Political hotties

forlorndonkey · 27-02-2011 6:20am

RandolphEsq wrote: »

As long as democracy is in operation people can elect whoever they want for whatever reason they want. Politicians know this, so when they ur themselves up for election they agree that they can be elected for any reason whatsoever. Therefore they must,accept if people care to comment on their appearance

That doesn't mean people should be allowed to slag them for being ugly on a public message board. If this was printed in a newspaper there'd be war.

jethro081 · 27-02-2011 6:38am

Wicknight wrote: »

She is like 12 or something, isn't she

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-4KZjwAPXQ

in all fairness, i had to stop myself from voting for her, she is very pretty me thinks,

tis a pity she is a sinn feiner, twould feel dirty now, and not in a good way

scheister · 27-02-2011 6:53am

What they look like appears to have a lot to do with it. I was in the kildare count centre and was talking to people after Martin Heydon was elected and all i got from the 3 ladies was of course of course we voted for him he lovely looking. I looked i assume there was other reasons as well took a good minute before they answered while he was FG as well of course. As for Miss Reily Her in the dail wud be the only thing that would make me look at the SF benches.

Queen-Mise · 27-02-2011 7:37am

There has been a lot of fine looking young men been elected today. It was my second reason for watching the results. It will make watching politics a little bit easier on the eyes if not so much on the ears

:p

Lucifer_666 · 27-02-2011 7:50am

forlorndonkey wrote: »

That doesn't mean people should be allowed to slag them for being ugly on a public message board. If this was printed in a newspaper there'd be war.

I think you need to get a bit of perspective here.....this is not a newspaper or a news service which provides people with the latest info and are subject to libel laws.... its a forum to voice individual opinion. Though it has to be said do you ever read tabloid newspapers they are not very "nice" either and very often would go alot further than most forums or blogs.

As for people voting for someone because of their looks...rather that than vote for someone because their parents always voted for that party.:rolleyes: thats part of the reason we are in this mess now

Grid. · 27-02-2011 9:06am

They all went downhill after Liz O' Donnell!!!!!!!!!!:pac:

Einhard · 27-02-2011 9:53am

forlorndonkey wrote: »

Is it not stepping over the line, in a small country like this, to be slagging people off for their looks and talking about whether they take it up the hole or not? I mean come on now... I hate Joan Burton as much as anyone but she's a 60+ year old woman for jaysus sake.

forlorndonkey wrote: »

I just think it's a bit hypocritical to be treating other people like that when you wouldn't like it if your mother or granny had her photo posted up here and people talked about how ugly she is, or whether she'd take it up the hole?

I mean there has to be some sort of line drawn based on civility and common courtesy doesn't there?

And I assume the moderators can see this post and can make a decision one way or another, I really wasn't talking to them, I was talking to everyone in this thread. I'm not saying you should necessarily be censored, maybe a bit of self censorship would be the way to go in this case?

forlorndonkey wrote: »

They're standing for election, what does their looks have to do with being a td? Just because they're standing for election doesn't mean you have the right to abuse them or subject them to verbal abuse, why should it? Because you say so?

Awww don't worry forlorn, I'd still give ye one.

phill106 · 27-02-2011 10:08am

Wicknight wrote: »

She is like 12 or something, isn't she

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-4KZjwAPXQ

0:55-0:60 Seconds, Conversation of the two lads on the right

PAUL DONNELLY: Is she givin you a semi too?
CAOIMHGHÍN Ó CAOLÁIN: *Nods*

chughes · 27-02-2011 10:12am

Poor Craythur wrote: »

:P Hey, I didn't vote for him!

I bet if you could, you would have given him one

Einhard · 27-02-2011 10:14am

phill106 wrote: »

0:55-0:60 Seconds, Conversation of the two lads on the right

PAUL DONNELLY: Is she givin you a semi too?
CAOIMHGHÍN Ó CAOLÁIN: *Nods*

CAOIMHGIN: No that's a Kalashnikov in my pocket!:pac:

wolfpawnat · 27-02-2011 10:17am

Absurdum wrote: »

and this, my friends, is why women should never have been given the vote :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

:P

Aha, because I have never come across a fella to decide his vote based on the way a girl looks!:rolleyes::D;)

gcgirl · 27-02-2011 10:26am

RandolphEsq wrote: »

**** sake; it is spelt 'they're'. What you wrote makes no sense

One word grammer police !here I wrote this off a phone and wayhey this is after-hours seriously like omg get a life

testicle · 27-02-2011 10:29am

forlorndonkey wrote: »

I just think it's a bit hypocritical to be treating other people like that when you wouldn't like it if your mother or granny had her photo posted up here and people talked about how ugly she is, or whether she'd take it up the hole?

I mean there has to be some sort of line drawn based on civility and common courtesy doesn't there?

And I assume the moderators can see this post and can make a decision one way or another, I really wasn't talking to them, I was talking to everyone in this thread. I'm not saying you should necessarily be censored, maybe a bit of self censorship would be the way to go in this case?

You're ugly, aren't you?