Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Buying Britan

  • 03-11-2010 5:36pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭


    Never posted in here before and am not one for CT's but this is on the actual webpage of the house of lords in the UK. This is real and the member doesn't seem like a nutjob and has a very good business pedigree. Relenevat paragraphs are 1538 onwards on 01/11/2010 Whos behind this and why? Is it the Vatican, The Illuminatti...who else would have access to this sort of cash. Could it be the final throw of the dice for one of the cash rich Oil states to get a foothold?

    Could some one have found a few quid behind the couch? Opinions welcome.

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldhansrd/text/101101-0003.htm#10110215000101


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop


    OP can you highlight the relevent bits ,it's very long


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Very interesting dialogue, but it seems like the guy talking about 'Foundation X' is rambling a bit and not really saying anything of substance.

    Are there any more references to this from the media?

    here's a video - http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_lords/newsid_9146000/9146065.stm

    he starts talking at 2h 34m in


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop


    Very interesting dialogue, but it seems like the guy talking about 'Foundation X' is rambling a bit and not really saying anything of substance.

    Are there any more references to this from the media?




    Tory peer hints at shadowy 'Foundation X', admits to IRA money laundering


    Here's a question: if a respected Tory fixer and peer carefully detailed an enormous and far-reaching conspiracy, what would the reaction of the public be?

    That's what seems to have happened on Monday in the House of Lords, anyway: read from column 1538 in Hansard, the official record of such things. In that transcript, Lord James of Blackheath spells out how a shadowy 'Foundation X' offered to pay off the government's multi-billion-pound debts, with no strings attached. He goes into how he personally (and, apparently, proudly) laundered more than £1bn in IRA funds:

    Foundation X was introduced to me 20 weeks ago last week by an eminent City firm, which is FSA controlled. Its chairman came to me and said, "We have this extraordinary request to assist in a major financial reconstruction. It is megabucks, but we need your help to assist us in understanding whether this business is legitimate". I had the biggest put down of my life from my noble friend Lord Strathclyde when I told him this story.

    He said, "Why you? You're not important enough to have the answer to a question like that". He is quite right, I am not important enough, but the answer to the next question was, "You haven't got the experience for it". Yes I do. I have had one of the biggest experiences in the laundering of terrorist money and funny money that anyone has had in the City. I have handled billions of pounds of terrorist money.

    My biggest terrorist client was the IRA and I am pleased to say that I managed to write off more than £1 billion of its money. I have also had extensive connections with north African terrorists, but that was of a far nastier nature, and I do not want to talk about that because it is still a security issue.

    Incredibly, when Lord James sat down after his 15-minute speech, the Lords seems to have carried on with their proceedings as if nothing odd had been said. Almost no mainstream-media coverage has been given to the incident, barring an amused FT blog.

    Far be it from me to theorise as to the provenance of what the noble peer said on Monday, but isn't it strange how, in the face of such astonishing claims, the collective reaction is 'well how about that then'? This is either genuinely explosive stuff, or the mother of all 419 scams...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    Maybe these guys are behind it : http://www.unoitc.org/

    O course the logo is triangle-tastic. A wet dream for the illumaniti hunter:rolleyes:


    http://www.funfactory.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&id=3CF707B3-F806-4A2D-9859-4F6B04CE54D2&fid=F8C39420-9DEF-4036-AB93-FBF8A5E60A5C


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    studiorat wrote: »
    Maybe these guys are behind it : http://www.unoitc.org/

    O course the logo is triangle-tastic. A wet dream for the illumaniti hunter:rolleyes:

    Do you have reason to believe that they are behind it?

    Can there not just be one thread in which the childish sarcasm is left at the door btw? It's an interesting topic would you not agree? And odd that such a respected Peer would formally speak about such a thing


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    studiorat wrote: »
    Maybe these guys are behind it : http://www.unoitc.org/

    O course the logo is triangle-tastic. A wet dream for the illumaniti hunter:rolleyes:


    http://www.funfactory.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&id=3CF707B3-F806-4A2D-9859-4F6B04CE54D2&fid=F8C39420-9DEF-4036-AB93-FBF8A5E60A5C
    As My Name Is Url says, can you not give it a rest for just one little thread? Read what was said and try and have a serious reply about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    Very, Very interesting, from the horses mouth aswell.
    £5 Billion backed with gold, my guess Knights Templar or their modern name Freemasons?, but thats just a guess.

    Whoever they are they are very powerful, only heads of state may contact them.

    The £1 billion he laundered for the IRA seems irrelevent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It's quite possible that he was simply the target of a sophisticated scam attempt. The group that studiorat mentioned are notable for being involved in such apparent high-level scams, and claim ties to the UN and various other groups. They're certainly a shadowy bunch - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_International_Treasury_Control

    Whatever it is, it should be taken seriously. And I'm surprised that it was just dropped in the House of Lords after James finished speaking


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    humanji wrote: »
    As My Name Is Url says, can you not give it a rest for just one little thread? Read what was said and try and have a serious reply about it.

    Well humanji, I had expected better from you. If you actually did read any of the content of either link and didn't just look at the little triangles. You would realize the connection. But I guess you didn't make it past the illumaniti symbolism either!

    So I suppose I'll have to give it in simple terms : The OITC is an "international institution registered under the United Nations with "substantial assets" under it's control. It claims it was established by "Governments of the World of Legal Decadency"

    I dunno it kind of fits their MO.

    They tried to bank roll Fiji and Ecuador offering them a couple of billion they declined.

    And my favorite, they claim to be a “Sovereign Entity” stating that they are "effectively no different to a Sovereign Nation except for the fact that a Sovereign Entity holds “Sovereign” status without subjects".

    All their accounts are kept secret and only those who hold the relevant "International Security Clearance level" can have access to these accounts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4681369.stm
    UK businessman David James' consortium has been confirmed as the third party in talks with MG Rover administrators.

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/789126d8-e383-11d9-b6f0-00000e2511c8,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F789126d8-e383-11d9-b6f0-00000e2511c8.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FOffice_of_International_Treasury_Control
    Sellers of companies don't often get paid by postal order. But the accountants running failed carmaker MG Rover are now owners of one for £1, courtesy of a group calling itself the "Office of International Treasury Control".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It's quite the most extraordinary speech I think I've ever come across. It was given by Lord James of Blackheath, a respected industrialist and a former senior adviser to the Conservative party.

    James was speaking in the Lords debate on the spending review. You might expect him to touch on the issue of government waste, which he is known for politically. Not a bit of it.

    James's speech begins with Brigadoon, moves on to money laundering billions of pounds of terrorist money and ends with the claim that he has been contacted about a mysterious "Foundation X" that wishes to invest £5bn in the United Kingdom, with an extra £17bn for hospitals, schools and Crossrail by Christmas, and who have met with a cabinet minister to discuss their investment. Intriguing, isn't it?

    So here's the skinny.

    As an expert in the laundering of terrorist finance and funny money who has "handled billions of pounds of terrorist money", James claims he was asked by a leading FSA regulated institution to investigate a mysterious organisation that wanted to invest substantial sums into the UK's economic reconstruction.

    This body, which he calls "Foundation X", apparently has huge reserves of gold bullion-backed funds. On some estimates, these funds amount to more than the entire gold bullion mined from the earth. With such great wealth, Foundation X is understandably secretive and only wishes to discuss the disbursement of its funds with a head of state or one of the "top six people in the world". So for 20 weeks, James investigated the foundation. He came to the conclusion that "Foundation X is completely genuine and sincere and that it directly wishes to make the United Kingdom one of the principal points that it will use to disseminate its extraordinarily great wealth into the world".

    Having come to this conclusion, James wished to expedite this investment. So he secured a meeting for representatives of Foundation X with the leader of the House of Lords, Lord Strathclyde. This was held some weeks ago and was, at best, inconclusive. Since then, James has discussed Foundation X in detail with Treasury ministers and now believes the government is dragging its heels and missing a major opportunity to drive forward the UK economy.

    Now, you might think this is all barmy. After all, mystery foundations with vast quantities of gold bullion-backed securities to invest in the British economy don't come along every day. It's tempting to think that James has been the victim of a particularly convincing Nigerian email scam.

    But if it is madness, it is madness that has reached the highest levels of government.

    After all, not only have members of Foundation X met with the leader of the House of Lords, the Treasury minister, Lord Sassoon, confirmed that he has been in "detailed discussions" on this subject with James, adding that the government "take seriously anyone who wants to invest in our economy".

    So what on earth is going on? One thing is for sure.

    The truth is out there.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/03/strange-case-lord-james-foundation-x


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,405 ✭✭✭gizmo


    If it really is the Office of International Treasury Control then there's going to be a hell of a lot of red faces in the House of Lords. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop


    To me this is an admission that secretive groups control a lot of what goes on in the world.From terrorism to collapsing economies and equally driving economies.I don't want to go off topic here ,but zimbabwae tried to break away from these outside influences and their economy was destroyed.The Rothschilds set up a bank in zimbabwae some years back and maybe this was setup to influence, monitor and destroy that particular economy.This foundation X must be surely tied to the biggest banking dynasty in history.There is a list of banks which the Rothschilds allegedly contol.

    The Alleged Rothschild-Owned Central Banks of the World (Alphabetical Order)

    Bank For International Settlements (BIS)
    Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
    Albania: Bank of Albania
    Algeria: Bank of Algeria
    Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
    Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
    Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
    Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
    Austria: Austrian National Bank
    Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
    Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas
    Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
    Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
    Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
    Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
    Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
    Belize: Central Bank of Belize
    Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
    Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
    Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
    Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Botswana: Bank of Botswana
    Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
    Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
    Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
    Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
    Cameroon: Bank of Central African States
    Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada
    Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
    Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
    Chad: Bank of Central African States
    Chile: Central Bank of Chile
    China: The People’s Bank of China
    Colombia: Bank of the Republic
    Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
    Congo: Bank of Central African States
    Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
    Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Croatia: Croatian National Bank
    Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
    Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
    Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
    Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
    Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
    East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
    Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
    Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
    El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
    Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
    Estonia: Bank of Estonia
    Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
    European Union: European Central Bank
    Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
    Finland: Bank of Finland
    France: Bank of France
    Gabon: Bank of Central African States
    The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
    Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
    Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
    Ghana: Bank of Ghana
    Greece: Bank of Greece
    Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
    Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Guyana: Bank of Guyana
    Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
    Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
    Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
    Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
    Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
    India: Reserve Bank of India
    Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
    Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
    Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
    Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
    Israel: Bank of Israel
    Italy: Bank of Italy
    Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
    Japan: Bank of Japan
    Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
    Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
    Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
    Korea: Bank of Korea
    Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
    Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
    Latvia: Bank of Latvia
    Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
    Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
    Libya: Central Bank of Libya
    Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
    Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
    Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
    Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
    Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
    Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
    Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
    Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Malta: Central Bank of Malta
    Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
    Mexico: Bank of Mexico
    Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
    Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
    Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
    Morocco: Bank of Morocco
    Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
    Namibia: Bank of Namibia
    Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
    Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
    Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
    New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
    Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
    Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
    Norway: Central Bank of Norway
    Oman: Central Bank of Oman
    Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan
    Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
    Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
    Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
    Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
    Poland: National Bank of Poland
    Portugal: Bank of Portugal
    Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
    Romania: National Bank of Romania
    Russia: Central Bank of Russia
    Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
    San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
    Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
    Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
    Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
    Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
    Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
    Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
    Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
    Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
    Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
    South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
    Spain: Bank of Spain
    Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
    Sudan: Bank of Sudan
    Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
    Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
    Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
    Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
    Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
    Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
    Thailand: Bank of Thailand
    Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
    Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
    Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
    Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
    Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
    Uganda: Bank of Uganda
    Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
    United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
    United Kingdom: Bank of England
    United States:Federal Reserve Bank of New York
    Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
    Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
    Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
    Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
    Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
    Zambia: Bank of Zambia
    Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.

    Now if this could be true ,you could crash economies at will ,create terrorist threats at will and control leaders of countries to bring in policies that you want..thus creating the world that you want..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Is there any info on the people behind the OITC? It seems like quite an elaborate hoax.. if they have people attending high-level meetings and the like then they obviously have some degree of proper organisation. It's bizarre stuff altogether.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 728 ✭✭✭joebucks


    Hopi Sen's follow up to guardian blogpost on his personal blog.

    United Nations Office of International Treasury Control main suspects here also.

    http://hopisen.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/have-we-uncovered-foundation-x/#comments


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,405 ✭✭✭gizmo


    To me this is an admission that secretive groups control a lot of what goes on in the world.From terrorism to collapsing economies and equally driving economies.I don't want to go off topic here ,but zimbabwae tried to break away from these outside influences and their economy was destroyed.
    Or maybe Mugabe was just a ****ing nutjob?
    Is there any info on the people behind the OITC? It seems like quite an elaborate hoax.. if they have people attending high-level meetings and the like then they obviously have some degree of proper organisation. It's bizarre stuff altogether.
    Indeed it is but their track record speaks for itself. Odd that they'd offer the British government the exact same amount they were willing to buy MG Rover with too. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop


    gizmo wrote: »
    Or maybe Mugabe was just a ****ing nut job


    I totally agree ,he was a nut job but he blamed outside influences from the west for that.But then again thats what all these nutters claim ,you cannot take his word as the truth ,you see it time and time again ,that people say that such and such from a broke country said Americans or the west was responsable for their own mismanagement of government..

    But then again;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri


    apologies havent had time to review the whole of the op...

    But just reading comments here, surely 5billion is really not a lot of money.. huge reserves of gold wouldnt be needed.. even the additional 17billion is not a lot of money for certain people....

    it would hardly buy Britain or even a portion of it..
    could be a few investors, know britain could do with a few quid so they could offer them money and get bonds or something similiar in return to get their money back at a later stage plus interest....

    lets face it it would be better than putting money in banks.. if banks go bust u loose your money... at least with a country u will get ur money back, a near risk free investment......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    gizmo wrote: »
    Or maybe Mugabe was just a ****ing nutjob?


    Indeed it is but their track record speaks for itself. Odd that they'd offer the British government the exact same amount they were willing to buy MG Rover with too. ;)

    Aye, doubt it's a merely coincidental. The link between James and the OITC is also enough to raise eyebrows, given that they made up 2 of the 3 competing bids when MG was being sold.

    What are the bets that it will all just be swept aside as an unfortunate mix-up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    The Alleged Rothschild-Owned Central Banks of the World (Alphabetical Order)

    Maybe its just me, but that looks like a list of all the world's central banks. Who's alleging that the Rothscilds own every single central bank? What basis do these allegations have?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    bonkey wrote: »
    Maybe its just me, but that looks like a list of all the world's central banks. Who's alleging that the Rothscilds own every single central bank? What basis do these allegations have?

    Is there any definitive and verifiable source that lists the countries in which they do hold a certain degree of clout within banking sectors? I'd genuinely be interested in seeing that. I've heard a few times in the past that there are only a handful of countries which don't have their banks controlled to some degree by Rothschilds. All of which have historically endured major struggles on a world stage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop


    bonkey wrote: »
    Maybe its just me, but that looks like a list of all the world's central banks. Who's alleging that the Rothscilds own every single central bank? What basis do these allegations have?

    I cannot find any list on any official website with all those banks named ,only a list of offices from their own site

    here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2




    Here's the video for anybody who didn't see it, very strange, even if it is a scam, he's still admitted laundering £1 billion of IRA money, TBH I'm still trying to get my head around this.


    Tory peer hints at shadowy 'Foundation X', admits to IRA money laundering
    http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/communication-breakdown-10000030/tory-peer-hints-at-shadowy-foundation-x-admits-to-ira-money-laundering-10020941/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I'm willing to assume that when he mentioned the laundering of IRA money that he was attempting to allude to the fact that he was responsible for simply writing off the money which they themselves were laundering. Doubt that the way he said it was anything more than a slip of the tongue which seems to have intrigued a greater audience than the fact that meetings took place between himself, the head of the UK's Treasury and whoever the hell it is that was representing The X Men


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭digme


    This has to be the most surreal video I've ever seen to do with a government.I'm lost for words. Thanks for posting this op.
    The Rothschilds must be the x, as they own a sh!tload of gold.

    Trillions


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,630 ✭✭✭The Recliner


    It is certainly very interesting

    I am sure this type of thing goes on all the time but for it to happen in such a public way is a bit bizarre

    The money mentioned isn't massive in the grand scheme of things, certainly not enough to buy Britain but as mentioned above it would be a risk free investment so would make sense for someone to do it


  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭TheBlock


    It is certainly very interesting

    I am sure this type of thing goes on all the time but for it to happen in such a public way is a bit bizarre

    The money mentioned isn't massive in the grand scheme of things, certainly not enough to buy Britain but as mentioned above it would be a risk free investment so would make sense for someone to do it


    I think the implications are quite clear though. This is the deposit the rest will come as soon as we start talking. The more I think of it the more I think this is really old money...The Vatican are the front runners for me. I know they have there own bank but as has been mentioned this seems like a safe bet as the UK are hardly likely to default.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭iPlop


    TheBlock wrote: »
    I think the implications are quite clear though. This is the deposit the rest will come as soon as we start talking. The more I think of it the more I think this is really old money...The Vatican are the front runners for me. I know they have there own bank but as has been mentioned this seems like a safe bet as the UK are hardly likely to default.

    Very bizzare stuff.I get the feeling that Lord Strathclyde my just commit "suicide" before he blabs anymore.I would say these wealthy people and their influence is well known among the house of lords ,and there is probably an unwritten rule that you do not reveal the true nature of things to the public.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    Seems its not UNOITC!
    Lord James: Foundation X not a scam
    "I'm convinced it's bona fide," said James. "I've been working on this case for five months, and I've not found a single reason [to think otherwise]."

    Blogger Hopi Sen suggested in a blog post on Wednesday that the mysterious organisation could be the "United Nations Office of International Treasury Control" (UNOITC), which claims to be a sovereign entity formed after the Second World War.

    James told ZDNet UK that he had not been approached by the UNOITC, and that there were no links between Foundation X and UNOITC.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    The family of Lord Sassoon, the treasury secretary is intermarried with the Rothschild family. The whole thing is surreal, these cnuts in the house of Lords are the elite. I find it hard to believe that there could be this incredible gold bullion hidden stash and a Sassoon/Rothschild Lord didn't know about it.

    Gives a motive for an engineered global depression though.

    Surprised nobody else picked up on this. The part in bold was left out of the OP.
    Lord James of Blackheath: Not into my pocket. My biggest terrorist client was the IRA and I am pleased to say that I managed to write off more than £1 billion of its money. I have also had extensive connections with north African terrorists, but that was of a far nastier nature, and I do not want to talk about that because it is still a security issue. I hasten to add that it is no good getting the police in, because I shall immediately call the Bank of England as my defence witness, given that it put me in to deal with these problems.

    If people don't know about the Rothschilds- Taken from The Money Masters





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    That's interesting about the ties between the Sassoons and the Rothschilds. I'd be reluctant to make any assumptions based on that alone however. Remember, it wasn't him that was contacted by the group and he hasn't said much about it other than to confirm that he had discussed the matter with James.

    It's not really surprising either that the two families have connections, since the Rothschilds have always endogamously married into other wealthy Jewish families.. when not into their own, of course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I saw this posted on the comments section of a site reporting the story - http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/2010/08/united-nations-alan-greenspan-now-implicated-in-1345-billion-bond-scandal.html

    The bit about the 134.5 Billion dollars worth of bonds being seized is particularly interesting, most of the rest sounds like crap to be fair.. But look at who is mentioned in the article, the OITC.

    Here's a more in-depth analysis of the seizure and the media blackout surrounding it - http://seekingalpha.com/article/143462-strange-inconsistencies-in-the-134-5-billion-bearer-bond-mystery

    I don't know if any of this is connected to 'Foundation X', but y'never know =p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    Skynews video



    Edit:

    THEY WANT TO SAVE THE WORLD!

    Ok this is CT, if anybody has a problem with that go post in my thread in politics.

    1:12 they want to put their assets to work, TO SAVE THE WORLD

    Is this man announcing the emergence of the "New World Order", the beginning of the global government?, their coming to save us!!!
    Ask Iraqi's and Afghan's what it's like when people come to save you.

    2:16 "It's rather like finding that after all these years that good gracious, you find on christmas eve that father christmas does exist and he's just popped down your chimney, it is a bit of a surprise"................Lying Basttard, you knew exactly where they were all along.

    If these "saviours" are allowed save britain, and spread to europe as this elitist pig is suggesting, then further afield.

    This is almost the NWO script we've been reading about, is it not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    uprising2 wrote: »
    Ok this is CT, if anybody has a problem with that go post in my thread in politics.

    1:12 they want to put their assets to work, TO SAVE THE WORLD

    This is almost the NWO script we've been reading about, is it not?

    Yeah, and in a few days the whole episode will be confined to the world of CTs. After the mainstream interest has waned and the journalists pin it down to an old Lord having a 'moment'. The guy who broke the story originally has already backed away from his first declaration that it was an interesting piece of dialogue and is now basically showing his pity for James.

    This world pisses me off at times.. There's definitely something behind all of this which people need to be aware of, whatever side of the fence they may be on.

    When it becomes a little talked about issue, mainly discussed in CT circles then it will already have lost all credibility. Funny that, since nothing new will have emerged to suggest that it is all just a fantastical notion.

    If there is any justice in the world of politics then a full disclosure of the group will be made, so that it doesn't just fizzle out with two disparate groups making polar assumptions on who it was and what the intent may have been.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    Yeah, and in a few days the whole episode will be confined to the world of CTs. After the mainstream interest has waned and the journalists pin it down to an old Lord having a 'moment'. The guy who broke the story originally has already backed away from his first declaration that it was an interesting piece of dialogue and is now basically showing his pity for James.

    This world pisses me off at times.. There's definitely something behind all of this which people need to be aware of, whatever side of the fence they may be on.

    When it becomes a little talked about issue, mainly discussed in CT circles then it will already have lost all credibility. Funny that, since nothing new will have emerged to suggest that it is all just a fantastical notion.

    If there is any justice in the world of politics then a full disclosure of the group will be made, so that it doesn't just fizzle out with two disparate groups making polar assumptions on who it was and what the intent may have been.

    I think he's saying exactly what he's supposed to be saying, he's basically offered britain a way out of the hardship, do the govt ignore it and shut hospitals, OR, get new hospitals underway almost immiediately?

    The sheeple will write millions of letters of complaint to the british govt if santa claws offer isn't accepted, the govt will "give in" to the sheeples demands.

    Stage 1 complete.

    Edit:
    Reading about the date 1st November, interesting date to announce the savior in the shadows.

    Edit:Edit:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 728 ✭✭✭joebucks


    A few observations:

    a/ It is unlikely to be the Rothschilds directly as the Rothschilds already know all the important people in the UK government so would not be dealing with this chump. example: Nat Rothschild was in the same university club/ fraternity as PM David Cameron and London mayor of London Boris Johnson. Surely if the Rothschild wanted something done, these two would be the ones contacted.
    It may be a 3rd party acting on behalf of the Rothschilds, it has been suggested before that the likes of George Soros and the Mittal family are agents for the Red Shield

    b/ He says this group X have given him a list of referees amongst the most powerful and high profile people on the world stage. Who would these referees be??

    c/ The whole thing totally stinks.

    d/ The proposals would suggest that the whole system is working fine and its just an injection of cash that is needed. No need to review fractional banking reserve system, the nature of markets that allowed Foundation X to accumulate such wealth.

    e/ As uprising2 says this is close to what the likes of Jones/Icke etc said was going to happen with the NWO. Crash the system and then come in to save the day, unbeknownst to the masses that the saviours were the ones that caused the problems in the first place.
    Kinda like that movie Inception. Make the people think what they are choosing is their own decision and in their own best interest..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 728 ✭✭✭joebucks



    If people don't know about the Rothschilds- Taken from The Money Masters

    Eyelyn de Rothschild blogger extraordinaire:
    In short, where do we go from here?

    It may be that there is still time to consider these things and work out the right course of action. It is no longer enough for us merely to react. Perhaps this is the time to take a breath and step back from all the madness and try and properly think things through.

    Had we done this, it might have been possible to avoid all the turmoil and trouble in the world that has been brought on by the financial debacle. The behavioral problems discussed above have not just affected children but adults too. Thoughtless decisions based on momentary circumstances have been made that have had huge ramifications for all of us.

    Many were motivated by the instantaneous needs of their own pocket, without a thought to the ethics of what was being done or an understanding of what it took to make those pockets full in the first place.

    Most of us know, when we take that every important moment to think, that truthful, proper and ethical standings make for a better and more prosperous life for all. I believe that's who we truly are.


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/evelyn-robert-de-rothschild/where-do-we-go-from-here_2_b_773424.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    Looking in the wrong direction as usual...
    The family of Lord Sassoon, the treasury secretary is intermarried with the Rothschild family. The whole thing is surreal, these cnuts in the house of Lords are the elite.

    He's about as intermarried with the Rothschilds as I am. His great great grandfathers second cousin married the daughter of a Rothschild about 120 years ago. :rolleyes:


    Members of the media were chased out after the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Office of the International Treasury Control and the Viti Land and Resource Owners today.

    The press conference with foreign national Dr. Keith Scott who claims to be the Head of Cabinet of OITC was abruptly terminated after specific questions regarding the validity of the $6,000,000,000 billion (USD) being offered by the company to set up a commercial bank was brought up.

    Questions on when and how the initial $3,800,000,000 billion (USD) would come through were left half-answered by Dr. Scott after front man for the resource owners Masi Kaumaitotoya called for security to escort the media out.

    Audio Comment [ http://www.fijivillage.com/artman/mar/a60.wax ]

    Doctor Scott also revealed at the Bose Ni Turaga earlier this week that he would transfer the first payment of $3,800,000,000 billion (USD) by yesterday afternoon. However nothing has eventuated since the announcement.

    When questioned earlier today on why the transfer was not done, Resource Owners Association president Ratu Osea Gavidi said there is no bank account in Fiji that can hold $3,800,000,000 billion (USD).

    In the Memorandum Of Understanding ( MOU ), 50% is to be funded by the The Office Of International Treasury Control ( ITC ) and the other 50% is to be provided by the landowners who are expected to use their land and resources as monetary value.

    This afternoon, members of the media who were at the press conference were handed a copy of the MOU which contains a signature under the name Dr. Ray. C. Dam. The document under the The Office Of International Treasury Control ( ITC ) header also shows its offices based in Malaysia, Netherlands, USA, Australia, and Ecuador, however no information on the company or Dr. Dam is available at this stage.

    The MOU states that OITC will provide total 2.805 billion (USD) for an acquisition of trucks and timber milling plant and equipment for landowners, development of a Community Aged Center, development of community owned tourist and resort centre construction of modern prisons for Fiji and reforestation programme through TRIUNION INVESTMENT HOLDING COMPANY and the resource owners association.

    Meanwhile, Fiji Police are now seeking the assistance of their overseas counterparts to try and establish the authenticity of the claims being made by foreign national Dr. Keith Scott and the background of his company called The Office Of International Treasury Control ( ITC ).

    Director CID Joe Rasiga has confirmed with Legend FM news that a weeks search for information on Dr. Keith Francis Scott and The Office Of International Treasury Control ( ITC ) has been fruitless and now INTERPOL has been called in.

    Reference

    http://www.fijivillage.com/artman/publish/article_27562.shtml


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    studiorat wrote: »
    Looking in the wrong direction as usual...



    He's about as intermarried with the Rothschilds as I am. His great great grandfathers second cousin married the daughter of a Rothschild about 120 years ago. :rolleyes:





    Reference

    http://www.fijivillage.com/artman/publish/article_27562.shtml

    133809.jpg

    James told ZDNet UK that he had not been approached by the UNOITC, and that there were no links between Foundation X and UNOITC.

    Are the ITC, OITC and the UNIOTC one and the same?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,405 ✭✭✭gizmo


    uprising2 wrote: »
    Are the ITC, OITC and the UNIOTC one and the same?
    From the various articles I've read, yes. They claim they are chartered by the UN, hence the UNOITC, their website has a logo which just says ITC and the O could be just people shortening their name.

    As for the Fiji connection, it sure does read like one hell of a scam.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It's odd that whoever is behind OITC has, to this day been able to attempt to con numerous countries and companies while at the same time claim to be connected to the UN; without the UN actually using its resources to put a stop to it. And it can't be that the UN simply don't see them as anything to worry about, given that they have had to, at various times; confirm that they are in no way connected to OITC and that the charter no. they provide does not exist.

    Surely Interpol should be all over them? I'm guessing they are indeed monitoring the group to some degree, which makes me doubt even further that they are 'Foundation X'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭RGDATA!


    It's odd that whoever is behind OITC has, to this day been able to attempt to con numerous countries and companies while at the same time claim to be connected to the UN; without the UN actually using its resources to put a stop to it.................

    Surely Interpol should be all over them?

    There doesn't seem to be much info about how the various stories of OTIC are linked - i.e. what evidence is there that the same people that put the bid in for GM Rover were the ones that tried to scam the Fijiians?
    The Rover bid reads like a hoax rather than a scam to me - somebody wanted to see how far they could take it, was able to pull off being taken seriously up to a certain point.
    The other stuff they're linked with, at least on wikipedia, seems like typical "419/we will give you millions if you send us a few quid first" scams, although in the Fijian case on quite a high level.
    Not much about them makes sense based on what's wikipedia. Not much to link the different things they're accused of apart from the common name, which proves nothing really.

    As for the Lord James allegations - sensational if true obviously, but the first question that springs to mind is why this Foundation X approach this guy to make their offer. Makes very little sense to me. He seems to think he's important enough and makes more sensational claims about his past (re IRA etc) to back this up, but I find that stuff hard to believe. I hope more information is forthcoming, it's a bizarre but interesting story. I would imagine part of the reason for the "non-reaction" to his comments when he made them in the house was because a lot of people would have been stunned, and unsure if maybe the guy was being taken for a ride by someone or losing the plot a bit. Obviously once the allegations are made in a forum like that you would hope they are investigated openly.
    Most of what he has said is pretty vague - this Foundation X is secret, yet they can get references from "top level" world figures in business, yet the Brits have never heard of them.
    I'd lean strongly towards this Lord James being scammed/hoaxed by someone.


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    RGDATA! wrote: »
    There doesn't seem to be much info about how the various stories of OTIC are linked - i.e. what evidence is there that the same people that put the bid in for GM Rover were the ones that tried to scam the Fijiians?

    There is a good timeline here. Exactly the kind of weird **** that interests me.
    http://amkon.net/strange-bedfellows-gfvn-saint-t25204.html?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/communication-breakdown-10000030/treasury-has-decided-not-to-pursue-22bn-foundation-x-proposal-10020975/
    According to the spokesperson, Treasury commercial secretary Lord Sassoon has "looked into Lord James of Blackheath's proposal, and has decided not to pursue the matter any further".

    "At no point has Lord Sassoon, or any Treasury officials, held any meetings with Lord James of Blackheath or any organisation that he mentions on this subject," the spokesperson added.

    Well that's that then :rolleyes:

    Anyone else simply not believe that no meeting took place? I highly doubt that he would have said they attended a meeting unless there was some truth in it. Maybe they're too embarrassed to let on that they were being taken for a ride


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,405 ✭✭✭gizmo


    God, it's like P-P-P-P-P-Powerbook all over again. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 728 ✭✭✭joebucks


    http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/communication-breakdown-10000030/treasury-has-decided-not-to-pursue-22bn-foundation-x-proposal-10020975/



    Well that's that then :rolleyes:

    Anyone else simply not believe that no meeting took place? I highly doubt that he would have said they attended a meeting unless there was some truth in it. Maybe they're too embarrassed to let on that they were being taken for a ride

    Hey Url.. what happened to your thread about editing Lord Blackheath's Wikipaedia page??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭Duiske


    According to the spokesperson, Treasury commercial secretary Lord Sassoon has "looked into Lord James of Blackheath's proposal, and has decided not to pursue the matter any further".

    "At no point has Lord Sassoon, or any Treasury officials, held any meetings with Lord James of Blackheath or any organisation that he mentions on this subject," the spokesperson added.

    Think we can put this one down to the 'oul "senile demented" syndrome. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    joebucks wrote: »
    Hey Url.. what happened to your thread about editing Lord Blackheath's Wikipaedia page??

    I asked to have it removed. I was too hasty in starting it and should have discussed it on Wiki before coming here to moan about it =p Wales actually tidied it up a bit in the end and added more credible sources than myself


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 728 ✭✭✭joebucks


    I asked to have it removed. I was too hasty in starting it and should have discussed it on Wiki before coming here to moan about it =p Wales actually tidied it up a bit in the end and added more credible sources than myself

    Aha cool. I was beginning to wonder if there was even such a thread in the first place!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement