Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Japanese earthquake / tsunami discussion

Options
17475777980175

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭daelight


    500 people are being evacuated from 20km radius of the plant. They are advised to stay indoors. This mornings incident is same type of incident that occurred at No.1 reactor and so far very little chance of any large radiation release.

    On the news they announce no power cuts in Tokyo yet - but just now they announce in my local area of powercut for 3.5 hrs today.


  • Posts: 14,344 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It is hard to have respect for Sky News. Before they go to an ad, they play silly music and what looks like a promo video for an upcoming disaster.

    Then they follow up with "JAPAN DISASTER: On your Mobile, TV, PC" or some ****e like that.

    You'd think a station dedicated to news would have a more professional and serious approach to thousands of people being killed in a horrible natural disaster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Toyota having to halt all production for at least the next few days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 153 ✭✭MissJustice


    Between this

    and this http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2011/03/13/2011-03-13_hundreds_flee_in_japan_after_shinmoedake_volcano_begins_spewing_ash_boulders.html

    where it states that the volcano has been more active over the past few weeks. Japan spends E100 million a year on assessing earthquakes, and with all this investment plus the information above, surely there were enough tell tale signs/technology to give them some indictation this disaster was on its way? Can someone clarify this for me?
    "Eruptions and quakes are common in Japan's "ring of fire."
    The volcano erupted in January - the first major seismic activity on the mountain in 52 years. Scientists say lava had been building up in recent weeks"

    This says alot to me.....

    Read more: http://society.ezinemark.com/relationship-between-earthquakes-and-volcanoes-31fa4aa9107.html#ixzz1GXgZmL6W
    Under Creative Commons License: Attribution No Derivatives


    From this above article "Earthquakes and volcanos have a close relationship and usually exhibit their activity simultaneously"

    With the volcano been active since January, it would make you wonder about it all..


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭That username is already in use.


    Thrill wrote: »
    Video of that explosion at reactor 3...........


    Sounds like 3 explosions.. why would that be.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭andyseadog


    It is hard to have respect for Sky News. Before they go to an ad, they play silly music and what looks like a promo video for an upcoming disaster.

    Then they follow up with "JAPAN DISASTER: On your Mobile, TV, PC" or some ****e like that.

    You'd think a station dedicated to news would have a more professional and serious approach to thousands of people being killed in a horrible natural disaster.

    glad i'm not alone in thinking that. i'm looking for reliable info on people lives, not catchy tv.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭andyseadog


    Sounds like 3 explosions.. why would that be.

    an echo?


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Sounds like 3 explosions.. why would that be.

    That's actually just Sky News's "promo" or "ad" for continous Japanese Tsunami coverage in the background. Each "explosion" you hear is the flashing image effect. If you listen closely you can even hear that signature silly eerie music crap.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 12,333 ✭✭✭✭JONJO THE MISER


    Off to bed, hopefully things dont get worse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Yakult wrote: »
    Im hoping that they will have enough time so that America can bring them coolant.
    thats not coming. Japan refused the offer. The coolant isnt the problem, the cooling system is the problem at these plants.

    If they managed to keep the conditions similar to the No. 1 reactor they should be fine. Radiation readings need to be taken though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,485 ✭✭✭Thrill


    0414: So what was the origin of those reports about a 3-metre (10-foot) tsunami? It seems the crew of a fire department helicopter reported spotting the wave off Fukushima Prefecture


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,288 ✭✭✭TheUsual


    You'd think a station dedicated to news would have a more professional and serious approach to thousands of people being killed in a horrible natural disaster.

    Sky News love a natural disaster. They keep replaying the worst scenes to get their audience figures up.

    I haven't watched them in years. Same kind of people that go and watch accidents and fires for fun.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    Reactor 3 is using MOX fuel, reprocessed nuclear fuel/weapons, which is far more difficult to cool and control than the other reactors.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,958 ✭✭✭Chad ghostal


    daelight wrote: »
    On the news they announce no power cuts in Tokyo yet - but just now they announce in my local area of powercut for 3.5 hrs today.

    There's no power cuts (yet) but trains are almost all stopped, most people still coming in on bikes or working from home though. They've stopped the trains to try and avoid power cuts, but afaik there will still be some anyway.. Minato + chuo won't be affected because of the gov/banks. Facebook has train links if anyone is wondering what's available in Tokyo (very little atm) ** just log in and they give you links


  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭gary223


    mgmt wrote: »
    Reactor 3 is using MOX fuel, reprocessed nuclear fuel/weapons, which is far more difficult to cool and control than the other reactors.

    How do you know so much about this kind of stuff? :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    gary223 wrote: »
    How do you know so much about this kind of stuff? :confused:
    Its easy enough to look up. Press releases already tell us it's MOX fuel. All just a matter of googling for information after that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    gary223 wrote: »
    How do you know so much about this kind of stuff? :confused:

    Read this article, its very informative.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/japan-fukushima-nuclear-reactor.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mgmt wrote: »
    Wasnt aware they'd have to release steam for that long. I hope thats inaccurate or assuming they wont be able to restore external power.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    The radiation levels after the second hydrogen blast were 50 m Sv / hr. Far from any lethal levels.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭bradlente


    So is getting power back the main objective?To get the cooling mechanism working again?Or is that impossible now?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Malty_T wrote: »
    The radiation levels after the second hydrogen blast were 50 m Sv / hr. Far from any lethal levels.
    Still higher than after first explosion which registered less than 1 mSV

    If my math is loosely correct that would mean lethal exposure (2+ SV) in just 400 hours.

    correction: 40 hours.

    Thats, thats bad.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Overheal wrote: »
    Still higher than after first explosion which registered less than 1 mSV

    My guess would be that that's because of the different fuels used. This reactor has more hazardous material to human health so the Sievert level would be higher. There would also be radiation present from the issues with Unit I too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Malty_T wrote: »
    My guess would be that that's because of the different fuels used. This reactor has more hazardous material to human health so the Sievert level would be higher. There would radiation present from the issues with Unit I too.
    The levels after the No. 1 explosion were like 800 something µSV. I worked out the lethal exposure to be something like 27 years. This is a considerably higher reading.

    My math was wrong by a lot. ~3 years. But still, a jump from 3 years to 40 hours.
    So is getting power back the main objective?To get the cooling mechanism working again?Or is that impossible now?
    I don't know really.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Overheal wrote: »
    This is a considerably higher reading.I don't know really.

    Yup it is and time is becoming a crucial factor here now for some of the workers at the plant.:(


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Malty_T wrote: »
    Yup it is and time is becoming a crucial factor here now for some of the workers at the plant.:(
    Some reports say that 3 workers already display clear symptoms of radiation sickness.

    That 50 mSV reading, where was it taken from?


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    bradlente wrote: »
    So is getting power back the main objective?To get the cooling mechanism working again?Or is that impossible now?

    I remember reading yesterday that AC Power was restored but I dunno has anyone else seen confirmation of this? Getting the power back is a big priority because it will make operation of everything much more convenient. Not that conditions are anywhere near convenient in the plant at the moment.

    Unit I is effectively being mothballed in sea water.Unit III's status is a little bit more hazy it is not clear if sea water injection is being effective enough and they don't have an accurate gauge of level of water immersion. IF the core is not being fully immersed then that situation is quite bad.:(

    @Overheal :Service hall. Levels at the entrance are 20 mSv /hr.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    William Broad reports in the New York Times that crew members on the US aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, sailing in the Pacific, "passed through a radioactive cloud from stricken nuclear reactors in Japan." Crew members got a month's worth of radiation in about an hour. US helicopters flying missions about 60 miles away from the stricken nuclear reactors "became coated with particulate radiation that had to be washed off." Officials say the radioactive plume currently poses no risk to the US.


    ...

    Now I'm not saying anyone should panic, but I'll be grabbing some iodine tablets tomorrow. You know, for my bad thyroid.

    In all saneness though "A months worth" probably refers to regular background levels.

    full story: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/14plume.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Overheal wrote: »
    Now I'm not saying anyone should panic, but I'll be grabbing some iodine tablets tomorrow. You know, for my bad thyroid.

    I wouldn't be getting too worried yet mate. This is still looking like a TMI the level of radiation that reaches the West Coast should be minimal. I hate the way news reporters are using terms like " a thousand times" " a months worth" " twice the normal" etc. This is really just useless info , a months worth of what and what unit are you using? :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭bradlente


    Fair dues to the lads updating this thread,it's been better than any news coverage I've been watching.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,126 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    i figure. they probably mean a month of natural background radiation. still, watch the number reports.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement