Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sports threads on Afterhours: why the double standards?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Options
    #32
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Biggins wrote: »
    I could be wrong but anyone can be sued if the information is false, true?
    ..But if it is is indeed true - and so far no British court has served any outlets beyond the borders of Britain with direct injunctions, then I assume it will be a serious major uphill legal battle to chase the whole world inc USA, Ireland, etc besides the internet that have supposedly only stated true facts...........

    ....the injunction is to prevent comment/reporting/mentioning. That A shagged B is not in dispute at all, all.


  • Options
    #33
    stovelid
    Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Nodin wrote: »
    If you've nothing to offer, its usually best to keep fingers from keys.

    A bit of advice that many of us would be better off paying heed to.


  • Options
    #34
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Nodin wrote: »
    ....the injunction is to prevent comment/reporting/mentioning. That A shagged B is not in dispute at all, all.
    Well that injunction that is applicable to the British press, worked well didn't it?
    I must remember, we are not England or Wales where the injunction has legal basis!
    No judge in England does get to censorship the world.

    O' and the Mumbi Mirror and the Times of India has announced the whole lot too - EVERYTHING including the other footballer and his injunction!
    Thats over 7 Million people now in India alone that has been informed.
    See: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389841/Super-injunction-footballer-pictured-Scottish-paper-30k-unmask-Twitter.html

    Add to that, British MP John Hemmings stood up a little while ago in British parliament and announced Ryan Giggs name as to be connected to the injunction, to the world, in his state building!

    It seems they are not afraid to say what many, many millions elsewhere knows also - even in India!
    Good luck to Giggs suing him and India also for saying the truth!

    Also our footballer is trying to sue Twitter only for the names of those that first exposed him.
    Not suing those that after that repeats the truth it appears.
    He can't seriously sue the rest of the world now - if he does try he will be a bigger joke now than what he is - if thats possible!

    The English Mail has now announced it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389841/Ryan-Giggs-named-Commons-footballer-injunction-preventing-details-affair-Imogen-Thomas.html


  • Options
    #35
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Aye, the cats out of the handbag now. And he's still spending money on it.


Advertisement