Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Photo Thread.

Options
12223252728123

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 39,872 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    The work on the bridge is still going and the ticket barriers are in place but not operational yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,372 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    In addition to the new entrance by CIÉ/IÉ, it seems the council are proposing alterations to the Lower Glanmire Road.


  • Registered Users Posts: 937 ✭✭✭Rud


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    Not sure if it will be opened but work still going on there to the station building which was in a poor state but looking a lot better now. The new ticket barriers at Newbridge and Kildare are in use afaik.

    The ticket barriers are not in use yet in Newbridge


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    Evening folks,

    Just a quick hop to Thurles this afternoon.
    - 22031 1325 Heuston - Limerick.
    - 22037 1420 Limerick - Heuston.
    - 232 1400 Heuston - Cork.
    - 22052 1820 Limerick - Heuston.
    http://smu.gs/17gUkHt

    The Wanderer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    Good evening all,

    The sunny (Exam Time) weather was too much to resist this evening. So here is a selection of photos from 60 minutes split between Clonkeen, outside Portlaoise and Portarlington.
    http://smu.gs/17pDrdM

    The Wanderer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,416 ✭✭✭cml387


    Did someone post a link to the O'Dea collection at the NLI

    If not, here they are now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,463 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I've found this on Twitter today while I was listening to the FM104 Phoneshow on Monday night.

    Jeremy Dixon at Inchicore Depot.

    The carriage does appear to be in great condition though on the inside.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 276 ✭✭Rocky Bay


    DD9090 wrote: »
    Nicked from Facebook.

    Kilbarrack/Howth Junction 1981

    931363_382891348488793_514146525_n.jpg
    Where is that train headed?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭steamengine


    Howth


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 276 ✭✭Rocky Bay


    Howth
    A goods train to Howth? Where would it have been unloaded in Howth?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators Posts: 9,936 ✭✭✭LEIN


    Rocky Bay wrote: »
    A goods train to Howth? Where would it have been unloaded in Howth?

    Could be ballast for maintenance or upgrades.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,754 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    Rocky Bay wrote: »
    A goods train to Howth? Where would it have been unloaded in Howth?

    They look like these wagons used for ballast
    Perway__16_.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    More of Howth Junction.

    First photo is from around the mid 1970s I think.
    10571.jpg

    This is from 1974
    Geograph-1660973-by-Aubrey-Dale1974.jpg

    217.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,157 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    DD9090 wrote: »
    Could be ballast for maintenance or upgrades.

    Its obviously ballast judging by the photo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭Eiretrains


    DD9090 wrote: »
    Nicked from Facebook.

    Kilbarrack/Howth Junction 1981

    931363_382891348488793_514146525_n.jpg
    That photo is by Barry Pickup, it is indeed a PWD ballast train heading onto the Howth branch, operating in conjunction with the track upgrading for the DART.

    The talk of a goods train to Howth is interesting. In fact until the late 1960s, both Sutton and Howth were served sporadically by a trip goods working, sometimes hauled by an E Class locomotive.
    Paint was dispatched from the paint works housed in the former GNR power station, while the Parsons Siding in Howth received some wagons (they also manufactured freight stock such as those ballast hoppers).


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    Fairview depot looking towards Connolly station in the pre DART days. Home then to C201 class and 6100 pushpull sets.

    58534964.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,372 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Ah, I thought Fairview was built specifically for the DART.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    Victor wrote: »
    Ah, I thought Fairview was built specifically for the DART.

    Same here. That building in the picture is still part of it today, they added the new extension to the north end of it where the locos are with a higher roof profile for the lifting jacks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,110 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Victor wrote: »
    Ah, I thought Fairview was built specifically for the DART.

    The GNR built their railcar depot there in 1951 on reclaimed landfill. CIE made it the suburban depot in the late 60's and it became the logical depot for the DART and was expanded and refitted in 1981.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    Just looking at the old pics of Howth Junction and comparing it to now, when the points where replaced did they re-align the branch tracks. Today the branch has a long sweep onto the main line compared to the curve around the old signal box that no longer exists.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭steamengine


    Was the signal cabin just to the right of the house and in front of the buffers ? There seems to be enough space for it there !

    258470.JPG


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    Yeah, the signal cabin would be to the right of the buffers and just behind it.

    Don't know why they built that runoff siding as part of DASH 1. The DARTs have APT and CAWS fitted. APT restricts the speed a DART can even approach a red signal and automatically applies the brake if it SPADs. It would still be well clear of the mainline in a worse case event even without the runoff. It's a real belt and braces setup.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,754 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    Yeah, the signal cabin would be to the right of the buffers and just behind it.

    Don't know why they built that runoff siding as part of DASH 1. The DARTs have APT and CAWS fitted. APT restricts the speed a DART can even approach a red signal and automatically applies the brake if it SPADs. It would still be well clear of the mainline in a worse case event even without the runoff. It's a real belt and braces setup.

    The run off means that you can simultaneously signal a train into that platform while signalling a through train on the up main line. Without it you may not have enough safety overlap on the signal to prevent a train fouling the main line. Regardless of APT on the DART not every train that approaches that signal would have ATP fitted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    What I mean is, the runoff is protecting the main line from the branch. Only DARTs all of which have APT use the branch making that runoff feature redundant. APT will restricts the DART to 10-15mph within about 200 metres or more of a red signal so it will crawl right up it. Say the driver fails to pay attention and tries to then move off when checking the train under a red signal the APT will have the train stopped before it's even over the points for the runoff never mind near fouling the main line. All that is for coming off platform 1.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,754 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    What I mean is, the runoff is protecting the main line from the branch. Only DARTs all of which have APT use the branch making that runoff feature redundant. APT will restricts the DART to 10-15mph within about 200 metres or more of a red signal so it will crawl right up it. Say the driver fails to pay attention and tries to then move off when checking the train under a red signal the APT will have the train stopped before it's even over the points for the runoff never mind near fouling the main line. All that is for coming off platform 1.

    While DARTs are the only scheduled service train over the branch they are not the only trains to operate over the branch. Per way and specials also operate over the branch and they would have no APT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,372 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Does the Howth layout as built mean that both trains can make an approach at service speed instead of a crawl? ATP may be added to other trains.
    The GNR built their railcar depot there in 1951 on reclaimed landfill. CIE made it the suburban depot in the late 60's and it became the logical depot for the DART and was expanded and refitted in 1981.

    Someone better tell Mr. Johnson. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,754 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    Victor wrote: »
    Does the Howth layout as built mean that both trains can make an approach at service speed instead of a crawl?

    No, one of the trains is still going to be approaching a red signal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    No, one of the trains is still going to be approaching a red signal.

    Before the run off siding was provided at Howth Jct. any train coming off the Howth Branch had to have a proceed aspect at the signal on the Up Howth Branch Platform.

    If the signal was at red (protecting a movement on the Up Belfast) then the signal before it at Bayside Station was also held at Red. This was due to lack of a suitable overlap at Howth Jct.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭CaptainSkidmark


    Way too much talking and not enough photos here! should be a separate thread like the aviation forum


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    Way too much talking and not enough photos here! should be a separate thread like the aviation forum

    It's supposed to be photos only but we go very side tracked. Really needed a new thread for it.


Advertisement