Jim Corr is on the late late show now!

FrostyJack

iaminminsk wrote: »

I think RT treated Jim Corr with contempt. He was rude and nasty.

Don't worry he does it with everyone, worst presenter in history. He has done it with better people than Jim Corr. In fairness to him last night he was tied for time due to the nature of the show. They should have a show devoted to Jim, there isn't enough good comedy on RTE anymore.

sh1tstirrer

Dave! wrote: »

This eye dude is nuttier than Jim!

The climate nut in the audience is nuttier than both of them.

mikemac

I remember a time when he toured the world to sell out concerts and stepped out with a former Miss Ireland

Now, a laughing stock

Sky King

I just called Deirdre De Burca a minger in another forum and someone responded with this:

http://a.yfrog.com/img620/5660/7gfm.jpg

God I love the internet.

Ghandee

His father should have used the WITHDRAWal technique!

numbersix99

FrostyJack wrote: »

http://articles.cnn.com/2002-08-07/tech/contrails.climate_1_contrails-cirrus-clouds-david-travis?_s=PM:TECH

But this claims that the temperature ROSE when there were no planes. So that means that the carbon emitted by jet fumes actually helps cool the earth (this is covered in Superfreakonomics) and reduce global warming. Sometimes human interference can strangely be of benefit!

The Waltzing Consumer

I feel extremely dirty after watching that car-crash tv. RTE should not be putting disabled people on tv like that. They are clearly "special" and it was more of a freak show then a talk show.

FrostyJack

numbersix99 wrote: »

But this claims that the temperature ROSE when there were no planes. So that means that the carbon emitted by jet fumes actually helps cool the earth (this is covered in Superfreakonomics) and reduce global warming. Sometimes human interference can strangely be of benefit!

It points to humans ARE affecting the climate and ties in with part of the global dimming theory, where the affects of global warming are being masked and we are actually in a worse state than we currently believe.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2058273530743771382#

detonator1979

look up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIeVvZvSIQ8

Beware the sheeple they are even trying to sound cool!

detonator1979

I am sorry but who is retarded, have you researched anything?
Probably not as if you had done, you would see the rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper.
Trust me false flag attacks are mild compared to some of the intelligence doing the rounds, some you might not even believe possible.

As for Jim I am sure has plenty of money and does not have to do this he is putting himself out there and not giving a **** about his ego.

Did everyone miss the point he made that our Gas reserve was handed over to Royal Dutch Shell with no royalty's whatsoever, that is criminal.

Give him credit where credit is due for having the balls to stand up and question at least,
instead of trying to sound cool and having your head stuck in a make believe bucket.

As for climate the change the sun is about to go through a massive phase of solar storms, it is affecting here now and other planets also.

The Waltzing Consumer

detonator1979 wrote: »

I am sorry but who is retarded, have you researched anything?
Probably not as if you had done, you would see the rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper.
Trust me false flag attacks are mild compared to some of the intelligence doing the rounds, some you might not even believe possible.

As for Jim I am sure has plenty of money and does not have to do this he is putting himself out there and not giving a **** about his ego.

Did everyone miss the point he made that our Gas reserve was handed over to Royal Dutch Shell with no royalty's whatsoever, that is criminal.

Give him credit where credit is due for having the balls to stand up and question at least,
instead of trying to sound cool and having your head stuck in a make believe bucket.

As for climate the change the sun is about to go through a massive phase of solar storms, it is affecting here now and other planets also.

:rolleyes: Look, I don't care what he says. The man is, sad to say, not right in the head. RTE should not be giving these loons a platform, it is not about their views, but the fact they are clearly touched by the branch of f**king craziness. When you get a bunch of idiots, who have no training or actual education in the areas they conspire about, it is a joke. All his figures, everything he says, is all second-hand nonsense from other retards on the internet. They are as crazy as those westboro baptist church, Alive newspaper, youth defence groups. But in this case, it ain't religion, but conspiracies they worship.

Monty Burnz

KeithAFC wrote: »

As much as i ain't for the whole 9/11 inside job thing, i think Corr give as good as he got. The American guy came out with some good stuff but so did Corr about the explosives found which can only be made in a lab.

...assuming what he said was true. It's been disputed as to what was actually found, and whether it could be naturally derived from what happened.

Monty Burnz

kilkenny flyer wrote: »

I just called Deirdre De Burca a minger in another forum and someone responded with this:

http://a.yfrog.com/img620/5660/7gfm.jpg

God I love the internet.

The birth of a meme...is a beautiful thing.

AckwelFoley

i was particularly amused with his 9/11 consporacy theories, i was pretty amused with his science that he tries to claim as proof that the buildings were actually taken down by the government and not by the giant fcuking aeroplanes that hit them.


1. Nano-thermite reactions stuff is only in the infancy stage of testing at the moment, the amounts that would be rewuired to bring down tis building would be considerable, and even at that not likely to cut through larhe beams

2. I dont know if you ever watched any programs on demolition on discovery jim, but a child woudl tell you that there is an incredible amount of preparation and planning on explosive demolition, its not as easy as slapping some magic thermite onto beams willy nillie, its about precutting and placing the proper explosive charges on the right beams - these beams jim were incased in the building, so if these beams were to be cut and a charge placed on them it would take weeks probably months to do and jim - dont you think people would notice the exposed beams and walls around them that were ripped out to get at?

whitesands

snyper wrote: »

i was particularly amused with his 9/11 consporacy theories, i was pretty amused with his science that he tries to claim as proof that the buildings were actually taken down by the government and not by the giant fcuking aeroplanes that hit them.

If you bothered to do any research you'd know 3 buildings collapsed, only 2 were hit, explain that one.

The Waltzing Consumer

whitesands wrote: »

If you bothered to do any research you'd know 3 buildings collapsed, only 2 were hit, explain that one.

Oh, you poor poor thing

whitesands

Another one not bothering to research it, building 7, the official explanation makes no sense, NO sense.

My name is URL

The Waltzing Consumer wrote: »

Oh, you poor poor thing

That's it.. spunk all over his face when your done with the condescension too. It's much more fulfilling than addressing what he says

digme

detonator1979 wrote: »

I am sorry but who is retarded, have you researched anything?
Probably not as if you had done, you would see the rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper.
Trust me false flag attacks are mild compared to some of the intelligence doing the rounds, some you might not even believe possible.

As for Jim I am sure has plenty of money and does not have to do this he is putting himself out there and not giving a **** about his ego.

Did everyone miss the point he made that our Gas reserve was handed over to Royal Dutch Shell with no royalty's whatsoever, that is criminal.

Give him credit where credit is due for having the balls to stand up and question at least,
instead of trying to sound cool and having your head stuck in a make believe bucket.

As for climate the change the sun is about to go through a massive phase of solar storms, it is affecting here now and other planets also.

perhaps if the dumb masses knew Vietnam was based on an attack on a us warship which never happened they just might open their tiny little minds to such things.
People are mostly cowards with no opinion of their own,they need to repeat like parrots what they hear and see on tv.

FrostyJack

digme wrote: »

perhaps if the dumb masses knew Vietnam was based on an attack on a us warship which never happened they just might open their tiny little minds to such things.

There is a big difference in killing over 3000 people and misdirection. It's not like with like.

If you bothered to do any research you'd know 3 buildings collapsed, only 2 were hit, explain that one.

There is a very plausible explaination if you did your research and steered clear of the likes of loose change. It has been covered extensively in the CT forum.

KeithAFC

sh1tstirrer wrote: »

The climate nut in the audience is nuttier than both of them.

Climate change is just natural. Too many people on the planet, just looking to clean itself out. It will do so in time.

bobblepuzzle

There is no consirpacy regarding 9/11... two planes crashed into both towers toppling them and a third building as a direct result... The Pentagon was also hit (Intelligence services attacking their own military, give us a break!)... I'd imagine the majority of relatives and friends of those who died on 9/11, this conspiracy rubbish just upsets them more... Some of the nonsense that comes out of the theorists is downright insane & rediculous (missiles attached to the planes) SOME PEOPLE HAVE TO MUCH TIME ON THEIR HANDS!

numbersix99

whitesands wrote: »

Another one not bothering to research it, building 7, the official explanation makes no sense, NO sense.

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm

bobblepuzzle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZalGu0DpYA

Fast forward the 2:20 and you'll see how they collapsed...

My name is URL

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

There is no consirpacy regarding 9/11... two planes crashed into both towers toppling them and a third building as a direct result... The Pentagon was also hit (Intelligence services attacking their own military, give us a break!)... I'd imagine the majority of relatives and friends of those who died on 9/11, this conspiracy rubbish just upsets them more... Some of the nonsense that comes out of the theorists is downright insane & rediculous (missiles attached to the planes) SOME PEOPLE HAVE TO MUCH TIME ON THEIR HANDS!

Oh noes.. it might upset some people if anyone dare to question stuff. Well woe are fcuking they tbh.. does it not upset people that thousands of young lives have been lost as the result of 2 unjust wars.. both of which are played up as wars on terror.. directly connected to what happened on that day.

Forget about the specifics of the attack, and use the benefit of hindsight to look at what has happened between then and now. I'm sure the relatives of those who have lost their lives would appreciate it more than just putting it down to tragedy, only to be dug up whenever the US have an agenda to perpetuate.

bobblepuzzle

My name is URL wrote: »

Oh noes.. it might upset some people if anyone dare to question stuff. Well woe are fcuking they tbh.. does it not upset people that thousands of young lives have been lost as the result of 2 unjust wars.. both of which are played up as wars on terror.. directly connected to what happened on that day.

Forget about the specifics of the attack, and use the benefit of hindsight to look at what has happened between then and now. I'm sure the relatives of those who have lost their lives would appreciate it more than just putting it down to tragedy, only to be dug up whenever the US have an agenda to perpetuate.

Questioning things is good... but when it desends into absolute stupidity and insanity, thats where most people draw the line, don't you think?

You state 2 unjust wars? Are you attempting to say Afghanistan was an unjust war or is that your opinion? Because it certainly isn't the UN's...

MaybeLogic

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

Questioning things is good... but when it desends into absolute stupidity and insanity, thats where most people draw the line, don't you think?

Which specific point is stupidity and insanity? Without repeating the mantra that there was no conspiracy, please.

jimthemental

My username could not be anymore suited to this thread:pac:

bobblepuzzle

MaybeLogic wrote: »

Which specific point is stupidity and insanity? Without repeating the mantra that there was no conspiracy, please.

You had lunatics, not far short of Jim Corr producing photographs magnified 10 million times to show us missiles on aircraft... other conspirators claim the planes actual passengers were taken of them at a military base (with no evidence whatsoever)... the guys at loose change didn't know the difference between a B-25 Mitchall and a B-52 in their little movie, they focused on little puffs of smoke comming from the buildings as they collasped attempting to tell the masses they were explosives when in reality they are nothing but compressed debris... should I go on??

The_B_Man

Whats this about all this oil we have off the coast??

bobblepuzzle

It belongs to Royal Dutch Shell I believe, and they don't owe us loyalties because of a deal in the eighties I think...

KeithAFC

One thing i will say about the theories of 9/11. A lot of people have made a LOT of money from the deaths of thousands of people in a tragic event in history. And i ain't just talking about the American or European governments here either.

MaybeLogic

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

You had lunatics, not far short of Jim Corr producing photographs magnified 10 million times to show us missiles on aircraft... other conspirators claim the planes actual passengers were taken of them at a military base (with no evidence whatsoever)... the guys at loose change didn't know the difference between a B-25 Mitchall and a B-52 in their little movie, they focused on little puffs of smoke comming from the buildings as they collasped attempting to tell the masses they were explosives when in reality they are nothing but compressed debris... should I go on??

Not all the evidence is going to stack up, and people will see evidence of a conspiracy where there is none. This is human nature.

But what about the evidence of which there is proof, like the 'Five Dancing Israelis', for example?

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html

Or the example above of 2 planes hit, 3 buildings collapse?

Or Bush being left unprotected, reading kids a story in a school, within 15 minutes of 4 airports, after the second plane hit?

Should I go on?

bobblepuzzle

MaybeLogic wrote: »

Not all the evidence is going to stack up, and people will see evidence of a conspiracy where there is none. This is human nature.

What about the evidence of which there is proof, like the 'Five Dancing Israelis', for example?

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html

Or the example above of 2 planes hit, 3 buildings collapse?

Or Bush being left unprotected, reading kids a story in a school, within 15 minutes of 4 airports, after the first plane hit?

Should I go on?

No please don't go on thanks

MaybeLogic

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

No please don't go on thanks

Is that the best you can do to address those points?

bobblepuzzle

MaybeLogic wrote: »

Is that the best you can do to address those points?

Sigh, the proximity of building 7 to the towers, with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and debris crashing near it sealed it's faith... there is an official report on this from the 9/11 commision, please elaborate if you don't understand this?

As regards Bush, I have no comment on that as I don't care what he was doing when the planes hit

MaybeLogic

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

Sigh, the proximity of building 7 to the towers, with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and debris crashing near it sealed it's faith... there is an official report on this from the 9/11 commision, please elaborate if you don't understand this?

As regards Bush, I have no comment on that as I don't care what he was doing when the planes hit

The collapse of building 7 is not mentioned in the 9/11 commission report.

And your claim not to care about the Bush incident, clear evidence that the Secret Service knew he was in no danger, isn't really scoring you any points here.

My name is URL

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

Questioning things is good... but when it desends into absolute stupidity and insanity, thats where most people draw the line, don't you think?

You state 2 unjust wars? Are you attempting to say Afghanistan was an unjust war or is that your opinion? Because it certainly isn't the UN's...

What do you mean by 'draw the line'.. of course people should ignore the outlandish and downright idiotic theories.. but in doing so it doesn't mean that you need to accept the official line and resort to name calling and mud slinging. Lots of things can be questioned about 9/11.. but even more can be questioned about how 9/11 shaped the immediate future. Lots of lies have been told about the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan and many people have erroneously connected the events of 9/11 to both of those wars.

The UN are hardly infallible you know.. they recently assigned Pakistan as head of the IAEA even though Pakistan have not signed the UN Nuclear Non-Proliferation agreement.

sparkydub007

Do the research pal. this queer would slap u down x

bobblepuzzle

Details can be found here http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

It was appended to a copy of the 9/11 Commisions book that I bought last year... but not actually part of their report, so apologies for that... but I think you will find this makes interesting reading....

bobblepuzzle

My name is URL wrote: »

What do you mean by 'draw the line'.. of course people should ignore the outlandish and downright idiotic theories.. but in doing so it doesn't mean that you need to accept the official line and resort to name calling and mud slinging. Lots of things can be questioned about 9/11.. but even more can be questioned about how 9/11 shaped the immediate future. Lots of lies have been told about the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan and many people have erroneously connected the events of 9/11 to both of those wars.

The UN are hardly infallible you know.. they recently assigned Pakistan as head of the IAEA even though Pakistan have not signed the UN Nuclear Non-Proliferation agreement.

The majority of people do support the official line mate...

Of course the UN aren't infallible, but there was a significant mandate for war in Afghanistan to oust the Taliban, this is what I was referring to...

bobblepuzzle

MaybeLogic wrote: »

And your claim not to care about the Bush incident, clear evidence that the Secret Service knew he was in no danger, isn't really scoring you any points here.

What are you talking about

bobblepuzzle

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

Sigh, the proximity of building 7 to the towers, with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and debris crashing near it sealed it's faith... there is an official report on this from the 9/11 commision, please elaborate if you don't understand this?

As regards Bush, I have no comment on that as I don't care what he was doing when the planes hit

Well this guy who had financial interests in the buildings quite clearly says it was taken down purposely

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

bobblepuzzle

gilberto_eire wrote: »

Well this guy who had financial interests in the buildings quite clearly says it was taken down purposely

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

When? They had to pull out the fire fighters... you do relise hundreds were already killed?

I don't hear him talking about anything to do with potential malice?

numbersix99

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

When? They had to pull out the fire fighters... you do relise hundreds were already killed?

I don't hear him talking about anything to do with potential malice?

Plus his people have clarified that he did mean the firefighters, and not the building (even if he did mean demolish the building, how would firefighters have the time to demolish the building and with what methods etc). I don't think this can be accepted as an indication of anything.

bobblepuzzle

numbersix99 wrote: »

Plus his people have clarified that he did mean the firefighters, and not the building (even if he did mean demolish the building, how would firefighters have the time to demolish the building and with what methods etc). I don't think this can be accepted as an indication of anything.

I didn't know that, and I knew immediately he meant pull the fire fighters out...

Conspiracy Theorists, ffs... would you believe another theory they put out was the guy on CNN saying "It looks like a controlled explosion" of course they cut the rest of the tape where the guy says "but obviously not a controlled explosion"... ffs like :rolleyes:

The Waltzing Consumer

gilberto_eire wrote: »

Well this guy who had financial interests in the buildings quite clearly says it was taken down purposely

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

He said the fire department made a decision to pull. Normal people would take that as pulling out his men because, as he said, the amount of lives already lost, so they had to pull the fire fighters out.

The myth stirred up by weirdos is this is a demolition word. Pity it was the fire fighters who made the decision to pull, because they have nothing to with demolition. :rolleyes:

Seriously, if you believe this nonsense, you need a life!

dapto1

Re: WTC 7

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4085

bobblepuzzle

dapto1 wrote: »

Re: WTC 7

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4085

Wow, thanks very much for that....

dapto1

bobblepuzzle wrote: »

Wow, thanks very much for that....

Dunning is the man.