Why is Sarah Palin still getting air time?

Black Swan

Sarah Palin was the best thing that ever happened for the Republicans Democrats during the 2008 elections.

Amerika

I’ve scoured Sarah Palin’s recent posting about the NAACP’s charge of racism against the Tea Party movement. Sadly, I couldn’t find one spelling mistake on which to gleam and scream about from the tallest mountains as solid proof of her idiocy. Curses, foiled again!
http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/the-charge-of-racism-its-time-to-bury-the-divisive-politics-of-the-past/408166998434

And keep up with the times folks... even the progressives and democrats are now changing their tune about Sarah Palin, and are getting panicky.
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/75944/media-maven?passthru=NThlZGFlZTAyYTJkZWQxMGM4NTJmNzRmNTcxMzcxYjU

Denerick

Sarah Palin doesn't write her own Facebook posts. Do you really believe that she does? Conservatives see her as some kind of genuine 'hockey mom', when the reality is that she is just like any other politician, surrounded by infinitely more intelligent people telling her what to do and to say. She spends the average conservatives annual income on shopping binges and make up artists. Honestly.

Amerika

Denerick wrote: »

Sarah Palin doesn't write her own Facebook posts. Do you really believe that she does?

No more than I believe Barack Obama writes his own speeches or posts his own Twitter messages. But I believe she shapes them much more than does Barack Obama.

Denerick

Amerika wrote: »

No more than I believe Barack Obama writes his own speeches or posts his own Twitter messages. But I believe she shapes them much more than does Barack Obama.

Obama doesn't write his own speeches - who claims he does? But he very definately is the master of his own policy. Palin had to be given grinds by Joe Lieberman because she didn't know where America was on a world map. She is unforgivably idiotic and its a crime to compare her in any way to the most intelligent man to sit in the oval office since Woodrow Wilson.

Though he does contribute heavily to major speeches. For example, he wrote the now famous philadephia race speech.

Amerika

Denerick wrote: »

She is unforgivably idiotic and its a crime to compare her in any way to the most intelligent man to sit in the oval office since Woodrow Wilson.

Woodrow Wilson... OMG!

Oh wait... Now that you mention it, it is somewhat fitting that you compare Obama to one of the most evil presidents we’ve ever had, who mostly reigned by terror and didn't care what the American people felt.

Overheal

Amerika wrote: »

one of the most evil presidents we’ve ever had, who mostly reigned by terror and didn't care what the American people felt.

Vice President Dick Cheney?

mufcboy1999

because she is a milf with a pornstar face and body

can you dig it homeboys?

Black Swan

Amerika wrote: »

Woodrow Wilson... OMG!

Oh wait... Now that you mention it, it is somewhat fitting that you compare Obama to one of the most evil presidents we’ve ever had, who mostly reigned by terror

This is uninformed. You are obviously confusing Woodrow Wilson with some other president?

"But the attention of this man of peace was forced to turn to war. In the early days of World War I, Wilson was determined to maintain neutrality. He protested British as well as German acts; he offered mediation to both sides but was rebuffed."

Amerika wrote: »

and didn't care what the American people felt.

"The American electorate in 1916, reacting to the slogan «He kept us out of war», reelected Wilson to the presidency."

Source: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1919/wilson-bio.html

Amerika

Yeah, voters elected Wilson in 1916 on his commitment not to go to war. Even at his inaugural address on March 4th, 1917, he said, "We're going to pursue peace and even though we've been injured by the effects of war, we're not going into war." Then just a little more than a month later, on April 13th, 1917, America goes to war. Hmmmmmm!

Oh crap, you all suckered me back in. Shame on you. I'm banning myself from this thread as punishment for not following my claim. So have at the lies, the coast is now clear.

Overheal

:rolleyes:

Red Hand

Amerika wrote: »

Yeah, voters elected Wilson in 1916 on his commitment not to go to war. Even at his inaugural address on March 4th, 1917, he said, "We're going to pursue peace and even though we've been injured by the effects of war, we're not going into war." Then just a little more than a month later, on April 13th, 1917, America goes to war. Hmmmmmm!

Oh crap, you all suckered me back in. Shame on you. I'm banning myself from this thread as punishment for not following my claim. So have at the lies, the coast is now clear.

"No new taxes"-Bush Mark 1

"Ah did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinski"-Slick Willy

"We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so". Dubbya on those tricky WMD.

