Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back a page or two to re-sync the thread and this will then show latest posts. Thanks, Mike.

UFC/MMA Gambling. **NO AFTER-TIMING**

17980828485190

Comments

  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr. Manager


    El Guapo! wrote: »
    I agree 100%
    I often place bets on long shots if the price is right. It's the fight game and everyone has a punchers chance. If the price is attractive enough then sometimes it's worthwhile throwing on a very small bet. It pays off from time to time.
    But like you say, any sizeable bet against Rousey is pretty crazy.

    Yeah and as soon as I hit "place bet" I fully accepted that that's money I'll never see again.

    I'll always shout for Ronda too. She's a class act and a pleasure to watch (no sexual intentions with that one).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    El Guapo! wrote: »
    I agree 100%
    I often place bets on long shots if the price is right. It's the fight game and everyone has a punchers chance. If the price is attractive enough then sometimes it's worthwhile throwing on a very small bet. It pays off from time to time.
    But like you say, any sizeable bet against Rousey is pretty crazy.
    The size of the bet changes nothing. It's either a good price or a bad price. If it's throwing away $100, then it's equally throwing away $10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,438 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    Mellor wrote: »
    The size of the bet changes nothing. It's either a good price or a bad price. If it's throwing away $100, then it's equally throwing away $10.

    The point we were making is that it's easier to stomach losing €10 rather than €100.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr. Manager


    Mellor wrote: »
    The size of the bet changes nothing. It's either a good price or a bad price. If it's throwing away $100, then it's equally throwing away $10.

    Not really. Throwing away €1 isn't the same as throwing away €10,000. Monetary wise it's not. That's the point that I was getting at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭but1er


    Anyone fancy anything on Saturday??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭smilerf


    but1er wrote: »
    Anyone fancy anything on Saturday??
    Rondas bum :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    El Guapo! wrote: »
    The point we were making is that it's easier to stomach losing €10 rather than €100.

    Yeah I got that. Easier to stomach doesn't make it any better of a bet. You said yourself it was throwing money away.

    You see it all the time, people post some nonsense accumulator, because its "worth a $5". Same people betting on the lotto etc. The bookies probably make more from bets like that than $100 shots.
    Not really. Throwing away €1 isn't the same as throwing away €10,000. Monetary wise it's not. That's the point that I was getting at.
    Monetary wise it's obviously not the same cash value. That means nothing in regards to value though.


    If you are planning on having a Holm bet for the laugh.
    Then consider Holm by KO at 11/1, or even rd1 at 27/1
    As realistically that's the only way its happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Jose Aldo at 6/4 is insane


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,456 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Mellor wrote: »
    You see it all the time, people post some nonsense accumulator, because its "worth a $5". Same people betting on the lotto etc. The bookies probably make more from bets like that than $100 shot

    You have to realise that whatever the cost of them, if you can afford to lose, it's only really a bit of craic. I always do them in MMA and football because it gets me interested in fights and matches I wouldn't have looked at. Don't let it bother you; live and let lose! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,438 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    Mellor wrote: »
    Yeah I got that. Easier to stomach doesn't make it any better of a bet. You said yourself it was throwing money away.

    You see it all the time, people post some nonsense accumulator, because its "worth a $5". Same people betting on the lotto etc. The bookies probably make more from bets like that than $100 shots.

    Of course it doesn't make it a better bet. But like I said, the point we were getting at is that while the bet is unlikely to come in, the long odds would make it attractive to place a small bet on.

    Look at it this way.... if there was a two horse race, one horse is the clear favourite while the other is a massive underdog at 50/1, I'd obviously back the favourite but it's also worth sticking a very small bet on the other horse. Stranger things have happened. Doesn't mean it's a good bet though.

    Also the amount wagered does matter. A small bet of a couple of quid on a long shot is fun to do and it will come in on the rare occasion. But a big amount wagered on the same bet suggests some confidence in the bet.
    Not sure what the lotto has to do with anything tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Mellor wrote: »
    Jose Aldo at 6/4 is insane

    I think he'll get even longer. I could actually see him hitting 2/1 before the sharps load on Aldo on fight night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    martyos121 wrote: »
    You have to realise that whatever the cost of them, if you can afford to lose, it's only really a bit of craic. I always do them in MMA and football because it gets me interested in fights and matches I wouldn't have looked at. Don't let it bother you; live and let lose! :pac:
    I get the idea it's a bit of craic no issue with that, but that doesn't make what I said not true. I'm talking about people convincing themselves that a long shot equals value.
    And it genuinely doesn't bother me one bit, I'm happy to punt away at roulette/virtual dogs/South African chariot racing for the craic.
    El Guapo! wrote: »
    Look at it this way.... if there was a two horse race, one horse is the clear favourite while the other is a massive underdog at 50/1, I'd obviously back the favourite but it's also worth sticking a very small bet on the other horse. Stranger things have happened. Doesn't mean it's a good bet though.
    Betting on both horses in a two horse race is just silly ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Paully D wrote: »
    I think he'll get even longer. I could actually see him hitting 2/1 before the sharps load on Aldo on fight night.

    Man, if I see 2/1 come up, I'll be hard pressed not to drop a sizeable bet on it


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr. Manager


    Mellor wrote: »
    I get the idea it's a bit of craic no issue with that, but that doesn't make what I said not true. I'm talking about people convincing themselves that a long shot equals value.
    And it genuinely doesn't bother me one bit, I'm happy to punt away at roulette/virtual dogs/South African chariot racing for the craic.

    I could be wrong but I'm pretty certain no one said it was value...


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭tinpib


    Okey dokey less than 90 minutes to KO in Japan. What's the consensus for tonight?

    Edit: I'm just looking to have an extra bit of interest before the McGregor fight. Also maybe this has been answered before, I haven't read the whole thread, but what time is Conor fighting at?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭themandan6611


    tinpib wrote: »
    Okey dokey less than 90 minutes to KO in Japan. What's the consensus for tonight?

    Edit: I'm just looking to have an extra bit of interest before the McGregor fight. Also maybe this has been answered before, I haven't read the whole thread, but what time is Conor fighting at?

    weak attempt, pitiful i reckon


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭tinpib


    weak attempt, pitiful i reckon

    I agree that it could use some work and maybe some fresh ideas.

    Anyway, any thoughts on tonight? Would be curious to hear any input. Really looking forward to it. Absence makes the heart grow fonder.

    Maybe we were spoiled with cards happening 5/6 weeks in a row and then a gap of a week and then another 5/6 weeks in a row.

    Scant cards recently and for another month or so.

    Myself and my mate were jabbering away last night reckoning that ufc should be on every week at more or less the same time. They probably are aiming for that? And in the nt so distant future that would happen.

    I guess the danger is in spreading it too thin, but I would pretty much half-watch any ufc at that time on a Saturday.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 10,462 Mod ✭✭✭✭Axwell


    This is the gambling thread, you seem a bit lost.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭tinpib


    Axwell wrote: »
    This is the gambling thread, you seem a bit lost.

    Maybe I rambled on a bit but I was looking for some gambling advice for tonight's card.

    Would like to hear anyone's thoughts?

    I'm clicking away here putting an accumulator together, might aswell be roulette though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭tinpib


    Right e o. Looks like I'm the only one here.

    So we have the following:

    Shinso Anzai @ 1.83
    Kajan Johnson @ 1.33
    Nick Hein @ 1.3
    Li Jingling @ 1.36
    Brandao in rd1 @2.87
    Mousasi in rd 1 @ 4.33

    Go team tinpib!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 10,462 Mod ✭✭✭✭Axwell


    tinpib wrote: »
    Right e o. Looks like I'm the only one here.

    You arent but you were talking a lot of non gambling waffle.

    Stuck an MOV accumulator on for the craic

    Teruto Ishihara on Points @ 9/2
    Diego Brandao by KO @ 13/8
    George Roop by Submission @ 17/2
    Kyoji Horiguchi on Points @ 5/6
    Gegard Mousasi on Points @ evens

    €10 returns 5k.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,432 ✭✭✭weemcd


    Did a 10er double of Hall and Barnett fight to not go the distance.

    Couldn't resist the price Hall was at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,914 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    only thing catching my eye so far at the weekend is the 6/4 about cariaso beating sergio pettis, a price I just took with hills

    first I don't rate sergio pettis very highly and secondly cariaso has been in there with some of the best and all his losses have been against guys on a different level to sergio pettis
    I can't see why he's such an underdog but maybe the price is based on reputation with pettis?
    no prices available on mov yet which I'm guessing may well be pts

    outside of that maybe a few obvious ones
    namajunas, hendricks looks almost bombproof, maybe cormier does also but my desire to see gus win means I don't want to bet on that one and the price isn't that attractive on dc anyway
    tempted to go with reshad but if it means I have even have to half watch that one then I think I'll avoid it altogether


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,456 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Mellor wrote: »

    Not saying he's definitely going to move up to LW and definitely not saying hes going to walk straight into a title shot when he does, but RDA at 50/1 is severely overpriced. Couldn't resist a flutter on that one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭but1er


    All other 10/1 is that anyone after the first 4?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,576 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    but1er wrote: »
    All other 10/1 is that anyone after the first 4?

    Anyone not listed. So anyone other than the 10 fighters there.

    So for 10/1 you get Barao, Guida, Swanson, stephens, Bermudez etc


    Does he move up if he wins or loses?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,456 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Mellor wrote: »
    Anyone not listed. So anyone other than the 10 fighters there.

    So for 10/1 you get Barao, Guida, Swanson, stephens, Bermudez etc


    Does he move up if he wins or loses?

    Unless they want to really test him and give him Frankie, a move up is the only option. Sure he could fight Holloway again, but I don't see it ending too differently to last time, bar the injury of course.

    There's bias in my post though, because I am obsessed with seeing McGregor vs. Pettis, that would be incredible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭akelly02


    is gustaffson not a massive price at 12/5?? he towers all over DC, he will find it hard to take him down i think


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭Hoki


    I dont think DC is going to have much trouble taking down Gus tbh....


Advertisement