Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

issues with autofocus (Nikon)

  • 30-07-2010 8:43am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭


    Hi All,

    I've been having an issue with some of the portrait/beauty stuff I do (Nikon D300, 50mm f/1,8) whereby the system sometimes can't autofocus. I'm generally about 1 to 2 metres from the subject in a dimly lit room using AF-Single (S mode) and Dynamic-area AF (middle position) with manually selected focus points on the rocker switch at the back. I use a couple of strobes for lighting.

    My question is: Is the camera responsible for the dependability of AF or does it also depend on the quality of the lens?

    I'm aware that the 50mm f/1.8 is cheap as chips and the build quality mightn't be all that it should be, I'm also aware that I don't have a complete understanding of the AutoFocus system on my camera - the manual is all over the place.

    Would I be better off upgrading to a 50mm f/1.4?

    Any thoughts?

    Thanks,

    Hugh


Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,278 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    does the autofocus assist light come on?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    occasionally. Can't remember how I have it set, don't have the camera nearby.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,278 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i assume it only comes on when the AF system judges it to be necessary; i'm not sure if that's based on light or contrast levels.

    when you say the lens can't focus, i assume you mean it hunts rather than it just sits there dead as a post?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭eas


    Both camera and lens play a part in how fast/accurate is will focus.

    The 1.8 is a fine lens, unless there's a fault with yours it's not part of the problem here.

    your camera will start to struggle in dim light particularly if the selected focus point is towards the outside of the array. I'd suggest keeping your focus point in the center and recomposing if required. Also, as had been mentioned use the focus assist light on your body or strobes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭Thecageyone


    Have you tried Manual focus in this situation? If it's for portraits you're as well off using MF. Or, try putting the cam into release priority over focus priority. You'll get the shots, and judge yourself if they're in focus or not. Must be some kind of light conflict.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    i assume it only comes on when the AF system judges it to be necessary; i'm not sure if that's based on light or contrast levels.

    when you say the lens can't focus, i assume you mean it hunts rather than it just sits there dead as a post?

    Thanks mb,

    I think this is the case, yes, only comes on when the camera thinks it's necessary. And yes, the lens hunts and doesn't latch onto anything.

    @eas: I use the strobes off-camera so I can't use their AF assist lamps. The 1.8 is pretty much my workhorse a brilliant lens, I occasionally use an old MF 85 1.4 which is a great lens but is awkward in the fast-paced production environment I work in.

    I suppose I'm wondering if the 50mm 1.4 would help ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    Have you tried Manual focus in this situation? If it's for portraits you're as well off using MF. Or, try putting the cam into release priority over focus priority. You'll get the shots, and judge yourself if they're in focus or not. Must be some kind of light conflict.


    Yes, I override to manual in cases where it hunts (but doesn't find). To be honest I haven't tried the release priority because there's a lot of pressure in my sessions to turnover fast, so I have to rely on AF to get me through the session.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭Thecageyone


    Unless the 1.4 focuses a lot quicker there's little difference really. Both have the same minimum focusing distance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    Tbh, it just sounds like you don't have enough light in the studio. I'm going to assum you don't have modeling lights on the strobes, so there's two relatively easy ways of getting around this - First one, get an LED flashlight, use it to focus with AF, turn it off, and you're good to shoot - The second (which I'm not sure you can do on your D300, and requires a tripod) is turning on liveview, getting your focus, when you're happy, go back to the viewfinder.

    Tbh though, I'd rather the investment into having modeling lights.

    The 50 1.4 will have better build quality, I'm sure, it might have better IQ, and it might focus in good light ever so slightly faster, but I don't think it's the answer to your problem. Whether it's a 50 1.4 or an 85 1.2, if there's not enough light to focus, it won't focus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭eas


    As Fajitas said - the 1.4 will focus a bit quicker and quieter in good light, but will hunt just the same if there isn't enough light.

    Before making any purchases - try my tip above about keeping your focus point dead center and recompose if required. I can focus in very dark conditions as long as there is something for it to grab onto and the focus point is in the center.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    eas wrote: »
    keeping your focus point dead center and recompose if required.

    Thanks eas, I think this'll be what I'll try first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    Fajitas! wrote: »
    Tbh, it just sounds like you don't have enough light in the studio. I'm going to assum you don't have modeling lights on the strobes, so there's two relatively easy ways of getting around this - First one, get an LED flashlight, use it to focus with AF, turn it off, and you're good to shoot - The second (which I'm not sure you can do on your D300, and requires a tripod) is turning on liveview, getting your focus, when you're happy, go back to the viewfinder.

    Tbh though, I'd rather the investment into having modeling lights.

    Thanks Al,

    I have liveview but it's so friggin slow to use in the studio when the model is flailing round pulling poses that's it's just not even a consideration. You'd lose the moment and so many of them ... :)

    Must try the led flashlight idea, I've read that people don't bother turning them off, unless you're wide open the strength of the flashlight is completely overpowered by the strobe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    A bit of gaffer tape/no more nails and you'll have a hotshoe mounted LED flashlight too, which saves a hand. And yep, as you said, you're often going to be overpowering it by your strobes. Sent you a PM about the 1.4 too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭eas


    Hugh_C wrote: »
    when the model is flailing round pulling poses that's it's just not even a consideration.

    If your models are moving fast and often, it may also be a good idea to switch from AF-S to AF-C. Actually, for people AF-C makes more sense to me 100% of the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    eas wrote: »
    If your models are moving fast and often, it may also be a good idea to switch from AF-S to AF-C. Actually, for people AF-C makes more sense to me 100% of the time.



    Interesting thought, I've tried the AF-C option a quite often for flaily (?) models, but it still hunts and fails.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭eas


    yeah - not a solution to your problem with focus hunting in low light - but imo a better option in general for the type of work it sounds like you're doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    The light levels must be really low for the lens to hunt, the 85mm f1.2 I have will focus in near darkness even on the 5d. I have moved from the 50mm f1.8 to the f1.4 and find the focussing more accurate but it still hunts in the same low light situations that the f1.8 would have.


Advertisement