Politicians lie. It's what they do. Woody was no different.

Denerick

Nice one, free lies! Thanks Amerika!

Overheal

Amerika wrote: »

Yeah, voters elected Wilson in 1916 on his commitment not to go to war. Even at his inaugural address on March 4th, 1917, he said, "We're going to pursue peace and even though we've been injured by the effects of war, we're not going into war." Then just a little more than a month later, on April 13th, 1917, America goes to war. Hmmmmmm!

Because Republicans Never lie! :eek::D:rolleyes::pac:

I guess when GhWB declared No New Taxes that was just an Enhanced Interrogation Election Technique, and not actually a lie?

monkeypants

Also don't forget: the more they bang on about family values, the gayer they are.

rovert

monkeypants wrote: »

Also don't forget: the more they bang on about family values, the gayer they are.

Must see doc: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaTsmXaw5NQ

jank

Amerika wrote: »

Yeah, voters elected Wilson in 1916 on his commitment not to go to war. Even at his inaugural address on March 4th, 1917, he said, "We're going to pursue peace and even though we've been injured by the effects of war, we're not going into war." Then just a little more than a month later, on April 13th, 1917, America goes to war. Hmmmmmm!

I suppose you have never heard of the Zimmerman telegram that pushed America into war. Here is a hint it involved your friend Mexico!

jank

On Palin. Well see my Sig. She is an idiot who is only looking after herself.
She made 15 million last year. Do you really think that she would have chosen to serve her "people" if that kind of money was on offer.

The cries of blame against the liberal media stating "I cant do my job anymore so.... I have to resign..." but then runs off around the country so that she can whore herself out to every convention, book signing and TV opportunity known. Well thats the American dream and I dint really blame her for that. Fair play to her in fact.

But then for others and her to state that she is some kind of Newt Gingrich mark II is an insult to Newt Gingrich and the pre 90's GOP party. Name one policy that bears her fingerprint, just one. "Oh kick out them illegals" Yeap, very original there Palin! Have a read of the book 'A race of a lifetime' It is a shocking indictment on Palin who many in the McCain campaign had grave fears for her mental well being. She thought Africa was a country and when told it wasn't she couldn't get her head around it? It took them half an hour to explain that it was a continent....!!

She is an embodiment of the lack of new ideas of the current right. Have a look at this article from the economist (A center right publication). It pulls no punches when writing about Obama but then castigates the right for lack of ideas and solutions problems.

http://www.economist.com/node/16321546?story_id=16321546&CFID=143407372&CFTOKEN=66999589

Some snippets

As for ideas, the Republicans seem to be reducing themselves into exactly what the Democrats say they are: the nasty party of No. They may well lambast Mr Obama for expanding the federal deficit; but it is less impressive when they are unable to suggest alternatives. Paul Ryan, a bright young congressman from Wisconsin, has a plan to restore the budget to balance; it has sunk without a trace. During the row over health care, the right demanded smaller deficits but refused to countenance any cuts in medical spending on the elderly. Cutting back military spending is denounced as surrender to the enemy. Tax rises of any kind (even allowing the unaffordable Bush tax cuts to expire as scheduled) are evil.

This lack of coherence extends beyond the deficit. Do Republicans favour state bail-outs for banks or not? If they are against them, as they protest, why are they doing everything they can to sabotage a financial-reform bill that will make them less likely? Is the party of “drill, baby, drill” in favour of tighter regulation of oil companies or not? If not, why is it berating Mr Obama for events a mile beneath the ocean? Many of America’s most prominent business leaders are privately as disappointed by the right as they are by the statist Mr Obama.

Out of power, a party can get away with such negative ambiguity; the business of an opposition is to oppose. The real problem for the political right may well come if it wins in November. Just as the party found after it seized Congress in 1994, voters expect solutions, not just rage. The electorate jumped back into Bill Clinton’s arms in 1996. Business conservatives are scouting desperately for an efficient centrist governor (or perhaps general) to run against Mr Obama in 2012. But tea-party-driven success in the mid-terms could foster the illusion that the Republicans lost the White House because Mr McCain was insufficiently close to their base. That logic is more likely to lead to Palin-Huckabee in 2012 than, say, Petraeus-Daniels.

Screaming "Obama is a commie" is not a solution to a problem.
Screaming "Take our country back" is not a solution to a problem.
Screaming "Reload" is not a solution to a problem.
Screaming "End Tyranny" is not a solution to a problem.

Unfortunately that is the level of discourse we can expect of the right today and you know what I think you can lay a big part of the blame on fox news. They have dumbed down journalism for the right. Gone from "you dont criticize a president in war time, if you do its treason" to "we have tyranny here in our own country, fight back". A complete 180 and sure if you listen to that believe it, well where are the new ideas going to come from?

There is a serious lack of intellectualism in the right presently. Where is the next Reagan? The next Goldwater? The next McCain (pre -2008)?
Palin?? You have to be joking. She IS the problem with the right not the solution. As long as the right continue to behave as if politics is like American Idol with balloons and ribbons then they are going nowhere?

Overheal

The book seems to be known under the title Game Change in the US, and from a bit of googlin, I think im gonna buy it.

As apocalyptic as the TPM likes to play the Obama administration, I shudder to think of that woman as my VP.

jank

Overheal wrote: »

The book seems to be known under the title Game Change in the US, and from a bit of googlin, I think im gonna buy it.

As apocalyptic as the TPM likes to play the Obama administration, I shudder to think of that woman as my VP.

Great read! Most of the book is taken up with the Obama vs Clinton battle.
Man they hated each other but it seems the relationship has ironed itself out. Getting Clinton on board as Secretary of State was huge achievement for Obama. It gave him a free hand in 2012 to have a united front and have her on board front and centre. Some good insights into Palin and McCain too.

Like this line best! When someone high up in the bush administration (think it was Cheney or maybe it was Rove?) was talking to a reporter off the record about Mitt Romneys chances, his response "Romney!!? He's in a Fcuking cult!"

I LOL'd

Hate obama or love him its going to take something special to beat him in 2012

Any other book I should get, been looking to get a team of rivals about the Lincoln administration but looks intimidating, maybe we should have a sticky!

kev9100

Overheal wrote: »

The book seems to be known under the title Game Change in the US, and from a bit of googlin, I think im gonna buy it.

I finished reading it a month ago, and you really should buy it. It's an excellent read. Interestingly enough, according to the authors many of Palin's own staffers had given up on her by the end of the campaign.

kev9100

jank wrote: »

Any other book I should get, been looking to get a team of rivals about the Lincoln administration but looks intimidating, maybe we should have a sticky!

Team of Rivals is good, but I think you really should know a lot of the backstory before you read it. Before reading it, I knew very little about Lincoln and that era and a lot of stuff flew straight over my head at first.

Mjollnir

jank wrote: »

On Palin. Well see my Sig. She is an idiot who is only looking after herself.
She made 15 million last year. Do you really think that she would have chosen to serve her "people" if that kind of money was on offer.

The cries of blame against the liberal media stating "I cant do my job anymore so.... I have to resign..." but then runs off around the country so that she can whore herself out to every convention, book signing and TV opportunity known. Well thats the American dream and I dint really blame her for that. Fair play to her in fact.

But then for others and her to state that she is some kind of Newt Gingrich mark II is an insult to Newt Gingrich and the pre 90's GOP party. Name one policy that bears her fingerprint, just one. "Oh kick out them illegals" Yeap, very original there Palin! Have a read of the book 'A race of a lifetime' It is a shocking indictment on Palin who many in the McCain campaign had grave fears for her mental well being. She thought Africa was a country and when told it wasn't she couldn't get her head around it? It took them half an hour to explain that it was a continent....!!

She is an embodiment of the lack of new ideas of the current right. Have a look at this article from the economist (A center right publication). It pulls no punches when writing about Obama but then castigates the right for lack of ideas and solutions problems.

http://www.economist.com/node/16321546?story_id=16321546&CFID=143407372&CFTOKEN=66999589

Some snippets









Screaming "Obama is a commie" is not a solution to a problem.
Screaming "Take our country back" is not a solution to a problem.
Screaming "Reload" is not a solution to a problem.
Screaming "End Tyranny" is not a solution to a problem.

Unfortunately that is the level of discourse we can expect of the right today and you know what I think you can lay a big part of the blame on fox news. They have dumbed down journalism for the right. Gone from "you dont criticize a president in war time, if you do its treason" to "we have tyranny here in our own country, fight back". A complete 180 and sure if you listen to that believe it, well where are the new ideas going to come from?

