Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

It's Official Now - Fukushima Nuclear Radiation Found In US Food

Options
  • 01-07-2011 1:14pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3


    Thanks to the jet stream air currents that flow across the Pacific Ocean, the U.S. is receiving a steady flow of radiation from Fukushima Daichi. And while many scientists say that the levels of contamination in food pose no significant threat to health, scientists are unable to establish any actual safe limit for radiation in food. Detection of radioactive iodine 131, which degrades rapidly, in California milk samples shows that the fallout from Japan is reaching the U.S. quickly." :eek:

    http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/07/its-official-now-fukushima-nuclear.html


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 infoguru


    infoguru wrote: »
    Thanks to the jet stream air currents that flow across the Pacific Ocean, the U.S. is receiving a steady flow of radiation from Fukushima Daichi. And while many scientists say that the levels of contamination in food pose no significant threat to health, scientists are unable to establish any actual safe limit for radiation in food. Detection of radioactive iodine 131, which degrades rapidly, in California milk samples shows that the fallout from Japan is reaching the U.S. quickly." :eek:
    http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/07/its-official-now-fukushima-nuclear.html


    "Additionally, drinking water tested in some U.S. municipalities also shows radioactive contamination. Is the fallout from Fukushima Daichi falling on us? Yes, it is."

    “Children are much more susceptible to the effects of radiation and stand a much greater chance of developing cancer than adults,” states Andrew Kanter, M


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    cool, ufo-blogger backs this up yeah?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭Logical Fallacy


    Ufo blogger.

    lol


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,322 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    Ah yes, those great investigative journalists at Ufo blogger.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,052 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    66 years to retaliate for Hiroshima?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 427 ✭✭scotty_irish


    so is infoguru a re-reg of infomaster?

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=72717926


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 271 ✭✭JimiWonderDoor 92


    I hate this. First you got chernobyl, now Fukushima...

    Seems we've hit an all time glow...


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Cianos


    I hate this. First you got chernobyl, now Fukushima...

    Seems we've hit an all time glow...

    err, as bad as Fukushima is, it's nothing compared to Chernobyl.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭NTMK


    ejmaztec wrote: »
    66 years to retaliate for Hiroshima?

    Well that would take kamikaze strategy to a whole new level:pac:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    Cianos wrote: »
    err, as bad as Fukushima is, it's nothing compared to Chernobyl.

    I think in time we will see that Fukushima is much worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,689 ✭✭✭✭OutlawPete


    Who is Ushima and why is he to blame?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 701 ✭✭✭Cathaoirleach


    Seems legit. There's another article on that site about air on the moon.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Cool_CM


    OutlawPete wrote: »
    Who is Ushima and why is he to blame?

    He was that Chinese guy who held Weiwei for too long and pissed all over Japan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 271 ✭✭JimiWonderDoor 92


    karma_ wrote: »
    I think in time we will see that Fukushima is much worse.

    In time will anyone notice the pun?;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,030 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Cianos wrote: »
    err, as bad as Fukushima is, it's nothing compared to Chernobyl.

    I think you'll find that you're mistaken there.

    It's shocking the lack of information being made public on the matter.
    The states will have more to worry about when the weapons-grade plutonium in Los Alamos catches fire. But they probably won't report anything about that either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,052 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    In time will anyone notice the pun?;)

    Mr Shima has been aware of it for some years.:(


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Cianos


    Ficheall wrote: »
    I think you'll find that you're mistaken there.

    It's shocking the lack of information being made public on the matter.
    The states will have more to worry about when the weapons-grade plutonium in Los Alamos catches fire. But they probably won't report anything about that either.

    Well hopefully I'm not mistaken :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,030 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Hopefully.

    enenews.com has been painting a pretty grim picture for the last couple of months though...
    And it's not just "UFO blogger" type stuff. More's the pity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,494 ✭✭✭citizen_p


    and now they care...


    FIXED


  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭EL_Loco


    Mousey- wrote: »
    and now they care...

    your link doesn't work because s h i t was replaced with ****. good day.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    Given that the majority of users of this site live in/near Ireland why should radioactivity in American food be of any more interest to us than radioactivity in Japanese food ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,030 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Because it's about the same distance from Japan to Ireland as it is from Japan to the US?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    The prevailing winds/ocean currents dont travel directly from Japan to here though.

    No doubt it will make it here eventually too but it is unlikely to constitute the principal source of manmade non medical radioactive exposure.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭goat2


    Ficheall wrote: »
    I think you'll find that you're mistaken there.

    It's shocking the lack of information being made public on the matter.
    The states will have more to worry about when the weapons-grade plutonium in Los Alamos catches fire. But they probably won't report anything about that either.
    i agree with you here, on lack of information, my guess is we are not hearing the whole story, and i am thinking it is ten times worse that they are letting on, afraid to lose earnings


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭Logical Fallacy


    Mike 1972 wrote: »
    Given that the majority of users of this site live in/near Ireland why should radioactivity in American food be of any more interest to us than radioactivity in Japanese food ?

    Because each contaminated hot dog that the Americans eat could possibly lead to an Incredible Hulk or a Spiderman.

    Imagine how much easier it would be to make Superhero movies then?


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    The japanese once tried to posion the americans with balloons filled with disease sent over on these very same winds


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭smokingman


    There's more radiation in a banana than the yanks are getting.
    Yes, bananas are the most radioactive food you can eat.....though in the journalistic style of the OP, I should have said it like this...

    "NUCLEAR BANANAS ARE KILLING OUR CHILDREN!"


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    smokingman wrote: »
    There's more radiation in a banana than the yanks are getting.
    Yes, bananas are the most radioactive food you can eat.....though in the journalistic style of the OP, I should have said it like this...

    "NUCLEAR BANANAS ARE KILLING OUR CHILDREN!"
    Sub heading..
    What they're not telling you is that 100% of all nuclear banana eaters will die.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭smokingman


    Malty_T wrote: »
    Sub heading..
    What they're not telling you is that 100% of all nuclear banana eaters will die.

    ....ESPECIALLY DEM FORIN NANAS!...

    Ah jaysus I could run with this all day...going home soon though so I'll leave it with this..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,030 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    3.5mSv annually, eh?
    That's the amount contained in Japanese urine these days...
    http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110627a2.html

    Nothing to worry about at all.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement