Chelsea V Manchester United (Tuesday 1st March K.O 19.45 SS2)

GavRedKing

I love Chelsea

My thoughts, fully deserved to the game, we we're the better team on balance over 90 mins, David Luiz is immense, Ramieres is yutning into a good midfielder, Torres movement is great, Drogba's cameo was great, what a beat.

CAREFREE.

Love for all you Chelsea fans out there and now im backing out of this thread, after a fewd rinks, dont wanna say anything to biased

parker kent

salthillman wrote: »

He had him rattled since he walked out the tunnel sure, clearly you don't understand the word 'psychological'.

That is a load of nonsense. Vidic played well but like all defenders is susceptible to red cards given how easily players get booked in modern football.

Jazzy

salthillman wrote: »

He had him rattled since he walked out the tunnel sure, clearly you don't understand the word 'psychological'.

no he didnt. stop talking such utter garbage

what set vidic off was a soft penalty followed by chelski fuking around with the ball in the bottom corner of the pitch for 6 minutes. you could see with the push on ramires that this was setting him off.
it wasnt the "psychological effect of playing against fernando torres".

---

i state again the need for a license to enable you use and express your opinion on the internet

3hn2givr7mx1sc

salthillman wrote: »

One good game against Vidic??? Take off the spectacles son, this one's as clear cut as they get. Have yet to see Vidic handle Torres when he's played halfway decent.

Don't call me son, thank you very much. Only people I like are allowed to call me son.:pac:
Vidic had Torres in his pocket the last time they played iirc. The 4-1 game is the only time Torres has played excellently against Vidic, and even at the it as only one sprint. Certainly nothing to effect Vidic mentally, which sounds like some ball of shít, tbh.:pac:

m@cc@

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

Love this picture

I hope it keeps you warm when it comes to handing out trophies in May.

adox

salthillman wrote: »

He had him rattled since he walked out the tunnel sure, clearly you don't understand the word 'psychological'.

I already explained the error in my post previously, but I can assure you it was nothing to do with understanding the word psychological.

Bodhisopha

David Luiz is not immense, not yet. How can you deserve to be red carded for a stupid challenge and be immense. Not to mention the time Hernandez sidestepped him and the time he jumped in on Nani and was left for dead.

Looks a very exciting player, great on the ball and has amazing hair but looks naive defensively.

salthillman

parker kent wrote: »

That is a load of nonsense. Vidic played well but like all defenders is susceptible to red cards given how easily players get booked in modern football.

Yeah, especially when Torres is playing for some reason

Jazzy wrote: »

no he didnt. stop talking such utter garbage

what set vidic off was a soft penalty followed by chelski fuking around with the ball in the bottom corner of the pitch for 6 minutes. you could see with the push on ramires that this was setting him off.
it wasnt the "psychological effect of playing against fernando torres".

---

i state again the need for a license to enable you use and express your opinion on the internet

What set Vidic off was seeing Torres in the Chelsea line-up.

baz2009 wrote: »

Don't call me son, thank you very much. Only people I like are allowed to call me son.:pac:
Vidic had Torres in his pocket the last time they played iirc. The 4-1 game is the only time Torres has played excellently against Vidic, and even at the it as only one sprint. Certainly nothing to effect Vidic mentally, which sounds like some ball of shít, tbh.:pac:

Well, whatever people say here, and it is clear I will be very much in the minority with my argument considering how many United supporters there are, but so much has been made of the Torres-Vidic battle even in the run up to this match, so I think it's fair to say there is something more going on then your red-tinted spectacles allow you to see.

Sgt Pepper 64

m@cc@ wrote: »

I hope it keeps you warm when it comes to handing out trophies in May.

Well, I get all hot when I look at this one!



oh and this one

Jazzy

salthillman wrote: »

What set Vidic off was seeing Torres in the Chelsea line-up.

ok. you are just crap at football opinions. i know it sounds like a weird thing to be crap at but I honestly believe that people can be crap at anything and everything

salthillman

Bodhisopha wrote: »

David Luiz is not immense, not yet. How can you deserve to be red carded for a stupid challenge and be immense. Not to mention the time Hernandez sidestepped him and the time he jumped in on Nani and was left for dead.

Looks a very exciting player, great on the ball and has amazing hair but looks naive defensively.

Clearly haven't seen him play for Benfica. By your post it's sounds as if it was his debut tonight! And I don't think he commanded the fee he did if he's a naive defender tbf...

Ush1

Is that popstar Usher on the bus??? Didn't know he was a Chelsea fan...

salthillman

Jazzy wrote: »

ok. you are just crap at football opinions. i know it sounds like a weird thing to be crap at but I honestly believe that people can be crap at anything and everything

Like grammar for instance??:pac:

Jazzy

salthillman wrote: »

Like grammar for instance??:pac:

I use correct grammar when needed

citytillidie

That_Guy wrote: »

Wow, Ferguson being a bit of a hypocrite.

When is he not???????????

m@cc@

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

Well, I get all hot when I look at this one!

Well if we're going to do nostalgia.....

adox

salthillman wrote: »

Clearly haven't seen him play for Benfica.

Correct grammer you say....

Nalz

citytillidie wrote: »

When is he not???????????

sometimes

adox

citytillidie wrote: »

When is he not???????????

When he's not.

spiralism

salthillman wrote: »

One good game against Vidic??? Take off the spectacles son, this one's as clear cut as they get. Have yet to see Vidic handle Torres when he's played halfway decent.

You know what difference there would have been had Torres not played today? Nothing.

You would swear Vidic wouldn't have given that second yellow away with Chelsea players running the ball into the corner for six minutes because Torres's magical presence didnt goad him into it....

I'm sure, with Torres standing around doing SFA and Chelsea players running the ball into the corner as time expired Vidic looked and said to himself "hey, there's Torres, I think i'll foul Drogba and then Ramires and get sent off because Torres is getting to me"

3hn2givr7mx1sc

salthillman wrote: »

Well, whatever people say here, and it is clear I will be very much in the minority with my argument considering how many United supporters there are, but so much has been made of the Torres-Vidic battle even in the run up to this match, so I think it's fair to say there is something more going on then your red-tinted spectacles allow you to see.

Please stop saying I have tinted spectacles, because I haven't posted anything biased in this thread as far as I can tell.
No there isn't, which you also been told by a Liverpool supporter.:pac:
The media hype up this bullshít to an unreal level because it's what they do, and you've obviously been brainwashed by it.
Please give me an example of Torres making bits of Vidic other than the goal in the 4-1 game.

jaykay74

Nani just tweeted this....

KeithAFC

Something i noticed was how Torres had Vidic rattled. Must be some psychological reason.

Sgt Pepper 64

m@cc@ wrote: »

Well if we're going to do nostalgia.....

LOL, good response! Damm that cheap russian grass!

Hope the wembly stuff is better!

Jazzy

sure the only reason Boggles isnt posting any more is because I psychologically rattled him! :pac:

psychological rattlings for all I say!

Grayditch

KeithAFC wrote: »

Something i noticed was how Torres had Vidic rattled. Must be some psychological reason.

RAPE, I TELL THEE!

salthillman

baz2009 wrote: »

Please stop saying I have tinted spectacles, because I haven't posted anything biased in this thread as far as I can tell.
No there isn't, which you also been told by a Liverpool supporter.:pac:
The media hype up this bullshít to an unreal level because it's what they do, and you've obviously been brainwashed by it.
Please give me an example of Torres making bits of Vidic other than the goal in the 4-1 game.

Try every time he's played against him in the past 3 years, apart from maybe last season when he was ravaged by injuries.
Brainwashed?? Good lad, won't even dignify that with a response. Anyways, I'm off to bed, long day tomorrow, plenty of United fans to meet...:pac:

barryd09

great game tonight,united were really good in the first half,chelsea raised their game big time second half.
2 decisions that shaped the game

luiz not getting a 2nd yellow & the (wrong) penalty decision.

swings and roundabouts though,i remember us getting a soft(er) penalty at home to liverpool.
best united away display all season,not worried whatsoever.
arsenal still have to win that game in hand,lets see how that goes.

spiralism

m@cc@ wrote: »

Well if we're going to do nostalgia.....

hahaha good man, i was going to post that if you didn't!

flahavaj

He's gone and done it again. Good man Fergie.

Will ye ever learn?

3hn2givr7mx1sc

salthillman wrote: »

Try every time he's played against him in the past 3 years, apart from maybe last season when he was ravaged by injuries.
Brainwashed?? Good lad, won't even dignify that with a response. Anyways, I'm off to bed, long day tomorrow, plenty of United fans to meet...:pac:

Such an easy(and wrong) answer, I did ask for an example.

Because you know I'm right?

:P

Nalz

salthillman wrote: »

plenty of United fans to meet...:pac:

OMG they'll be so jealous of you OMG

Grayditch

Wow. Imagine the amount of Wrigley's Extra Sir Alex will have to buy to get the taste of his own medicine out of his mouth. He'll have to NOT sign anymore 7m orphan flops.

UnitedIrishman

Grayditch wrote: »

Wow. Imagine the amount of Wrigley's Extra Sir Alex will have to buy to get the taste of his own medicine out of his mouth. He'll have to NOT sign anymore 7m orphan flops.

You using the same to get the bitterness out of your mouth?

barryd09

Grayditch wrote: »

Wow. Imagine the amount of Wrigley's Extra Sir Alex will have to buy to get the taste of his own medicine out of his mouth. He'll have to NOT sign anymore 7m orphan flops.

bahahaha,taste of what medicine exactly is this youre on about??
2 league defeats all season,still 4 points clear,still in the fa cup,still in the champions league.
yes,he'll be so bitter about that.
walk on troll,with hope in your heart.

Grayditch

OH, cutting.

jaykay74

Grayditch wrote: »

Wow. Imagine the amount of Wrigley's Extra Sir Alex will have to buy to get the taste of his own medicine out of his mouth. He'll have to NOT sign anymore 7m orphan flops.

a bit of a **** comment tbh. flop would have been enough....

spiralism

Drink up everybody

Grayditch

jaykay74 wrote: »

a bit of a **** comment tbh. flop would have been enough....

Fair enough. I just didn't want to get mixed up with the Hernandez. I take it back.

barryd09 wrote: »

bahahaha,taste of what medicine exactly is this youre on about??

Fergie saying the ref was blind to the fouls basically, considering the "peoples elbow" we all saw.

barryd09

id imagine fergie is a wrigleys juicy fruits man anyhow myself.

3hn2givr7mx1sc

Grayditch wrote: »

Wow. Imagine the amount of Wrigley's Extra Sir Alex will have to buy to get the taste of his own medicine out of his mouth. He'll have to NOT sign anymore 7m orphan flops.

Are you talking about Bébé or Chico?
Because Bébé didn't play and Chico has been anything but a flop.

flahavaj

Grayditch wrote: »

Wow. Imagine the amount of Wrigley's Extra Sir Alex will have to buy to get the taste of his own medicine out of his mouth. He'll have to NOT sign anymore 7m orphan flops.

What a classy comment.

Grayditch

I didn't want people thinking I was calling Hernandez a flop, of course he's not.

barryd09

Grayditch wrote: »

Fergie saying the ref was blind to the fouls basically, considering the "peoples elbow" we all saw.

the letter of the law was applied on saturday against wigan,clattenburg dealt with the situation there and then,atkinson dealt with **** all.

3hn2givr7mx1sc

Grayditch wrote: »

I didn't want people thinking I was calling Hernandez a flop, of course he's not.

But why bring Bébé into it at all?
It makes zero sense, like.

Grayditch

Haha, people need to stop getting hung up on the orphan comment, it was for identification purposes, I'm sure he's a lovely fella.

adox

Gaybitch wrote: »

,

Childish I know but it's late.

barryd09

baz2009 wrote: »

But why bring Bébé into it at all?
It makes zero sense, like.

bitter id imagine.

on another note,carrick tonight??

thought it was one of his better preformances in the last while.

3hn2givr7mx1sc

Grayditch wrote: »

Haha, people need to stop getting hung up on the orphan comment, it was for identification purposes, I'm sure he's a lovely fella.

There's plenty of better ways to phrase it.
Portugese, lanky, flops called Bébé.

3hn2givr7mx1sc

barryd09 wrote: »

bitter id imagine.

on another note,carrick tonight??

thought it was one of his better preformances in the last while.

From what I saw of the game he didn't look great, but he may have played well in the first 70 minutes or so.