There is a serious lack of intellectualism in the right presently. Where is the next Reagan? The next Goldwater? The next McCain (pre -2008)?
Palin?? You have to be joking. She IS the problem with the right not the solution. As long as the right continue to behave as if politics is like American Idol with balloons and ribbons then they are going nowhere?

Hate to break it to you, but your sig is actually from Homer Simpson.

Or do you already know that?

Only other nitpick is that don't ever need another Reagan, Pre 2008 McCain was an unindicted co-conspirator in a huge financial scandal, and Barry Goldwater, may he RIP, weeps for our nation from somewhere. He was a better man than either of those two clowns.

jank

Mjollnir wrote: »

Hate to break it to you, but your sig is actually from Homer Simpson.

Or do you already know that?
.

Well if that is the case then she is even more stupid than I thought as it is a quote directly from her book 'Going Rogue'. Taking a quote unkowningly or knowingly from a carton character speaks volumes.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/palins-book-sparks-republican-war-on-vegetarians.html

Mjollnir wrote: »

Only other nitpick is that don't ever need another Reagan, Pre 2008 McCain was an unindicted co-conspirator in a huge financial scandal, and Barry Goldwater, may he RIP, weeps for our nation from somewhere. He was a better man than either of those two clowns.

I meant the 2000 McCain. He would have stood up to the neo-cons that bush was not able to.

Reagan had his faults but looks like FDR or Lincoln compared to Palin or any of the new right. At least he had new ideas, most of them I didnt agree with but you have to give me dues especially about the cold war. Talk to any eastern european who grew up under the iron curtain and they love him.

And yes you are nit-picking!

Bog Warrior

argosy2006 wrote: »

Her eyes are like those of a zombie robot drone
looks like she's trying to psyche me out

Overheal

jank wrote: »

Well if that is the case then she is even more stupid than I thought as it is a quote directly from her book 'Going Rogue'. Taking a quote unkowningly or knowingly from a carton character speaks volumes.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/palins-book-sparks-republican-war-on-vegetarians.html

im tempted to search this forum for "palin derangement syndrome" and say we told them so

rovert

The Bristol Palin deal is rather sad, she is obviously pregnant and needed to get back to your man lest lose her gig with the abstinence groups.

PopeUrbanII

While Sara isn't presidential, she's great. Liberalism doesn't automatically equate to intelligence. In fact, I argue the opposite.

rovert

PopeUrbanII wrote: »

While Sara isn't presidential, she's great. Liberalism doesn't automatically equate to intelligence. In fact, I argue the opposite.

While there are scienfic studies which prove differently. For example a lot of Republicans dont know what Marxism actually entails.

Denerick

PopeUrbanII wrote: »

While Sara isn't presidential, she's great. Liberalism doesn't automatically equate to intelligence. In fact, I argue the opposite.

Liberalism doesn't equate to intelligence as there and have been very many intelligent American conservatives. Sarah Palin is not one of them, and you are the most intelligent Liberal to ever grace the internetz, what with your rip roaring parodies of the right.

Overheal

If you wish to pen a blog article about a correlation between intelligence and political persuasion, I would be very glad to read it.

FatherTed

I used to think she was a nut job but she is actually pretty smart. She is saying the right things to get the nut jobs to vote for her. I mean the same people who voted twice for GWB will vote for her too and I won't be too surprised if she is elected president in 12 or 16.

Kepti

FatherTed wrote: »

I used to think she was a nut job but she is actually pretty smart. She is saying the right things to get the nut jobs to vote for her. I mean the same people who voted twice for GWB will vote for her too and I won't be too surprised if she is elected president in 12 or 16.

I agree with you, but I can't bring myself to say that she's smart. She does seem to have a knack for manipulating a certain demographic. Take a look at this article I was reading yesterday, it basically echoes what you said.

You really think she'll ever be elected president? I think you're overestimating her popularity due to the loudness of her supporters. As far as I'm concerned, she was completely rejected as even VP on the McCain ticket, as most sensible people could see the danger of her being one heart attack away from the presidency.

FatherTed

Kepti wrote: »

I agree with you, but I can't bring myself to say that she's smart. She does seem to have a knack for manipulating a certain demographic. Take a look at this article I was reading yesterday, it basically echoes what you said.

You really think she'll ever be elected president? I think you're overestimating her popularity due to the loudness of her supporters. As far as I'm concerned, she was completely rejected as even VP on the McCain ticket, as most sensible people could see the danger of her being one heart attack away from the presidency.

I think it was more of an overwhelming love for Obama more than anything that got him elected. Now that he is in there, the Obama reality is not as good looking as it once was so 2012 could be in play. As I said, the number of nut jobs just could beat the number of Obama loyalists.

Amerika

FatherTed wrote: »

...the number of nut jobs just could beat the number of Obama loyalists.

I thought the terms were one in the same.

transylman

Palin engages with an unhappy Alaskan.

oscarBravo

transylman wrote: »

Palin engages with an unhappy Alaskan.

The story behind that video is pretty disturbing.

Amerika

oscarBravo wrote: »

The story behind that video is pretty disturbing.

IMO... I notice nothing was reported regarding how this teacher feels about the numerous ridiculous ethics lawsuits filed against Palin while trying to act as governor after the November 2008 election, when she confronted Palin with her "WORST GOVERNOR EVER" banner. Funny how nothing is ever reported that these numerous lawsuits made it near impossible for Palin to effectively function as governor. The frivolous lawsuits were brought about with the intent to make the Governor spend her personal money and bankrupt her in the process. Reportedly Palin had already personally spent more than $500,000 at the time of her resignation (as the use of public funds probably violates state law… bringing even more lawsuits) on legal fees fighting the completely politically motivated partisan ethical lawsuits. Ten ethics complaints filed against her by my last count. An example of one of the lawsuits is an ethics complaint filed against her claims a conflict of interest because she wore an Arctic Cat logo gear during the Iron Dog snowmobile race that her husband participates in (wooooooo gather the pitchforks and torches folks and storm the governor mansion). Gee, maybe it was just cold out there.

But it’s Palin, and PDS is a vile disease which attacks and rots the brains of the Left, so the truth matters not as there is no know cure at the current time. :rolleyes:

And of curious note is in this bloggers link oscarBravo provided:

On the public dock, private security patted down private citizens. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure from their government. Private security searching private citizens in a public place, doesn’t fall under that category. It’s a bit more hinky.

Whether it was TLC or the Palins who contracted security, under what authority did they operate in a public location? Were they looking for weapons? Well, now there’s a Second Amendment issue.

This is Alaska, we carry guns. You can open-carry or acquire a concealed weapons permit from the state. If you are a law abiding citizen, you don’t even need a permit.

I have one and only one question of this blogger… Would you be bitching about security searches in a public place if it were Barack Obama or Bill Clinton visiting Homer? (Rhetorical question, I think we all know the answer)

oscarBravo

Amerika wrote: »

I have one and only one question of this blogger… Would you be bitching about security searches in a public place if it were Barack Obama or Bill Clinton visiting Homer? (Rhetorical question, I think we all know the answer)

So you're OK with private security searching private citizens in a public place without probably cause?

Amerika

oscarBravo wrote: »

So you're OK with private security searching private citizens in a public place without probably cause?

Oh come on… this teacher was not at the event to cut bait. She was there to protest the former governor, former vice presidential candidate, and a top current political figure who has had numerous threats of violence against her.

Do you think it would be wrong that I would be checked out by a security detail if I were to protest at an event, being in close proximity, to private citizen Bill Clinton?

And yes, if I were to protest in close proximity to Bill Clinton, it would be just fine with me and I would even hope and expect to be checked out by his security detail.

oscarBravo

I'm not talking about the USSS, I'm talking about private security guards searching private citizens in a public place without probably cause.

I guess you're just not that into the fourth amendment.

Overheal

Amerika wrote: »

IMO... I notice nothing was reported regarding how this teacher feels about the numerous ridiculous ethics lawsuits filed against Palin while trying to act as governor after the November 2008 election, when she confronted Palin with her "WORST GOVERNOR EVER" banner. Funny how nothing is ever reported that these numerous lawsuits made it near impossible for Palin to effectively function as governor.

And regardless, as far as the Homer woman is concerned, she swore an oath on a Bible to carry out her Term as Governor of Alaska. Palin caved and broke this oath. Politicians encounter frivolous lawsuits plenty.

The frivolous lawsuits were brought about with the intent to make the Governor spend her personal money and bankrupt her in the process. Reportedly Palin had already personally spent more than $500,000 at the time of her resignation (as the use of public funds probably violates state law… bringing even more lawsuits) on legal fees fighting the completely politically motivated partisan ethical lawsuits. Ten ethics complaints filed against her by my last count. An example of one of the lawsuits is an ethics complaint filed against her claims a conflict of interest because she wore an Arctic Cat logo gear during the Iron Dog snowmobile race that her husband participates in (wooooooo gather the pitchforks and torches folks and storm the governor mansion). Gee, maybe it was just cold out there.

Again, irrelevant to the situation.

But it’s Palin, and PDS is a vile disease which attacks and rots the brains of the Left, so the truth matters not as there is no know cure at the current time. :rolleyes:

Bla Bla Bla? ..... Yip? Yip? Yip yip yip yipyipyip

And of curious note is in this bloggers link oscarBravo provided:


I have one and only one question of this blogger… Would you be bitching about security searches in a public place if it were Barack Obama or Bill Clinton visiting Homer? (Rhetorical question, I think we all know the answer)

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/07/senate-candidate-joe-miller-guns-not-unusual-in-political-rallies-in-alaska.html

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Alaska Senate candidate Joe Miller’s campaign drew headlines earlier this month when a group of his supporters marched in a local parade carrying guns – including handguns and several weapons that appear significantly larger than that.
On ABC/Washington Post’s “Top Line” today, Miller, R-Alaska, said he wasn’t bothered by the demonstration, though he acknowledged that it might “raise some eyebrows” outside Alaska.
“You know, guns are a pretty big thing up here in Alaska. In fact, per capita, we probably have the highest rate of gun ownership in the nation. The Second Amendment’s very important to people up here in Alaska,” Miller said.
“So you know, it's not unusual to walk into a Wal-Mart, or to walk into a gas station, and see people carrying guns. Frankly, I wasn't in that Hummer. I was out there walking, shaking hands. But you know, it's not unusual in political rallies, it's not unusual in parades, to see that type of thing. Probably though, in the lower 48, it does raise some eyebrows.”

See Also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63GiXzpfGhA

You don't remember our friend the AR-15 Activist? /shock

Can I at least assume you have not entirely succumb to your derangement and you oppose Palin's entourage defacing private property in breach of the First Amendment?

Overheal

PS. -> Probable Cause

“The vehicle was equipped with clear LED law enforcement-style lights in the front and rear dash,” the announcement reads. “This vehicle was unknown to the law enforcement officers present. The vehicle had a mounted digital camera in the front window, and four large antennas on the trunk lid.”

McVey exited the car wearing a sidearm — later found to be an XD40 handgun — and “appeared to be listening to a handheld scanner/radio which was attached to a remote earpiece.” Approached by police and Secret Service, McVey produced an Ohio driver’s license that law enforcement couldn’t verify.

According to police, when asked what he was doing, McVey “stated that he heard the President was in town. He stated that he wanted to see the President.”

A search of his car “determined that Mr. McVey was in possession of a police scanner and was monitoring some local agencies when he arrived. Under the steering wheel was a siren box that was in working order and a note with rifle scope formulas in the cup holder.”

Amerika

Again, come on. If it were illegal for private security to check private citizens at this event, with all the PDS loons out there, they would have demanded police arrest them… with the full force of MSM calling for a public execution of Palin. I notice there is no mention of any crime committed, just opinion. Does Chelsea Clinton get USSS protection? No. Would I be able to just go up to her and confront her if she was speaking at an event? No. Would I be checked out by her private security? Yes.

I probably wouldn't even be allowed to fly over the area.

Oh yeah almost forgot... threats of violence is Probably Cause in my, and most others, books IMO.

Overheal

An Event Where?

Even Starbucks can tell you that you aren't allowed to carry a firearm on their premises.

Is she in a public venue or a private one such as an auditorium or mall?

In the situation at the docks there was no probable cause. Again I have given you reference to another Alaska Politician who has No Problems Whatsoever greeting voters who happen to be carrying firearms.

“So you know, it's not unusual to walk into a Wal-Mart, or to walk into a gas station, and see people carrying guns. Frankly, I wasn't in that Hummer. I was out there walking, shaking hands. But you know, it's not unusual in political rallies, it's not unusual in parades, to see that type of thing. Probably though, in the lower 48, it does raise some eyebrows.”



Bear in mind private security doesnt mean they can wall off the dock and call the air around them their Private Bubble.

Amerika

STOP THE PRESSES!

I’m confident the MSM (or LSM as Palin refers to them) will quickly stop reporting on this "teacher" confrontation with Palin story. And I’m sure you won’t hear the rest of the story that's emerging.

It looking like this Kathleen Gustafson isn’t really a teacher, but rather a tech in a theater department, and also a singer in a drag queen band. She apparently is also President, Board of Directors, Kachemak Bay Family Planning Clinic (KBFPC) in Homer, AK. Early reports are also starting to pop up that it might have been part of a radio stunt, and actually been orchestrated or coordinated between Gustafson and the so-called PDS queen - Shannyn Moore (you know her... the person who wrote oscarBravo's linked page).

PDS at it’s finest!

Poor MSNBC, this information if determined to be correct, will now cause them to have to change the subject of their entire prime time evening lineup for the rest of the week. Alas.


http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2010/08/09/kathleen-gustafson-radio-stunt/

Overheal

Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) is an organosulfur compound with the formula (CH3)2SO2. It is also known by several other names including DMSO2, methyl sulfone, and dimethyl sulfone. [1] This colorless solid features the sulfonyl functional group and is considered relatively inert chemically. It occurs naturally in some primitive plants and is present in small amounts in many foods and beverages and it is marketed as a dietary supplement, although its benefits are disputed.

Overheal

Amerika wrote: »

STOP THE PRESSES!

I’m confident the MSM (or LSM as Palin refers to them) will quickly stop reporting on this "teacher" confrontation with Palin story. And I’m sure you won’t hear the rest of the story that's emerging.

It looking like this Kathleen Gustafson isn’t really a teacher, but rather a tech in a theater department, and also a singer in a drag queen band. She apparently is also President, Board of Directors, Kachemak Bay Family Planning Clinic (KBFPC) in Homer, AK. Early reports are also starting to pop up that it might have been part of a radio stunt, and actually been orchestrated or coordinated between Gustafson and the so-called PDS queen - Shannyn Moore (you know her... the person who wrote oscarBravo's linked page).

PDS at it’s finest!

Poor MSNBC, this information if determined to be correct, will now cause them to have to change the subject of their entire prime time evening lineup for the rest of the week. Alas.


http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2010/08/09/kathleen-gustafson-radio-stunt/

Any anyway, if she is a cross dressing theatre tech what the flying **** does that have to do with anything? Does it excuse Palin's destruction of private property or her Entourage's breach of the 4th Amendment?

And again, what does her stance on abortion have to do with this incident?

Talk about Deflection-Denial. "Oh you're a pro-abortion drag queen holding down a low tier job? In that case I'm ripping down your banner and violating your right to Free Speech. You're not carrying a gun on you? Todd, pat this woman down. Now if you had been a Pro-Life God Fearing Christian who thought Obama was a Muslim, hell you could carry one for all we care."

The absolute depths of Ad-Hominem Defamation. But I'll bet you spent the last 2 hours digging that tripe up.

Amerika

Overheal wrote: »

Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) is an organosulfur compound with the formula (CH3)2SO2. It is also known by several other names including DMSO2, methyl sulfone, and dimethyl sulfone. [1] This colorless solid features the sulfonyl functional group and is considered relatively inert chemically. It occurs naturally in some primitive plants and is present in small amounts in many foods and beverages and it is marketed as a dietary supplement, although its benefits are disputed.

If it were the Science Forum your information would be correct, but it’s the US Politics Forum.

But Wait! "This colorless solid feature…," and"considered relatively inert ," "occurs naturally in some primitive plants," and "its benefits are disputed" would also describe the MainStream Media (MSM), so I guess it’s somewhat okay then.

Overheal

Amerika wrote: »

If it were the Science Forum your information would be correct, but it’s the US Politics Forum.

But Wait! "This colorless solid feature…," and"considered relatively inert ," "occurs naturally in some primitive plants," and "its benefits are disputed" would also describe the MainStream Media (MSM), so I guess it’s somewhat okay then.

Yip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYZxrBpK2Uo

/thats the sound of Rhetorical Nonsense