Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Lens question IS V DC

  • 30-12-2010 11:19am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,003 ✭✭✭✭


    What is the difference between an is and dc lens?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    I don't know, what is the difference? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,584 ✭✭✭PCPhoto


    One is a Canon term (IS)

    and the other is a Nikon term (DC)

    IS = Image stabilization

    DC = Defocus Control*

    *=I'm open to correction on that - I'm a Canon user so had to actually google to find it out....apologies to all nikonites out there.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Canon do IS and DO lenses.
    Nikon have VR lenses as an equivalent to IS but don't offer an equivalent to DO AFAIK.

    IS and VR are active methods to reduce shake by stabilizing the optics in the lens with a gyro.

    DO is a funky thing. It stands for diffractive optics. It uses jagged shaped lenses and standard refractive optics to reduce chromatic aberration. It also appears to make the resulting lens shorter and lighter than it's standard refractive counter parts.

    Nikon DC is as PCPhoto has said is Defocus Control. I clever way to change the out of focus bits on an image without affecting the in focus bits.

    Canon don't appear to do DC and Nikon don't appear to do DO so they're not worth comparing. VR and IS are very similar and their respective takes on it and resulting performance is worth a fanboy flame war.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,003 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    This DC lens is on a canon camera. Just wondering what the difference is as I'm considering buying one.

    Canon EOS 500D with 18-55 DC Lens

    http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/78164/show.html


    http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/76113/show.html


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    That's a typo, there is only the 18-55 Mk II which is non-IS and the Mk III which is IS.
    You can see the IS and non-IS models by simply looking at the text on the front of the lens in image on the webpage.

    The Mk III isn't supposed to be half bad, but in general the Canon kit lenses are rubbish.

    EDIT: Okay a google search brings this up:
    http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_18-55_3p5-5p6_is_c16/

    The lens has a "DC micro motor" autofocus motor instead of Canon's fancier Ultrasonic system.
    The IS model is the newer version of the same lens.

    TBH I'd get the body only 500D and a 17-55 f2.8 IS.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,003 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    5uspect wrote: »
    That's a typo, there is only the 18-55 Mk II which is non-IS and the Mk III which is IS.
    You can see the IS and non-IS models by simply looking at the text on the front of the lens in image on the webpage.

    The Mk III isn't supposed to be half bad, but in general the Canon kit lenses are rubbish.

    EDIT: Okay a google search brings this up:
    http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_18-55_3p5-5p6_is_c16/

    The lens has a "DC micro motor" autofocus motor instead of Canon's fancier Ultrasonic system.
    The IS model is the newer version of the same lens.

    TBH I'd get the body only 500D and a 17-55 f2.8 IS.


    Thanks for the info and advice, it's appreciated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    5uspect wrote: »
    TBH I'd get the body only 500D and a 17-55 f2.8 IS.
    Super lens by all accounts, but damned expensive for an EF-S!


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    [hushed]They say it's L quality[/hushed]


Advertisement