Gaming Humour

Skerries

Serbian News

Mr E

NoviGlitzko

Retr0gamer

I'm not one to approve of vandalism but at least this guy has taste.

dudeeile

Skerries

Zero-Cool

Skerries

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY_CsaGWH38

Burgo

Skerries

[NSFW]

new game released

http://store.steampowered.com/app/545250/

dreamers75

Nerdkiller1991

YouSavedMyLife

Nerdkiller1991 wrote: »

Man. Toshiro Mifune, what a ****ing guy

dudeeile

Playing with your high level friend.

jenearl

dudeeile wrote: »

Playing with your high level friend.

hahaha call it opportunism

challengemaster

Zero-Cool

Skerries

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

K.O.Kiki

challengemaster wrote: »

PC >>> console

SeantheMan

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

PC >>> console

-- Well....UT came out on PC and not a console.
So users were able to make maps/mods for the games as they wanted.
GOW was released on console, people don't have access to mod tools so they can't make or add content.

-- PC has always been online and connected to the net, so 99% of games are usually free to play online.

The subscription mentioned for GOW was XBox Live I assume, which is to pay for servers and all other online content they provide, that 'subscription' was not a Gears of War subscription.

-- I don't know about the price, but $60 is standard and has been for a long time for AAA games.

-- With regards to all the maps in UT2004, the game was a multiplayer based game, I owned it on release...I don't think it was 109 different maps...maybe variations of the same map over different modes.
The single player wasn't great at all.

GOW had a great single player campaign which was the main selling point of the game for many, the multi-player was an excellent too.

Blazer

I was gonna say there was maybe only 10 that I remember but looking at this..damn its a lot

https://liandri.beyondunreal.com/Unreal_Tournament_2004#Assault

gizmo

SeantheMan wrote: »

<Sensible Reply>

Oh, you took it seriously, I thought the joke was that someone was stupid enough to make that hilariously off base comparison and ask that inane question at the end in the first place.

Stone Deaf 4evr

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

PC >>> console

nothing like a pc vs console post to take the humor out of the humor tread. :rolleyes:

K.O.Kiki

SeantheMan wrote: »

-- Well....UT came out on PC and not a console.
So users were able to make maps/mods for the games as they wanted.
GOW was released on console, people don't have access to mod tools so they can't make or add content.

-- PC has always been online and connected to the net, so 99% of games are usually free to play online.

The subscription mentioned for GOW was XBox Live I assume, which is to pay for servers and all other online content they provide, that 'subscription' was not a Gears of War subscription.

-- I don't know about the price, but $60 is standard and has been for a long time for AAA games.

-- With regards to all the maps in UT2004, the game was a multiplayer based game, I owned it on release...I don't think it was 109 different maps...maybe variations of the same map over different modes.
The single player wasn't great at all.

GOW had a great single player campaign which was the main selling point of the game for many, the multi-player was an excellent too.

Stone Deaf 4evr wrote: »

nothing like a pc vs console post to take the humor out of the humor tread. :rolleyes:

I simplified it, but the gist is that console shooters are more expensive & less feature-rich, due to the limitations of their platform.

And therefore PC is, objectively, superior.

kunst nugget

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

I simplified it, but the gist is that console shooters are more expensive & less feature-rich, due to the limitations of their platform.

And therefore PC is, objectively, superior.

Wasn't very funny though…

SolvableKnave

Stone Deaf 4evr wrote: »

nothing like a pc vs console post to take the humor out of the humor tread. :rolleyes:

I was gonna say something about it being lucky it was consoles in general, and not, say, ..... xbox. :rolleyes:

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

I simplified it, but the gist is that console shooters are more expensive & less feature-rich, due to the limitations of their platform.

And therefore PC is, objectively, superior.

Then, this gem.

Penn

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

I simplified it, but the gist is that console shooters are more expensive & less feature-rich, due to the limitations of their platform.

And therefore PC is, objectively, superior.

Sabre0001

kunst nugget

Sabre0001 wrote: »

I bet most of those guys are now shivering in mass recycling bins wondering why their masters abandoned them…

Dave_The_Sheep

kunst nugget wrote: »

I bet most of those guys are now shivering in mass recycling bins wondering why their masters abandoned them…

Ah here, there was no call for that.