Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why did intelligence take so long to evolve?

Options
  • 26-03-2011 11:57am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭


    Over the course of paleo-history we have seen the same niches evolve over and over again... for example you have the ichtyosaurs & dolphins, who are remarkably similar, yet are completely unrelated:

    motani_3fish.gif

    12-diagram.gif

    Almost every time an ancient extinct creature is described it is described to "be like a modern day..."

    It seems time and time again the same roles are adopted by completely unrelated creatures. Mammals like the elephant occupy the niche of gigantic plant-eater like the ancient giant vegatarian dinosaurs before.


    So my question is, why has intelligence never evolved as a biological niche until the very recent past?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 28,568 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    How can you be sure that it hasn't?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭gbee


    Not sure if the total destruction of the planet's surface was responsible and the other global extinction events had anything to do with it, but life has been kicked back on this planet more than once.

    Animal who spent millions of years developing on land after crawling from the sea, ventured back again as the land became hostile to life.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭cavedave


    It is a very good question.

    Here are some possible answers
    1. Anthropic principle the fact we can ask the question might be some of the answer. If dolphins had evolved intelligence they would have made damn sure we would not have eaten them with tuna. and they would be asking "why did monkeys never learn to make nets"

    2. The Fermi paradox is related to this. Why aren't the stars full of aliens? possibly the same reason the world did not have an intelligent species before now. This is the great filter theory that there are several stages a species has to survive to become an intergalactic. We have passed many but only just. A nuclear exchange here a slightly more powerful church there, a slightly more virulent plague etc and we would not have a world where we would know enough astronomy or evolution to ask the question

    3. Species live on average 3-4 million years. Humans have not been around that long and at a 3% annual growth rate it is hard to imagine they will be. Maybe intelligence just is not that useful a tool for survival

    4. Maybe they did. Related to three. If the dinosaurs had gotten to roughly our level 65 million years ago we would not know. the 200+ years of industrialisation and 5000+ years of civilisation would not be obvious at this time distance. Maybe we should look for dinos on the moon


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Does intelligence improve a species survival ?

    Yes we are the only species potentially capable of stopping a planet killer asteroid, but we've only been around globally for a blink of an eye.


    One theory why marsupials have smaller brains is that Oz is a tough place to live and brains need a lot of enegery and high quality diet. But there is an old saying that in the kingdom of the blind the one eyed man is king, and with the high cost of maintaining a brain you only need to be smarter than your prey or competitors to survive. That old myth about using just 10% of our brains is just that.


    IIRC the brightest Dinosaurs had brains that were comparable to birds, and I don't mean parrots or crows.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭cavedave


    Capt'n Midnight


    Does intelligence improve a species survival ?

    Yes we are the only species potentially capable of stopping a planet killer asteroid, but we've only been around globally for a blink of an eye.

    But cockroaches and bacteria would survive even if a asteroid hits. Also bacteria are flung into intersteller space regularly. They have made it to the moon, mars and venus well before we have.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    I was always crap at quotations, but I think it was Wittgenstein who said something like "if a lion could speak you would not be able to understand it". Perhaps all animals have intelligence to different degrees, but the nature of that intelligence isn't really comparable to ours.
    As Douglas Adams said, dolphins probably think they're the greatest species on earth as the swim and play all day.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    We also have found amino acids on meteors from other planets.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    We also have found amino acids on meteors from other planets.
    Given the right conditions it's probable that some form of self replicating molecules will arise given starting conditions of simple bio molecules which have produced inorganically.

    But the big question is how likely is it for photosynthesis to evolve , or at least some renewable lifestyle after the primordial soup has been finished.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭Morbert


    High intelligence is rarely advantageous. A large brain requires huge amounts of resources that could be invested in other survival strategies like powerful jaws or swift legs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,382 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    Our body-shape and other features encouraged intelligence. Even if a dolphin were to gain the develop a level of intellect approaching that of early humans, he'd never be able to make tools or construct dwellings.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Even if a dolphin were to gain the develop a level of intellect approaching that of early humans, he'd never be able to make tools or construct dwellings.

    You see, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much - the wheel, New York, wars and so on - whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man - for precisely the same reasons.
    Douglas Adams


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29 SecurityGuy


    Morbert wrote: »
    High intelligence is rarely advantageous. A large brain requires huge amounts of resources that could be invested in other survival strategies like powerful jaws or swift legs.

    Right, even if you look at our society you can confirm this - educated, highly intelligent people rarely have more than 2 children while knackers in pyjamas living animal lives reproduce like rabbits.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd



    But the big question is how likely is it for photosynthesis to evolve , or at least some renewable lifestyle after the primordial soup has been finished.

    It may evolve in the primordial soup.

    I saw these Jelly fish on a nature program recently. They have algae in their gut. They take themselves to the waters surface, the algae photosynthesises, and they feed off the algae by-products.


    Photosynthesis, is probably not that difficult to evolve. There's just so much light around. Photo-sensitivity is probably something that evolved very early on. There's just so much light. Organisms have to be sensitive to it in one way or another.

    What always stuns me, is how so many organism are sensitive to the cycle of the moon.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    krd wrote: »
    What always stuns me, is how so many organism are sensitive to the cycle of the moon.
    for marine animals like barnacles that don't move it's a handy way to synchronise mating time so all the off spring are released at the same time so that preditors can't gobble them all up

    also for marine animals there is the link between tides and the moon, some want high tides to get further up the beach , others may like lower tides as the waves may be smaller


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    for marine animals like barnacles that don't move it's a handy way to synchronise mating time so all the off spring are released at the same time so that preditors can't gobble them all up

    also for marine animals there is the link between tides and the moon, some want high tides to get further up the beach , others may like lower tides as the waves may be smaller

    Yes........but.....and I know this is known....and this is the marvel......how do such simple creatures know there is a full moon.

    How do plants know what time of the year it is. These questions on the surface look so simple, but they're not.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Single celled photosynthetic organisms like euglena have an eye spot and can swim towards the light.

    More complex organisms could have more complex behaviour.

    Many organisms react to changes in temperature, in the UK spring moves north at about 3mph. So the changes that take place in Scotland happen a few weeks after they happen in Cornwall.


Advertisement