Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
"The Origin of Specious Nonsense"
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
If you can read this, you're too close!
0 -
Advertisement
-
Please tell us all exactly where your posted video addresses Young Earth Creationism? ... and I'll be happy to comment on it.
Time reference please?0 -
Please tell us all exactlywhere your posted video addresses Young Earth Creationism? ... and I'll be happy to comment on it.
Time reference please?
So, I've posted the link around 10 times, and you haven't even read it?
Read the post and you'll see where the video addresses creationismIf you can read this, you're too close!
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
You are trying to help me out to believe what you believe... Suppose i believe what you want me to believe, will it remove the existence of God, will it change the God even if he exists...Here I am trying to help you out,
my response doesn't match with your hyphothesis so, it is natural for you to believe it glib dismissal...and you respond with glib dismissal. If I didn't know better I'd think you wanted people to repeatedly show you that you don't know what you're talking about. That kind of desire for humiliation is pretty kinky, even by decadent western standards.
ah!!!! thousands of factors--- If thousands of factor can work on earth, then why not on other planets like Mars--- Like titan--- materialistic evolution has honestly nothing to do with science, but on the other hand, it is a religion of materialistic beliefs....Close enough, I suppose. You're still ignoring the thousands of other factors that would bias the "chance" element.
Here are some points, if you leave your arrogance behind...
a. scientific research with all of its history can't explain, living things have never created/emerged from non-living matter. Materialistic Evolutionists deemed the unscientific trust that this is thinkable as the first stage of materialistic evolution, but they cannot prove it can happen.
b. genealogical complex things have never formed from nothing....This is just believed by evolutionists to be accessible...
c. No singular-cellular organism has ever changed into a multi- cellular organisms. materialistic Evolutionists strongly believe this can is possible as the second stage of evolution, on the other hand the fact that it has never been noticed in the history of scientific research.
d. No creature has ever produce something that was a unlike of organism than itself.
e. poikilothermic animal can't give birth to a homeothermic animal, still it is believed by materialistic evolution like fish changed to mammal, lizard to bird...
f. herbs have been around since the origin of life, with all the theories of materialistic evolution... they haven't evolved intelligence.
g. There are no chances of herbs changing into animals.
h. Every king of animal has two sex required for reproduction. How this mechanism could have aimlessly turned from cell division,
why these bunch of chemicals started their work on earth-- why not on Mars-It was a bunch of chemicals in a box with occasional lightning strikes. There was nothing intelligent about the conditions. If you bother to read the results of the experiment, you'll see that.
Miller thought that the beginning earth’s environment was very contrary from today. He build his initial chemical mixture on the conjecture that the early earth had a decreasing atmosphere (an atmosphere that have no free oxygen). Why did other materialistic evolutionists and Miller thought there was no free oxygen in earth’s early environment? today it is known biological molecules are annihilated in the company of oxygen, making it difficult for life to evolve.
Oxygen is a lethal gas to those organic and inorganic materials that have not evolved protection against it..... So inorder to overcome this problem materialistic evolutionists suggest that earth’s early atmosphere hadnot any freestanding oxygen. Ask to yourself professor Sarky "“Is there any evidence to support this claim?” There is no scientific evidence that says planet ever had a non-oxygen atmosphere......
If we were to follow the materialistic evolutionists’ claim of no oxygen in the early atmosphere, another huge problem arises. Since the ozone is build of oxygen, it would not exist; and the dangerous rays from the sun would finish off any biological molecules. This asserts a difficult situation for the evolution to example . If there was oxygen, spirit could not begin . If there was no oxygen, spirit could not start. ..... when i use the word spirit it means life as general.... professor-- professor--:eek:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)
Do fossil record, geological records, analysis of deep icy fresh hell, suggest that there was no oxygen in everly earth's atmosphere.... in 1950 when technology wasn't so advance.....Fossil records, geological records, analysis of deep ice from the polar regions... There are plenty of sources to work it out.
ignorance isn't crime, sarky....The experiment of Millah (all related experiments since then) unsuccessful to create even a single biological protein by purely naturalistic processes. .... See, Sarky, Creating amino acids is not the hard part. The difficult stage is getting the true type and organization of amino acids.....amino acids have over 2,000 types, but only 20 are process in life. Furthe, the molecules that build each amino acid are arranged in two basic shapes.These are left-handed and right-handedHe probably didn't manage to create the 20 or so observed in organic life, but he didn't exactly have a few hundred million years, so I'd say getting even a few amino acids in the short time the experiment ran is pretty good going for the random chance you think is impossible.
Two enantiomers of a generic amino acid
Read this link for further detail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_(chemistry)
match them to man's hands. one hand has the same components (four fingers and a thumb), yet they are different...The thumbs are at different places......
Similar to our hands, amino acids have two shapes. They are madeup of the exact atoms (components) but are like mirror images of each other, called left-handed amino acids and right-handed amino acids....... The general idea portrayed by these books and media is that Millar with other experiment were true in creating the amino acids essential for life. but, they fail to tell that what they had actually created was a mixture of left- and right-handed amino acids... material scientist Scientists still don't have any idea why biological proteins use only left-handed amino acids.
You can't explain because you put trust on theories... All right, give me the links of videos.... So that i can see, what you got, in your videos...Another rookie mistake, and one that has been covered in loads of videos in this thread. Fully fledged genes and chromosomes did not suddenly appear. Suggesting otherwise is stupid. I'm not going to bother explaining why because there must be a hundred videos in this thread that do it already
Sarky, the link is working at my place, don't ask where i live...its a hell hole..From halfway down the first page of this paper's introduction:
The link which you gave show intelligence behind evolution not non-intelligence behind evolution.....Well crap, I guess God wasn't so hard to figure out after all.
You also completely ignored the link I put up about Adrian Thompson, didn't you?
Allah created things using scienceYes, it can. Do you think if you ignore the truth hard enough Allah will suddenly appear and say it was him all along?
The Quranic account of creation is in balance with modern scientific thought about the development of the universe and life on earth. We believe that life developed over a long period of time, but see God's power behind it all.....The Qur'an tells that God "made from water every living thing" (21:30). Another verse tells how "God has created every animal from water. Of them are some that creep on their bellies, some that walk on two legs, and some that walk on four. God creates what He wills, for truly Allah has power over all things" (24:45). These verses support the scientific theory that life began in the Earth's oceans.
http://islam.about.com/od/creation/a/creation_2.htm
Honestly, sarky you look more childish, when you utter vioces like baby...I was asking you to stop the threats because they make you look childish and stupid. I don't want you to look childish and stupid. I want a conversation with an adult capable of acting like a civilised human being for five minutes. It would be a nice bonus if you were able to admit you're wrong when people call you on it, but I'll make do with civilised.
See,
Dead one: Is there intelligence present behind evolution
professor sarky: Peeep, Peeepp, gheeee,,,
Dead one: How life started as chance
Professor sarky: naaaa, naaa ,gaaaa, gaaa
No civilized/educated man will believe in your dogmas... That life came out of nothing.... This doctrine is cruel as hunger of hyenas...
and again, yes evolution is science, and yes i'll just say that again in big letters.... EVOLUTION IS SCIENCE. .... I am 100% agree... But i disagree with your materialistic belief to make science a religion---a mockery....... Evolution is science not your materialistic beliefs ..... Science has nothing to do with you materialistic belifs.... Wasted beliefs, wasted life, wasted time.... may be i will see you soon...... See God's power behind present behind evolution which is more logical/scientificAnd again, evolution IS science. I'll just say that again in big letters in case you decide to ignore it. EVOLUTION IS SCIENCE. It is a conclusion based on observing massive amounts of evidence. Its models have been INVALUABLE in modern medicine and biology. Again, you're ignoring everything I said. Why are you so determined to remain ignorant of the world around you? Are you just going to hold on to your superstitions and bigotry to the bitter end because you're afraid to see the world for what it really is?0 -
-
so which is it? Is evolution science or not?Originally Posted by dead one
ah!!!! thousands of factors--- If thousands of factor can work on earth, then why not on other planets like Mars---;)materialistic;):) evolution has honestly nothing to do with science, but on the other hand, it is a religion of materialistic beliefs....
Here are some points, if you leave your arrogance behind...
materialistic evolution has nothing to do with science.... iand again, yes evolution is science, and yes i'll just say that again in big letters.... EVOLUTION IS SCIENCE. .... I am 100% agree... But i disagree with your materialistic belief to make science a religion---a mockery....... Evolution is science not your materialistic beliefs ..... Science has nothing to do with you materialistic belifs.... Wasted beliefs, wasted life, wasted time.... may be i will see you soon...... See God's power behind present behind evolution which is more logical/scientific
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
why should i, should i?? i believe evolution as general development of life into stages......ok, so you lied to Sarky when you stated that evolution is science.
SO you cheated by not boding the word "materialistic"
what makes you do that, isn't it your belief in materialistic evolutionOriginally Posted by dead one
ah!!!! thousands of factors--- If thousands of factor can work on earth, then why not on other planets like Mars--- Like titan--- materialistic evolution has honestly nothing to do with science, but on the other hand, it is a religion of materialistic beliefs....
Here are some points, if you leave your arrogance behind...
0 -
why should i, should i?? i believe evolution as general development of life into stages......
SO you cheated by not boding the word "materialistic"
what makes you do that, isn't it your belief in materialistic evolution
[/I]
You said in one sentence "materialisitic evolution isn't science" and in another, "evolution is science".
That is a contradiction, so one of those statements has to be untrue, which is why I'm saying you lied to Sarky. Because both of those statements can't be true.If you can read this, you're too close!
0 -
-
-
what's you point, that i am lying--- i have cleared you that i believe evolution as general idea of development of life into stages and i believe God's power behind evolution--- right.... You see, material belief behind evolution that's how it differs......You are just proving my point, unless you want to display some evidence that the ghost of christmas past is involved in evolution.
Unless you can provide an explanation as to how materialistic evolution differs from evolution without the materialistic tag, then you are indeed guilty of lying.
See, you are blaming me of lying....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial 0 -
what's you point, that i am lying--- i have cleared you that i believe evolution as general idea of development of life into stages and i believe God's power behind evolution--- right.... You see, material belief behind evolution that's how it differs......
See, you are blaming me of lying....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial
Ok, now I get you, you don't understand evolution. So you weren't lying, you just don't understand what evolution is.
Evolution has nothing to do with god, it's just science. Now if you want to talk about origins of life, then we are into the realm of abiogenesis.
So to clear up, I'm not in denial, I just presumed (wrongly) that you understood what evolution actually pertains to.If you can read this, you're too close!
0 -
-
Advertisement
-
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement