Stop kicking the fcuking can down the road.

Luxie

mike65 wrote: »

I'm 110% fully committed to seeking a solution. At the end of the day, it’s time to step up the plate, and focus on our core competency if we want to take it to the next level.

Thanks for the headsup.

trad

Anyone getting the helicopter view here?

Claasman

trad wrote: »

Anyone getting the helicopter view here?

yes, the future looks bleak, with synergy led developments taking a nosedive

Ste_D

just wanted to throw my hat into the ring and announce my intention to pro-actively leverage the humorous nature of this thread on a go forward basis.

Sergeant

Ste_D wrote: »

just wanted to throw my hat into the ring and announce my intention to pro-actively leverage the humorous nature of this thread on a go forward basis.

Have you asked the rest of the stakeholders? Because there is no magic bullet.

K-9

We need to put our faith in the knowledge economy going forward.

Akrasia

Jumpy wrote: »

Oh. Oh god thats a bad one. It makes me want to punch you.

I think we have a winner.

I don't accept that

UsernameInUse

They're playing with us.

Holding out until their banks reach a place where our default won't harm them. Then we'll be thrown by the wayside.

I say we do it now! If we're going down - WE'RE TAKING EVERYBODY WITH US!

Duggy747

Ste_D wrote: »

just wanted to throw my hat into the ring and announce my intention to pro-actively leverage the humorous nature of this thread on a go forward basis.

Duly noted and will be forwarded onto the relevant enchilada.

K-9

Akrasia wrote: »

I don't accept that

I refute that premise.

NewFrockTuesday

Ste_D wrote: »

just wanted to throw my hat into the ring and announce my intention to pro-actively leverage the humorous nature of this thread on a go forward basis.

Extrapolate the relevant buzzword and transfer it to your pipeline

EverEvolving

K-9 wrote: »

I refute that premise.

For refuting that premise you need a check up from the neck up, we need more blue sky thinking and less bottom fishing.

az2wp0sye65487

We need to copper-fasten this idea before progressing

Kiera

How is Wibble these days, Mike?

Sergeant

Ruth Miniature Furnace wrote: »

We need to copper-fasten this idea before progressing

Are you suggesting we go about reinventing the wheel without moving the goalposts!?

jackiebaron

If the can is kicked in the right direction can we all agree that that constitutes a deliverable?

EverEvolving

jackiebaron wrote: »

If the can is kicked in the right direction can we all agree that that constitutes a deliverable?

Thinking logistically I see

BobTheBeat

jackiebaron wrote: »

If the can is kicked in the right direction can we all agree that that constitutes a deliverable?

Have we a contingency in place? Its a distinct possibility that external market inertial forces may impede its vector transition.

Guill

That is not within the scope of this debate.

Sean Quagmire

Lets send this guy out on a cruise and see if he comes back with a tan

fabbydabby

True, however it's better to be effective than efficient and we can benchmark our metrics against our co-opetition to establish relevant key performance indicators.

Once the SWOT analysis is complete, we can quantify the goal-oriented paradigm and then it should be possible to team-lead our way to a holisitic future-proof solution.

Through empowerment, I propose we E-Enable our key team players towards better interconnectiveness in Ireland Inc. going forward.

jumpin jaysus

that would be an eccumennical matter

BobTheBeat

Agreed, vis-a-vis the atlantic technology corridor being bolstered by the knowledge based economy.

Fratton Fred

Has anybody baselined this thread yet? If not, how are we going to establish the benefits of the "to be" versus the "as is"?

Claasman

what is the lead-time a function of, in this endevour?

Akrasia

Ruth Miniature Furnace wrote: »

We need to copper-fasten this idea before progressing

I'll run it by legal and compliance

(the black hole of all sensible business ideas)

Sean Quagmire

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Has anybody baselined this thread yet? If not, how are we going to establish the benefits of the "to be" versus the "as is"?

I've crunched the numbers, and it's a guestimation that we could catch a cold on this one

HoneyRyder

Sean Quagmire wrote: »

I've crunched the numbers, and it's a guestimation that we could catch a cold on this one

Im not sure that's actionable at this juncture but if we bring it back to brass tacks we could roll this one out in real time.
I want full optics on this from the get-go!

Ste_D

Did everyone get the memo about the new covers for the TPS reports?

Wossack

seems to be alot of crossed lines here.. I strongly suggest having a round table at the next nearest juncture. This should empower us to get all our ducks in a row, and then going forward, we'll all be singing from the same hymn sheet

K-9

The people on the ground and at the doorsteps are telling us we don't have a plan to bring to the table.

mikemac

I don't understand you OP

Send me a pm and we'll touch base.

mikemac

I'm noticing very few thanked posts on this thread

Come on folks, must get the KPI figures up

K-9

feelingstressed wrote: »

I'm noticing very few thanked posts on this thread

Come on folks, must get the KPI figures up

We need a team bonding exercise.

Group Hug.

Duggy747

K-9 wrote: »

We need a team bonding exercise.

Group Hug.

Risk Management recommend we keep physical contact to a minimum to protect from potential harrasment complaints.

EverEvolving

The rota for team building exercises is in situ

Should have it completed by close of play.

Guill

OEE is below 85%
OPE is even less,
Dont talk to me about the AM,
Who's doing 5s?
The CPK from our SPC is below 1.33,



Boss: I think we need a Praeto chart!



<everyone in meeting nods and say yaes>

Oh_Noes

TheUsual wrote: »

"Going forward we need to" ...... aaaaggghhhh why am I speaking such ****e !!!!

Can't we just go backward? It was all more fun in 2005.

chicken fingers

we have to go ahead and nail down the straggler who is not using the new coversheets on the TPS reports, and kind of go right ahead and, just spitballing here, lets go ahead and synergize a proactive basetouching roundtable spadework at grassroots level.

Fratton Fred

feelingstressed wrote: »

I'm noticing very few thanked posts on this thread

Come on folks, must get the KPI figures up

We need to focus on priorities here and ignore the noise.

I suggest we put post thanking on the back burner for now and redefine our core objectives.

PyeContinental

Removing previous posters and moving to BCC...
For any further replies, please little-r me.
I will be OOF (Out Of Foffice) until the following Monday.
For any urgent enquiries, please deal with the actioning team directly.

HoneyRyder

Can I please get a ballpark on who's going to sign off on this before COB?

Plazaman

If the glove fits then put it on the other foot or we'll be counting our hens before they hatch in the one basket.

Wait a minute...... D'Oh!!!

ardinn

All HOD's are in meetings expected to be productive after the recent managerial team-building exercises successfully produced positive outlooks.

JGEP

This threads just not granular enough

Gingersnaps

This could blow up in our face. Lets hit them before they hit us and make sure we get more bang for our buck!

iPlop

JGEP wrote: »

This threads just not granular enough

Yes but the horse is farting downwind, so it's all cool

mikemac

K-9 wrote: »

We need a team bonding exercise.

Group Hug.

Have you cleared this group hug with Health & Safety?
Sounds dangerous and we don't need claims

unknownlegend

I suggest a hostile reverse takeover of this thread. Your ma is also partial to this manoeuvre.

Aswerty

We need to initiate a focus group to increase inter-post coherency before progressing further with this discussion. The team dynamic also has to be diversified to maximise potential value add.