Shark fin soup sold in Ireland

steddyeddy

maximoose wrote: »

steddyeddy wrote: »

Would you chop of a dogs legs and let him bleed to death.

Depends, Is Dog's Leg Soup tasty?

Dog is supposed to be nice

steddyeddy

Batsy wrote: »

steddyeddy wrote: »

Cutting of a dogs legs and leaving it to die . Please god dont have children.

I WOULD eat a dog if I was starving.

So would I but not if it involved torturing it to death

Mr Benevolent

steddyeddy wrote: »

Are those fish definned and left to bleed to death.

No, they're left to drown in air.

steddyeddy

Confab wrote: »

steddyeddy wrote: »

Are those fish definned and left to bleed to death.

No, they're left to drown in air.

Another thing I have objected to in the paste. The waste that is.

Sonnenblumen

More sharks = less Dolphins :eek:
Less sharks = more Dolphins

LH Pathe

Where can I get monkey brains

(don't say I already have them)

I want it straight out the skull, still steaming, gleaming.. all the little synapses still popping away, working overtime.. mongo brain will do

cassi

Batsy wrote: »

If you want to see what REAL waste is you should go out with the EU fishing fleets.

Thanks to one of the many bizarre EU rules (its fishing quota system), 1 MILLION tons of fish are thrown back dead into the North Sea each year. Unlike those sharks, no part of those fish are eaten at all.

Countries such as China fishing for sharks for their fins is much less wasteful than what the Eu does when it catches fish.

So does that make the wasteful nature of shark fin soup suddenly okay??!!

steddyeddy wrote: »

So would I but not if it involved torturing it to death

Also, in Korea dog soup is made by torturing the dog to death, it suppose to release adrenalin and give it more energy or some rediculous thing.

RussellTuring

Batsy wrote: »

It is okay to kill an animal for food.

Humans are natural meateaters. Humans killing animals for food is what nature intended, so spare us all the unnatural hippy, vegetarian, Greenpeace nonsense.

Nature doesn't have a mind of it's own and claiming it does is an obvious attempt at using the Naturalistic Fallacy. "Nature" may have no problem with a lot of things, lacking a consciousness and all; that doesn't make them right.

Batsy wrote: »

If you want to see what REAL waste is you should go out with the EU fishing fleets.

Thanks to one of the many bizarre EU rules (its fishing quota system), 1 MILLION tons of fish are thrown back dead into the North Sea each year. Unlike those sharks, no part of those fish are eaten at all.

Countries such as China fishing for sharks for their fins is much less wasteful than what the Eu does when it catches fish.

I'm not sure where to start with this one.

Firstly, how is it less wasteful to use only the fin rather than the whole animal? Secondly, in the quote above this one you were trying to argue against me for seeing something wrong with animals being killed at all, and now you do the same thing. Thirdly, no matter how bad it is to kill fish in general, that in no way makes it right to slice the fins from these sharks. If you have a problem with fishing in EU waters then maybe you should argue against that, unless you're being disingenuous of course.

AeoNGriM

Humanity manages to sicken once again.

Disgusting and sad.

DannyKing

Anyone know somewhere in Dublin to get a good turtle soup?