The Paddy Doherty interview

FlutterinBantam

sunflower27 wrote: »

Not mine either, never saw it, but just thought you may like to know the fact seeing as you are talking about the guy and his 'upcoming' show. No harm knowing the facts of what you are talking about.

Fair enough Ms. Sunflower, again proves that there was vested interest behind him.

Now I liked the guy on first impression, but that stuff was all an act.

Fair dues to him if he can con people and make a living out of it.

jade goody did it .

There are always idiots out there who are taken in.

temply

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Fair enough Ms. Sunflower, again proves that there was vested interest behind him.

Now I liked the guy on first impression, but that stuff was all an act.

Fair dues to him if he can con people and make a living out of it.

jade goody did it .

There are always idiots out there who are taken in.

What "stuff"?

PK2008

I think he tried to sell me a carpet......

njburke

When you consider that tomorrow morning millions of people will partake in communion whereby bread and wine are believed to trans-substantiate into flesh and blood, Paddys story doesn't seem that shocking.

It was interesting to see Paddy and then David Norris, has Paddy a chance at the Aras I wonder?

FlutterinBantam

temply wrote: »

What "stuff"?

The 'stuff' of being a nice guy and not wishing to tell a lie on my baby's life.


I'm not saying he is not a nice guy, he may very well be, but that stuff on the LLS last night was all an act to promote his career, whatever that is.


M'kay

hondasam

njburke wrote: »

When you consider that tomorrow morning millions of people will partake in communion whereby bread and wine are believed to trans-substantiate into flesh and blood, Paddys story doesn't seem that shocking.

It was interesting to see Paddy and then David Norris, has Paddy a chance at the Aras I wonder?

More of a chance than David Norris after last nights interview.

CorkMan

Next up is the fitness video I suppose :rolleyes:

FlutterinBantam

CorkMan wrote: »

Next up is the fitness video I suppose :rolleyes:

Nice one, definitely a runner.:D

temply

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

The 'stuff' of being a nice guy and not wishing to tell a lie on my baby's life.


I'm not saying he is not a nice guy, he may very well be, but that stuff on the LLS last night was all an act to promote his career, whatever that is.


M'kay

Hardly! The stuff he came out with last night is not from someone who wants a "career" in the entertainment industry.

He admitted he drank some of his dead kids blood for gods sakes, I would not call that savy, nor contrived.

sunflower27

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

The 'stuff' of being a nice guy and not wishing to tell a lie on my baby's life.


I'm not saying he is not a nice guy, he may very well be, but that stuff on the LLS last night was all an act to promote his career, whatever that is.


M'kay

So you are saying he may be a nice guy as you don't really know that much about him yourself.

And do you think he rang the LLS for an interview or did they contact him? I'd be guessing after winning Celeb BB they were hankering to get him on there.

The majority of people that go on there are promoting something - a film, album, book. He hasn't anything to promote at the moment as he hasn't secured anything.

His account of what happened with his son is more likely to do more damage than good anyway as most people can't understand what he did. There is no way any PR people he may or may not have would have told him tell that incident and ham it up.

I believe his account of what happened at the hospital was genuine, heartfelt and real.

Did you even watch it? Just curious.

4zn76tysfajdxp

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

that stuff on the LLS last night was all an act to promote his career, whatever that is.

So? That's literally the only reason chat-show guests have ever appeared on those programmes. Why do you expect him to be any different?

Chuck Stone

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

To eat pieces of his dead sons still warm flesh is part of his culture and to criticise him would be to discriminate and we just cant do that can we?

There are approximately a billion people who routinely chop the foreskin off their own children while they're alive; by comparison, consuming a bit of your dead son in the throes of grief seems decidedly tame.

Seems like a genuine sort does Paddy.

John Doe1

I can totally understand the reasoning behind what he did, hopefully the tabloids will show more tact than they usually do and ignore this story.

FlutterinBantam

Angelo Quick Fan wrote: »

So? That's literally the only reason chat-show guests have ever appeared on those programmes. Why do you expect him to be any different?

Correct me if I am wrong pal, but that's the point I have been making all evening.

Do try to read the posts and keep up.

FlutterinBantam

John Doe1 wrote: »

I can totally understand the reasoning behind what he did, hopefully the tabloids will show more tact than they usually do and ignore this story.

No chance boss, no chance.

sunflower27

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Correct me if I am wrong pal, but that's the point I have been making all evening.

Do try to read the posts and keep up.

He actually promoted nothing.

If they asked him on the show, then why shouldn't he go?

4zn76tysfajdxp

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Correct me if I am wrong pal, but that's the point I have been making all evening.

Do try to read the posts and keep up.

I'm keeping up fine, buddy. Just curious to know why you're acting so surprised that this particular hombre is promoting his media career by appearing on television. You can answer a simple question like that, right? Not that hard, compadre. :cool:

temply

he's away off there now working out his next angle

*awaits pal, buddy, mate retort*

sunflower27

temply wrote: »

he's away off there now working out his next angle

*awaits pal, buddy, mate retort*

No, he's caved and is watching the interview, bud

FlutterinBantam

Angelo Quick Fan wrote: »

I'm keeping up fine, buddy. Just curious to know why you're acting so surprised that this particular hombre is promoting his media career by appearing on television. You can answer a simple question like that, right? Not that hard, compadre. :cool:

Not in the least surprised.Where did I indicate that surprise bro?

Just surprised that so many posters seem to be convinced that this lad ( and I liked the fcuker too) is exactly as he appears on TLLS.


Is that plain enough for you ?

Kidchameleon

He does realize that he **** his sons flesh out a while after he ate it? So his son was "inside him" for only a brief period.

sunflower27

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He does realize that he **** his sons flesh out a while after he ate it? So his son was "inside him" for only a brief period.

I think it was more the blood and the blood on the flesh than the actual flesh, which is obviously not going to stay in his body.

temply

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Not in the least surprised.Where did I indicate that surprise bro?

Just surprised that so many posters seem to be convinced that this lad ( and I liked the fcuker too) is exactly as he appears on TLLS.


Is that plain enough for you ?

where did anyone say this

FlutterinBantam

eh here

temply

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

eh here

i don't think so, pal

Killer Pigeon

Does he own any slave?

SV

I hate the way FlutterinBantam always comes in and ruins all the good threads.

sunflower27

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

eh here

That's weak, dude :cool:

He did come across as a likeable fellow and you said yourself he might be a nice guy. I really don't get what has you so het up about people that go on talk shows. He is not promoting anything. He was entertaining and he told a really emotional story.

temply

SV wrote: »

I hate the way FlutterinBantam always comes in and ruins all the good threads.

ahhh, ok

this i was not aware of

parrai

When you read this thread, it seems as tho FlutterinBantam seems to want to control the way people think about this lad, wonder what is the motivation for it? Everybody knows that you can't make an informed decision in 15 minutes of an interview, but the truth of the matter is, the man came across as a likeable, 'It is what it is' type of character... Don't see what the problem is tbh... so what if he does well. I'm sure if he is 'a bad man' it'll come to light sooner or later, as is the case with all celebs.

CashMoney

In fairness, who hasn't taken a bite out of a dead relative?

FlutterinBantam

parrai wrote: »

When you read this thread, it seems as tho FlutterinBantam seems to want to control the way people think about this lad, wonder what is the motivation for it? Everybody knows that you can't make an informed decision in 15 minutes of an interview, but the truth of the matter is, the man came across as a likeable, 'It is what it is' type of character... Don't see what the problem is tbh... so what if he does well. I'm sure if he is 'a bad man' it'll come to light sooner or later, as is the case with all celebs.

Tell me, my good man, how did you arrive at that conclusion.

FlutterinBantam

SV wrote: »

I hate the way FlutterinBantam always comes in and ruins all the good threads.

maybe you can expand on that, my friend?

parrai

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Tell me, my good man, how did you arrive at that conclusion.

Read back over all your entries

FlutterinBantam

sunflower27 wrote: »

That's weak, dude :cool:

He did come across as a likeable fellow and you said yourself he might be a nice guy. I really don't get what has you so het up about people that go on talk shows. He is not promoting anything. He was entertaining and he told a really emotional story.

That's the whole point, Ms Sunflower, he is promoting something, his career.

Not getting het up as you say, just putting forward the view that all which appears on TV shows may be not what it appears.

Just throwing out a word of caution to our more naive viewers about how these things actually work.

sunflower27

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

That's the whole point, Ms Sunflower, he is promoting something, his career.

Not getting het up as you say, just putting forward the view that all which appears on TV shows may be not what it appears.

Just throwing out a word of caution to our more naive viewers about how these things actually work.

Who doesn't know how these things work in this day and age? I think you are deluding yourself if you think anyone has read your posts and gone 'aaaahhhhhhh, I seeee, I seeeeee. Thank God for his posts'.

It was a really good thread and I hope it now gets back on track :cool:

temply

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

That's the whole point, Ms Sunflower, he is promoting something, his career.

Not getting het up as you say, just putting forward the view that all which appears on TV shows may be not what it appears.

Just throwing out a word of caution to our more naive viewers about how these things actually work.

Like a poster who posts under different accounts, ehh Fulton Crown???

entropi

Who in the name of fcuk is Paddy Doherty when he's at home? Never heard of the chap in my life!

mr kr0nik

looks like theres not many catholics on this thread.

This is my body...

sunflower27

temply wrote: »

Like a poster who posts under different accounts, ehh Fulton Crown???

Too cool for school, temply :cool:

Nice one

temply

sunflower27 wrote: »

Too cool for school, temply :cool:

Nice one

I got yo back, yo

woodoo

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He does realize that he **** his sons flesh out a while after he ate it? So his son was "inside him" for only a brief period.

Hard to know exactly how long his flesh and blood would stay once broken down inside him. The amino acids could end up being used almost anywhere in the body.

Simon Adebisi

If he wasn't a traveller people would be sickened, but because he is a traveller the right on gang are shouting down anyone that dares complain.

Its not a normal thing to do, its f**king odd. Grief or not.

FlutterinBantam

sunflower27 wrote: »

Who doesn't know how these things work in this day and age? I think you are deluding yourself if you think anyone has read your posts and gone 'aaaahhhhhhh, I seeee, I seeeeee. Thank God for his posts'.

It was a really good thread and I hope it now gets back on track :cool:

How was it a good thread?

temply

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

How was it a good thread?

well, you got put in your place a number of times, which has pleased me, buddy

hondasam

If he did not tell that story there would be no interview,his son was killed 14yrs ago.
He did say he had ten children but he never said how four of them died shortly after birth.
This story is what everyone is talking about. No one has mentioned what he said about jedward which was funny.

Jesus Wept

MrsD007 wrote: »

Paddy was a very successful bare knuckle fighter within the Travelling Community, I believe that he was never defeated. Bare Knuckle Fighting is a massive business so he made a lot of money from that.

I have serious respect for the man, I enjoyed the interview last night, it was refreshing to see someone who is so brutally honest.

Is your respect based on his success as a bare knuckle boxer?

The Internet Explorer

CondescendinBantam.

FlutterinBantam

The Internet Explorer wrote: »

CondescendinBantam.

You can do better than that surely.:rolleyes:

sunflower27

hondasam wrote: »

If he did not tell that story there would be no interview,his son was killed 14yrs ago.
He did say he had ten children but he never said how four of them died shortly after birth.
This story is what everyone is talking about. No one has mentioned what he said about jedward which was funny.

I suppose because Tubbs asked him in particular about his son.

Yeah, I laughed at the Jedward comments. He probably said what all those in the house thought about them being annoying/juvenile but would never actually say :p