CHEMTRAILS

lalee17 · 01-09-2010 01:20AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Sure, they can report all they like but it's up to the person they report to to take any action. People very high up in the military have been reporting UFO sightings for years but they are largely ignored. What's your point?

Sigh.. So you're saying that engineers who have seen evidence of this may have reported potentially hazardous residue, only to be completely ignored? Do you not see how silly that statement is?

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:22AM

lalee17 wrote: »

Sigh.. So you're saying that engineers who have seen evidence of this may have reported potentially hazardous residue, only to be completely ignored? Do you not see how silly that statement is?

Eh, companies in the U.S. have been dumping lethally toxic substances for years and nobody's said a word. Didn't you watch Erin Brockovich? Now a little less of the "silly" and "absurd" comments. Your lack of knowledge on this subject is silly and absurd.

Jeboa Safari · 01-09-2010 01:22AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Yeah, nvm. I'll just ignore your posts. Sorry for any confusion.

No why am I really here, or are you just going to use the ignore excuse, because you can't respond to questions I put to you and need an easy way out?

Scarab80 · 01-09-2010 01:23AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Can you find any info from a source not directly funded by the government of the United States of America? I don't consider NASA to be an unbiased source of information.

Edit: Don't forget, NASA almost killed E.T.

Take your pick

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=effect+of+aerosols+on+climate&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

lalee17 · 01-09-2010 01:25AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Eh, companies in the U.S. have been dumping lethally toxic substances for years and nobody's said a word. Didn't you watch Erin Brockovich? Now a little less of the "silly" and "absurd" comments. Your lack of knowledge on this subject is silly and absurd.

What companies?! Attack the post, not the poster.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:27AM

Scarab80 wrote: »

Take your pick

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=effect+of+aerosols+on+climate&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

Eh, that's the effects of aerosols on climate. Not really what we're discussing here. Barium, aluminum, and the rest are metals. Besides, I'm not a scientist and can't understand much of what's being said in those reports.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:30AM

lalee17 wrote: »

What companies?! Attack the post, not the poster.

Didn't you watch Erin Brockovich?

That company for one. And why are you attacking anything?

I've a complete open mind to this whole thing

You're not fooling anyone, least of all me.

lalee17 · 01-09-2010 01:31AM

I find it hard to believe that billions of aeronautical engineers worldwide would simply disregard harmful residue on the jet engines.

I said that I was open-minded to this conspiracy, but your logic baffles me.

Scarab80 · 01-09-2010 01:32AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Eh, that's the effects of aerosols on climate. Not really what we're discussing here. Barium, aluminum, and the rest are metals. Besides, I'm not a scientist and can't understand much of what's being said in those reports.

Aerosols are any particulates suspended in the atmosphere (such as contrails from aircraft), not cans of lynx.

Here is an easier to understand report from the UN

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-4.html

lalee17 · 01-09-2010 01:32AM

demonspawn wrote: »

You're not fooling anyone, least of all me.

Sorry, what?

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:34AM

lalee17 wrote: »

I find it hard to believe......

Well maybe that's your problem, who knows?

Edit: Damn, I should have included the "billions of aeronautical engineers" bit. It's a hoot!

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:36AM

Scarab80 wrote: »

Aerosols are any particulates suspended in the atmosphere (such as contrails from aircraft), not cans of lynx.

Here is an easier to understand report from the UN

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-4.html

Yes, but we are discussing chemtrails, not contrails. There's a big difference.

Scarab80 · 01-09-2010 01:37AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Yes, but we are discussing chemtrails, not contrails. There's a big difference.

1. Both chemtrails and contrails are aerosols so the links are relevant.
2. There is no such thing as chemtrails.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:40AM

Scarab80 wrote: »

1. Both chemtrails and contrails are aerosols so the links are relevant.
2. There is no such thing as chemtrails.

So why are you on a thread about chemtrails on a CT forum if you know for an absolute fact that chemtrails do not exist? You're not gonna change my mind, I can tell you that right now. Seems a bit of a waste of time if you ask me.

lalee17 · 01-09-2010 01:45AM

Methinks demonspawn needs to chill...

