Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

PAT testing

Options
  • 26-06-2010 8:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 706 ✭✭✭


    a very quick, i hope, question regarding pat testing
    a legal requirement or recommendation?
    thanks in advance


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,952 ✭✭✭✭Stoner


    It should be carried out once per year for electrical items.


  • Registered Users Posts: 708 ✭✭✭Hoagy


    dolittle wrote: »
    a very quick, i hope, question regarding pat testing
    a legal requirement or recommendation?
    thanks in advance

    It's legal.

    S.I. no 299 of 2007

    Regulation 81.


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭PrismES


    Hoagy wrote: »
    It's legal.

    S.I. no 299 of 2007

    Regulation 81.

    (c) portable equipment which is—
    (i) exposed to conditions causing deterioration liable to result in danger, and

    (ii) supplied at a voltage exceeding 125 volts alternating current,

    is—

    (I) visually checked by the user before use, and

    (II) periodically inspected by a competent person, appropriate to the nature, location and use of the equipment.

    "exposed to conditions causing deterioration liable to result in danger"

    This is the cop out clause, Pat Testing can not be inforced currently.


  • Registered Users Posts: 706 ✭✭✭dolittle


    PrismES wrote: »
    (c) portable equipment which is—
    (i) exposed to conditions causing deterioration liable to result in danger, and

    (ii) supplied at a voltage exceeding 125 volts alternating current,

    is—

    (I) visually checked by the user before use, and

    (II) periodically inspected by a competent person, appropriate to the nature, location and use of the equipment.

    "exposed to conditions causing deterioration liable to result in danger"

    This is the cop out clause, Pat Testing can not be inforced currently.

    thats what i thought
    its more of an interpretation of existing rules than an actual rule of PAT testing must be carried out
    or will i be corrected


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭PrismES


    I have spoken to many company safety officers and have been told, they would love to implement PAT testing but there budgets won't stretch and the only time PAT will be an issue is in court after an accident involving portable appliances where the company does not have a PAT cert, even then the onus will be on the plantiff to prove the equipment was exposed to conditions causeing deterioration liable to result in danger. So it's hard to justify PAT of the office photocopier. Many companies have actually cut PAT as an unnecessary expense.
    The only real Market for PAT is in the Plant & Equipment hire business and they usually have inhouse testing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,737 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    Is this still just a recommendation



Advertisement