followed and stopped by garda

Officer Giggles

the point im making is that if the garda didnt make any notes on the side of the road for a traffic stop the chances are he isnt going to, in general it is going to be more serious incidents where notes have to be taken afterwards as the garda wouldnt have time to take them there and then, at a traffic stop the garda has all the time in the world to write the details down, it makes no sense for the garda to pull the car over for five minutes and not write anything down if he intended to at some stage

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

PULSE DOES NOT TELL IF A POLICY HAS BEEN CANCELLED.
it is merely insurance information provided by the motor tax renewal office. insurance could expire shortly after tax is purchased for say a year, and in these circumstances PULSE might indicate that insurance has expired when in fact since the tax was renewed the insurance has also been renewed separately (possibly with a different insurer and/or with a different policy number)PULSE DOES NOT TELL IF A POLICY HAS BEEN CANCELLED. END OF

Source?

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

Source?

thats the fact of the matter. i know it. source? no
insurance companies dont provide details to gardai so if a policy is changed or updated gardai dont know until it is next taxed. FACT

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

thats the fact of the matter. i know it. source? no
insurance companies dont provide details to gardai so if a policy is changed or updated gardai dont know until it is next taxed. FACT

Anyone can say fact in capitals.
Can we have a source?
It seems you can't.
Enough said.

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

Anyone can say fact in capitals.
Can we have a source?
It seems you can't.
Enough said.

i know this for a fact. i cannot give you a source. ask any guard and you will be told. face it your bull**** was found out to be exactly that, bull****. come back on here and apologise WHEN you establish that you are wrong

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

i know this for a fact. i cannot give you a source. ask any guard and you will be told. face it your bull**** was found out to be exactly that, bull****. come back on here and apologise WHEN you establish that you are wrong

I know for a fact you are wrong.
Come back here when you are ready to apologise.
Still no source. How strange? Imagine that
Just cos you right fact doesn't make it so.

You're training in the school of arrogance hasn't taught you much:D

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

I know for a fact you are wrong.
Come back here when you are ready to apologise.
Still no source. How strange? Imagine that
Just cos you right fact doesn't make it so.

You're training in the school of arrogance hasn't taught you much:D

you know for a fact i am wrong?
i know for a fact YOU are wrong. i havent seen much sources from yourself to back up what you are saying? you assume you are right, youre not.

school of arrogance?? please cast a little more light upon that, it confuses

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

you know for a fact i am wrong?
i know for a fact YOU are wrong. i havent seen much sources from yourself to back up what you are saying? you assume you are right, youre not.

school of arrogance?? please cast a little more light upon that, it confuses

Still no source from you?

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

Still no source from you?

nor you?
i know
you dont
you clearly think you know
you should investigate further

school of arrogance? still no explanation?

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

i know this for a fact. i cannot give you a source. ask any guard and you will be told. face it your bull**** was found out to be exactly that, bull****. come back on here and apologise WHEN you establish that you are wrong

Well seeing as you say its fact that's ok then. It must be true.

I must remember that in future.


note to self: use the word 'fact' more often in posts

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

nor you?
i know
you dont
you clearly think you know
you should investigate further

school of arrogance? still no explanation?

Well seeing as you were the one who first stated ''fact'' i think you should back it up? Fact:). Yes that is a Fact

Get your notebook out:D

Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact

Oh Ok Rafa:rolleyes:

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

school of arrogance? still no explanation?

No explanation needed:p

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

Well seeing as you were the one who first stated ''fact'' i think you should back it up? Fact:). Yes that is a Fact

Get your notebook out:D

Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact

Oh Ok Rafa:rolleyes:

ok youre being silly now.
school of arrogance? notebook? rafa?
are these "comments" related ?

are you resorting to being silly and making childish comments when u realise someone knows better than you?

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

ok youre being silly now.
school of arrogance? notebook? rafa?
are these "comments" related ?

are you resorting to being silly and making childish comments when u realise someone knows better than you?

And still no source to your earlier ''FACT''
So cos you say its FACT we need to accept it?
Ok so. Good one. Fact

amiable

no source, no fact:D

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

And still no source to your earlier ''FACT''
So cos you say its FACT we need to accept it?
Ok so. Good one. Fact

you are extremely childish. focus on the words one uses in correcting you rather than the FACT that you have been shown up for what you are. A BLUFFER.

YOU WERE WRONG.
GO INVESTIGATE.
COME BACK AND APOLOGISE.

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

you are extremely childish. focus on the words one uses in correcting you rather than the FACT that you have been shown up for what you are. A BLUFFER.

YOU WERE WRONG.
GO INVESTIGATE.
COME BACK AND APOLOGISE.

You show me a source to prove i'm wrong and i'll apologise.
Ask yourself this though, why do i know you can't provide a source?:D
Seems to me you are throwing your toys out:)
Who's being childish?
Still no source for your Fact?

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

no source, no fact:D

youre childish and uneducated and youre getting on my nerves. goodnight

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

youre childish and uneducated and youre getting on my nerves. goodnight

Source on this statement?
Very untrue too:D
I'd hazard a guess my education exceeds yours

amiable

missymoo1 wrote: »

youre childish and uneducated and youre getting on my nerves. goodnight

So lets get this straight. You can't provide a source which makes your statements not fact?
Ok i await your apology:)

Snaggerman

alcockandbrown wrote: »

This is simple, you have not broken any law so dont worry.
You have the free right to travel. Always remember that! (I know about this stuff because I am the first and only pilot in this country who operates aircraft without a licence). Thats another story! I used to be part of this money making scam until I found out what was REALLY going on.

Understand that the road traffic act is just an ACT! It is not law, however, it can be given the force of law when consented to by the governed (That means you!).
Just say no and dont represent your Person (Legal fictional identity).
They are only after money !

Garda = Profit making private company (Look it up for yourself on dun and bradstreet website).

Remember, you have the free right to travel. This is a god given right, look up common law or brehans law!
Republic of Ireland = Public limited company!
25th Feb 2011 = Ireland elected new directors to the company listed as "The goverment of Ireland PLC".
WAKE UP folks..

Exact same reply to 2 different posts,TROLL. Do hope you enjoy those mushrooms tho!

amiable

alcockandbrown wrote: »

This is simple, you have not broken any law so dont worry.
You have the free right to travel. Always remember that! (I know about this stuff because I am the first and only pilot in this country who operates aircraft without a licence). Thats another story! I used to be part of this money making scam until I found out what was REALLY going on.

Understand that the road traffic act is just an ACT! It is not law, however, it can be given the force of law when consented to by the governed (That means you!).
Just say no and dont represent your Person (Legal fictional identity).
They are only after money !

Garda = Profit making private company (Look it up for yourself on dun and bradstreet website).

Remember, you have the free right to travel. This is a god given right, look up common law or brehans law!
Republic of Ireland = Public limited company!
25th Feb 2011 = Ireland elected new directors to the company listed as "The goverment of Ireland PLC".
WAKE UP folks..

Snaggerman wrote: »

Exact same reply to 2 different posts,TROLL. Do hope you enjoy those mushrooms tho!

You were just ahead of me
I smell a rat:D

sboyle01

Time will tell. I am also angry about drivers doing 30mph on good roads. I am a careful driver and have no points. Also I drive a Corsa which is 973cc, so I rarely overtake unless the car in front is really slow. I know the law is the law but I would consider these slow drivers a real problem on the road.

sboyle01

Hopefully I will know in a few weeks. Also I was driving a 973cc Corsa at the time so I rarely overtake any cars. Only if the car in front is really slow and I have a good straight. I know I broke the law but it seemed like common sense. I think people should be charged for driving too slow, they cause a nuisance and if they are not competent then they should not be on the road.

x in the city

30 mph drivers,should be castrated, might stop this inbreed of drivers from occuring in the future

Zambia

Its a single straight line you know not to break it , you broke it, you got caught there really is nothing to argue here.

Momentary bad decision it could be worse.

If you didn't get the "under section bla bla bla" speel I doubt you'll hear any more about this. I was stopped in Galway once and they wanted my Galway address (Cork one was on the drivers license), where I was working, name of local Garda station in Cork, what I do for a living etc etc. The cheeky bastad asked me had I come to their attention before too, I asked him why, did I look familiar :pac:

Esel

RoverJames wrote: »

If you didn't get the "under section bla bla bla" spiel I doubt you'll hear any more about this.

Don't think you are correct there, James. For a good while now there is no requirement for the garda to tell you about any penalty/prosecution. I'd be expecting a letter....

Esel

Esel wrote: »

Don't think you are correct there, James. For a good while now there is no requirement for the garda to tell you about any penalty/prosecution. I'd be expecting a letter....

Ooops
'tis been a while since I got points admittedly. Apologies

Paulw

sboyle01 wrote: »

I know I broke the law but it seemed like common sense.

It's simple. You broke the law. Common sense says don't overtake over a continuous white line. Wait for an appropriate spot to overtake.

Biggles1980

Tails142 wrote: »

This happened to me a few years back driving up in Donegal.

Overtook a bus driving in the hard shoulder on a continuous white line. Garda on a bike pulled me over.

He took my licence and walked back to the bike for a few minutes and got on the radio.

Came back with my licence and said, "OK, safe driving".

Thought I was away scot free only for a letter to come in through the door a few weeks later, 2 points and 80 euro fine.

I was raging that he never mentioned it at the side of the road as I definetly would have argued it, bus was in the hard shoulder and only reason I crossed the line was to be extra safe, nothing even coming in the opposite direction, wide road, only a slight bend. Bleh, anyway, expect points!

You shoudn't have payed the ticket. You said you would have argued it. The way to do that is say nothing to the Guard, don't pay the fine, go to court when you get the summons and put your case to the Judge. It probably would have been struck out.

Our man in Havana

I do agree it is pointless arguing the toss at the side of the road. The place to argue is the court.

jakdelad

Paulw wrote: »

They don't give you anything at the side of the road.

You'll get a notification in the post as to the offence, and any penalty. This may be as simple as a fine and points, or may even be a summons.

All he needed for this was your license, and your details.

a bit sneaky dont you think
why dont they be man or woman enough to come out and say
sir you will be getting a ticket whatever
the ould dirty irish way say nothing and let it off in the post
takes a special breed of person to take on a job like that

Paulw

jakdelad wrote: »

a bit sneaky dont you think
why dont they be man or woman enough to come out and say
sir you will be getting a ticket whatever

If you're pulled over, then it's highly unlikely you're getting away with it.

This is the way it's been done for a number of years now. You don't get any notification on the side of the road. You simply get the summons, FPN in the post in the coming weeks.

DUB777

That is a joke, look at the levels of corruption that go on in this country. The government is corrupt from the top down. Politics, Governement officials, Bankers, Developers & lets not fail to mention the cops that were working for fred thompson, or the cops working for Brian Rattigan & if thats to hear say for you.. Then the Morris tribunal.... Fact everything in it was posted out to the public, practically an entire district from the head honcho Sargent to the desk jockey, all rotten to the core but for the honesty and bravery of one decent cop it'd still be going on. This is farcial, we can talk about corrupt politicians, bankers & developers but not cops?????
Are you living in a small town where one honest local cop looks after the enitre juristiction??? Are you saying cops aren't bribed? They've been caught before & they will be caught again believe me:eek:. This country is corrupt..:pac:
Wake up...

missymoo1

amiable wrote: »

Source on this statement?
Very untrue too:D
I'd hazard a guess my education exceeds yours

you hazard a guess on many things, you shouldn't.

FreudianSlippers

DUB777 wrote: »

That is a joke, look at the levels of corruption that go on in this country. The government is corrupt from the top down. Politics, Governement officials, Bankers, Developers & lets not fail to mention the cops that were working for fred thompson, or the cops working for Brian Rattigan & if thats to hear say for you.. Then the Morris tribunal.... Fact everything in it was posted out to the public, practically an entire district from the head honcho Sargent to the desk jockey, all rotten to the core but for the honesty and bravery of one decent cop it'd still be going on. This is farcial, we can talk about corrupt politicians, bankers & developers but not cops?????
Are you living in a small town where one honest local cop looks after the enitre juristiction??? Are you saying cops aren't bribed? They've been caught before & they will be caught again believe me:eek:. This country is corrupt..:pac:
Wake up...

Firstly, do not discuss moderator actions on thread and certainly do not post PMs without permission.

Secondly, just because corruption goes on in this and other countries does not mean it is right or just and certainly does not mean that it should continue or that it should be advocated. Not all members of AGS are "rotten to the core" and I think you'll find that the vast majority are honest and upstanding people.

Thirdly, I'm not a member of AGS, nor do I work for the government, nor do I live in some small town. So there goes that theory out the window.

This is not a very good start to your boards.ie posting career... take this as your final warning.