Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

SIlage Bales. Best way to store. End up or lay on side?

  • 17-06-2011 9:59am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 805 ✭✭✭


    Just wondering, if people see a difference in preservation quality of bales stored with ends up, compared to those layed on their sides.
    I had a mix of bales stored each way last couple of seasons. I reckon those with ends up, have less mould / bits of black stuff compared to those layed on their sides.
    Agree or disagree?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    BeeDI wrote: »
    Just wondering, if people see a difference in preservation quality of bales stored with ends up, compared to those layed on their sides.
    I had a mix of bales stored each way last couple of seasons. I reckon those with ends up, have less mould / bits of black stuff compared to those layed on their sides.
    Agree or disagree?

    I always store them end up. My personal opinion on leaving them flat is that the bale will inevitavly go out of shape - when it does go out of shape, the wrap is tighter in some places and looser in other parts of the bale. This leads to air in the bale which will inevitably cause mould.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭5live


    If stored singly then the ends are best as there in more plastic at the ends to protect against crows etc.
    But if stacking i find less damage when on their side as reilig says with the weight of another bale on top, the wrap all around the middle will be looser and i get a lot of mould there while it isnt as bad on those laid on the side


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 733 ✭✭✭jeff greene


    Negligible with 6 layers and well made, reasonable DM bales,tried both here, ball ache stacking them on their ends, on their side alot faster and safer too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭Tora Bora


    5live wrote: »
    If stored singly then the ends are best as there in more plastic at the ends to protect against crows etc.
    But if stacking i find less damage when on their side as reilig says with the weight of another bale on top, the wrap all around the middle will be looser and i get a lot of mould there while it isnt as bad on those laid on the side

    Could you clarify what you mean here. You say if stacking there is less damage when layed on their sides!! I assume that is the bottom row!

    What about the top row? These are on their sides, so should have air pockets as described by Reilig .... hence damage potential!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭5live


    Tora Bora wrote: »
    Could you clarify what you mean here. You say if stacking there is less damage when layed on their sides!! I assume that is the bottom row!

    What about the top row? These are on their sides, so should have air pockets as described by Reilig .... hence damage potential!!
    Yeah there is damage but i found the bales stored on the ends and stacked 2 high had a lot more mould around the middle in the bottom row as they had 600kg+ of weight on them and the wrap got loose and there was a load of mould because of the poorer seal compared with bales stacked on the side where the mould was only at the top and middle (where the bale on top wasnt pressing down and forming a seal).

    Relax. Its just what i found. I only stack on the side now:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 908 ✭✭✭funny man


    i have stacked them both ways here with 4 layers of plastic and can confirm i have never seen more mould on one over the other, but if i was stacking on rough ground i would stack them on their end as there is more plastic on there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    I find if stored on their sides, that is the flat side, that there is far less waste. There is more wrap on the flat sides so better protected from birds, cats feet etc.
    I only stack one high so can't comment on stacking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 303 ✭✭gav86


    Just curious if anyone has ever heard about regulations about storing bales in the field next to a dwelling house. Is there an expected distance by law or is it just courtesy towards the household?

    I know that there is a 20metre buffer zone from a river unless the effluent is collected but have never seen any regulations regarding a house.. thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭13spanner


    We've always stored them standing up on their ends.
    There's more plastic on the 2 flat sides than anywhere else on the bale, theory is it might make it harder for birds to do damage if one of these sides is up. They usually hold there shape better too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭Good loser


    If bales are stored on concrete must there be provision for effluent (by regulation)?

    Must they be a specified distance from a bored well?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 867 ✭✭✭locky76


    Good loser wrote: »
    If bales are stored on concrete must there be provision for effluent (by regulation)?

    Must they be a specified distance from a bored well?
    By Reps spec, not if they're stacked two high.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,343 ✭✭✭bob charles


    much less space need for storage on ends. you have to be fairly handy to get 3 rows up. nice neat stack when on ends


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭Good loser


    locky76 wrote: »
    By Reps spec, not if they're stacked two high.

    Thanks Locky. Good night!


  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭tvo


    as a related topic what do you find is the quickest way of bringing in bales for a short draw double bale lifter + one on front loader or bale trailer


Advertisement