Have a listen to this song, think it may be right up your street.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeiFVfyiSiw

Jeboa Safari · 01-09-2010 01:46AM

demonspawn wrote: »

So why are you on a thread about chemtrails on a CT forum if you know for an absolute fact that chemtrails do not exist? You're not gonna change my mind, I can tell you that right now. Seems a bit of a waste of time if you ask me.

Maybe he doesn't like seeing lies being spread.
Why are you here if nobody can change your mind
Your post suggest you just want people agreeing with you and find it hard to deal with people that don't

Scarab80 · 01-09-2010 01:47AM

demonspawn wrote: »

So why are you on a thread about chemtrails on a CT forum if you know for an absolute fact that chemtrails do not exist? You're not gonna change my mind, I can tell you that right now. Seems a bit of a waste of time if you ask me.

I don't know anything for an absolute fact, if sufficient evidence were provided to show that chemtrails did exist I would change my mind, unfortunately this clearly has not happened in this thread.

You have been refuted on almost every point you have raised yet you still refuse to acknowledge the possibility that the lines in the sky are just contrails - and that even if more evidence were provided you would still not change your mind, that would seem to be a rather unfortunate and dogmatic position to take up, good night.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:53AM

lalee17 wrote: »

Methinks demonspawn needs to chill...

Metinks people need to stop coming here to aggressively refute any and all CTs on this forum.

You see, I don't take any of this seriously. How could I? I'd end up in a mental institution fairly quickly. CTs are a source of entertainment for me, trying to explain the unexplainable. It's a bit like religion really, without the all that nasty mass control and world domination.

So do me a favor, stop trying to make people on this forum look like idiots or lunatics. It's just not on. This is a place to come have a laugh and share crazy ideas without the fear of persecution by close-minded individuals.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 01:57AM

Scarab80 wrote: »

I don't know anything for an absolute fact, if sufficient evidence were provided to show that chemtrails did exist I would change my mind, unfortunately this clearly has not happened in this thread.

You have been refuted on almost every point you have raised yet you still refuse to acknowledge the possibility that the lines in the sky are just contrails - and that even if more evidence were provided you would still not change your mind, that would seem to be a rather unfortunate and dogmatic position to take up, good night.

Maybe we'd have a lot more evidence to provide if people such as yourself didn't come here and shoot down every idea that's brought forward. Maybe people are afraid to say anything on this damn forum because they are constantly hounded by non-believers. Good night.

Zillah · 01-09-2010 02:01AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Maybe we'd have a lot more evidence to provide if people such as yourself didn't come here and shoot down every idea that's brought forward. Maybe people are afraid to say anything on this damn forum because they are constantly hounded by non-believers. Good night.

Decades from now it shall be remembered that the NWO's nefarious plans for the world were exposed one day on the Conspiracy Theories forum of boards.ie, and all it took was a hefty dose of credulity and the barely literate ramblings of one brave man.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 02:08AM

Zillah wrote: »

Decades from now it shall be remembered that the NWO's nefarious plans for the world were exposed one day on the Conspiracy Theories forum of boards.ie, and all it took was a hefty dose of credulity and the barely literate ramblings of one brave man.

*golfclap* Aren't you the clever one. I assume that crack about "barely literate ramblings" was not directed at me? Please let me know if it was. Oh, and in case you missed it...

demonspawn wrote: »

Metinks people need to stop coming here to aggressively refute any and all CTs on this forum.

You see, I don't take any of this seriously. How could I? I'd end up in a mental institution fairly quickly. CTs are a source of entertainment for me, trying to explain the unexplainable. It's a bit like religion really, without the all that nasty mass control and world domination.

