Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The great big "ask an airline pilot" thread!

Options
15758606263116

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 703 ✭✭✭Cessna_Pilot


    Again to quote;
    "When runway is in sight and at or above 100ft or 50ft(dependent on approach catagory) autoland is disengaged"

    When I last in for my recurrent training we had a little time at the end to practice some non prescribed stuff.
    I asked could we do a manual disconnect at a rad alt of 50 foot on a cat 3a to mins. The result was not pleasant.

    As Boeingboy says there, it is extremely dangerous and a reread out your company's manuals is certainly a priority, perhaps before you go flying again. I personally don't believe that an airline has doing this written into it's SOPs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 179 ✭✭NewSigGuy


    LeftBase wrote: »
    When I answer here I try and state things in simple enough terms for those who are not dealing with the daily abbreviations and technical terms etc.

    To clarify the issues raised. We are advised to use autoland for CAT II/III however we have a Decision Height of 100ft(CAT II) or 50ft(CAT III) at which we must be able to make out the significant characteristics of the runway and we are not permitted to fly autoland to touch down. When runway is in sight and at or above 100ft or 50ft(dependent on approach catagory) autoland is disengaged. If at DH we do not have visual reference we go around. If the crosswind is above 20kts and autoland cannot be used we can operate down to 100ft which is the DH for those conditions. Commanders are advised to divert after one failed attempt in this case.

    Company will not allow us to operate without a DH.

    So does your company stipulate that all CAT 111 approaches are to a manual landing.. Seams a little odd!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    In fairness to left base, he did say earlier that CAT3 approaches would normally be to autoland, and I think he was trying to clarify that of course you could disconnect and land manually at anytime if visual references are sufficient.
    Wrt disconnecting the AP at low level, he flies an A320, and disconnecting to complete the landing manually is allowed in the event that a failure may make autoland impossible - as Basill said earlier. It's not illegal, and I've never experienced any untoward pitch changes, so it's not dangerous. Maybe the type you guys are on is different.


  • Registered Users Posts: 116 ✭✭Rabbitt


    Can those Aer Lingus Regional planes take off if they loose an engine/propellor while on takeoff?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    Rabbitt wrote: »
    Can those Aer Lingus Regional planes take off if they loose an engine/propellor while on takeoff?

    Yes indeed they can. Even if they lose an engine or something is loose:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    It is approved procedure on the ATR to disconnect the AP at 50' Rad Alt on a CAT II approach. Happens quite quickly, lights at 100' - 3 consecutive including a lateral element; disconnect at 50' and at 20' close the Power Levers and flare.


  • Registered Users Posts: 116 ✭✭Rabbitt


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    Yes indeed they can. Even if they lose an engine or something is loose:)

    Phew. Probably gonna be flying on one soon so trying to reassure myself they are good planes


  • Registered Users Posts: 79 ✭✭boeingboy


    It is approved procedure on the ATR to disconnect the AP at 50' Rad Alt on a CAT II approach. Happens quite quickly, lights at 100' - 3 consecutive including a lateral element; disconnect at 50' and at 20' close the Power Levers and flare.


    We were talking about Aircraft that Autoland off a Cat 3A approach. With a Cat 3B the problems not there if u continue with a 0 feet DH.

    Those new ATRs are nice, I was very impressed with the Cockpit Layout and Crew Procedures on my recent Cockpit Jumpride to DUB.

    Nice Lady Captain ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    It is approved procedure on the ATR to disconnect the AP at 50' Rad Alt on a CAT II approach. Happens quite quickly, lights at 100' - 3 consecutive including a lateral element; disconnect at 50' and at 20' close the Power Levers and flare.


    Check out the new guy! That's nearly word for word from OMB.
    Rabbitt wrote: »
    Phew. Probably gonna be flying on one soon so trying to reassure myself they are good planes


    They are good aircraft, no need to worry. If you're really concerned it might ease your mind that all the worst scenarios you can think of are practiced in the simulator every 6 months.


  • Registered Users Posts: 313 ✭✭TheBoss11


    Iv a question. What is reverse trust and what does it do to the airplane?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,173 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    TheBoss11 wrote: »
    Iv a question. What is reverse trust and what does it do to the airplane?

    Im not a pilot or anything but it kind of does what it sounds like it does! It reverses or redirects the thrust of the engine in order to slow down the aircraft on the runway upon landing!! Its the roar you hear after the aircraft touches down on the runway when landing. Make no mistake though, while the engines have a reverse feature the plane cant fly backwards :p:p;):D


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    They obviously can't fly backwards but some aircraft, have the facility to "power back" on the ground. It's dependent on operator and airport approval.


  • Subscribers Posts: 4,076 ✭✭✭IRLConor


    They obviously can't fly backwards but some aircraft, have the facility to "power back" on the ground. It's dependent on operator and airport approval.

    I know it's a military and not civil aircraft, but it's something they like to show off with the C-17:



    EDIT: Here's some footage of an ATR doing it:



  • Registered Users Posts: 7 cliffordg90


    What would you recommend the best route would be to go down to become an Airline Pilot? When the funding for an FTO is unavailable?


  • Registered Users Posts: 313 ✭✭TheBoss11


    What would you recommend the best route would be to go down to become an Airline Pilot? When the funding for an FTO is unavailable?

    I'm not a pilot but I'd assume Military would be your only other option, or you can get a cadetship but that's extremely difficult to get into and even at that you still have to pay a portion of the costs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    What are the circular things here (with the white markings) and why do they spin around?

    SAM_1719.JPG


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭basill


    Stab trim. On the Airbus they don't spin like on a Boeing and make lots of noise and risk taking off your hand. You hardly notice them move actually.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭adam88


    basill wrote: »
    Stab trim. On the Airbus they don't spin like on a Boeing and make lots of noise and risk taking off your hand. You hardly notice them move actually.

    What they used for


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    basill wrote: »
    Stab trim. On the Airbus they don't spin like on a Boeing and make lots of noise and risk taking off your hand. You hardly notice them move actually.

    So trim is the angle of attack? Do they only provide a visual reference, you don't grab them to control the trim do you? :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    keith16 wrote: »
    So trim is the angle of attack? Do they only provide a visual reference, you don't grab them to control the trim do you? :pac:

    It basically changes the angle of the horizontal stabiliser, to take the load off the stick. And you only use them to set the trim for take off, or if the sh1t really hits the fan and the aircraft ends up in a very degraded state you might have to use it. That would be a very bad day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    It basically changes the angle of the horizontal stabiliser, to take the load off the stick. And you only use them to set the trim for take off, or if the sh1t really hits the fan and the aircraft ends up in a very degraded state you might have to use it. That would be a very bad day.

    On Boeing aircraft you manually adjust the stab trim regularly during manual flight. It's automatic when the autopilot is engaged. During manual flight it is controlled via a switch on the control column and it is used all the time for small adjustments. On the Airbus this is done automatically all the time I believe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    IngazZagni wrote: »
    On Boeing aircraft you manually adjust the stab trim regularly during manual flight. It's automatic when the autopilot is engaged. During manual flight it is controlled via a switch on the control column and it is used all the time for small adjustments. On the Airbus this is done automatically all the time I believe.

    Yep. The pic is an airbus, and it's only used manually as I've said.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 525 ✭✭✭Suasdaguna1


    That would be a very bad day.

    Professor, it would be a day for pints and medals !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    Professor, it would be a day for pints and medals !

    Some baked goods and confectionary perhaps? :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Professor, it would be a day for pints and medals !

    I will glady forsake the pints and medals to avoid that day. My aim is a nice, boring day at work ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    IngazZagni wrote: »
    On Boeing aircraft you manually adjust the stab trim regularly during manual flight.

    Not on the 777. It will trim automatically for thrust, gear and flap changes, but has to be manually trimmed only for speed changes.
    It's a bit of a mish-mash, probably done to placate the anti-Airbus crowd who would go mad if it had full auto-trim.

    When someone comes out with the usual "but I like to know what the controls are doing" line when denigrating the Airbus philosophy of non-moving sidestick/thrust levers, I always point out that on the 777, we can't see what the stab trim is doing as the only indication is a small display indicator either side of the thrust lever quadrant. Usually takes them a few minutes to think about that one!


  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Fame and Demise


    When adjusting the flaps, and you'd say e.g. flaps 15, what does the 15 mean? Is it 15", 15 degrees, or something else?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,781 ✭✭✭amen


    It basically changes the angle of the horizontal stabiliser
    Is the Tail not also trimable?


  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭youknowwho


    amen wrote: »
    Is the Tail not also trimable?

    I assume you mean the vertical stabilizer and rudder. Generally on large aircraft all the control surfaces can be trimmed to allow straight and level flight if for instance an engine failed. Light aircraft tend to only have elevator trim.

    AFIK propeller aircraft can also tend to yaw at high power settings and the rudder trim allows this to be compensated for.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭youknowwho


    When adjusting the flaps, and you'd say e.g. flaps 15, what does the 15 mean? Is it 15", 15 degrees, or something else?

    Degrees - I believe Boeings have a number of settings and Airbus only have 3 but the professionals in here will be able to comment on the different settings.


Advertisement