Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ice Age humans used skulls as cups

Options
  • 21-02-2011 9:30pm
    #1
    Hosted Moderators Posts: 11,362 ✭✭✭✭


    This is actually news from last week, but I only just got around to posting it up now! From the BBC website:
    Ancient Britons were not averse to using human skulls as drinking cups, skeletal remains unearthed in southwest England suggest.

    The braincases from three individuals were fashioned in such a meticulous way that their use as bowls to hold liquid seems the only reasonable explanation.

    The 14,700-year-old objects were discovered in Gough's Cave, Somerset.

    Scientists from London's Natural History Museum say the skull-cups were probably used in some kind of ritual.

    "If you look around the world there are examples of skull-cups in more recent times - in Tibetan culture, in Fiji in Oceania, and in India," said Dr Silvia Bello, a palaeontologist and lead author of a scientific paper on the subject in the journal PLoS One.

    "So, skulls have been used as drinking bowls, and because of the similarity of the Gough's Cave skulls to these other examples, we imagine that that's what these ancient people were using them for also," she told BBC News.

    Gough's Cave is situated in the Cheddar Gorge, a deep limestone canyon on the southern edge of the Mendip Hills.

    Palaeo-investigations started there a hundred years ago, with many of the finds now held at the Natural History Museum (NHM).

    The site is particularly noteworthy for the discovery in 1903 of "Cheddar Man", the complete skeleton of a male individual dating to about 10,000 years ago.

    But the users - and owners - of the skulls discussed in the PLoS One article are actually from an earlier period in the history of the British Isles.

    This was during a brief warm spike in a series of ice ages that allowed humans living in southern Europe to venture north into what was otherwise an utterly inhospitable landscape.

    These Cro-Magnons, as we now call them, were hunter-gatherers living on their wits and, it seems, eating human flesh when the need and opportunity arose.

    Gough's Cave famously held the remains of human bones that had been butchered to extract marrow in exactly the same way as animal bones on the site had been processed.

    Our modern sensibilities find the thought of cannibalism repulsive, but these people lived in a different age, Dr Bello said:

    "They were a one man band; they were going out, hunting, butchering and then eating their kill. And they were extremely skilled at what they did, but then that's how they survived.

    "I think the production of the skull-cups is ritualistic. If the purpose was simply to break the skulls to extract the brain to eat it, there are much easier ways to do that.

    "If food was the objective, the skull would be highly fragmented. But here you can really see they tried to preserve most of the skull bone; the cut marks tell us they tried to clean the skull, taking off every piece of soft tissue so that they could then modify it very precisely. They were manufacturing something."

    NHM colleague Professor Chris Stringer helped excavate one of the skull-cups in 1987 and is a co-author on the paper.

    "We've known that these bones were treated in this way for 20 years; it's been evident that there were cut marks on the skulls," he told BBC News.

    "But by applying the latest microscopic techniques and the experience we've got in working on butchered animal remains, as well as human remains, we can start to build up a much more detailed picture of how the Gough's Cave remains were treated. Yes, cannibalism is the most likely explanation. What we can't say is whether these people were killed to be eaten, or whether they died naturally. Were they even members of the same group?"

    And precisely how the cups were used cannot be known with total confidence either, although in more recent examples of such practice they have held blood, wine and food during rituals.

    At about 14,700 years old, the Gough's Cave skull-cups would represent the oldest, recognised examples in the world.

    The museum plans to put a detailed model of one of the skull-cups on display this March so that visitors can get a deeper insight the practices of these ancient Britons.

    Here is a picture of the fragments:

    _51284904_skullbowl_01copyrightnaturalhistorymuseum.jpg

    There is a short clip about it on the BBC website as well.

    I thought this was really interesting, I (perhaps stupidly) hadn't realised there were caves like this in England with cave art. Apparently when the 'Cheddar Man' was discovered, they cleared the cave to make it into a tourist attraction, which may have destroyed a lot of evidence that could have been invaluable to archaeologists today :eek: The skulls that were analysed for this paper weren't discovered until the 80s because they were lodged behind a rock - just think what else might have been there if the cave was only discovered now!

    EDIT: The Natural History Museum's press release is here, and the article is published in PLoS One (open access! :))


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    They took a DNA sample from Cheddar man, and then they took DNA samples from locals in the area. They found a local school teacher who lived half a mile from the caves who was the direct decendant of cheddar man.

    It must have been a very poignant moment when the teacher looked at the skeleton and knew it was his direct ancestor from 10,000 years ago. It also shows how as humans, in general, we don't move around that much if the same lineage has been in that area for 10,000 years.

    IMG_4738%20cheddar%20man.jpg
    In 1996, Bryan Sykes of Oxford University first sequenced the mitochondrial DNA of Cheddar Man, with DNA extracted from one of Cheddar Man's molars. Cheddar Man was determined to have belonged to Haplogroup U5, a branch of mitochondrial haplogroup U, which has also been found in other Mesolithic human remains.[1] Sykes got DNA from the 9,000 year old Cheddar Man's tooth, and from a 12,000 year old Cheddar tooth from the same cave.[2]

    Bryan Sykes' research into Cheddar Man was filmed as he performed it in 1997. As a means of connecting Cheddar Man to the living residents of Cheddar village, he compared mitochondrial DNA (MtDNA) taken from twenty living residents of the village to that extracted from Cheddar Man’s molar. It produced two exact matches and one match with a single mutation. The two exact matches were schoolchildren, and their names were not released. The close match was a history teacher named Adrian Targett. They, like anyone else carrying haplogroup U5 today, share a common ancestor many thousands of years ago with Cheddar Man through his maternal line.[3] [4]

    Sykes argued that this modern connection to Cheddar Man (who died at least three thousand years before agriculture began in Britain) makes credible the theory that modern-day Britons are not all descended from Middle Eastern migratory farmers who entered Britain about 10,000 years ago. Instead, modern Britons (and Europeans generally) are descended from ancient European Palaeolithic and Mesolithic hunter-gatherer tribes, who much later on adopted farming.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    Based on that impeccable source, Asterix the Gaul, this practice was also prevalent amongst the Vikings.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 11,362 ✭✭✭✭Scarinae


    I have to say, I was amazed what the Daily Mail's 'Science Editor' managed to make of this story, I think he let his imagination run away with itself... It is very funny, but slightly worrying in that there probably are people who take it seriously...
    With a bloodcurdling shriek, the shaman raised his stone dagger high above his head before plunging it into the chest of his young female victim.
    The pretty 17-year-old had been chosen by lot. To die in this manner was, after all, an honour, a way of winning the favour of the gods and guaranteeing a period of plenty for her friends and family.
    Her mind was clouded by a cocktail of hemlock and hallucinatory herbs prepared by the tribe’s elder womenfolk, and her limbs hung limp from her body as she was laid out over the sacred rock.
    Yet she had not gone to her death quietly — for while the herbal concoction was soporific, it could not soothe the agony of ritual death.
    As the knife, fashioned from the naturally occurring volcanic glass obsidian, cut through flesh and bone, her piercing cries set the scraggy village dogs laying in the warmth of the fire howling — a cacophony soon echoed by the wolves prowling the limestone crags 400ft above the encampment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 962 ✭✭✭darjeeling


    Fishie wrote: »
    I have to say, I was amazed what the Daily Mail's 'Science Editor' managed to make of this story, I think he let his imagination run away with itself... It is very funny, but slightly worrying in that there probably are people who take it seriously...

    Sadly there are people who take the Daily Mail seriously!

    Reading on, we find:
    [...]This catastrophic event, called the ‘Big Freeze’ by geologists, saw temperatures plummet by 15C in less than two years[...]

    The cannibals of Cheddar would have died or been forced to beat a hasty retreat back to France and Spain.

    Foreigners! I knew it!


Advertisement