Gays want to take over the rest of Society?

jam_mac_jam

daddydick wrote: »

No you see a woman gets it stuffed up her fanny. It's normal.

Oh right, anal sex only happens with the gays, i see. Thanks for clearing that up.

Reloc8

My name is URL wrote: »

So is the only natural form of sex that which ends in a child been conceived?

Remember to tell that to the next chick giving you head

Might be more realistic/he might have a more likely opportunity for him to say that to the next chick who gives someone he knows head.

MrStuffins

daddydick wrote: »

No you see a woman gets it stuffed up her fanny. It's normal.

Have you ever recieved a hand job from a woman? Or have you ever recieved oral sex from a woman?

Have you ever masturbated?

All of these things are not normal.

Freddie59

MrStuffins wrote: »

Well, that's what gay men do with other gay men. The vast majority of them will partake in this practice one way or another. So it's pretty normal.

Within that sector of society. For mainstream society? Far from it.

laoch na mona

gay straight it doesn't mean a fu*cken thing about who the person is

efb

daddydick wrote: »

No you see a woman gets it stuffed up her fanny. It's normal.

Have you actually had sex?

jam_mac_jam

Freddie59 wrote: »

Within that sector of society. For mainstream society? Far from it.

They are part of mainstream society, they dont all live in a big gay island you know.

randylonghorn

daddydick wrote: »

No you see a woman gets it stuffed up her fanny. It's normal.

You must have a pretty one-dimensional sex life tbh.

MrStuffins

Freddie59 wrote: »

There's a difference between something being termed 'normal' and something being an everyday occurrence. It is normal in the eyes of some - but not others.

Out of curiousity, how much of the population is 'gay'?

Well, society is and has always been a mixture of different types of people.

In Ancient Greece, love between 2 men was considered the highest and purest form of love.

Gay people and gay sex has existed since the dawn of man, Doens't come more normal than that!

Spunge

daddydick wrote: »

No you see a woman gets it stuffed up her fanny. It's normal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex

check this sh1t out

MrStuffins

Freddie59 wrote: »

Within that sector of society. For mainstream society? Far from it.

See my post above.

If you don't think gay people are normal in mainstrem society then you're not living in mainstream society!

4leto

According to Mr Blair who I remember during a question time session 16% of British people are gay. So it would be the same here, that is a sizeable minority.

MrStuffins

4leto wrote: »

According to Mr Blair who I remember during a question time session 16% of British people are gay. So it would be the same here, that is a sizeable minority.

I don't know the answer but i'd guess 16% is WAY too big a percentage!

yupyup7up

People aren't allowed have an opinion on homosexuality unless it's pro-gay, which is bullsh!t.

It has become a taboo subject, and unless comments are 100% PC, then people are labelled homophobes. I've always said that I wasn't a big fan of gay adoption , but I get absolutely slated for it. Why? It's my opinion. I don't approve of homosexuality, but I do have friends who are gay, and I don't go out trying to kill gay people.

Just because people have a different opinion to what is considered "PC", doesn't make them wrong. But who am I to argue? I'm just another "homophobe" :rolleyes:

laoch na mona

i think daddy dick is twelve

Inbox

Here's another example .

Male and female plumbers fittings or actually anything in the world that needs to join together, it won't work. You can maybe Join them in a temporary sort of way but eventually bad stuff will leak out and cause damage.



Well this is what gay people are trying to do. Their brains are leaking out bad stuff and covering the world in their **** thoughts.

Trying to convince the world that it will work and it's normal but it's not because simples......male and female bits go together but male to male or female to female bits will never work and will go wrong in the end. :pac:

MrStuffins

yupyup7up wrote: »

People aren't allowed have an opinion on homosexuality unless it's pro-gay, which is bullsh!t.

It has become a taboo subject, and unless comments are 100% PC, then people are labelled homophobes. I've always said that I wasn't a big fan of gay adoption , but I get absolutely slated for it. Why? It's my opinion. I don't approve of homosexuality, but I do have friends who are gay, and I don't go out trying to kill gay people.

Just because people have a different opinion to what is considered "PC", doesn't make them wrong. But who am I to argue? I'm just another "homophobe" :rolleyes:

No, this is not the case.

Whether you like it or not there are A LOT of people out there who hate gay people just through ignorance and blind hatred. They hate for no reason just like some people hate blace people, asian people, women, people just hate.

Now, these people hate and have no well thought through opinions on why they hate. So when they are asked about a subject like this, they will spout normal hate filled bull!

Now, if you or anyone else was to come along and give a proper, well thought out reason as to why gay adoption shouldn't be allowed then we could discuss it and we could agree to disagree. But nobody has done that so far.

So far all we've had is "It's unnatural", "It's sick", and "Kids will be embarrassed at parent teacher meetings". Not great arguments!

If you have anything substantial to back up the reasons why you don't agree with it then let's hear it. We can have a debate.

4leto

MrStuffins wrote: »

I don't know the answer but i'd guess 16% is WAY too big a percentage!

He would have been briefed, he wouldn't have plucked that figure out of the air, not in the British parliament when the opposition and the press is watching.

But I think it is to big a figure myself, I think it is more 10%, but that's a guess.

MrStuffins

4leto wrote: »

He would have been briefed, he wouldn't have plucked that figure out of the air, not in the British parliament when the opposition and the press is watching.

But I think it is to big a figure myself, I think it is more 10%, but that's a guess.

I'd guess even lower than that but I suppose you'll never get a proper number until homosexuality is completely accepted.

I reckon our generation who will have kids (well, i'm in my 20s now) will have parents who won't care and kids will feel comfortable enough to come out moreso than the past generations.

Perhaps in 2 generations "coming out" won't even be needed.

So until then, you'll still have people ticking "Hetero" on forms when they shouldn't be.

yupyup7up

MrStuffins wrote: »

No, this is not the case.

Whether you like it or not there are A LOT of people out there who hate gay people just through ignorance and blind hatred. They hate for no reason just like some people hate blace people, asian people, women, people just hate.

Now, these people hate and have no well thought through opinions on why they hate. So when they are asked about a subject like this, they will spout normal hate filled bull!

Now, if you or anyone else was to come along and give a proper, well thought out reason as to why gay adoption shouldn't be allowed then we could discuss it and we could agree to disagree. But nobody has done that so far.

So far all we've had is "It's unnatural", "It's sick", and "Kids will be embarrassed at parent teacher meetings". Not great arguments!

If you have anything substantial to back up the reasons why you don't agree with it then let's hear it. We can have a debate.

Sorry now but I have to disagree.

Not everybody that doesn't like homosexuality wants them dead or injured or whatever. I simply don't agree with it, but it's nothing to do with me. If I'm introduced to a gay person, I treat them as I would any other person.

I'm not going to say "Oh yeah I'm all for homosexuality", because I'm not for it, but I'm also not going to treat gay people any differently.

Biologically, gay people don't have kids, and I don't think anybody is in a position to mess about with nature. Next we'll be talking about putting wombs into men. It's insane.

I don't have any points to add other than it's not natural, which for me, is an extremely valid argument.

Freddie59

jam_mac_jam wrote: »

They are part of mainstream society, they dont all live in a big gay island you know.

Not the point. They are a minority of mainstream society. Practicing a minority culture and habits. Therefore it can come as no surprise that the majority can be offended or puzzled by that behaviour.

Freddie59

MrStuffins wrote: »

See my post above.

If you don't think gay people are normal in mainstrem society then you're not living in mainstream society!

No. I'm living in that part of mainstream society that is not gay - the majority part. You don't really get it - do you?

Reloc8

Inbox wrote: »

Here's another example .

Male and female plumbers fittings or actually anything in the world that needs to join together, it won't work. You can maybe Join them in a temporary sort of way but eventually bad stuff will leak out and cause damage.



Well this is what gay people are trying to do. Their brains are leaking out bad stuff and covering the world in their **** thoughts.

Trying to convince the world that it will work and it's normal but it's not because simples......male and female bits go together but male to male or female to female bits will never work and will go wrong in the end. :pac:

Finally ! A bit of good critical scientific analysis in this thread.

Wait...magnets...how do the magnets fit into your theory ?

Freddie59

yupyup7up wrote: »

People aren't allowed have an opinion on homosexuality unless it's pro-gay, which is bullsh!t.

It has become a taboo subject, and unless comments are 100% PC, then people are labelled homophobes. I've always said that I wasn't a big fan of gay adoption , but I get absolutely slated for it. Why? It's my opinion. I don't approve of homosexuality, but I do have friends who are gay, and I don't go out trying to kill gay people.

Just because people have a different opinion to what is considered "PC", doesn't make them wrong. But who am I to argue? I'm just another "homophobe" :rolleyes:

Yep. That's about it. But, unfortunately, here on AH and boards.ie in general, people who believe in God; question gay behaviour; and so on are almost classed as freaks. Shouted down by those that you mention at every opportunity because they refuse to be 'assimilated'!:D

Simtech

4leto wrote: »

He would have been briefed, he wouldn't have plucked that figure out of the air, not in the British parliament when the opposition and the press is watching.

But I think it is to big a figure myself, I think it is more 10%, but that's a guess.

This is a fascinating argument, I'm not sure I can call it a debate.
I found this http://www.avert.org/gay-people.htm

I have to say that I'm glad I'm not gay, I would hate to have to put up with some of the drivel I've seen here. It strikes me that the internet lends itself well to attack by hiding the attacker behind the keyboard so I wonder, are these sorts of utterances as common in the real world? Is homophobia that in yer face?

Freddie59

Simtech wrote: »

This is a fascinating argument, I'm not sure I can call it a debate.
I found this http://www.avert.org/gay-people.htm

I have to say that I'm glad I'm not gay, I would hate to have to put up with some of the drivel I've seen here. It strikes me that the internet lends itself well to attack by hiding the attacker behind the keyboard so I wonder, are these sorts of utterances as common in the real world? Is homophobia that in yer face?

TBH society is far more homophobic than is believed. People are just frightened to have any sort of opinion on it - unless it's the PC version.

laoch na mona

Freddie59 wrote: »

Not the point. They are a minority of mainstream society. Practicing a minority culture and habits. Therefore it can come as no surprise that the majority can be offended or puzzled by that behaviour.

so not normal=wrong
explain? does that mean emos are wrong are travelers wrong were jews wrong and hitler right

(i have been called a homophobe before so i am not fully pc on the matter)

Simtech

Freddie59 wrote: »

TBH society is far more homophobic than is believed. People are just frightened to have any sort of opinion on it - unless it's the PC version.

What is frightening about it though, that's what is interesting?

Freddie59

MrStuffins wrote: »

I'd guess even lower than that but I suppose you'll never get a proper number until homosexuality is completely accepted.

I reckon our generation who will have kids (well, i'm in my 20s now) will have parents who won't care and kids will feel comfortable enough to come out moreso than the past generations.

Perhaps in 2 generations "coming out" won't even be needed.

So until then, you'll still have people ticking "Hetero" on forms when they shouldn't be.

To be honest, we have three adult children. It wouldn't cost me a thought if one proclaimed they were gay tomorrow. I'd prefer not, but it is their choice.
But, of course, the rest of us aren't allowed to have an opinion that contravenes the gay mantra and agenda.:rolleyes:

yupyup7up

Freddie59 wrote: »

Yep. That's about it. But, unfortunately, here on AH and boards.ie in general, people who believe in God; question gay behaviour; and so on are almost classed as freaks. Shouted down by those that you mention at every opportunity because they refuse to be 'assimilated'!:D

Yeah that's true. I don't believe in god or any higher being, that's just my opinion, but yeah I don't see the point in treating people any different no matter what race, sexuality or anything like that because you'll only drive yourself mad.

One of my favourite quotes is from American History X changed my views on things for the better a long time ago!

"So I guess this is where I tell you what I learned - my conclusion, right? Well, my conclusion is: Hate is baggage. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time. It's just not worth it. Derek says it's always good to end a paper with a quote. He says someone else has already said it best. So if you can't top it, steal from them and go out strong. So I picked a guy I thought you'd like. 'We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory will swell when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.' "

Killer Pigeon

daddydick wrote: »

How is it normal for a man to have a cock shoved up his arse?

Te-he. Send me a PM with your number, maybe we can get together some time and I'll show you. Te-he.

BTW, asl? top/bottom? travel/accom?

MrStuffins

yupyup7up wrote: »

Sorry now but I have to disagree.

Not everybody that doesn't like homosexuality wants them dead or injured or whatever. I simply don't agree with it, but it's nothing to do with me. If I'm introduced to a gay person, I treat them as I would any other person.

I never said they were. i said A LOT of people are. So when others who are not voice an opinion about how they disagreee with homosexuality, sometimes they can be lumped in with the idiots.

If they are not an idiot and they have genuine reasons as to why they think homosexuality is wrong, thwy should voice their opinions and partake in debate.

I'm not going to say "Oh yeah I'm all for homosexuality", because I'm not for it, but I'm also not going to treat gay people any differently.

Now, can you tell me why you don't like it?

Can you give me a proper reasoned argument as to why you don't like it?

Biologically, gay people don't have kids, and I don't think anybody is in a position to mess about with nature. Next we'll be talking about putting wombs into men. It's insane.

Now you're coming across like one of THOSE people. Putting wombs into men? Come off it. You're showing that you either have absolutely no knowledge of modern science or you are scaremongering. Don't fall into the trap of sounding like the idiots my friend. Let's have a proper debate if that's what you want.

I don't have any points to add other than it's not natural, which for me, is an extremely valid argument.

Ah, ok. Then your argument falls down here i'm afraid. We've had the "it's not natural" argument already.

Clothes, cars, transport, television, processed foods, money, central heating, soap, deodorant, the internet, mobile phones, kettles, electricity.................... none of these things are natural.

Doesn't stop you using them though does it?

Killer Pigeon

laoch na mona wrote: »

i think daddy dick is twelve

I think daddy dick has a secret :eek:

MrStuffins

Killer Pigeon wrote: »

Te-he. Send me a PM with your number, maybe we can get together some time and I'll show you. Te-he.

BTW, asl? top/bottom? travel/accom?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KGRZuWXVhA

MrStuffins

Freddie59 wrote: »

No. I'm living in that part of mainstream society that is not gay - the majority part. You don't really get it - do you?

of course I get it.

So you're telling me that you live in an exclusively straight part of "mainstream society"? Is that what you're telling me?

Is it some sort of private estate you live in with "No benders" written on the gates?

Tell me, where do you live?

Killer Pigeon

Freddie59 wrote: »

To be honest, we have three adult children. It wouldn't cost me a thought if one proclaimed they were gay tomorrow. I'd prefer not, but it is their choice.
But, of course, the rest of us aren't allowed to have an opinion that contravenes the gay mantra and agenda.:rolleyes:

???????????????????????????????????

Elaborate.

Freddie59

Simtech wrote: »

What is frightening about it though, that's what is interesting?

You've seen it here on this thread. Anyone even daring to disagree with the 'being homosexual is normal' setiment is, as usual, deemed a homophobe and shouted down. That is why non-gays tend to stay shtum on the matter.

Freddie59

Killer Pigeon wrote: »

???????????????????????????????????

Elaborate.

How so? It is their choice whether or not they want to go public with it. Your reply is atypical of the hysteria against non-gays on this thread.

MrStuffins

Freddie59 wrote: »

To be honest, we have three adult children. It wouldn't cost me a thought if one proclaimed they were gay tomorrow. I'd prefer not, but it is their choice.
But, of course, the rest of us aren't allowed to have an opinion that contravenes the gay mantra and agenda.:rolleyes:

Lad, playing the bleeding heart card isn't working for you. Change the record.

Killer Pigeon

Freddie59 wrote: »

It is their choice whether or not they want to go public with it.

Covering your tracks I see.

laoch na mona

im catholic and i cant accept that a gay who works for a charity is more damned then a straight man who beats his wife

Freddie59

MrStuffins wrote: »

of course I get it.

So you're telling me that you live in an exclusively straight part of "mainstream society"? Is that what you're telling me?

Is it some sort of private estate you live in with "No benders" written on the gates?

Tell me, where do you live?

I live in a quite normal semi-d in surburbia.:) And you really are starting to get confused. Many people in mainstream society couldn't give a hoot about gays (myself included). But are perfectly within their rights to question the gay outlook on heterosexuals. It's kinda peculiar though. Wanting the whole marriage and kids thing - a heterosexual lifestyle in essence?:)

Freddie59

Killer Pigeon wrote: »

Covering your tracks I see.

Exactly how? Are you paranoid or something?

Killer Pigeon

laoch na mona wrote: »

im catholic and i cant accept that a gay who works for a charity is more damned then a straight man who beats his wife

Damned by what?

*Opens can of worms*

yupyup7up

MrStuffins wrote: »

I never said they were. i said A LOT of people are. So when others who are not voice an opinion about how they disagreee with homosexuality, sometimes they can be lumped in with the idiots.

If they are not an idiot and they have genuine reasons as to why they think homosexuality is wrong, thwy should voice their opinions and partake in debate.



Now, can you tell me why you don't like it?

Can you give me a proper reasoned argument as to why you don't like it?



Now you're coming across like one of THOSE people. Putting wombs into men? Come off it. You're showing that you either have absolutely no knowledge of modern science or you are scaremongering. Don't fall into the trap of sounding like the idiots my friend. Let's have a proper debate if that's what you want.



Ah, ok. Then your argument falls down here i'm afraid. We've had the "it's not natural" argument already.

Clothes, cars, transport, television, processed foods, money, central heating, soap, deodorant, the internet, mobile phones, kettles, electricity.................... none of these things are natural.

Doesn't stop you using them though does it?

The wombs comment was supposed to be joke, a dig at how ridiculous society becomes at times.

Why isn't my opinion valid? You listed material possessions. Not the same. I personally don't think messing about with human relations is a good thing. You can't come out and say I'm wrong just because of what you or anybody else thinks.

I don't have to agree with anything and I'm not going to hide about how I feel on a subject, but if you were gay (I'm sorry I don't know if you are or not!) I'd treat you as I would any other person. I'm a complete bastard, but I have my own personal opinions.

laoch na mona

Freddie59 wrote: »

How so? It is their choice whether or not they want to go public with it. Your reply is atypical of the hysteria against non-gays on this thread.

so your in favour of closet homophobia as seen in the murphy report?

Freddie59

MrStuffins wrote: »

Lad, playing the bleeding heart card isn't working for you. Change the record.

Back at ya buddy!:p Look who's talking.....

Killer Pigeon

Freddie59 wrote: »

Exactly how? Are you paranoid or something?

People like you are impeding on my gay agenda.

Freddie59

laoch na mona wrote: »

so your in favour of closet homophobia as seen in the murphy report?

Doesn't bother me either way.

Freddie59

MrStuffins wrote: »

Clothes, cars, transport, television, processed foods, money, central heating, soap, deodorant, the internet, mobile phones, kettles, electricity.................... none of these things are natural.

Doesn't stop you using them though does it?

Sweet Jesus. The sooner a 'shakes head' icon is added the better. I can't see cars or deodorants wanting to get married and have kids anytime soon......:rolleyes: