Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M50 thread

Options
1202123252628

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    marno21 wrote: »
    Widening the M50 has been continiously ruled out by all parties involved.

    It is not feasible for a multitude of reasons.

    Why is it not feasible?

    Of course it's feasible but the petals don't want to do it at the moment.

    Two extra lanes each way and more flyovers at junctions would improve things enormously.

    Much better chance of widening happening than tolling for political reasons.

    0_Screen-Shot-2018-08-17-at-162314.png

    Plenty of room. Let's get it done! :cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,068 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Why is it not feasible?

    Of course it's feasible but the petals don't want to do it at the moment.

    Two extra lanes each way and more flyovers at junctions would improve things enormously.

    Much better chance of widening happening than tolling for political reasons.

    0_Screen-Shot-2018-08-17-at-162314.png

    Plenty of room. Let's get it done! :cool:

    And then when those lanes fill up?

    Do you suggest to just keep adding lanes?

    Getting needless private comnuter traffic off the roads is the only game in town.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Personally i'd set the limit at 10 lanes each way (if we needed it) including car pooling and HOV lanes.

    Then i'd look at the outer ring motorway for Dublin...


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Why is it not feasible?

    Of course it's feasible but the petals don't want to do it at the moment.

    Two extra lanes each way and more flyovers at junctions would improve things enormously.

    Much better chance of widening happening than tolling for political reasons.


    Plenty of room. Let's get it done! :cool:

    You picked one part of the M50 where there is space either side.

    Not the parts where there are structures, developments beside the M50, or places like the Westlink.

    The M50 has been upgraded. Spending several billion on further upgrades is a distraction from what's really needed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 41 smurph6


    I'm flying out Saturday at 6.30pm from Dublin Airport. Was planning on taking the aircoach up from Cork. Will delays be bad on M50? I know on the aircoach site they said they'll be dropping passengers to Dublin airport first as opposed going through city. Just want to know what kinda time should I give myself


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,221 ✭✭✭✭m5ex9oqjawdg2i


    Widening the m50 to accommodate more traffic is very low on the list of stupid ideas to address the problem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,068 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Personally i'd set the limit at 10 lanes each way (if we needed it) including car pooling and HOV lanes.

    Then i'd look at the outer ring motorway for Dublin...

    And personally, why did you stop at 10 lanes?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Widening the m50 to accommodate more traffic is very low on the list of stupid ideas to address the problem.

    Where is all the traffic going to go? The approach roads are also full

    Aside from the multi billion cost of widening it. Addressing car dependence (especially needless car dependence) is the solution here

    I would also build the eastern bypass before any M50 widening, and there are other solutions road based too such as measures around the Ballymount junction, perhaps a 2nd auxiliary lane between N4-N7 etc


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    And then when those lanes fill up?

    Do you suggest to just keep adding lanes?

    Getting needless private comnuter traffic off the roads is the only game in town.

    The lanes don't create demand. They just release the choking elsewhere to get onto it.

    But I don't think the m50 has much more opportunity for expansion. The way Dublin and surrounding counties have developed over the last 25 years means it's no longer suited to it's purpose. Just like the north/south circular roads.

    Something needs to be done to enable people to make the journeys planners don't accept they need to. And that means reviewing what options there are with crossing liffey valley.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The lanes don't create demand. They just release the choking elsewhere to get onto it.

    But I don't think the m50 has much more opportunity for expansion. The way Dublin and surrounding counties have developed over the last 25 years means it's no longer suited to it's purpose. Just like the north/south circular roads.

    Something needs to be done to enable people to make the journeys planners don't accept they need to. And that means reviewing what options there are with crossing liffey valley.

    They do create demand. The M50 maxed out at around 100k vehicles between N4-N7 back before it was upgraded, it's now carrying upto 170k vehicles per day and there has been no relief given to the surrounding roads.

    I totally agree with your last point though. Extending the R136 Outer Ring Road across the Liffey to Blanchardstown really is a no brainer. The lack of Liffey crossing around the M50 are simply driving people onto the M50.

    The toll is the obvious stumbling block here though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    For goodness sake. It's not rocket science. Expand the approach roads as well with extra lanes and flyovers.

    Bigger, better roads is what we need.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    For goodness sake. It's not rocket science. Expand the approach roads as well with extra lanes and flyovers.

    Bigger, better roads is what we need.

    No, it's not rocket science. But even rocket science won't find you land to do this.

    Bigger roads is the opposite of what we need, on the M50 corridor

    Where will you find room to widen these?

    459252.JPG

    459253.JPG


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    There is room in all those locations for at least one extra lane. CPO for the rest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Example

    This could be the N4/M50 junction - full proper freeflow (though if the M50 mainline is under the flyovers i'd have an extra couple of lanes here)

    59sw_driver_view_at_bw8_A_going_s_21-july-2001_hres.jpg

    And this should be the N4 itself....

    153451_original.jpg

    When Dublin has roads like this there will be no problem! It will all work smoothly and never reach capacity in our lifetimes.

    Incidentally i'm a big fan of the rumble strips in the line paintings! That should be implemented here too!!


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    LOL I give up


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    marno21 wrote: »
    They do create demand. The M50 maxed out at around 100k vehicles between N4-N7 back before it was upgraded, it's now carrying upto 170k vehicles per day and there has been no relief given to the surrounding roads.

    I totally agree with your last point though. Extending the R136 Outer Ring Road across the Liffey to Blanchardstown really is a no brainer. The lack of Liffey crossing around the M50 are simply driving people onto the M50.

    The toll is the obvious stumbling block here though.

    The extra vehicles is because there's more people driving from outside Dublin. The m50 is the first major roadway available to disperse around Dublin for high volume traffic. Which'll continue to increase with time.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    marno21 wrote: »
    LOL I give up
    Yeah, It's like an obese patient going to the doctor anf been told to get the next size up in clothing rather than to lose weight!
    What is needed it to look at why there is so much traffic and either disperse the places of work, more accommodation in the city or better public transport, or a combination of all of these and other measures.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭Kamili


    I'm actually shocked that some posters on here think Ireland has the money to doll out building US style motorways, let alone the land or space, then theres the resources. Where do they think this money is going to come from?

    Simply building more and more lanes doesn't solve the issue. Poor planning, and our unreliable/sub standard and expensive public transport needs to be looked at before considering ah sure whack a US style 10 lane motorway in. and ah sure if that doesn't work feck in more lanes.

    The issues of bad routes on Public transport is forcing people into their cars. Taking 2-3 hours to get across a small city on a bus, is crazy. Lack of public or too expensive public transport options from commuter towns is also pushing more and more into their cars and clogging up roads.

    There is some epic trolling going on on this thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,068 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    I was willing to take KDF's ignorance on the matter at face value til I saw the posts/images above.

    So, I guess we can move swiftly on.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The M50 must be quite improved this morning, M1 closed SB J5-J4, and the R132 is barely coping with the traffic so there's a lot less traffic feeding into the M50 from the M1 corridor


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,156 ✭✭✭rameire


    unfortunately not.
    N3 inbound was very heavy.
    and M50 was very heavy from Lucan junction all the way to Jn12.

    🌞 3.8kwp, 🌞 Split 2.28S, 1.52E. 🌞 Clonee, Dub.🌞



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭Kamili


    Northbound was slightly slower than previous weeks too, and the brake light checkers and late lane changers/swervers are back. Along with the dawdling middle and right lane hoggers.

    Sigh.. I miss summer


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Jesus!



    US rumble strips instead of line painting could help with the drunks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,404 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Hope they got sorted. The beauty of a traffic cam, makes life a lot easier when having to explain something to an insurance company.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭Kamili


    piece in the Journal about the number of incidents on the M50 since 2017

    http://www.thejournal.ie/m50-crashes-foi-4278822-Oct2018/
    THE COUNTRY’S BIGGEST motorway has witnessed more than 5,100 accidents and incidents since the beginning of 2017.

    Dublin’s M50 ring road has recorded “incidents” at the rate of over 243 per month, according to a detailed list provided by Transport Infrastructure Ireland.

    And one just for Kermit:
    A spokesman for Transport Infrastructure Ireland said that with 50 million journeys a year, the motorway was no longer a ring road but rather within the city suburbs.

    Sean O’Neill said: “Options for increasing capacity are not endless and eventually there comes a point when adding lanes and upgrading junctions is no longer feasible.”


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,798 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And Sean O'Neill is American!


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars


    Proposals to bring in lower speed limits at times on the M50 to try to reduce congestion. That would simply be unworkable. At many times the speed on the road is reduced to a crawl for mile after mile.
    Recently I travelled southbound on a Sunday afternoon and the traffic came to a halt past Carrickmines,the cause-eejits jumping across from the overtaking lane to try and exit at Bray causing everyone behind them to brake and then we saw the concertina effect as traffic for miles behind simply stopped.


  • Registered Users Posts: 896 ✭✭✭Bray Head


    It's counter-intuitive but the lower the speed limit, the more capacity a road can carry.


    I drove around Antwerp a few years back and saw very aggressive traffic management using variable speed restrictions on its ring-motorway.


    Every few hundred metres was a speed limit sign which varied between 50 and 110 I think.


    The traffic was very heavy and, although it came close to snarling, it never actually came to a crawl even with extremely heavy traffic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,464 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    Recently I travelled southbound on a Sunday afternoon and the traffic came to a halt past Carrickmines,the cause-eejits jumping across from the overtaking lane to try and exit at Bray causing everyone behind them to brake and then we saw the concertina effect as traffic for miles behind simply stopped.
    Yes, it's crazy ... there's a whole 1.5km of sliproad between where the M11 joins to the Bray North exit for traffic to sort itself out into the right lane, more than enough if everyone planned ahead a little bit.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 896 ✭✭✭Bray Head


    Kamili wrote: »
    piece in the Journal about the number of incidents on the M50 since 2017

    A spokesman for Transport Infrastructure Ireland said that with 50 million journeys a year, the motorway was no longer a ring road but rather within the city suburbs.
    That is a bit silly. The M50 has been a conduit for traffic in and around Dublin since it was built.


Advertisement