So do me a favor, stop trying to make people on this forum look like idiots or lunatics. It's just not on. This is a place to come have a laugh and share crazy ideas without the fear of persecution by close-minded individuals.

Jeboa Safari · 01-09-2010 02:09AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Maybe we'd have a lot more evidence to provide if people such as yourself didn't come here and shoot down every idea that's brought forward. Maybe people are afraid to say anything on this damn forum because they are constantly hounded by non-believers. Good night.

Yep, silence logic and facts, that'll work.

01-09-2010 02:11AM

demonspawn wrote: »

So do me a favor, stop trying to make people on this forum look like idiots or lunatics. It's just not on. This is a place to come have a laugh and share crazy ideas without the fear of persecution by close-minded individuals.

Hold up.

demonspawn wrote: »

So why are you on a thread about chemtrails on a CT forum if you know for an absolute fact that chemtrails do not exist? You're not gonna change my mind, I can tell you that right now. Seems a bit of a waste of time if you ask me.

Isn't saying "I will never change my mind" the very definition of closed-mindedness?

And isn't asking for some kind of evidence or reasoning that would prove a theory or disprove the opposite the very definition of open-mindedness?

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 02:13AM

I'm sure you all feel like big hard men, what 4-5 people taking pot shots at one person on an online forum? Yeah, well it's not big and it's not clever. It's rather pathetic really. Single out pick on the weakest, that's usually the way it works with you lot, isn't it? I've got shocking news for yas, I'm far from weak. In fact, there's absolutely nothing you can say that's gonna stop me posting on these forums.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 02:15AM

King Mob wrote: »

Hold up.

Isn't saying "I will never change my mind" the very definition of closed-mindedness?

And isn't asking for some kind of evidence or reasoning that would prove a theory or disprove the opposite the very definition of open-mindedness?

No, you lot are never gonna change my mind. You've proven yourselves to be willfully ignorant and that's fine by me. If I wasn't open-minded, I wouldn't be here on this forum. Your logic is utter fail in every sense of the word.

Edit: No, demanding proof regardless of what's presented is the definition of ignorance.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 02:19AM

By the way, feel free to call me any name under the sun. Be as offensive as possible. I have the distinct feeling that mods here will just let it slide.

Jeboa Safari · 01-09-2010 02:21AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Edit: No, demanding proof regardless of what's presented is the definition of ignorance.

And not demanding proof and believing what random people post on the internet without evidence is the definition of stupidity

01-09-2010 02:21AM

demonspawn wrote: »

No, you lot are never gonna change my mind. You've proven yourselves to be willfully ignorant and that's fine by me. If I wasn't open-minded, I wouldn't be here on this forum. Your logic is utter fail in every sense of the word.

So how exactly can you be open minded and never change your mind?

demonspawn wrote: »

Edit: No, demanding proof regardless of what's presented is the definition of ignorance.

No it's really not.

demonspawn · 01-09-2010 02:25AM

Jeboa Safari wrote: »

And not demanding proof and believing what random people post on the internet without evidence is the definition of stupidity

Come on man. You can do better than that, can't you? I want offensive, not half-hearted childish remarks. Don't worry, the mods don't respond to my reports anymore so feel free to go nuts.

Edit: By the way, nobody's asking you to believe a damn thing. I couldn't care less what you believe to be honest.

Jeboa Safari · 01-09-2010 02:46AM

demonspawn wrote: »

Come on man. You can do better than that, can't you? I want offensive, not half-hearted childish remarks. Don't worry, the mods don't respond to my reports anymore so feel free to go nuts.

Edit: By the way, nobody's asking you to believe a damn thing. I couldn't care less what you believe to be honest.

Not trying to be offensive, no more so than you. And they don't always respond to my reports aswell. I have no reason to just offend you. Although I'm still curious as to why you think I'm here, do you think its just to offend you? Also, bit rich coming from you seeing as you randomly attacked me in an after hours thread, what was that all about?

CHEMTRAILS

Comments