Always wear a condom.

Iwannahurl

Kiera wrote: »

It appears your meaning of funny and mine are totally different.

Well fancy that.

Kiera wrote: »

I think CPR is required, Doc.

That CPR is a bit slow in coming. Must be HSE issue.

Kiera

Iwannahurl wrote: »

Well fancy that.
That CPR is a bit slow in coming. Must be HSE issue.

Its ok to admit that some things go over your head.

Iwannahurl

Kiera wrote: »

Its ok to admit that some things go over your head.

I admit that does!

User Friendly

gsxr1 wrote: »

I got banned here. From a pet forum

<snip>


If I told you why you would not believe me . You have to look

thats ridiculous and clearly that Moderator has lost the run of themselves,bring this to the attention of the Admins

Rabies

I'll put my mod hat back on.
This is not the place to complain about bans or infractions. Please use DRP, Feedback, Help Desk or if you make it, Prison.

Post deleted

Rabies

Now get back to having fun

TheZohanS

I think it's funny when users get sitebanned for a while, say they're neva eva coming back, throw their toys out of the pram and then when their ban is over they come crawling back.

Kiera

Ah, baiting people again. Some people will never learn

Gunsfortoys

Dravokivich wrote: »

asking for a good recipe with dogs?

We should have a Korea forum for that in fairness.

Rabies

Gunsfortoys wrote: »

We should have a Korea forum for that in fairness.

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=469

FreudianSlippers

dontmindme wrote: »

Just in....Mods are b*stards













:eek:

You're too kind.

Gunsfortoys

Rabies wrote: »

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=469

Guaranteed if I put up a thread in there looking for dog recipes it won't go down too well!:D

marco_polo

TheZohan wrote: »

I think it's funny when users get sitebanned for a while, say they're neva eva coming back, throw their toys out of the pram and then when their ban is over they come crawling back.

What is even more fun is trying to guess what the old banned username used to be for posters with < 10 posts who start threads giving out about boards/moderator opression etc.

tbh

superfish wrote: »

I got banned from the pet fourm because I told some smug prick I was going to snap their puppys neck it was so worth it permanent ban.......gigity gigity oh yea

can I just ask - how do you come up with your material?
"Snap their puppys neck" - that stuff is genius. "take that you smug prick!"

deadly.

Rabies

Gunsfortoys wrote: »

Guaranteed if I put up a thread in there looking for dog recipes it won't go down too well!:D

True, you'll get eaten.

Kiera

TheZohan wrote: »

I'll do something in FeedBack when I get time.

Where's your shinny new thread in Feedback? We're all waiting.....

FreudianSlippers

Kiera wrote: »

How about Dannii?

She's a no-talent, coat-tail-riding assclown.

TheZohanS

marco_polo wrote: »

What is even more fun is trying to guess what the old banned username used to be for posters with < 10 posts who start threads giving out about boards/moderator opression etc.

They all slip up eventually though...

Gunsfortoys

Rabies wrote: »

True, you'll get eaten.

That forum really is the dogs bollocks.

Insect Overlord

I edited the poll, and so did my wife!

superfish

tbh wrote: »

can I just ask - how do you come up with your material?
"Snap their puppys neck" - that stuff is genius. "take that you smug prick!"

deadly.

you had to be there

Micky Dolenz

I know something you don't know.

Kiera

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

I know something you don't know.

No you dont!

Micky Dolenz

Kiera wrote: »

No you dont!

nah, I don't. thanks for bursting my bubble.

hondasam

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

I know something you don't know.

I def know something you dont know

Wolfe Tone

I would definatly say that certain mods are very biased and use their "mod powers" to force over their viewpoint, or indeed partake in a thread in a baiting way which would not be accepted from a normal user.

Dudess

Iwannahurl wrote: »

Is the poll on this thread kosher? If so, and given the large number of responses, then the answer is clear to the question raised by the OP

Difference between mods abusing their position and some people thinking they do. Things aren't always as they seem. Not out to disagree with you btw, you're being reasonable.

superfish wrote: »

I got banned from the pet fourm because I told some smug prick I was going to snap their puppys neck it was so worth it permanent ban.......gigity gigity oh yea

You were personally abusive and you used the tactic that winds up Animals & Pet Issues forum users the most... and you complain about mods abusing their position...?

Bosco boy

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

I would definatly say that certain mods are very biased and use their "mod powers" to force over their viewpoint, or indeed partake in a thread in a baiting way which would not be accepted from a normal user.

I sence a circling of the wagons taking place, I suppose if you can't cope with constructive criticism then make a joke of the thread and ignore the issue. I have to say the treatment of the thread and posters by some moderators is embarrasing and a discredit to boards.ie.

Latchy

Some mods make mistakes and like anybody have to learn by trial and error ,they are only human .We are told there is no free speech on boards.ie which has as much to do with by example , preventing personal and racist abuse etc being posted , and rightly so . There will always be disputes with mods both in threads and in private but as long as the they keep the important stuff to the front and not get caught up what can sometimes seenas personal spats with posters in threads ( real or imagined ) then it makes for a much happy medium all round

AlmightyCushion

Bosco boy wrote: »

I sence a circling of the wagons taking place, I suppose if you can't cope with constructive critisem then make a joke of the thread and ignore the issue. I have to say the treatment of the thread and posters by some moderators is embarrasing and a discredit to boards.ie.

Remember this is after hours, the only mods that count here are the after hours mods, all other mods are considered normal posters here and get treated as such.

Wolfe Tone

Who else hates the dispute resolution forum? It seems to exist simply to enable the powers that be to gang up.

Dudess

Bosco boy wrote: »

I sence a circling of the wagons taking place, I suppose if you can't cope with constructive criticism then make a joke of the thread and ignore the issue.

Think it's more that they disagree with you rather than being unable to cope with constructive criticism.

MagicSean

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

Remember this is after hours, the only mods that count here are the after hours mods, all other mods are considered normal posters here and get treated as such.

They may not have moderation powers but it shows a bad attitude which you can only assume is brought back to their forums.

Kiera

TBF this is AH. The place to have fun and a laugh. I expect the mods in here to have a giggle with polls and mess bannings once in a while. If i didnt i wouldnt post in here.

For those of you have an issue with other mods outside AH why not take it up with them/Feedback and quit bitching about them in here!

Wolfe Tone

Kiera wrote: »

TBF this is AH. The place to have fun and a laugh. I expect the mods in here to have a giggle with polls and mess bannings once in a while. If i didnt i wouldnt post in here.

For those of you have an issue with other mods outside AH why not take it up with them/Feedback and quit bitching about them in here!

Ive tried that, the wagons just circle. Take a look at feedback, two recent threads about politics moderation there, locked and instructed to go to dispute resolution where there will only be one dissenting voice.

Kiera

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

Ive tried that, the wagons just circle. Take a look at feedback, two recent threads about politics moderation there, locked and instructed to go to dispute resolution where there will only be one dissenting voice.

Well i dont mean to pick one mod and start a thread on them. That is for the resolution area but people are singling out mods in hereand its bang out of order. Bitching about people who might not even use AH is a load of poo.

Wolfe Tone

Kiera wrote: »

Well i dont mean to pick one mod and start a thread on them. That is for the resolution area but people are singling out mods in hereand its bang out of order. Bitching about people who might not even use AH is a load of poo.

They put themselves out there, fair game in my eyes, although I wouldn't name names myself.

steddyeddy

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

They put themselves out there, fair game in my eyes, although I wouldn't name names myself.

I wouldnt name names either and in fairness i havent had a problem with any mod but i think mods with personal agendas are only shooting themselves in the foot by scaring people away from their own forums.

Kiera

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

They put themselves out there, fair game in my eyes, although I wouldn't name names myself.

Fair game in the relevant forum or over pm. Not in here. I'm totally against bitching and linking to other forums in here. That's just my opinion tho. AH is for fun (or some serious news topics) not for bitching about mods of other forums.

Wolfe Tone

Kiera wrote: »

Fair game in the relevant forum or over pm. Not in here. I'm totally against bitching and linking to other forums in here. That's just my opinion tho. AH is for fun (or some serious news topics) not for bitching about mods of other forums.

Why not in here? If you dont want to see it, dont look.

Micky Dolenz

MUSSOLINI, if you have a problem with other forums,we don't want to hear about em.

Kiera

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

Why not in here? If you dont want to see it, dont look.

Because I dont think its right to air your problems with a certain mod of a different forum in After Hours. I've seen a few being singled out in this thread and its not right. I'd feel the same if people were doing it with just normal users who didnt use AH. Like i said, this is just my opinion.

Poccington

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

Who else hates the dispute resolution forum? It seems to exist simply to enable the powers that be to gang up.

You mean like the recent thread where ISAW got an apology from both a C-Mod and a Politics Mod for a wrong decision made on there part?

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

Why not in here? If you dont want to see it, dont look.

Cause AH isn't the place for it, Feedback is there for a very specific reason.

I honestly don't get what's so hard to grasp about the concept of using a Feedback forum to provide Feedback, rather than posting in other forums about your problem with a specific Mod.

The Feedback forum is for Feedback. It's quite simple.

Wolfe Tone

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

MUSSOLINI, if you have a problem with other forums,we don't want to hear about em.

This is a thread about mod abuse, are we only allowed to talk about this in general "yeah it happens" supposed instances on this forum, or something else entirely?

I looked for that feedback thread that was going to b started, didnt see it.

Dotsie~tmp

This forum used to be a decent place to come back when it was populated by gamers. Its gon to sh*t with mainstream catering and tinstar generals for mods. I knew it was f*cked when it started censoring "bad" language. Mostly populated by serial offence-taking arseholes now.

No big deal. The internet darwinistic. People will eventually tire of the control and something else will turn up.

Wolfe Tone

Poccington wrote: »

You mean like the recent thread where ISAW got an apology from both a C-Mod and a Politics Mod for a wrong decision made on there part?

After the ban expired. Take a look at the recent threads in feedback so.

Cause AH isn't the place for it, Feedback is there for a very specific reason.

I honestly don't get what's so hard to grasp about the concept of using a Feedback forum to provide Feedback, rather than posting in other forums about your problem with a specific Mod.

The Feedback forum is for Feedback. It's quite simple.

I havent posted about my problem with any specific mod at all. Dont know where you got that from.

Kiera

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

I looked for that feedback thread that was going to b started, didnt see it.

Get on to TheZohan. He was the one who said he would start one. Probably all talk tho.

Micky Dolenz

MUSSOLINI wrote: »

This is a thread about mod abuse, are we only allowed to talk about this in general "yeah it happens" supposed instances on this forum, or something else entirely?

I looked for that feedback thread that was going to b started, didnt see it.

We ain't Feedback, nor or we the DRP forum. You have a grievance with a forum, here isn't the place to air it and we don't want to hear it.

Wolfe Tone

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

We ain't Feedback, nor or we the DRP forum. You have a grievance with a forum, here isn't the place to air it and we don't want to hear it.

Fair enough Mickey, I just came on to offer my 2 cents on the subject of the thread and vaguely cited a case.

Dudess

An irony is that this thread is still open and has over 330 posts, yet there's still no doubt going to be someone bleating about "censorship" and "intimidation"...