Rangers FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2012/2013

Coillte_Bhoy

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Was it to difficult to read two posts back

So a decent performance then. :cool:

PARKHEAD67

TheBuilder wrote: »

Decent performance, everything there but more goals. Credit to Dunfermline, they defended well, excellently at times.

Aluko's penalty was extremely soft, but after not getting one last week the "these things even themselves up", idea obviously is partly true.

Thats an understatement.He should have been booked for "simulation".A little help from the ref never hurt the rangers in the past I suppose.The 1st goal was laurel and hardy stuff.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

PARKHEAD67 wrote: »

Thats an understatement.He should have been booked for "simulation".A little help from the ref never hurt the rangers in the past I suppose.The 1st goal was laurel and hardy stuff.

Notice your not saying anything about the penalty we didn't get last week

Or you never mention how Celtic got more penalty's last season than anyone else

PARKHEAD67

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Notice your not saying anything about the penalty we didn't get last week

Or you never mention how Celtic got more penalty's last season than anyone else

They made sure that was put right fair quick;).On the second point, we're the most attack-minded team in the league,so on the law of averages we're bound to get the most penalties.Not dodgy ones though.Aluko could be the new naisy if he keeps this codology up.

dartbhoy

Rangers made hard work today of their 2-1 win over Dunfermline. Looking at the penalty it looked a soft call but I'm sure rangers fans are not too bothered about that! Some reports on facebook suggesting that some rangers fans booed off the team at the end? Some football fans can be so fickle!

TheBuilder

dartbhoy wrote: »

Rangers made hard work today of their 2-1 win over Dunfermline. Looking at the penalty it looked a soft call but I'm sure rangers fans are not too bothered about that! Some reports on facebook suggesting that some rangers fans booed off the team at the end? Some football fans can be so fickle!

Didnt boo them off mate, booed them for holding the ball up and trying to play out the game, same thing as happened at parkhead last week, mental fans!

KeithAFC

Need to go back to getting more clean sheets. Seeing out the game is clever.

Jelle1880

PARKHEAD67 wrote: »

They made sure that was put right fair quick;).On the second point, we're the most attack-minded team in the league,so on the law of averages we're bound to get the most penalties.Not dodgy ones though.Aluko could be the new naisy if he keeps this codology up.

Not dodgy ones
Did you blank out the penalty in the last OF game of last season ?

KeithAFC

celtic fans can't complain about penalties. They got one of the worst decisions last season in a OF game which would have won them the title with Samaras and his penalty.

spiralism

KeithAFC wrote: »

celtic fans can't complain about penalties. They got one of the worst decisions last season in a OF game which would have won them the title with Samaras and his penalty.

on the other side of the coin hamilton had a ludicrously offside goal allowed against celtic and a last minute winner for celtic was unfairly chalked off in the same match, those 2 points would have sent the title to parkhead...so that kinda balances out doesnt it? or it would if samaras didnt predictably miss that fcuking pen

Jelle1880

spiralism wrote: »

on the other side of the coin hamilton had a ludicrously offside goal allowed against celtic and a last minute winner for celtic was unfairly chalked off in the same match, those 2 points would have sent the title to parkhead...so that kinda balances out doesnt it? or it would if samaras didnt predictably miss that fcuking pen

Or Rangers have had insane decisions gone against them, from perfectly good goals being disallowed to stonewall penalties not given,...

Bottom line is that the standard of referees in Scotland is abysmal, and I don't think it has anything to do with bias towards any team.

As for yesterday's game, it wasn't bad at all.
Especially the first half we were playing pretty good, could have easily been 4 up by then.
The second half was worse, but still in control of the game.

PARKHEAD67

this.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zsVTaGTENE Kirk.the rangers cheat again.

Jelle1880

You mean this one ?



Hell, the replay around 0:17 even clearly shows him looking.

PARKHEAD67

Watch this.One of Keiths heroes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3iUDg6JEo0

PARKHEAD67

Jelle1880 wrote: »

You mean this one ?



Hell, the replay around 0:17 even clearly shows him looking.

Looking at gross simulation by the man who cant cook an egg in a microwave without ending up in A&E:D

Jelle1880

Do I need to post that video again of your hero, Lennon ?

TheBuilder

I've woken up 2 years in the past

Jelle1880

TheBuilder wrote: »

I've woken up 2 years in the past

So we'll win the league this year too ? :pac:

PARKHEAD67

TheBuilder wrote: »

I've woken up 2 years in the past

You could go back a lot longer than 2 years.The insane decisions that go the rangers way are sometin=mes astonishing.The Aluko dive yesterday was unreal.The wife saw it on sky sports there a while ago.Now she understands why I rant:D

Dempsey

Jelle1880 wrote: »

You mean this one ?



Hell, the replay around 0:17 even clearly shows him looking.

The referee was badly positioned and did not see the incident properly. To say that he saw enough of it is complete bull

PARKHEAD67

Jelle1880 wrote: »

So we'll win the league this year too ? :pac:

Well, if the refs keep this up nothing can stop yee.

Jelle1880

PARKHEAD67, is this you ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILjRwZrTeCI

PARKHEAD67

Jelle1880 wrote: »

PARKHEAD67, is this you ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILjRwZrTeCI

No.He makes some valid points though.Although he sounds a little stoned:D

Jelle1880

'Valid points', are you sure you're not the one who's stoned ? :eek:

PARKHEAD67

Jelle1880 wrote: »

'Valid points', are you sure you're not the one who's stoned ? :eek:

I only listened to about 30 seconds of it..:rolleyes:

TheBuilder

SFA are reviewing Aluko's dive.

Jelle1880

Hopefully together with the stonewaller against him at Killie.

PARKHEAD67

TheBuilder wrote: »

SFA are reviewing Aluko's dive.

Bit late now. The points are in the bag.Theyd be better off reviewing their referee.

TheBuilder

PARKHEAD67 wrote: »

Bit late now. The points are in the bag.Theyd be better off reviewing their referee.

Same as if they decided to review why he didnt get the stonewaller last week, they need to review that referee as well.

Eirebear

PARKHEAD67 wrote: »

.On the second point, we're the most attack-minded team in the league,so on the law of averages we're bound to get the most penalties

*********Congratulations PARKHEAD67*********
You have become the proud winner of the Straw That Broke The Camels Back Award! Your prize is to make Eirebear post on this forum again!
:D

You do know, that we've outscored you in the last 2 seasons yes?
In fact the last time you outscored us was 2006-07?
And for the last two seasons Celtic have been awarded more penalties, and conceded less?

PauloMN

Eirebear wrote: »

*********Congratulations PARKHEAD67*********
You have become the proud winner of the Straw That Broke The Canmels Back Award! Your prize is to make Eirebear post on this forum again!
:D

You do know, that we've outscored you in the last 2 seasons yes?
In fact the last time you outscored us was 2006-07?
And for the last two seasons Celtic have been awarded more penalties, and conceded less?

Welcome back dude!

Eirebear

PauloMN wrote: »

Welcome back dude!

I'm not staying...i need to go and find out more about "Canmels"

PauloMN

Eirebear wrote: »

I'm not staying...i need to go and find out more about "Canmels"

Def: "Canmel" - a camel that supports The Rangers.

Jelle1880

2 game ban for Aluko, has to be appealed imo.
Joke of a decision.

Dempsey

Jelle1880 wrote: »

2 game ban for Aluko, has to be appealed imo.
Joke of a decision.

It is a joke, it should have been a 6 match ban.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Dempsey wrote: »

It is a joke, it should have been a 6 match ban.

Of course it should he should have been branded on the forehead with a big D for diver as well

Dempsey

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Of course it should he should have been branded on the forehead with a big D for diver as well

That would be nice! It would help the stupid referees!

A 2 match ban with a chance of appeal isnt a proper deterrent. You think that will stop a player taking a dive if there is a title, european spot, relegation decider? It would be water off a ducks back for the likes of Naismith and Aluko.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Dempsey wrote: »

That would be nice! It would help the stupid referees!

A 2 match ban with appeal isnt a proper deterrent. You think that will stop a player taking a dive if there is a title, european spot, relegation decider? It would be water off a ducks back for the likes of Naismith and Aluko.

Would you have been saying this when a players like Nakamura for example did it

Jelle1880

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Would you have been saying this when a players like Nakamura for example did it

No, they still go on about that win against ManU, which came about after a ridiculous dive from Nakamura.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Where are you seeing this about the two match ban jelle

Dempsey

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Would you have been saying this when a players like Nakamura for example did it

My opinion of diving/cheating/simulation doesnt change to suit Celtic. What made you think that it would? The deterrent has to be heavy handed to put players off trying to cheat. We both know that the biggest offenders in the SPL play for Rangers, why else would you be put off wanting big punishments for cheats!

Dempsey

Jelle1880 wrote: »

No, they still go on about that win against ManU, which came about after a ridiculous dive from Nakamura.

Nakamura wasnt the one fouled actually. :P

Jelle1880

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Where are you seeing this about the two match ban jelle

http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottish-premier/rangers/285394-explained-how-the-scottish-fa-punish-diving/

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Dempsey wrote: »

My opinion of diving/cheating/simulation doesnt change to suit Celtic. What made you think that it would? The deterrent has to be heavy handed to put players off trying to cheat. We both know that the biggest offenders in the SPL play for Rangers, why else would you be put off wanting big punishments for cheats!

Show me where I said I didn't want him punished you must seeing things I did't post

Are you 67 in disguise

Dempsey

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Show me where I said I didn't want him punished you must seeing things I did't post

I didnt say that you didnt want him punished. You ridiculed me for suggesting big punishments which is what is required. Potentially, a 2 match ban for a league title? Naismith would make sure to injure himself in the somersault, he'd be a method actor about it!

Jelle1880

Dempsey wrote: »

I didnt say that you didnt want him punished. You ridiculed me for suggesting big punishments which is what is required. Potentially, a 2 match ban for a league title? Naismith would make sure to injure himself in the somersault, he'd be a method actor about it!

With every tim on here bitching and moaning about Naismith, one would think he really pissed you lot off after the last OF game.

bobmalooka

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Stop making Naismith to look like a cheat, it's getting sad.

pretty sure naisy doesn't need anyone else to make him look like a cheat

Jelle1880

bobmalooka wrote: »

pretty sure naisy doesn't need anyone else to make him look like a cheat

No, you lot are doing a good enough job of that.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

I find it funny how short some peoples memories are regarding divers

Jelle1880

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

I find it funny how short some peoples memories are regarding divers

You mean like McGeady ?
But he didn't dive, 'he was too fast for the defenders' :rolleyes: