Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ivan Yates - Celtic Bookmakers

13»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Uh, you know... the slot machines have already 'landed'. They've been here for years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 936 ✭✭✭Fentdog84


    +100. Post of the decade, the amount of horrible Irish begrudgery here is sickening, extended in the most sense by smarmy armchair consultants who smugly sit back in their PAYE jobs, all kindly provided by people like Ivan Yates.

    We've a long way to go yet in this country, it's no wonder the only hope for us on the jobs front is to import a "can-do" attitude by f*cking our IDA funds at people with a real entrepreneurial spirit in order to get their their FDI into Ireland.

    What dosent sit easily with me and a lot of people is that Ivan Yates is/was a politician turned bookie. If it were the other way round he may have more sympathy. let me explain this:
    When he started Celtic Bookmakers, he was still a politician and most likely used his political connections and influence to give him a leg up in the business world. Bookmakers is a very difficult industry to break into at a large scale and make no mistake you would need some powerful connections to get any kind of a foothold in that door. A real enterpreneur in my eyes is somebody who starts from zero and builds their business up through their own hard work, business intuition and dedication. Yes Yates created a lot of employment through his enterprise but it all seemed to be built on quicksand and for me he didnt seem to be fully focussed on his business rather than courting his own media image. Look i hate to see anyone failing in business and people losing their jobs but along with the daily revelations of excess from the political classes I hold minimal sympathy for Yates who is in my eyes, just another an opportunistic shyster, which most bookies are in any case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭bitter


    paulaa wrote: »
    The problem, looking at the bigger picture, is that is usually a minority that holds a country back or destroys it altogether. That's a quote from a friend in the US I sent a link to this thread. He was surprised at some of the attitudes he read here as he thought Ireland had moved on from the bigotry and "pigs in the parlour" mentality as he put it


    The Celtic Tiger was the classic "lipstick on a pig" mentality. Now it's back to the usual "put upon peasant" mentality of sneering at success & successful people. There is always a self-destruct mindset in Irish people and until that 'defect of character' is erased then Ireland will never progress the way it should.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭dermo88


    I have to sympathise with Ivan Yates, and compliment him on his honesty and decency in holding his hands up and taking responsibility. I hope that Karma rewards this conduct and he bounces back somehow.

    I think the problem was an outdated business model. Internet bookmaking costs a lot of money to set up, and the expertise in the field is relatively scarce. The costs of advertising are very high also. I think this acted as a disincentive to Celtic Racing to change their business model.

    High Street betting offices, generally have relatively poor and potentially risky working conditions, in terms of security.

    The days of the High Street betting office are numbered. It is nice to have one as a social outlet, when it is next to a pub, and you can pop in and have a tenner on the horses / soccer over a few pints. But then, I could so all that online, with a broadband Internet connection and a debit card in the same pub, get the best price from a variety of International bookmakers, take all bets from the barman and his mates, give them a better price than the bookies next door, and gouge perhaps 1-2% extra for myself in the process. Once the volume is sufficient, its worth my while doing that.

    BUT the average size of bet taken in High Street betting offices has declined over the years in real terms. This is particularly evident after the emergence of the Internet.

    The advent of Betfair means that essentially, the lines between bookmaker and punter are blurred. The traditional old style bookmaker needs large reserves of cash capital to ensure against "Nuclear" scenarios such as Frankie Dettori's 'magnificent seven' at Ascot (28.09.1996). There also needs to be credit lines between small bookmakers and larger as lay off facilities, just like banking to an extent. There also needs to be decent expertise in risk control, bookmaking, sports. Which.....incidentally does not come cheap, and those who try doing bookmaking on the cheap, or take shortcuts will get their ar$es kicked.

    Celtic was competing with a shrinking pie. In the early 1990's, chains of 3-5 betting shops were common enough in Ireland. These have been taken over by major congomerates, such as Paddy Power, William Hill, Ladbrokes whose reserves dwarf the likes of Celtic, and the average Irish Main Street can only support one betting office, taking 100,000 (Euro) a week, with 4 staff at 7% profit margin before expenses, rental and taxes.

    The begrudging remarks are repulsive, and represent the worst of Irish begrudgery. But it sums up my somewhat cynical outlook on recent events and history. It may be flippant and a bit politically incorrect.

    "You'll happily take the bastard rejects of Cuba, and pretend they are from Limerick, and let the best of Wexford leave and go to America"

    Well.....one became the DeValera's and started Fianna Fail. The other.....the Kennedy's. The rest.....history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Fat_Fingers


    I see Ivan as someone who build his connections and used them when to start the business as he exited politics. Then he tried to get rich quick and failed. But why did he not concentrate on the business rather than pontificating on the radio? If he was 100% dedicated to running his business i think this would maybe not happened. Mind you, personal guaranties he gave are puzzling , either he’s very naive; inexperienced or just listened to the wrong advice. Or the buffer of ministerial pension clouded his judgment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭paulaa


    I see Ivan as someone who build his connections and used them when to start the business as he exited politics. Then he tried to get rich quick and failed. But why did he not concentrate on the business rather than pontificating on the radio? If he was 100% dedicated to running his business i think this would maybe not happened. Mind you, personal guaranties he gave are puzzling , either he’s very naive; inexperienced or just listened to the wrong advice. Or the buffer of ministerial pension clouded his judgment.

    Do you know the facts ?
    Ivan started his bookmaking business 23 years ago, not in the last few years. His family had been in business for generations so he didn't need to build up anything.

    His business was a family business and was also run by his son and wife , very capable people. Unless you think women can't run a business ?

    Personal guarantees are very common particularly in family run businesses. I heard a figure of 1200 businesses quoted on the radio a few days ago, all family business which have gone to the wall in the last year and where personal guarantees were given.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Fat_Fingers


    paulaa wrote: »
    Do you know the facts ?
    Ivan started his bookmaking business 23 years ago, not in the last few years. His family had been in business for generations so he didn't need to build up anything.

    Thanks for the clarification. Didn't know that. They way it failed then still smells of get rich quick.
    His business was a family business and was also run by his son and wife , very capable people. Unless you think women can't run a business?
    lol, You corrected some of my wrong assumption then you tell me that business is actually run by son and wife which i didn’t know and you follow that up with accusing me been chauvinist ?!?!? Where did that come from ?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭paulaa


    Thanks for the clarification. Didn't know that. They way it failed then still smells of get rich quick.


    lol, You corrected some of my wrong assumption then you tell me that business is actually run by son and wife which i didn’t know and you follow that up with accusing me been chauvinist ?!?!? Where did that come from ?!

    23 years is a long time to "get rich quick"

    Did you miss the question mark at the end of my sentence ? Last time I looked a question is not an accusation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Fat_Fingers


    paulaa wrote: »
    23 years is a long time to "get rich quick"
    His family had been in business for generations

    It’s the curse of the 3rd generation .
    In Italy there is expression “ the first generation builds, the second generation maintains and the third generation destroys”

    Did you miss the question mark at the end of my sentence ? Last time I looked a question is not an accusation.

    Your original remark was completely uncalled for , backpedalling with sentence structures and grammar does not make it valid argument.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,737 ✭✭✭MidlandsM


    Or the buffer of ministerial pension clouded his judgment.

    Fat Finger, you talk some amount of bollox. He only gets 48k pension, hardly a massive wedge to buffer millions of borrowings.:rolleyes:
    ohhh, and yes, he's a bookie for 23years as you were rightly corrected.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,710 ✭✭✭flutered


    as i am just back from sunnier climes i haqve not heard all that ivan yeats has said, my take on this is he opened shops ie expansion, very high overheads, a shrinking market, ie people out of work, if one looks at the results one has to notice that punters are only backing two horses in most races, a bookmaker is no longer a bookmaker, because he cannot make a book, there is no profit margain, quite a few on course bookmakers have given up their licences, settlers have taken wage cuts, expenses have still risen, until the online tax problem is rectified more of this is on the offing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Fat_Fingers


    MidlandsM wrote: »
    Fat Finger, you talk some amount of bollox. He only gets 48k pension, hardly a massive wedge to buffer millions of borrowings.:rolleyes:
    ohhh, and yes, he's a bookie for 23years as you were rightly corrected.

    SO what is your point?!

    23 years in business and then runs it into the ground. 23 years of experience not worth much then. Anyway, bid deal, we wouldn’t be talking about this if it wasn’t the Great Ivan himself. Roll you eyes as much as you want but he doesn’t sound like a great businessman as he makes himself to be when he’s on the radio pontificating and tearing people to shreds for exact the same. Turns out Ivan is the same as people he was so vocal about.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,737 ✭✭✭MidlandsM


    SO what is your point?!

    I made my point...that you talk bollox:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Doesn't disguise the fact that greed represented by rapid and unsustainable expansion, was a big factor in the collapse.
    I wouldn't be that quick to blame greed on businesses expanding too quickly. Its the natural train of thought for most people upon building a successful, profitable business to consider next how to continue building it. In this regard success can be more dangerous than failure, one of the most important lessons to learn about business, in that the operation gets overextended, then the projections don't quite come up to expectations, and you're left not with a profitable business on a grander scale, but a slew of obligations that can't be met.

    It's kind of an amateur mistake, so I'm somewhat surprised that he went for it, but then again he's far from alone in that.


Advertisement