries with a free media

    http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?idr=530&id=619775




    Yes because a linken page is proof of a career. :rolleyes: I've also worked for Al Jazeera and CNN

    The point I was making, albeit somewhat drunkenly.. was that if you're going to shoot down a claim which suggests that governments have a say in the media, by claiming to work for said media, then it's only fair if you can back up your own claim when asking others to back up theirs.

    Have you heard of the CNN Effect?.. and how Psyops are sometimes incorporated into the reporting of the news?


  • #120
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    The point I was making, albeit somewhat drunkenly.. was that if you're going to shoot down a claim which suggests that governments have a say in the media, by claiming to work for said media, then it's only fair if you can back up your own claim when asking others to back up theirs.

    No really I think you were making more sense while drunk.

    Have you heard of the CNN Effect?.. and how Psyops are sometimes incorporated into the reporting of the news?

    I have heard the one about the bishop and the actress. Does it go anything like that?


  • Advertisement
  • #121
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Di0genes wrote: »
    No really I think you were making more sense while drunk.




    I have heard the one about the bishop and the actress. Does it go anything like that?

    lol.. you're a poor troll really


  • #122
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    lol.. you're a poor troll really

    So I back up my point using links from Reporters Without Borders, and you think I'm the troll?

    It's irony on a base level but I like it.


  • #123
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Di0genes wrote: »
    So I back up my point using links from Reporters Without Borders, and you think I'm the troll?

    It's irony on a base level but I like it.

    What point were you backing up? That RT is an unreliable source..? Fair enough, but you then go on to say that other news agencies aren't run with the same intent, to deliver a government line, which isn't always true


  • #124
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    What point were you backing up? That RT is an unreliable source..? Fair enough, but you then go on to say that other news agencies aren't run with the same intent, to deliver a government line, which isn't always true

    No and the point that eluded you, was that Russia Today was a reliable source. It's not.


Advertisement