Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ship bound for Gaza

1235720

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    I don't see how that is relevant to this thread?
    ..
    :confused::confused::confused::confused: It was a direct reply to your post 196


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    anymore wrote: »
    I have said many, many times, the big, big majority of muslims killed violently in the Middle east over the past twenty years have been killed by fellow muslims and not by Israel. That fact is almost never reflected in threads.

    Not the US? Walked into wars in large part by (Likudite) neocon fantasies?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭CrackisWhack


    anymore wrote: »
    It was a direct reply to your post 196


    This thread is about the flotilla bound for Gaza, there are other threads on boards.ie about Syria, Libya etc.

    This argument about Israel being demonised, or why nobody is talking about other conflicts is rubbish, in fact it's not an argument at all, it's purely trying to deflect the attention away form the thread topic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    anymore wrote: »
    This seems to be a standard response on anti Israeli threads when faced with logic or facts. I have forgotten how many times I have been faced with it.

    Considering that posters in question was shown to be completely wrong, and insisted that they were right, even after shown to be wrong, its a perfectly valid response, considering how many times, those who support Israel tend to say stuff, and even when proven wrong repeat it time and time again.

    We are talking about pretty uncontroversial stuff (unless your a Greater Israel nut), like expansions of settlement being land theft, being denied, and also when contrary facts being presented, they are ignored or mis-represented, and posters just insist there correct in anyways.

    Also, btw you seem to ignore the facts presented in the post you quoted, which directly refuted the claims being made......
    anymore wrote: »
    The above assertion, based on past behaviour, is obivously the only sane conclusion any reasonable person could come to.

    No, it actually isn't. Again, the International community could help check what goes in and out of Gaza, and and as such the siege isn't the only option available for Israel at all.

    Secondly, I always find it hilarious that Israel, who have killed plenty of civilians and have engaged in state terrorism, are allowed all kinds of advanced weaponry. Pretty typical double standard imho.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,644 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Again, the International community could help check what goes in and out of Gaza, and and as such the siege isn't the only option available for Israel at all.

    So you suggest that the international community conducts the blockade, instead of Israel? Well, if you really want the UN to fight Israel's war, I guess it can be done, but I don't think that's really the route you're inclined to take, and Israel is under no particular obligation to allow it.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Palmach


    So you suggest that the international community conducts the blockade, instead of Israel? Well, if you really want the UN to fight Israel's war, I guess it can be done, but I don't think that's really the route you're inclined to take, and Israel is under no particular obligation to allow it.

    NTM

    What Wes forgets is that there was an agreement whereby the EU monitored what went in and out with the Israelis being allowed to see on camera what was going on. Hamas scuppered the deal. Hamas and their spokesmen are quite clear in what they intend to do as is their charter. Anyone who thinks they'll just settle down to become Scandinavians is living in lala land.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭paulaa


    Palmach wrote: »
    What Wes forgets is that there was an agreement whereby the EU monitored what went in and out with the Israelis being allowed to see on camera what was going on. Hamas scuppered the deal.

    Do you have any links for that ?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,644 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    paulaa wrote: »
    Do you have any links for that ?

    I, too, would be curious to see the details. Even if Hamas scuppered that deal first, I find it hard to accept that, unless there were some fairly stringent conditions, the Israelis would have accepted it either.

    NTM


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    wes wrote: »
    Considering that posters in question was shown to be completely wrong, and insisted that they were right, even after shown to be wrong, its a perfectly valid response, considering how many times, those who support Israel tend to say stuff, and even when proven wrong repeat it time and time again.

    We are talking about pretty uncontroversial stuff (unless your a Greater Israel nut), like expansions of settlement being land theft, being denied, and also when contrary facts being presented, they are ignored or mis-represented, and posters just insist there correct in anyways.

    Also, btw you seem to ignore the facts presented in the post you quoted, which directly refuted the claims being made......



    No, it actually isn't. Again, the International community could help check what goes in and out of Gaza, and and as such the siege isn't the only option available for Israel at all.

    Secondly, I always find it hilarious that Israel, who have killed plenty of civilians and have engaged in state terrorism, are allowed all kinds of advanced weaponry. Pretty typical double standard imho.
    1.. Israel does nor surround all of Gaza - Ipso Facto Israel cannot be laying 'Siege' to Gaza.
    2. International Community - this International Community doesnt give a Rar's ass about Somalia etc, so ..... you unlike yourself I really cant bothered spending hours and hours recycling, regurgitating the same old tired weary arguements on an internet site which absolutely nothing at all ! I seem to recall we were doing the same old a year ago.
    Like I said more and more people are simply tired of the same old same old.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    This thread is about the flotilla bound for Gaza, there are other threads on boards.ie about Syria, Libya etc.

    This argument about Israel being demonised, or why nobody is talking about other conflicts is rubbish, in fact it's not an argument at all, it's purely trying to deflect the attention away form the thread topic.
    If you are not interested in the answer, then dont ask the question !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Palmach


    paulaa wrote: »
    Do you have any links for that ?
    I, too, would be curious to see the details. Even if Hamas scuppered that deal first, I find it hard to accept that, unless there were some fairly stringent conditions, the Israelis would have accepted it either.

    NTM

    Right here chaps........
    http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/6346702.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    anymore wrote: »
    I have said many, many times, the big, big majority of muslims killed violently in the Middle east over the past twenty years have been killed by fellow muslims and not by Israel. That fact is almost never reflected in threads.

    I don't see many posters consistently supporting the state terrorism of Gaddaffi and Mubarak. That's why there are so many threads on the issue, because there are people defending Israel's actions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    I don't see many posters consistently supporting the state terrorism of Gaddaffi and Mubarak. That's why there are so many threads on the issue, because there are people defending Israel's actions.

    I dont quite see the logic here ? Most threads tend to be anti israeli so does this mean if nobody defended Israel or criticised hamas etc, there would be so many threads on the subject ?:confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    anymore wrote: »
    [/B]
    I dont quite see the logic here ? Most threads tend to be anti israeli so does this mean if nobody defended Israel or criticised hamas etc, there would be so many threads on the subject ?:confused::confused:

    There would be less, because threads would be boring and repetitive without any form of debate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    Let me offer one general comment; the US is beginning a long process of disengagement from its position of being the number one power for mainly economic reasons and is resigned to being second to China in the not too distant future. The US's stand off position on Libya is a fair indicator of this. China cares nothing for human rights and Gaza and the West Bank have nothing to offer it anyway. The US will continue to support Israel, so people can huff and puff all they like about it, but fewer and fewer people will be listening. The big story from Africa over the next fifty years will be mainly climate change induced migration to Europe. And of course China's intentions as reagrds acquiring and protecting natural resources is one of the freat unkowns. Chinas large investments in Africa over several decades are well known - as people may have noticed, China hasnt spent too much time sinvesting in Gaza/West bank. The world is changing before our eyes and some people just dont seem to have noticed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭CrackisWhack


    anymore wrote: »
    If you are not interested in the answer, then dont ask the question !


    What are you on about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭CrackisWhack


    anymore wrote: »
    Let me offer one general comment; the US is beginning a long process of disengagement from its position of being the number one power for mainly economic reasons and is resigned to being second to China in the not too distant future. The US's stand off position on Libya is a fair indicator of this. China cares nothing for human rights and Gaza and the West Bank have nothing to offer it anyway. The US will continue to support Israel, so people can huff and puff all they like about it, but fewer and fewer people will be listening. The big story from Africa over the next fifty years will be mainly climate change induced migration to Europe. And of course China's intentions as reagrds acquiring and protecting natural resources is one of the freat unkowns. Chinas large investments in Africa over several decades are well known - as people may have noticed, China hasnt spent too much time sinvesting in Gaza/West bank. The world is changing before our eyes and some people just dont seem to have noticed.

    And your point is? We might aswell just forget about Palestine?:confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    I am convinced the people in government in Israel are a bunch of god damn idiots and clueless when it comes to international politics and all that entails. Im my opinion the people running that country will eventually lead to the downfall of it or at least the status quo. Or maybe they are just arrogant and couldnt careless. Incase Israel hadnt noticed and the posters here defending the sea-blockade, Israel's international image, whats left of it anyways, is in complete tatters. And here we have an opportunity for Israel to show some humanity by doing the right thing, to regain some of the respect it has lost by its actions last time around and what do they do? they start threatening people again with snipers and attack dogs, threaten to illegally board the ships once again, once again they are not showing even a glimpse of common sense and humanity just threats of force and violence.
    The Israeli logic for blocking the flotilla is illogical and does not stand up to scrutiny. It would of been very easy for Israel to meet the flotilla halfway for example sending some people of their own to the port where the flotilla was based and inspecting the ships themselves. We all know there are no weapons on these ships. Was simple for Israel to confirm this but they arent interested. The ships have been inspected countries will vouch for the cargo. Israel isnt interested. Israel maybe could have even sent a ship of their own along to shadow the flotilla or sail with it some sort of compromise. But Israel isnt interested. One can only assume then that Israel does not want vital humanitarian supplies reaching civilians. This as everyone knows and accepts, bar Israel of course, is wrong, illegal and in-human.
    From an Irish point of view there are some 20 Irish people involved in this flotilla and personally speaking I demand that they return home to Ireland unharmed, no bullets in them and in one piece. The Irish government once again have shown themselves to be spineless. When another country threatens violence against your people, in international waters no less, surely a strongly worded rebuke should be forthcoming. Not a thing. Zilch. Nothing new there so. Israel has an opportunity here, again, to show another side of themselves to the world. Question is which side will they show.

    In relation to the flotilla a Swedish ship which is part of the flotilla is claiming to have been sabotaged in port.

    Lets hope humanity prevails when the ships arrive it isnt much to expect.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    WakeUp wrote: »
    I am convinced the people in government in Israel are a bunch of god damn idiots and clueless when it comes to international politics and all that entails. Im my opinion the people running that country will eventually lead to the downfall of it or at least the status quo. Or maybe they are just arrogant and couldnt careless. Incase Israel hadnt noticed and the posters here defending the sea-blockade, Israel's international image, whats left of it anyways, is in complete tatters. And here we have an opportunity for Israel to show some humanity by doing the right thing, to regain some of the respect it has lost by its actions last time around and what do they do? they start threatening people again with snipers and attack dogs, threaten to illegally board the ships once again, once again they are not showing even a glimpse of common sense and humanity just threats of force and violence.
    The Israeli logic for blocking the flotilla is illogical and does not stand up to scrutiny. It would of been very easy for Israel to meet the flotilla halfway for example sending some people of their own to the port where the flotilla was based and inspecting the ships themselves. We all know there are no weapons on these ships. Was simple for Israel to confirm this but they arent interested. The ships have been inspected countries will vouch for the cargo. Israel isnt interested. Israel maybe could have even sent a ship of their own along to shadow the flotilla or sail with it some sort of compromise. But Israel isnt interested. One can only assume then that Israel does not want vital humanitarian supplies reaching civilians. This as everyone knows and accepts, bar Israel of course, is wrong, illegal and in-human.
    From an Irish point of view there are some 20 Irish people involved in this flotilla and personally speaking I demand that they return home to Ireland unharmed, no bullets in them and in one piece. The Irish government once again have shown themselves to be spineless. When another country threatens violence against your people, in international waters no less, surely a strongly worded rebuke should be forthcoming. Not a thing. Zilch. Nothing new there so. Israel has an opportunity here, again, to show another side of themselves to the world. Question is which side will they show.

    In relation to the flotilla a Swedish ship which is part of the flotilla is claiming to have been sabotaged in port.

    Lets hope humanity prevails when the ships arrive it isnt much to expect.
    If I get up to some particularily dangerous activity when abroad, I dont expect the irish Tax payer to cover my ass.
    As for humanity prevailing, I would prefer sanity to prevail, dont go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    anymore wrote: »
    If I get up to some particularily dangerous activity when abroad, I dont expect the irish Tax payer to cover my ass.
    As for humanity prevailing, I would prefer sanity to prevail, dont go.

    Since when did sailing in international waters become dangerous apart from the obvious dangers of being in a boat on water i.e sinking and such? What gives Israel the right to board/assault ships in international waters? So on that basis I demand all the Irish people and people on those ships return home alive and unharmed.
    I respect you and people like yourself defending your country/people/view point whatever your reason is for doing so but you dont have a leg to stand on, really, its quite obvious and apparent. But Israel seems blinded to this fact maybe they just dont want to see. As for sanity prevailing? there is nothing sane about the IDF illegal sea blockade or the general treatment of the people of Gaza. Such a statement as the one you made is quite frankly ridiculous in the extreme. When Israel and the IDF start acting in a rational and sane way come back and talk to me about "sanity".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    Since when did sailing in international waters become dangerous apart from the obvious dangers of being in a boat on water i.e sinking and such? What gives Israel the right to board/assault ships in international waters? So on that basis I demand all the Irish people and people on those ships return home alive and unharmed.

    You can demand all you want till your blue in the face. If these people try and break the blockade and attack Israeli naval personnel then they do so at their own risk. Hopefully they won't be that dumb.
    I respect you and people like yourself defending your country/people/view point whatever your reason is for doing so but you dont have a leg to stand on, really, its quite obvious and apparent. But Israel seems blinded to this fact maybe they just dont want to see. As for sanity prevailing? there is nothing sane about the IDF illegal sea blockade or the general treatment of the people of Gaza. Such a statement as the one you made is quite frankly ridiculous in the extreme. When Israel and the IDF start acting in a rational and sane way come back and talk to me about "sanity".

    This is the official IDF stance on the legality or otherwise of the blockade, seems pretty sane and rational to me http://idfspokesperson.com/2011/06/26/the-idfs-lawfully-enforced-naval-blockade-on-the-gaza-strip/

    There was a aid convoy that delivered medical aid to Gaza recently but because it didn't have any publicity hungry western politicians or maniac islamists on board it didn't rate much publicity but it did its work quietly and effectively via Egypt and in conjunction with Israel http://occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/miles-for-smiles-3-convoy-geared-to-bring-aid-to-gaza/

    and in case some people think that Gaza is being strangled for aid, thats not the case, the information is out there if people wish to look for it http://www.idf.il/1283-12241-EN/Dover.aspx


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    So you suggest that the international community conducts the blockade, instead of Israel? Well, if you really want the UN to fight Israel's war, I guess it can be done, but I don't think that's really the route you're inclined to take, and Israel is under no particular obligation to allow it.

    Eh, no I am not suggesting that at all, and I have no idea where your getting that from. My point is that the International community can be used to stop weapons being smuggled into Gaza, and that is certainly an option, as opposed to the current inhuman shield. As for what Israel won't allow, I could care less, as they do have other options then there current admitted policy of state terrorism, which as per usual supporters of Israel refuse to acknowledge or condemn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    anymore wrote: »
    1.. Israel does nor surround all of Gaza - Ipso Facto Israel cannot be laying 'Siege' to Gaza.

    Israel control all there air space and sea access, and via past agreement with Egypt, the Egyptians can't just open there border either, and hence the siege.
    anymore wrote: »
    2. International Community - this International Community doesnt give a Rar's ass about Somalia etc,

    Neither do you. You only bring Somalia up to distract from the current topic. If you cared you would start a thread, the fact you haven't and constantly bring it up in this one, again shows you could care less, and even if you did start one, it would only be due to people pointing out the fact you don't care.
    anymore wrote: »
    so ..... you unlike yourself I really cant bothered spending hours and hours recycling, regurgitating the same old tired weary arguements on an internet site which absolutely nothing at all ! I seem to recall we were doing the same old a year ago.

    And yet here you are posting.......
    anymore wrote: »
    Like I said more and more people are simply tired of the same old same old.

    The only person you can speak for is yourself, and it should be pointed out, you were talking about anything but the topic half time, like you always do....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    You can demand all you want till your blue in the face. If these people try and break the blockade and attack Israeli naval personnel then they do so at their own risk. Hopefully they won't be that dumb.

    You will find that it was the IDF, who did the killing and attacking last time. They have a habit of murdering civilians, thats cheered for very loudly by supporters of Israel. Never, a single bit of condemnation of Israeli state terror, go figure......
    This is the official IDF stance on the legality or otherwise of the blockade, seems pretty sane and rational to me http://idfspokesperson.com/2011/06/26/the-idfs-lawfully-enforced-naval-blockade-on-the-gaza-strip/

    Yeah, the IDF, who are well know [sarcasm]for being unbiased and being truthful[/sarcasm]. It laughable that you expect anyone to accept a word, the IDF, who are well known liars, and were exposed multiple times lieing through there teeth, is laughable.

    Of course, what is dumb is Israel reaction to the latest Flotilla, if they weren't being led by idiots, they would let it quietly go to Gaza, and not make a big fuss over it, and hence giving the Flotilla even more publicity. Also, the various threats being made, by both Israel and her supporters about murdering the people on boards, is also massive own goal, when it comes to Israels image. I always find it funny, that there are so many who support Israel, who complain about other demonizing Israel, when its often Israel who make themselves look bad, and not to mention supporters who refuse to condemn state terror, and even some supporters who cheers on the IDF to kill there fellow citizens.
    There was a aid convoy that delivered medical aid to Gaza recently but because it didn't have any publicity hungry western politicians or maniac islamists on board it didn't rate much publicity but it did its work quietly and effectively via Egypt and in conjunction with Israel http://occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/miles-for-smiles-3-convoy-geared-to-bring-aid-to-gaza/

    Ah yes, personal attacks on those aboard, there either Islamists or publicity hungry. As has been pointed out before, the Egyptian crossing, isn't as open as you would think, and peacefully highlighting Israel inhuman acts of state terror, which supporters of Israel refuse to condemn as per usual, is perfectly reasonable.
    and in case some people think that Gaza is being strangled for aid, thats not the case, the information is out there if people wish to look for it http://www.idf.il/1283-12241-EN/Dover.aspx

    Again, the IDF? A group that has been shown time and time again to lie through there teeth (when there not using Palestinian children as Human Shields), and we are suppose to accept a word they say? It pretty laughable that you post multiple links from the IDF, and expect anyone to take a word you say seriously, as the organization is well know for lieing and murdering civilians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    You will find that it was the IDF, who did the killing and attacking last time. They have a habit of murdering civilians, thats cheered for very loudly by supporters of Israel. Never, a single bit of condemnation of Israeli state terror, go figure......

    It was the Islamist nutters on the Marmara who did the attacking but it was the IDF who ended that fight. As for not a single bit of condemnation on anything ever, thats not only wrong its extremely disingenuous.

    Yeah, the IDF, who are well know [sarcasm]for being unbiased and being truthful[/sarcasm]. It laughable that you expect anyone to accept a word, the IDF, who are well known liars, and were exposed multiple times lieing through there teeth, is laughable.

    The IDF are probably the most reliable sources amongst all the participants in the middle east, they are certainly FAR more reliable than any palestinian source.
    Of course, what is dumb is Israel reaction to the latest Flotilla, if they weren't being led by idiots, they would let it quietly go to Gaza, and not make a big fuss over it, and hence giving the Flotilla even more publicity. Also, the various threats being made, by both Israel and her supporters about murdering the people on boards, is also massive own goal, when it comes to Israels image.

    The IDF have not threatened to murder anyone. They have said that the convoy will be stopped and if attacked they will take defensive measures, as usual you up the hyperbole to the max when you get worked up.
    I always find it funny, that there are so many who support Israel, who complain about other demonizing Israel, when its often Israel who make themselves look bad, and not to mention supporters who refuse to condemn state terror, and even some supporters who cheers on the IDF to kill there fellow citizens.

    Yeah, thanks for the random link to some random blogger making outrageous posts. There are extremist cranks on both sides, tell us something new, the one difference being that Joshual Trevino isn't in power anywhere whereas the extremists are in government in Gaza.
    Ah yes, personal attacks on those aboard, there either Islamists or publicity hungry. As has been pointed out before, the Egyptian crossing, isn't as open as you would think, and peacefully highlighting Israel inhuman acts of state terror, which supporters of Israel refuse to condemn as per usual, is perfectly reasonable.

    And yet a peaceful convoy delivered its medicines and ambulances without making political points or looking for trouble, if the leaders of the current flotilla actually cared about humanitarian aid they would do the same instead of looking for notoriety.
    Again, the IDF? A group that has been shown time and time again to lie through there teeth (when there not using Palestinian children as Human Shields), and we are suppose to accept a word they say? It pretty laughable that you post multiple links from the IDF, and expect anyone to take a word you say seriously, as the organization is well know for lieing and murdering civilians.

    Ah yes, attack the post AND the poster, well done. In the link on humanitarian aid from the IDF that I posted, is there any factual error there? C'mon, there must be if your so hot and bothered about it right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    It was the Islamist nutters on the Marmara who did the attacking but it was the IDF who ended that fight.

    This is exactly what I am talking about, the IDF attack the boat, and are the ones who do all the killing and there victims are to blame. The only nutters were the IDF, who murdered people on that boat, and per usual we see the typical excuses for Israeli state terror, as opposed to condemnation. Always love the double standard for Israeli state terror, where there never to blame.
    As for not a single bit of condemnation on anything ever, thats not only wrong its extremely disingenuous.

    Considering you blamed the victims of the IDF above, that is a bit rich.
    The IDF are probably the most reliable sources amongst all the participants in the middle east, they are certainly FAR more reliable than any palestinian source.

    No there not. They have been caught telling blatant lies numerous times. Just, because you choose to ignore this fact, doesn't change it. The IDF are well known liars, and I find it hard to believe you are unaware of that fact.
    The IDF have not threatened to murder anyone. They have said that the convoy will be stopped and if attacked they will take defensive measures, as usual you up the hyperbole to the max when you get worked up.

    Fair enough, that was hyperbole on my part. Nonetheless, the IDF have no business stopping that boat, and as we saw last time, the IDF attacked first, and killed a bunch of people. I know you deny that fact, and instead blame the victims, which is typical for supporters of Israel.
    Yeah, thanks for the random link to some random blogger making outrageous posts. There are extremist cranks on both sides, tell us something new, the one difference being that Joshual Trevino isn't in power anywhere whereas the extremists are in government in Gaza.

    Joshual Trevino was a former Bush speech writer, so hardly some random blogger as you claim, it even tells you that in the link, I provided. So not some random blogger, but someone who worked for the highest level of the US government.

    The extremists of the Likud party are in power in Israel, and let not forget the Israeli Foreign Ministers party, and the other assorted extremists in the current coalition.
    And yet a peaceful convoy delivered its medicines and ambulances without making political points or looking for trouble, if the leaders of the current flotilla actually cared about humanitarian aid they would do the same instead of looking for notoriety.

    No, highlighting Israels siege is perfectly legitimate form of peaceful protest, and the only ones looking for trouble is Israel, who could just let them into Gaza, and save themselves all the trouble. Raising awareness of humanitarian issues, is also a perfectly valid way to help, except of course for those who support Israel.

    Also, the people are not looking for notoriety, but rather to highlight what is going on in Gaza.
    Ah yes, attack the post AND the poster, well done. In the link on humanitarian aid from the IDF that I posted, is there any factual error there? C'mon, there must be if your so hot and bothered about it right?

    Your source is from a group of well known liars and murderers. Why should I even bother with them? The IDF are about as trust worthy as Hamas, and I find it laughable that you would even suggest that any would should take a word they say seriously. The IDF are one side of the conflict, and even if they weren't caught out numerous times lieing, anything they claim would need to be taken with a pinch of salt, but as we all know they have been caught out lieing, and as such there reputation is in tatters at best.

    As for attacking the poster, fair enough, my bad on that one. However, would you take anyone seriously if they started posting links directly from Hamas?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    wes wrote: »
    Israel control all there air space and sea access, and via past agreement with Egypt, the Egyptians can't just open there border either, and hence the siege.



    Neither do you. You only bring Somalia up to distract from the current topic. If you cared you would start a thread, the fact you haven't and constantly bring it up in this one, again shows you could care less, and even if you did start one, it would only be due to people pointing out the fact you don't care.



    And yet here you are posting.......



    The only person you can speak for is yourself, and it should be pointed out, you were talking about anything but the topic half time, like you always do....
    I see there is a letter in Irish Times from PRO of so called 'Irish Anti War Movement ' verbally attacking some Irish Councillor for having the termity to publicly oppose this so called ' flotilla'. Rather ironic that an individual labelling himself as ' Anti War' should take such umbrage at an irish Councillor simply availing of the right to free speech. Still if the Councillor in question had been a Gaza resident who stood up in public to oppose Hamas, then we know what would have happened - for anyone who doesn't YOU Tube provides the answer.
    AS for humanitarian aid, I am told that driving a new BMW or SUV is quite the thing to do in GAZA and there is no shortage of these imported vehicles for sale there. :confused:
    Here is an article from the Guardian, which as you know is favourable to the situation in Gaza carrying an interesting article on an Entrepeneur in GAZA. Nice swimming pool - of course not in my wildest dreams could I afford a swimming pool.
    In closing I am wondering, did they ever find any of the billions in ' vital financial aid' Araffat stashed in off shore accounts ?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/10/gaza-oil


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    WakeUp wrote: »
    I am convinced the people in government in Israel are a bunch of god damn idiots and clueless when it comes to international politics and all that entails.
    They're Jews who keep holding up the anti-semitism card, like black people can hold up the race card when they feel they are discriminated against.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    Im my opinion the people running that country will eventually lead to the downfall of it or at least the status quo.
    Considering they're still there, what they are doing seems to be working.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    Or maybe they are just arrogant and couldnt careless.
    Most likely. They don't have any reason to care.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    Israel's international image
    As long as they get lots of money from the US, I don't think they care about their image. If anyone says they are swine, I dare say they'll query if you are being anti-semitism and if all Jews are swine.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    And here we have an opportunity for Israel to show some humanity by doing the right thing, to regain some of the respect it has lost by its actions last time around and what do they do?
    Why should they? What benefit does it give them?
    WakeUp wrote: »
    once again they are not showing even a glimpse of common sense and humanity just threats of force and violence.
    Once you no longer care about public image, you can pretty much do as you please.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    It would of been very easy for Israel to meet the flotilla halfway for example sending some people of their own to the port where the flotilla was based and inspecting the ships themselves.
    What benefit does this give to Israel. You talk of bettering their image, but if they do not care about their image, why would they allow anything through. I'd say going ship by ship is more work than just stopping any ships with a blockade.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    We all know there are no weapons on these ships. Was simple for Israel to confirm this but they arent interested. The ships have been inspected countries will vouch for the cargo. Israel isnt interested. Israel maybe could have even sent a ship of their own along to shadow the flotilla or sail with it some sort of compromise. But Israel isnt interested.
    Correct. Israel is not interested. Compromise is an odd word to use. Compromise is something the weaker side does to appease the stronger side. And as Israel is not interested in allowing anything in, or bettering it's image, they don't need to compromise. If the USA (read: stronger side) said that Israel must allow aid to come in by sea, Israel could then compromise and do searching, but as long as Israel offers itself as a runway in the middel east, I don't see the US doing this.
    WakeUp wrote: »
    Israel has an opportunity here, again, to show another side of themselves to the world. Question is which side will they show.
    Will they allow a ship full of civilians past the blockade? I doubt it. They stopped every other one, so I doubt they'll stop this one.

    =-=

    In many states, image is something you want to keep clean, as your image helps you sell goods, and bring in money to your ecomony. If you have a country bank-rolling you, you don't have to care about your image.

    Thus, until Israel has to care about its image, I can't see them budging on the flotilla issue.
    wes wrote: »
    Eh, no I am not suggesting that at all, and I have no idea where your getting that from.
    You are not suggesting that the "international community conducts the blockade", but that
    wes wrote: »
    My point is that the International community can be used to stop weapons being smuggled into Gaza
    they are used somehow to stop the weapons from coming in. Apart from conducting the blockade and checking the ships as they come in, how else would the international community do this without conducting the blockade?
    wes wrote: »
    Israel control all there air space and sea access, and via past agreement with Egypt, the Egyptians can't just open there border either, and hence the siege.
    I think the question is that since the Egyptian government was overthrown, is the agreement voided? Under normal rules, one government abides by treaties a past government has put into place, but as I don't view a forced government change as a a normal changing of the guard, I wonder will they abide by a treaty put in place by a government whom they overthrew?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    anymore wrote: »
    I see there is a letter in Irish Times from PRO of so called 'Irish Anti War Movement ' verbally attacking some Irish Councillor for having the termity to publicly oppose this so called ' flotilla'.

    Care to provide a link to the letter firstly, as I personally don't trust your version of events. Secondly, what your saying has feck all to do with my post.
    anymore wrote: »
    Rather ironic that an individual labelling himself as ' Anti War' should take such umbrage at an irish Councillor simply availing of the right to free speech.

    Free speech is a 2 way street. Someone disagreeing with someone isn't the same as that person disagreeing with the right to free speech, and again considering you posted no link, I find your version of events questionable.
    anymore wrote: »
    Still if the Councillor in question had been a Gaza resident who stood up in public to oppose Hamas, then we know what would have happened - for anyone who doesn't YOU Tube provides the answer.

    Ok, and I still not sure how this had anything to do with what I said. You are going off on some random tangent here. Also, no one here pretends that Hamas aren't a bunch of murderous idiots, but we do have people pretending that about the IDF.
    anymore wrote: »
    AS for humanitarian aid, I am told that driving a new BMW or SUV is quite the thing to do in GAZA and there is no shortage of these imported vehicles for sale there. :confused:

    Vehicles are smuggled in piece by piece, and as for there being no shortage, that is a laughable claim. I am sure you can provide a link from a reputable source to back up that claim, and also you will need to refute most of the worlds Human Rights orgs claims while you are at it, if you are really claiming there is no Humanitarian crisis, as it stands you are engaged in a rather disgusting denial of the effect of Israel's state terrorism.
    anymore wrote: »
    Here is an article from the Guardian, which as you know is favourable to the situation in Gaza carrying an interesting article on an Entrepeneur in GAZA. Nice swimming pool - of course not in my wildest dreams could I afford a swimming pool.

    A single individual managing to make money doesn't refute the fact that the vast majority don't have it nearly as good. Some people in Gaza, have managed to make money from smuggling, and you will always find people who manage to make money even in the worst circumstance. Sure, you will find rich people in plenty of 3rd world countries, but there existences doesn't change the fact that the rest are still dirt poor.

    So, as per usual you got nothing, except the same old disgusting denial of the terrible situation the vast majority of Gazans find themselves in.
    anymore wrote: »
    In closing I am wondering, did they ever find any of the billions in ' vital financial aid' Araffat stashed in off shore accounts ?

    Which has nothing to do with current thread....... Of course, half of what you posted has nothing to do with this thread.

    Also, I notice you decided to ignore my comment about you not starting a thread on Somalia. I would say that only brought up Somalia not because you care, but rather as a tactic of distraction, so you can attack other posters, and defend Israel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    the_syco wrote: »
    they are used somehow to stop the weapons from coming in. Apart from conducting the blockade and checking the ships as they come in, how else would the international community do this without conducting the blockade?

    They can do it the same way every country does, when checking for banned items being brought into there countries.
    the_syco wrote: »
    I think the question is that since the Egyptian government was overthrown, is the agreement voided? Under normal rules, one government abides by treaties a past government has put into place, but as I don't view a forced government change as a a normal changing of the guard, I wonder will they abide by a treaty put in place by a government whom they overthrew?

    Well, as it stands they are abiding by the previous agreements. This may change in the future, but I wouldn't imagine any major changes until after elections, if even then.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    ................

    The IDF are probably the most reliable sources amongst all the participants in the middle east, they are certainly FAR more reliable than any palestinian source.

    .......

    ...there are two sides, of which they compose one. Therefore....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    wes wrote: »
    Care to provide a link to the letter firstly, as I personally don't trust your version of events. Secondly, what your saying has feck all to do with my post.



    Free speech is a 2 way street. Someone disagreeing with someone isn't the same as that person disagreeing with the right to free speech, and again considering you posted no link, I find your version of event questionable.



    Ok, and I still not sure how this had anything to do with what I said. You are going off on some random tangent here. Also, no one here pretends that Hamas aren't a bunch of murderous idiots.



    Vehicles are smuggled in, and as for there being no shortage. I am sure you can provide a link from a reputable source to back up that claim, and also you will need to refute most of the worlds Human Rights orgs claims while you are at it, if you are really claiming there is no Humanitarian crisis, as it stands you are engaged in a rather disgusting denial of the effect of Israel's state terrorism.



    A single individual managing to make money doesn't refute the fact that the vast majority don't have it as good. Some people in Gaza, have managed to make money from smuggling. So, as per usual you got nothing, except the same old disgusting denial of the terrible situation the vast majority of Gazans find themselves in.



    Which has nothing to do with current thread.......

    Wes I can only stand back in awe at your pordigious output on this subject ! Still if you cant simply Google Irish Times, then forgive me if i dont come to your assistance - I am surprised a person in your position doesnt keep up to date with the Irish debate on the subject. I suppose you dont have time.
    I am a little amused that you ask me to provide ' link from a reputable source to back up that claim ' in relation to smuggled goods ! What can i say.
    A


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    In terms of AID, Gaza is probably one of the most ' Aided' places on earth. Where did it all go to ? Israel can hardly have destroyed it all !
    Where did all the money go to ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Palmach


    anymore wrote: »
    In terms of AID, Gaza is probably one of the most ' Aided' places on earth. Where did it all go to ? Israel can hardly have destroyed it all !
    Where did all the money go to ?

    The "Palestinians" have a UN aid agency just for themselves which gets bigger each year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    anymore wrote: »
    Wes I can only stand back in awe at your pordigious output on this subject !

    Coming from someone who has posted plenty of times in this thread, that is a rather striking bit of hypocrisy. Of course, a lot of your posts have nothing to do with topic, which make your achievement doubly funny.
    anymore wrote: »
    Still if you cant simply Google Irish Times, then forgive me if i dont come to your assistance - I am surprised a person in your position doesnt keep up to date with the Irish debate on the subject. I suppose you dont have time.

    Well, if you aren't going to bother with the common courtesy of providing a link to something that your discussing, then I see no reason to bother with your comments, and I will state what I said before. I find the fact you neglected to provide a link to be rather telling, and would guess that what you said about the letter in question to not be accurate.
    anymore wrote: »
    I am a little amused that you ask me to provide ' link from a reputable source to back up that claim ' in relation to smuggled goods ! What can i say.

    I asked for you back up your claim regarding the BMW's, which I said were probably smuggled (assuming what your saying is true at all), and seeing as you can't provide a link, then I can only wonder how came to such a conclusion in the first place, and seeing as there is no link provided, then what you said is clearly fiction. Seems to me you are making stuff up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    wes wrote: »
    Coming from someone who has posted plenty of times in this thread, that is a rather striking bit of hypocrisy. Of course, a lot of your posts have nothing to do with topic, which make your achievement doubly funny.



    Well, if you aren't going to bother with the common courtesy of providing a link to something that your discussing, then I see no reason to bother with your comments, and I will state what I said before. I find the fact you neglected to provide a link to be rather telling, and would guess that what you said about the letter in question to not be accurate.



    I asked for you back up your claim regarding the BMW's, which I said were probably smuggled (assuming what your saying is true at all), and seeing as you can't provide a link, then I can only wonder how came to such a conclusion in the first place, and seeing as there is no link provided, then what you said is clearly fiction. Seems to me you are making stuff up.
    Wes you become funnier as you get older ! You accuse me first of hypocrisy and then tell me i lack ' common courtesy' ! I ju:pst love it.
    Anyway, if you have any interest in the Gza issue, you will be fully familiar with the smuggling operations which are primarily profit driven operations and which pay ' tax' to Hamas. The reality is this 'siege' is proving remarably profitable to the upper echelon of the various political groups etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    anymore wrote: »
    Wes you become funnier as you get older !

    Practice make perfect as they say.
    anymore wrote: »
    You accuse me first of hypocrisy and then tell me i lack ' common courtesy' ! I ju:pst love it.

    Well, seeing as you have posted plenty of times in this thread, hypocrisy is perfectly apt. Also, talking about letter and not providing a link, and then refusing to do so even after being asked, is very much a lack of common courtesy. Now seeing as you can't be bothered to provide links, don't expect me to provide any if you ask. Still, I find it rather odd you didn't provide a link, and on that basis, I reckon your comments do no represent its content accurately.
    anymore wrote: »
    Anyway, if you have any interest in the Gza issue, you will be fully familiar with the smuggling operations which are primarily profit driven operations and which pay ' tax' to Hamas. The reality is this 'siege' is proving remarably profitable to the upper echelon of the various political groups etc.

    Yes, there are people benefiting from the siege, and there will always be people who can make money. In fact I said as much earlier myself.......

    However, you have yet to address your comment in regards to there being no shortage of BMWs, and you didn't mention smuggling when you posted that. I was the one who mentioned smuggling, and it leads me to conclude that you just made up that comment about BMWs without any proof at all, and seeing as you did not mention smuggling until after I brought it up, I find it highly questionable that you were talking about that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    It was the Islamist nutters on the Marmara who did the attacking but it was the IDF who ended that fight. As for not a single bit of condemnation on anything ever, thats not only wrong its extremely disingenuous.

    I'm sure that 61 year old İbrahim Bilgen was so much of a threat to them - that they had to riddled him at point blank range with 4 bullets. Some of the world's best trained soldiers couldn't subdue a 61 year old man. :rolleyes:

    The activists had every right to defend themselves against an act of piracy in international waters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    You can demand all you want till your blue in the face. If these people try and break the blockade and attack Israeli naval personnel then they do so at their own risk. Hopefully they won't be that dumb.

    Honestly a civilian ship attacking a military ship? Because that’s what it boils down to nobody on that flotilla is looking for a confrontation. Only Israel it appears is seeking confrontation. When people with guns intent on harming you board your ship illegally in international waters and you are faced with a choice of either defending yourself or being shot what would you do? Again there are 20 Irish nationals among that flotilla are you prepared to defend the IDF if any of those people end up dead or harmed?..in international waters..
    This is the official IDF stance on the legality or otherwise of the blockade, seems pretty sane and rational to me http://idfspokesperson.com/2011/06/26/the-idfs-lawfully-enforced-naval-blockade-on-the-gaza-strip/

    There was a aid convoy that delivered medical aid to Gaza recently but because it didn't have any publicity hungry western politicians or maniac islamists on board it didn't rate much publicity but it did its work quietly and effectively via Egypt and in conjunction with Israel http://occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/miles-for-smiles-3-convoy-geared-to-bring-aid-to-gaza/

    and in case some people think that Gaza is being strangled for aid, thats not the case, the information is out there if people wish to look for it http://www.idf.il/1283-12241-EN/Dover.aspx
    Israel and the IDF in particular consistently stick two fingers up at the international community with regard to rules, regulations and human rights if and when they engage in military adventures and in general. But are the first to cry wolf when the feel they are being wronged against. They quote international law but yet refuse to adhere to it themselves. Consistently this is what they do.

    Israel is blatantly breaching articles 13, 32 & 33 of the Fourth Geneva convention (GCIV) of which they are party too, which is intended to protect the civilian population against the adverse affects of war. The sea-blockade against Gaza is a collective punishment perpetrated against the civilian population of Gaza. Moreover and more importantly though..

    2 amendments to the above convention ( protocol 1 & protocol 2 -1977 ) relating to the victims of international armed conflict, have not been ratified by Israel. Israel does not recognise or adhere to these amendments. This isn’t surprising when you look at what they entail and are designed to protect against.

    Article 35 protocol 1 - bans weapons that "cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering," as well as means of warfare that "cause widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment."
    Articles 51 & 54 – “outlaw indiscriminate attacks on civilian populations, and destruction of food, water, and other materials needed for survival. Indiscriminate attacks include directly attacking civilian (non-military) targets,”…..
    Articles 76 and 77, 15 and 79 “provide special protections for women, children, and civilian medical personnel, and provide measures of protection for journalists.”

    Article 3 – protocol 2 – “Persons taking no active part in hostilities should be treated humanely”….

    Israel and IDF is in blatant breach of all of the above with regard to Gaza. So when Israel ratifies these amendments and the IDF adhere too and respect them, then and only then will I consider or give credence too any statements or opinion emanating from the Israeli military. Until such a time such statements by them are irrelevant and not worth the paper they are printed on, in my opinion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    WakeUp wrote: »
    Honestly a civilian ship attacking a military ship? Because that’s what it boils down to nobody on that flotilla is looking for a confrontation.
    I'd call sailing into an area which you know has a blockade "looking for confrontation".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    dlofnep wrote: »
    I'm sure that 61 year old İbrahim Bilgen was so much of a threat to them - that they had to riddled him at point blank range with 4 bullets. Some of the world's best trained soldiers couldn't subdue a 61 year old man. :rolleyes:

    The activists had every right to defend themselves against an act of piracy in international waters.

    No idea why my post didn't appear, but I'll give it another try.

    Read Bloodstained Mavi Marmara by Sefik Dinc.
    These were not simply innocent civilians who were brutally massacred by IDF soldiers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    the_syco wrote: »
    I'd call sailing into an area which you know has a blockade "looking for confrontation".

    Sry Syco, I will reply to this post and the other points you made in reply to my other comments when I get a chance later on:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    dlofnep wrote: »
    I'm sure that 61 year old İbrahim Bilgen was so much of a threat to them - that they had to riddled him at point blank range with 4 bullets. Some of the world's best trained soldiers couldn't subdue a 61 year old man. :rolleyes:

    The activists had every right to defend themselves against an act of piracy in international waters.

    If you attack a soldier with an iron bar then you're going to have to take your chances.

    And just because someone is 61 dosen't mean he can't attack you with an iron bar, your post smacks of age discrimination.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭PatsytheNazi


    Ah the Hasbara doing their bit for poor little Israel. I'd happily contribute towards the costs of sending them to the euthanasian clinics in
    Switzerland and putting them out of their misery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    WakeUp wrote: »
    Sry Syco, I will reply to this post and the other points you made in reply to my other comments when I get a chance later on:)
    No rush. I'm pretty sure Israel will block the flotilla, but I'm wondering how they'll do it this time. Hope they don't do the chopper routine as that fails. Hoping for an old fashioned "ship in the way" but I can't see Israel doing straight forward. That, and a "ship in the way" is a nice big target to some, and thus wouldn't be able to be used for "all" flotillas.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,644 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    WakeUp wrote: »
    The Israeli logic for blocking the flotilla is illogical and does not stand up to scrutiny. It would of been very easy for Israel to meet the flotilla halfway for example sending some people of their own to the port where the flotilla was based and inspecting the ships themselves.

    A couple of issues.

    Firstly, to my knowledge, the Israeli customs and excise service has no authority in Greece (or wherever). Secondly, there is nothing to prevent a loading or unloading of something en-route after that inspection has taken place.
    Israel maybe could have even sent a ship of their own along to shadow the flotilla or sail with it some sort of compromise.

    The Israeli Navy is not that big, and is certainly under no obligation to go dispatching its ships away from its operational areas to meet the political desires of some foreign agency, be they State or non-State. The fleet can come to them.
    My point is that the International community can be used to stop weapons being smuggled into Gaza, and that is certainly an option

    So they set up a blockade, then. How else can such an end-state be achieved but to intercept all traffic and escort it to a place where it can be searched?
    As for what Israel won't allow, I could care less,

    As an aside, it's "couldn't care less". I think it is generally acknowledged that Israel is in a state of hostilities with regards to Gaza. With all the limitations which follow from following the laws of war also come the inherent authorities, to include the authority to impose its own blockade. The Conventions are very clear: Neutral parties (to include hospital ships) must obey the instructions of the blockading force. If the International Community is not an active participant of the blockade and the Israelis don't want to let them in without meeting pre-conditions, they don't have to.
    Of course, what is dumb is Israel reaction to the latest Flotilla, if they weren't being led by idiots, they would let it quietly go to Gaza, and not make a big fuss over it, and hence giving the Flotilla even more publicity

    There's either a blockade, or there isn't. As the rules state, it must be enforced. If it quietly lets the flotilla past, it undermines both the legality of, and practical purpose of, the blockade. It may be politically more provocative to stop the flotilla, but it is the safer option for Israel's purposes.
    I'm sure that 61 year old İbrahim Bilgen was so much of a threat to them - that they had to riddled him at point blank range with 4 bullets. Some of the world's best trained soldiers couldn't subdue a 61 year old man

    There's an 80 year old woman by the name of Keiko Wakabayshi who is employed by the Italian Army to beat the crap out of its soldiers to drive into them the point that you should never take anyone at face value, even if they appear at first to be old and frail. One of the other individuals killed on the flotilla raid was a 54-year-old who was a Turkish Tae Kwon Do champion. Much safer to shoot him. (4 is 'riddled'?)
    When people with guns intent on harming you board your ship illegally in international waters and you are faced with a choice of either defending yourself or being shot what would you do? Again there are 20 Irish nationals among that flotilla are you prepared to defend the IDF if any of those people end up dead or harmed?..in international waters..

    There is, shall we say, some debate over the illegality of boarding in international waters where one side has declared an intention to breach a blockade. Arguments for and against on the Wiki page:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_assessments_of_the_Gaza_flotilla_raid#Legality_of_enforcing_blockade_on_the_high_seas
    No competent authority has as yet ruled on the matter, so no definitive statements can be made.
    Hope they don't do the chopper routine as that fails

    It is the more usual method of boarding non-compliant ships. It failed to work on the Marmara, but that was more an issue of poor planning than choice of technique.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Ah the Hasbara doing their bit for poor little Israel. I'd happily contribute towards the costs of sending them to the euthanasian clinics in
    Switzerland and putting them out of their misery.

    Banned for a week. A review of posting history suggests that the next ban will probably be the last.

    moderately,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭paulaa


    anymore wrote: »
    AS for humanitarian aid, I am told that driving a new BMW or SUV is quite the thing to do in GAZA and there is no shortage of these imported vehicles for sale there. :confused:
    Here is an article from the Guardian, which as you know is favourable to the situation in Gaza carrying an interesting article on an Entrepeneur in GAZA. Nice swimming pool - of course not in my wildest dreams could I afford a swimming pool.
    In closing I am wondering, did they ever find any of the billions in ' vital financial aid' Araffat stashed in off shore accounts ?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/10/gaza-oil

    Who told you that ?

    Of course there are business people in Gaza who made their fortunes before the siege was slapped on the strip. Just like there are still a fair few millionaires in Ireland who made their money before the crash. many of those still have their huge houses and their swimming pools, hots tubs and several holidays abroad every year. The difference is that our entrepreneurs CAN travel abroad.

    A more realistic and honest picture of smuggled cars in Gaza in the article below.
    There are very few new cars in Gaza. Locals estimate that only around 200 have been smuggled in through the tunnels in the past three years.

    In the past, cars were cut up to smuggle them though narrower tunnels. But the tunnels have now been widened.

    The lack of new cars means many cars in Gaza have seen better days.

    It is not uncommon to see cars 20 or 30 years old belching black smoke from the exhaust.

    Many Gazans resort to re-spraying old cars to make them look new.

    In a busy paint shop just outside Gaza, workers in face masks are sanding down the bodywork of old cars before repainting them.

    "Lots of people come back here over and over again," says Mohammed who works in the paint shop. "Some of the cars are 30 years old."

    The number of motorbikes in Gaza has risen dramatically in the past three years because they are easier to smuggle.
    There are still new car dealers in Gaza, but their showrooms are virtually empty.

    Marwan Kishawi's family has been dealing Mercedes cars in Gaza City for more than 40 years.
    Mohamed's car garage
    Mohamed's paint shop does a thriving business

    "Now we only have one car in the showroom," he says pointing at a bright yellow stretch taxi limousine.

    "I have had this car for seven years. I have had many offers to buy it, but I can't sell it because it is the only new car I have to put on display."

    Mr Kishawi says he used to import more than 100 cars a year from Israel, as well as $300,000 (£200,000) worth of parts a year.

    Mr Kishawi says he cannot bring his cars in through the tunnels because they are too valuable and his suppliers at Mercedes will not allow it to happen.

    He says he is spending thousands of dollars to keep the cars he has bought in storage at the border because Israel and Egypt will not allow them in.

    "I haven't sold a new car for almost three years," he says, shaking with frustration. "It's desperate now."
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8608376.stm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I've got word from the MV Saoirse that Israeli divers have sabotaged the ship.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    dlofnep wrote: »
    I've got word from the MV Saoirse that Israeli divers have sabotaged the ship.

    Wheres the ship at present?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement