Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Anti-Spammer Measures

Options
  • 07-10-2011 9:54pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 843 ✭✭✭


    With the recent surge of spammers it got me thinking of how to stop them in their tracks, is it time to introduce new measures to prevent spammers?

    eg. CAPTCHAs, 2week wait from registration before you can first post, block certain countries from registering users, bots that recognise spammy posts etc.
    Post edited by Shield on


Comments

  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 47,305 ✭✭✭✭Zaph


    Go on, I give up. Who are you a re-reg of?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    You've only been here 7 days.

    How big could this surge be?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,584 CMod ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Zaph wrote: »
    Go on, I give up. Who are you a re-reg of?
    You're such a bad fibber... :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 843 ✭✭✭maygitchell


    super-rush wrote: »
    You've only been here 7 days.

    How big could this surge be?

    An illness has me nocturnal, I see a lot of RWC streams spam, and a lot of "My boyfriend will like this?" seemingly Chinese spam.

    No need for suspiciousness, i was just idly thinking to myself how you would stop them at first instance, as I try to report as many as I can.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,584 CMod ✭✭✭✭Steve


    We're doing our best but we have to be fair to all.
    Seeing as you already have 2 forum bans in your brief tenure here, are you saying that we're lax and we've missed something obvious? Should this thread be in prison? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 843 ✭✭✭maygitchell


    Steve wrote: »
    We're doing our best but we have to be fair to all.
    Seeing as you already have 2 forum bans in your brief tenure here, are you saying that we're lax and we've missed something obvious? Should this thread be in prison? :confused:

    Nope far from it, I was only giving feedback, clearly im not wanted here so goodbye


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 9,812 CMod ✭✭✭✭Shield


    Please don't leave, you were on the cusp of endearing yourself to us...


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    I told you May, you need to get the finger out and start posting. :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,075 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    Has anyone ever developed a method for detecting re-reges?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Total Posts: 444
    Posts Per Day: 52.28


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 47,305 ✭✭✭✭Zaph


    ejmaztec wrote: »
    Has anyone ever developed a method for detecting re-reges?

    We have our methods, but obviously they're not always foolproof. We do have a pretty good detection rate though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 35,524 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    ejmaztec wrote: »
    Has anyone ever developed a method for detecting re-reges?
    Yes, I developed the TP-flowchart method that is one of the many methods available to Admins currently. The overall process that governs the TP-flowchart is what I call the "Suspected Shill or Duplicate Account process", as above, not the only method used by Admins for shills/duplicate accounts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    mike65 wrote: »
    Total Posts: 444
    Posts Per Day: 52.28

    Jealous? :p

    At that rate he'll surpass you in (insert amount of days here) :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,783 ✭✭✭Hank_Jones


    mike65 wrote: »
    Total Posts: 444
    Posts Per Day: 52.28

    Worried Mike?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Its why I want him taken out.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 843 ✭✭✭maygitchell


    mike65 wrote: »
    Its why I want him taken out.

    :(

    No love on this forum at all :(


    Teddy and Chuck Stone are good banter though! :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    I love the fact the May doesn't sleep and is able to keep posting pretty much 24/7.
    If I could post 24/7 365 days a year I would be so happy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    first time users cannot start a post unless they contact the relevant moderator and have the thread approved.

    you can't thank unless you make 10 posts but you can start a thread.. hmm.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 843 ✭✭✭maygitchell


    I love the fact the May doesn't sleep and is able to keep posting pretty much 24/7.
    If I could post 24/7 365 days a year I would be so happy.

    I dont sleep, I wait


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 413 ✭✭The Left Hand Of God


    My bets on Amp :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,174 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    My bets on Amp :D
    And who are you then?


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    Overheal wrote: »
    And who are you then?

    Rb_ie, probably.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,075 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    There should be a Boards polygraph, dna database and a retinal scanner.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    I wonder who that Facekicker chick was a re reg of.
    I'm betting it was an Admin/Cmod that's why it hasn't been revealed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    facekicker was an hero


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,075 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    Zaph wrote: »
    Go on, I give up. Who are you a re-reg of?

    Judging by the banlist, the mystery must have finally been solved.:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    Rb_ie, probably.

    Is that twat still awound?


Advertisement