Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Boards Keeper League

1171820222325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    Why has it been set to 8? It was always 4. :s

    And, yes it would be good to have a few reserves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭wong


    It was changed in 2017 when there was a refresh of the league.

    Eagle Eye even mentioned it in his post so I'm not sure why he is changing it to 4 keepers now.
    eagle eye wrote: »
    There shouldn't be any draft pick trades in a keeper league. I had a big issue with this.

    The league was set up wrong in the first place anyways. You should be able to keep a lot more than four players which would make it a hell of a lot more interesting.

    The idea of a keeper league is similar to dynasty in that it's about building up a powerful team through the draft over time.

    I'm all for staying in if we are starting over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    wong wrote: »
    It was changed in 2017 when there was a refresh of the league.

    Eagle Eye even mentioned it in his post so I'm not sure why he is changing it to 4 keepers now.
    Was there a vote on it? I can't remember one. I'll change it back to 8 if you can find a post where it was definitively decided that the change would occur and agreed to by a majority.


  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭billr67


    Just voted on the poll.

    My tuppence worth on keepers, I think everyone should be made to keep a minimum of 4 irrespective of how good or bad your squad is and a maximum of 8. It's a keeper league after all, if you don't like the guys you've got you can always offer them in trades or play the waiver wire game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭wong


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Was there a vote on it? I can't remember one. I'll change it back to 8 if you can find a post where it was definitively decided that the change would occur and agreed to by a majority.

    Not sure if there was an actual vote but the consensus was the majority wanted it changed to 8, including you who was particularly in favour of it.
    Draft order will be random. Final invite just sent to Wong there. We will have 14 teams.

    I'm going to set the number of keepers to 8. The number of keepers won't be an issue until the end of the season and I can't see thee being an appetite for more than 8 keepers.

    I'm not sure how we should decide on trading etc. Would a doodle poll be sufficient? .

    That was the post where it was definitive and nobody had any objections when it was posted. It was said in numerous posts on that page in fact with zero objections from anyone regarding the 8 keepers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭manafana


    in agreement 4 mini and 8 max is fine (open to more by vote as thats point of a keeper league its about dynasty


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    wong wrote: »
    Not sure if there was an actual vote but the consensus was the majority wanted it changed to 8, including you who was particularly in favour of it.

    That was the post where it was definitive and nobody had any objections when it was posted. It was said in numerous posts on that page in fact with zero objections from anyone regarding the 8 keepers.
    Yes I was in favour of it and I still am but I feel we should get a majority to agree before it becomes active.
    There is nothing definitive, I looked back and there isn't even one post with a good few thanks on it.
    I won't be home for a coupe of hours,l but I'll put up two posts below and people can thank the one the prefer and then it'll be done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    If you want a max 4 keepers thank this post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    If you want a max 8 keepers thank this post.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm voting for max 8 keepers. We need one more vote to make it 8 keepers. If we don't get another vote then it remains at 4.



    I've removed all teams except the eight returners. We now have two divisions of four players with six of the eight making the playoffs.



    I'm against forcing people to keep players, don't think that is fair at all.


    Five people have voted in the draft poll and it looks like Wednesday 28th August at 10.00pm is the likely draft time. I'm leaving it open until 12 midnight tonight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Draft will take place on Wednesday 28th August at 10pm Irish time.

    Make sure you have your keepers selected if you want to keep some players.

    Keepers set so you can keep 8.


  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭billr67


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Draft will take place on Wednesday 28th August at 10pm Irish time.

    Make sure you have your keepers selected if you want to keep some players.

    Keepers set so you can keep 8.

    Cheers eagle eye, what's the draft order or is it random?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    billr67 wrote: »
    Cheers eagle eye, what's the draft order or is it random?

    Random but obviously those with less keepers go first.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭manafana


    if its 8 teams and not 10, any interest in added a qb2 and/or Wr/RB ??? just thinking with 8 their is going be way too much on waiver wires

    Ie even with 8 teams 3 qb's in a roster would talke only 24 of 32 possible starters


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    eagle eye wrote: »
    If you want a max 8 keepers thank this post.

    Which post do I thank for just 1 keeper? My team is ****e. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    Hulk Hands wrote: »
    Prestige Worldwide
    eagle eye wrote: »
    Thats eight so far confirmed out of 14. I'll wait until Friday and delete whoever is not confirmed by then. Word of warning for anybody coming back in from here on. You are gone if you are the last to confirm and we end up with an uneven number.

    In the meantime here is a poll for a drat date. https://doodle.com/poll/2ak7yznn5mzhzy5u



    Also I set the keepers at four.

    I did sign back up but looks like I was missed out on the main list. Logged into the account and no sign of my team either, presume its gone at this stage? Not too bothered either way, 8 keepers is a bit much imo but will play if its very handy to reverse the deletion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Hulk Hands wrote: »
    I did sign back up but looks like I was missed out on the main list. Logged into the account and no sign of my team either, presume its gone at this stage? Not too bothered either way, 8 keepers is a bit much imo but will play if its very handy to reverse the deletion
    Well it's not handy and we need another player to put you back in as there has to be an even amount.

    Just in case, can you tell me who your keepers were?

    I just looked back through the thread and you quoted the post asking for names of teams. You never said you were back which is how you were missed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,308 ✭✭✭Pyjamarama


    If you guys need an even number and have a team that needs to be taken over i'd gladly jump on board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I can add both of you. I can put you in as new teams if you wish but if Hulk Hands had keepers then he can have them back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Well it's not handy and we need another player to put you back in as there has to be an even amount.

    Just in case, can you tell me who your keepers were?

    I just looked back through the thread and you quoted the post asking for names of teams. You never said you were back which is how you were missed.

    As exactly Boccys Jockeys did first off and he got added, I naturally copied him.

    My post was hardly aggressive so a simple apology would have sufficed rather than getting your pants in a twist. Shove it up your hole in any case


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭manafana


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I can add both of you. I can put you in as new teams if you wish but if Hulk Hands had keepers then he can have them back.

    yeah happy for to add Hulk's keepers if you can

    And lads lets just calm down, i think theirs been an over reaction to a mishap which is been fixed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Hulk Hands wrote:
    My post was hardly aggressive so a simple apology would have sufficed rather than getting your pants in a twist. Shove it up your hole in any case
    Very nice, I was willing to add you again and give you your keepers and that's what I get?
    You need to have a look on the mirror and sort yourself out imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    Agree with manafana, I think it was just a misreading of the tone of a post. No point losing out on a place in the league for it. Come back Hulk_Hands. It's about time we have a rivalry in the league and some people that straight up don't like each other. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    It's grand lads, I won't bother but cheers anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,053 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I sent pm's to both Hulk Hands and Pyjamarama. If they both come back and want in then I can add both but I need two to make it happen. League won't accept an uneven number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    Absolutely delighted with my team then I get the draft recap and it gives me a B and projected 2-11 finish :(.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    Raoul wrote: »
    Absolutely delighted with my team then I get the draft recap and it gives me a B and projected 2-11 finish :(.

    Giving me a B+ with a 10-3 finish.....
    Guaranteed now that you'll have the better season...


  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭billr67


    Mine gave me an A with an 11-2 finish, said I'm an awesome fantasy god with amazing good looks and that I should move to America to work in the Fantasy Football industry rather than in boring IT.

    So all in all not too bad!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭boccy23


    I haven't been in an 8 team league in years. The depth is disconcerting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    boccy23 wrote: »
    I haven't been in an 8 team league in years. The depth is disconcerting.

    Yeah, too bad Goodell scared away half the league. :pac:

    I hope that people are more active on here than previous years. It was a bit crap for a while because you may aswell be playing in a default NFL league if nobody is chatting in here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭wong


    8 team league gonna be weird but yeah, let's stay active. I'm ready for the B2B Championship


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    I think my Edelman pick was probably a poor one...
    Aside from the injury concerns, forgot about Gordon and Thomas splitting his receptions.

    It was a panic pick as the clock ticked down....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    BizzyC wrote: »
    I think my Edelman pick was probably a poor one...
    Aside from the injury concerns, forgot about Gordon and Thomas splitting his receptions.

    It was a panic pick as the clock ticked down....

    What round did you take him in?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭manafana


    I found it tricky too, lets see how goes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    Raoul wrote: »
    What round did you take him in?

    6th...

    I was looking over the picks to see who else I could have picked instead, and I see Michael Thomas picked up in the 8th?? Seems very odd given he's the 4th ranked WR in the league.

    Did "Can I borrow a Thielen" keep 8 players?

    EDIT:

    I see he also got James Connor in the 7th, must have been keepers, no way we all missed on both those players


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭wong


    They were all keepers.

    Antonio Brown
    Travis Kelce
    Damien Williams
    Tyreek Hill
    Dalvin Cook
    Aaron Jones
    James Conner
    Michael Thomas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    wong wrote: »
    They were all keepers.

    Antonio Brown
    Travis Kelce
    Damien Williams
    Tyreek Hill
    Dalvin Cook
    Aaron Jones
    James Conner
    Michael Thomas

    Who's team is that?

    That is a savage team! :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭wong


    Mine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    wong wrote: »
    Mine

    Nice!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭wong


    Someone has already spent 90% of the their FAAB?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭boccy23


    wong wrote: »
    Someone has already spent 90% of the their FAAB?

    On the Baltimore Ravens offence.

    We'll see how that one goes.

    Fair play. I am always caught somewhat at this stage of spending big to get someone who can help for the entire season or waiting for the inevitable injuries and the replacement pick-up at a later stage of the season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    Yeah, I always use my FAAB sparingly and it never pays off

    It's an early gamble, but I figured that Jackson in particular could potentially become a keeper worthy player, Brown may also emerge as a big player which again would make him a potential keeper given their ages too...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    Yeah fair enough. I usually keep my money too and it doesn't always work out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    Not liking my chances now, an average day for Brees will knock me out...
    My decision to start Montgomery & Landry over Drake and Lockett has backfired big time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    Is this back?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭billr67


    Raoul wrote: »
    Is this back?

    Not much activity yet, but I'm game if we're back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭Raoul


    billr67 wrote: »
    Not much activity yet, but I'm game if we're back.

    I'm definitely up for it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭manafana


    may as well "keep" it up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭BizzyC


    I'll come back


  • Registered Users Posts: 103 ✭✭Jaded Walker


    Eagle Eye asked me to say he is back.

    He says he has commissioner powers and he'll set up a draft if everybody agrees on a time.

    He wants to know if everybody is back. He will set up a poll and I will post the link to.it if you can post the numbers involved.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement