Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A few for C&C

  • 03-12-2010 12:40am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭


    Apple

    053B709A39E748F5899035185EFD2D58-0000319883-0002060969-00800L-33C6A48DEFFE4F6FA3683DC8B367612F.jpg

    Empire State

    555766C9535446449B67BBBBAC33428E-0000319883-0002060963-00800L-D21AC6E193164F2E8E2D86823BBE615C.jpg

    Stars

    3CCEB00C7D514CB1891F61CA328A0E70-0000319883-0002060953-00800L-93FD0CBBD3C64690892A72C548C14609.jpg

    Time Square

    3522A5A5379D4F319D3DF969C865B357-0000319883-0002060949-00800L-43F0F0FCC6814EB89BD8C943A604C7F6.jpg

    Thanks


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Danbo!


    2&3 are nice shots. Empire state one is a bit cliche, but it's been around for quite some time it's hard to get a unique shot. Good capture though. I like the colours in no. 3.

    For 1, try flipping it. The apple logo is quite well known and it being backwards it stands out a little, for me anyway. Otherwise a nice shot.

    4 looks a little snap-shot like, nothing really standing out to me. At a first glance it seemed crooked, but after looking closely it seems straight, not sure why I had that initial impression. Maybe try cropping with perspective on in photoshop an try to make it a 2 point perspective, make those vertical lines truly vertical, it does wonders for architectural photography.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭Thecageyone


    Love the vibrancy of the third shot. The empire state one, hmmm, not sure. There's something about the angle, and I'd prefer a little room above the spire so it didn't feel so cramped. Nice exposure though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭zdooldreb


    Cheers for the replies.

    I flipped the 1st one
    11FF1D871AF249CFA022CAAEFBFCE158-0000319883-0002062732-00800L-301476C5B2B64B57B27288A161596B20.jpg

    2nd one is probably a bit cliche but hey its not everyday you get to take a photo of the Empire State building so I was mainly hoping for sharpness.
    I put together a pano as well but im pee'd that the sides aren't sharp

    E747CA6CE6B541969CFBECA569985162-0000319883-0002060964-00800L-F7FF82A080884600B7917B1335449FAA.jpg


    4th one, this was my first attempt at this kind of shot. I had no tripod so was just hoping for a sharp-ish background with movement in the foreground, maybe this one is better...

    9DB54C0D1B18459CA0BAB14DA1CC9C18-0000319883-0002060946-00800L-1ED5257A21E44F9B9111331643AEF3D1.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    zdooldreb wrote: »
    Empire State

    555766C9535446449B67BBBBAC33428E-0000319883-0002060963-00800L-D21AC6E193164F2E8E2D86823BBE615C.jpg

    I'd suggest going a lot easier on the post-processing here. The sky looks weird and noisey (might just be ISO...but you had to have had a tripod so why is the ISO so high?) and there's a dark halo around the ESB (heh), and an odd blueish halo around that.

    I quite like stars.

    EDIT: Yeah, I check the exif. Your exposure was 2.5 seconds so definitely a tripod or wall balance job. The ISO is 500...why not put it to 100 and go for another couple of seconds on the exposure?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭Thecageyone


    Yup, if it's on a tripod, which it obviously was, or at least stabilised and you used the timer? either way, ISO should be kept to a minimum for long exposure, or you're battling with all kinds of leaks in light.

    If I was taking this shot, on a tripod, I'd go 10 seconds plus, with ISO at a min, and aperture narrowed to something like f/18 - f/22. I see you had it at f/13. Fine for dark landscapes but for night time long exposures you really do need it very narrow to contain light spillage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭zdooldreb


    I see the halo your talking about. I actually didn't do very much pp on it, just a small bit in levels so im not sure why the halo is there. The sky was pretty much that color. Didn't mean the ISO to be high, was meant to be 400. Reason I didn't go to 200 was because it was very windy on the top of the Rockefeller center and I didn't want to go much slower than 2.5 secs as I only had a gorrillapod with me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭Thecageyone


    2.5 secs @ 100 ISO should have been fine? You could have tried widening the aperture I guess. Night shooting is tough, trial and error usually dictates how we get results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭zdooldreb


    Im thinking it would of been too dark and would of needed a longer shutter time? Or as you said a wider aperture but I was trying to keep this narrow to maintain DOF? But I know what ya mean about the trial and error, I must of taken 30 shots (excluding ones I deleted straight away) of the ESB and what u see is the best of them. I couldn't take anymore or my fingers were going to fall off!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭Thecageyone


    You don't have a remote shutter release? Or just use the timer setting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭zdooldreb


    Ye I was using a remote shutter release. Just looked at the unprocessed pic from the camera and the halo is there, weird!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    zdooldreb wrote: »
    Or as you said a wider aperture but I was trying to keep this narrow to maintain DOF?

    You don't really need to worry about DOF when you're shooting buildings from a mile away. You don't want to push the aperture all the way open for other reasons though, mostly because most lenses will get a little soft and/or distorted wide open.


Advertisement