Green Bay Packers Thread

Billy86 · 11-09-2015 11:44pm

Some people just need to sit back, unwind and...

Screen-2Bshot-2B2014-09-23-2Bat-2B3.26.10-2BPM.png

seiphil · 13-09-2015 1:49pm

Game Day!

Excited for this now. I would say Lacey will be getting a good bit of the ball and Rodgers to spread it around field without much trouble.

Not sure what to expect with the D. I suppose we will be guaranteed a few picks seeing as its Cutler. I just hope we see some decent coverage and actually making tackles.

All I can see is a Pack win and a good start to the season.

limerickfc · 13-09-2015 6:27pm

PEPPERS!!!!

baby and crumble · 13-09-2015 6:37pm

That one-handed catch from Lacy, man!!!

OldMrBrennan83 · 13-09-2015 6:47pm

This post has been deleted.

Billy86 · 13-09-2015 6:47pm

Pherekydes wrote: »

Quoted for future reference.

OldMrBrennan83 · 13-09-2015 6:53pm

This post has been deleted.

thomond2006 · 13-09-2015 6:55pm

Potentially costly penalty.

OldMrBrennan83 · 13-09-2015 7:16pm

This post has been deleted.

Agent J · 13-09-2015 7:41pm

Who the hell is jones? (Says the guy with Rodgers X2, Cobb and Adams on various fantasy teams)

limerickfc · 13-09-2015 7:43pm

Run D has been piss poor

Billy86 · 13-09-2015 7:45pm

Agent J wrote: »

Who the hell is jones? (Says the guy with Rodgers X2, Cobb and Adams on various fantasy teams)

Cult legend, big play/occasional TD machine who also makes some incredible brainfarts too along the lines of drops and fumbles. Was a really good 3rd receiver for years before Cobb took his place, including a 14 TD season in 2012 but wanted starting time and more money, so went elsewhere and flopped. If he had more consistency/awareness/intelligence to his game he had all the other tools to be a multiple time all pro. Still, a very good and solid WR who Rodgers knows well.

OldMrBrennan83 · 13-09-2015 7:49pm

This post has been deleted.

Billy86 · 13-09-2015 7:59pm

Billy86 wrote: »

Cult legend, big play/occasional TD machine who also makes some incredible brainfarts too along the lines of drops and fumbles. Was a really good 3rd receiver for years before Cobb took his place, including a 14 TD season in 2012 but wanted starting time and more money, so went elsewhere and flopped. If he had more consistency/awareness/intelligence to his game he had all the other tools to be a multiple time all pro. Still, a very good and solid WR who Rodgers knows well.

Correction: He is the greatest WR of all timeseseses.

Pherekydes · 13-09-2015 8:00pm

Adams is already looking better this year.

Jones? It is believed some people in GB are happy that he's back. Possibly.

:pac:

skippymac6 · 13-09-2015 8:18pm

Run defence going to be a massive problem again. Forte with 132 already in the third quarter. Needs to be addressed if the packers are to go deep this year

limerickfc · 13-09-2015 8:44pm

Very important stop there

Pherekydes · 13-09-2015 8:53pm

Booom!

limerickfc · 13-09-2015 9:31pm

At least we got the W. Very poor overall though

digzy · 13-09-2015 9:39pm

limerickfc wrote: »

At least we got the W. Very poor overall though

Bit harsh on the offence....defence were awful though

limerickfc · 13-09-2015 10:23pm

Ya the O wasn't bad by any accounts..just felt like it cause we seen so little of em, & thankfully Rodgers seems fresh and mobile..way too many penalties though was stressing the life outta me

darklighter · 14-09-2015 1:16am

Pi$$ poor tackling again :mad:

Only for Seattles O-line is so bad, id be worried about losing next wk....fingers crossed the run D improves before next week!

raze_them_all_ · 14-09-2015 6:26am

darklighter wrote: »

Pi$$ poor tackling again :mad:

Only for Seattles O-line is so bad, id be worried about losing next wk....fingers crossed the run D improves before next week!

Lynch will have a ****ing field day

skippymac6 · 14-09-2015 3:29pm

raze_them_all_ wrote: »

Lynch will have a ****ing field day

Yeah Lynch has always torn it up against the Packers but even still I fancy us to do them this week. I think it will be a "statement" performance -- I don't think you can coach hunger and the lads will be absolutely flying around in training this week wanting to put the wrongs of the NFC championship game behind them. I'm putting myself out there to be shot at but I think the Packers will win by 10+

baby and crumble · 14-09-2015 3:37pm

skippymac6 wrote: »

Yeah Lynch has always torn it up against the Packers but even still I fancy us to do them this week. I think it will be a "statement" performance -- I don't think you can coach hunger and the lads will be absolutely flying around in training this week wanting to put the wrongs of the NFC championship game behind them. I'm putting myself out there to be shot at but I think the Packers will win by 10+

I think that's a tad optimistic, but this is a revenge game for sure.

Billy86 · 14-09-2015 4:44pm

The Seahawks will do what they always do: beat the living **** out of us up and down the field, be bigger, faster, stronger and meaner than us, and either walk over us altogether or take the lead on when we are beaten and broken. It's wash, rinse, repeat at this stage.

I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I will be. And if we don't play CM III inside and a lot, Lynch is more likely to go for over 200 yards than he is to go for under 150.

MightyMandarin · 14-09-2015 5:38pm

Billy86 wrote: »

The Seahawks will do what they always do: beat the living **** out of us up and down the field, be bigger, faster, stronger and meaner than us, and either walk over us altogether or take the lead on when we are beaten and broken. It's wash, rinse, repeat at this stage.

The NFC game was lost more due to the negative tactics of McCarthy and just plain 'ol throwing away a big lead and caving under pressure.

Let's not forget that up until the Seahawks comeback, Wilson was having a stinker of a game and GB were deservedly in front. What happened after had more to do with GB caving than the Seahawks' battering finally taking it's toll imo.

skippymac6 · 14-09-2015 5:44pm

baby and crumble wrote: »

I think that's a tad optimistic, but this is a revenge game for sure.

Yeah might be but just think they will be seriously ready to go for this week. Primetime slot too. I'd be more confident if the Hawks hadn't have dropped a clanger in St. Louis as that will have focussed the minds on their side too. They will also get a huge morale boost if Kam is in the lineup also. Lot of factors in this one but hoping it goes GB's way. Aslo, it's always good to throw in a bold prediction now and again and get a few people off the fence a bit! ha! :pac:

14-09-2015 5:56pm

Have lost the last 3 v Seahawks, but really should have won 2 that will go down in infamy, the Golden Tate TD and of course that game...

Billy86 · 14-09-2015 7:23pm

MightyMandarin wrote: »

The NFC game was lost more due to the negative tactics of McCarthy and just plain 'ol throwing away a big lead and caving under pressure.

Let's not forget that up until the Seahawks comeback, Wilson was having a stinker of a game and GB were deservedly in front. What happened after had more to do with GB caving than the Seahawks' battering finally taking it's toll imo.

Andrthat'seavhugeepartrofstheeproblemj-itheynownxusfmentally.oRodgersrbeingtafraidhofepassingwtoiSherman`snside, looking nervous at times in the NFC game, McCarthy reverting into his shell with a lead, etc etc... we clearly do nto only respect but fear them. We are more afraid of this Seattle team than anyone we have feared in my whole time watching the team, it really is kind of disturbing.

Green Bay Packers Thread

Comments