Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Finally converted my 35-80mm, great cheap macro lens

  • 25-10-2011 3:52pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭


    So i got a 35-80mm lens with a camera i bought a while ago. I didnt have any use for it as i already had a better lens to cover its focal range. I stumbled across an article online showing how you can convert this lens simply by removing the from element. So i went and did that and was blown away by the results. So now iv a macro lens that i got for free. Nice!!

    Heres some shots i took about two minutes after the conversion


    Master Chief 2" figure
    asimg1673.jpg

    Master Chief 2
    imssg1675.jpg

    Master Chief 3
    asdimg1674.jpg

    My Watch
    dweimg1671.jpg

    Playstation controller
    img166ee6.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭dinneenp


    can you share the link please?
    is it easy to convert?
    i want to explore the macro world...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭11811


    I've done this myself, tis pretty cool. Really all there is to it is removing the front element on the cheapo 35-80mm canon lens.

    http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=190428


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭dinneenp


    any idea if this works with other lenses of just this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭11811


    Im unsure to be honest and wouldn't want to mis-inform you about it. Im sure if you google it there might be some info. I've only come across it one the canon, but I wouldn't be looking at any thing else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    the process is very easy just remove the 3 screws holding the front element in place and your good to go. What i did was unscrew the front element and smash out the glass, leaving just the plastic casing behind. Then i reattached the plastic casing to the lens and put a filter on it to stop dust from getting in.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    Heres a few more shots

    Sharpener:

    img1694b.jpg

    Screw on the sharpener:

    img1696u.jpg

    Grains of salt on a salt shaker:

    img1699b.jpg

    10 cent:

    img1684l.jpg

    Zoomed 10 cent:

    img1685jv.jpg


    One thing i noticed is that light is key. Because you get so close to the subject you tend to cast it into shadow and the fact you need to stop down to about f16 or f22 in order to get increased DOF, a bright light source is essential. I used a bright desk lamp to illuminate the subject but ideally when im outside shooting id like to have a speedlight to better illuminate the subject


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭StopNotWorking


    Jealous, going to eventually buy some cheap extension tubes for my 50mm f 1.8, I heard that's good with tubes. Either that or I'll try my 70-300mm sigma "macro" with a tube


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    The 35-80mm is very inexpensive. Cheaper then extension tubes id reckon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭StopNotWorking


    steve_ wrote: »
    The 35-80mm is very inexpensive. Cheaper then extension tubes id reckon

    Filthy cheap & dirty basic extension tubes

    They get the job done so I hear, got some good scare stories about them getting stuck on bodies though :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Kenny Logins


    steve_ wrote: »

    One thing i noticed is that light is key. Because you get so close to the subject you tend to cast it into shadow and the fact you need to stop down to about f16 or f22 in order to get increased DOF, a bright light source is essential. I used a bright desk lamp to illuminate the subject but ideally when im outside shooting id like to have a speedlight to better illuminate the subject

    Have you tried the highest possible f-number, at 100 ISO with a tripod? Looooong exposure.

    I'd be curious to see how that worked out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    i was shooting handheld as i dont own a tripod yet but im sure the results would be much better with long exposures and a tiny aperture


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭dinneenp


    Filthy cheap & dirty basic extension tubes

    They get the job done so I hear, got some good scare stories about them getting stuck on bodies though :eek:

    I bought a pair of extension tubes for almost as cheap as a pint. Tried to use them maybe 3 times. Each time they got stuck to the camera body.
    I went through the same routine each time-
    try casually to get them off
    try not to panic while at the back of my mind thinking fcuk, they're stuck
    try to take them off with force, then quickly tell myself to stop
    pace the room thinking fcuk, fcuk what can I do
    eventually get them off; gently and using a needle instead of one of the pins.
    vow never to use them again.
    They're now sitting at the back of a drawer....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭bullpost


    You can save more money by making a homemade snoot for a speedlight from a pringles box. Works really well for macro by isolating the subject , giving a nice vignette effect.

    See instructions here:
    http://youtu.be/wXh89cB5Puk
    steve_ wrote: »

    One thing i noticed is that light is key. Because you get so close to the subject you tend to cast it into shadow and the fact you need to stop down to about f16 or f22 in order to get increased DOF, a bright light source is essential. I used a bright desk lamp to illuminate the subject but ideally when im outside shooting id like to have a speedlight to better illuminate the subject


  • Registered Users Posts: 692 ✭✭✭breadbin


    wow, great stuff. can't wait to see some insects and the like with this:)

    an alternative is to have a look on ebay for a reverse adapter ring. i got one for about 3quid and i use it now with an old 50mm lens that was gathering dust. its v. good. basically the 50mm lens goes onto the camera backwards. wasn't expecting much for 3 quid but wow!!


Advertisement