Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Officiating at the World Cup

2»

Comments

  • #52
    Mr.Nice Guy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Huh?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MED9mU3uU5I


  • #53
    Mitch Connor
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,467 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Man Utd vs City Old Trafford

    It would be a very simple change that would improve accuracy of games.

    it was spot on.


  • #54
    RichTea
    Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭RichTea


    http://worldcupdailyblog.com/2010/06/27/technology-debate-rekindled-in-wake-of-questionable-decisions/

    Very hasty piece I made in the wake of today's refereeing errors.


  • #55
    lordgoat
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,373 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Huh?

    Quibble all you want about it but the ref got the match time right almost to the exact second. Just because he actually had the balls to do it should not leave him open to ridicule.


  • #56
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    sdonn wrote: »
    The officiating has been consistent, and that's important.
    .

    Consistantly poor is still consistant. It's not good though,


    theres been far too many cards given out. Klose for example never should have been sent off. Plus the above examples of goals for USA and today.

    Blatters rubbish about the game being consistant all the way down is just that. If it has to be the same then why are there no proper linesmen sent with the ref to sunday league games? The fact is that football is not equal all the way down and theres no issue with the top tier having the bad stuff ironed out


  • #57
    DB10
    Site Banned Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭DB10


    Mitch Connor wrote: »
    it was spot on.

    It was spineless refereeing.

    YOU DO NOT ADD ON 30 SECONDS FOR A SUB IN INJURY TIME

    Unless of course, you are at Old Trafford, where the rules are made to suit the home side.


  • #58
    flahavaj
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    DB10 wrote: »
    YOU DO NOT ADD ON 30 SECONDS FOR A SUB IN INJURY TIME

    Where does it say this in the rules?

    Why would a substitution in injury time be treated any differently to one in normal time? Espcially when a substitution in injury time is almost certainly being done to waste time anyway?


  • #59
    lordgoat
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,373 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    DB10 wrote: »
    It was spineless refereeing.

    YOU DO NOT ADD ON 30 SECONDS FOR A SUB IN INJURY TIME

    Unless of course, you are at Old Trafford, where the rules are made to suit the home side.

    Have a read through the rules again and show us where it says this?


  • #60
    LuckyLloyd
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,407 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    DB10 wrote: »
    It was spineless refereeing.

    YOU DO NOT ADD ON 30 SECONDS FOR A SUB IN INJURY TIME

    Unless of course, you are at Old Trafford, where the rules are made to suit the home side.

    Jaysus lads, don't sidetrack the whole thread on this. My fault.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    Mr Alan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    the official at old trafford was wrong because thats not how extra time is dealt with week in week out in the PL, if they wanna change it so that it is, fine. But it has to be consistent. And it wasn't. That was the beef there.


  • #62
    lordgoat
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,373 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    the official at old trafford was wrong because thats not how extra time is dealt with week in week out in the PL, if they wanna change it so that it is, fine. But it has to be consistent. And it wasn't. That was the beef there.

    No the assistant added the correct amount of time. The fact it's not done this way week in week out, which is probably true does not make him wrong. Only highlights that rules need to be applied better.


  • #63
    jdooley28
    Registered Users Posts: 523 ✭✭✭jdooley28


    kenon wrote: »
    The first few games I was impressed by the officiating but it's been downhill from there in my opinion.

    I actually could'nt agree more after the first few games I was saying the standard of referee's was very high. pity it didn't remain so


  • #64
    Degag
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    Isn't Blatter going for re-election again?

    Amazing how anyone could vote in that fool..... and he more than likely will be.

    Hmmm, i think it's Platini going for re-election actually

    Carry on.


Advertisement