Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Low cost upgrade

Options
  • 22-09-2010 8:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭


    I want to upgrade the graphics card on an old-ish machine (E6600 dual core 2.4 GHz, 3GB RAM, Windows 7) on the cheap to tide me over for a few months and allow me to play some not-too-recent titles (e.g. Civ 4, L4D2, Dragon Age) at a maximum resolution of 1280 x 1024.

    Card is currently a 7600 GT. Which of these two would be worth the upgrade - X1950 Pro 256MB or an 8800 GTS 512MB? Or should I look at spending a bit more? Budget €40-50.


Comments

  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 18,377 Mod ✭✭✭✭Solitaire


    The latter card is far superior. And unless you find a HD4850 or better going for <€50 second-hand it'll be the best you can get. Just be wary of power requirements - both the 8800GTS and the HD4850 are a fair bit thirstier than the 7600GT so make sure you have a bit of PSU overhead! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 274 ✭✭kfish2oo2


    The X1950 Pro isn't even remotely worth considering. Its far too many generations old to handle new content. Find a 4850 or 4870 second hand (usually between €40 and €80) and you'll be set for a good while.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    kfish2oo2 wrote: »
    The X1950 Pro isn't even remotely worth considering. Its far too many generations old to handle new content. Find a 4850 or 4870 second hand (usually between €40 and €80) and you'll be set for a good while.
    8800GTS 512Mb performance is between the performance of a 4850 or 4870 so hes good with that, roughly 8800GT=4850 performance


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 18,377 Mod ✭✭✭✭Solitaire


    lmimmfn wrote: »
    8800GTS 512Mb performance is between the performance of a 4850 or 4870 so hes good with that, roughly 8800GT=4850 performance

    Very small differences between them but on average:

    8800GT ≈ 9800GT < HD4830 <<< 8800GTS (512MB) ≈ 9800GTX < 9800GTX+ < GTS250 ≈ HD4850 <<< HD4780


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    Solitaire wrote: »
    Very small differences between them but on average:

    8800GT ≈ 9800GT < HD4830 <<< 8800GTS (512MB) ≈ 9800GTX < 9800GTX+ < GTS250 ≈ HD4850 <<< HD4780
    yeah, 8800GTS (512MB) == 9800GTX( except the latter has slightly higher default clocks, but the cards are effectively the same only 9800GTX supports tri SLI whereas the 8800GTS( 512MB ) card only supports SLI )

    Also 9800GTX+ == GTS250 ( http://www.anandtech.com/show/2731 )

    So its:
    ( 8800GT == 9800GT )< HD4830 <<<( 8800GTS (512MB) == 9800GTX ) < ( 9800GTX+ == GTS250 )≈ HD4850 <<< HD4780 ≈ 260GTX < HD4790 < 260GTX( 216SP )

    However the GTS250 generally performs between the ATI4850 and 4870( mainly in TWIMTBP games though )

    Gotta love Nvidia branding :D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 18,377 Mod ✭✭✭✭Solitaire


    It performs like a lump of ****e in other games though so it averages out around the HD4850. And another mention of The Way It Was Meant To Be Paid (Off) and I will beat you with sticks! icon19.gif

    of RAM :pac:


Advertisement