Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most Overrated Musicians/Groups

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭saywhatyousee


    You're not right in the head

    Coming from the man that said Bob Marley


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    I don't like the stone roses though.
    Never has such a pish band got so much recognition. With most bands i can at least understand why some people like them. But the stone roses? No. Just no. Fuck right off Ian Brown.

    a bit like velvet underground, most bands today from britian wouldnt be around without them and they paved the way for them and the whole madchester scene


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    Well, I can understand that I suppose. Still think they're an awful band though.

    compared to?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 644 ✭✭✭filthymcnasty


    Coming from the man that said Bob Marley

    Yeah I sure did - a pile of shiite, like all reggae.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Yeah I sure did - a pile of shiite, like all reggae.

    Comments like this disqualify you from giving your opinion on any music.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    Anything. Well. I'll make obvious exceptions for Beiber and the like.
    I'm not just trying to be over the top here. I really think they're one of the most mind numbingly boring things I could listen to.
    But that's all my opinion. I'm not saying anyone else is wrong to like them, just that I don't get it ;)

    challenge accepted..:)

    skip to 3min 30 after you listen to the first 1 min or so for the first one









  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,751 ✭✭✭MyPeopleDrankTheSoup


    The National and James Blake

    And probably The Beatles, who were unreal obviously but the thread title is overrated, and the way some people talk about them you'd think all recorded music should have stopped in 1970. Mostly from 'fake' music fans like Ryan Tubridy who like bands he thinks he's supposed to like.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    The National and James Blake

    And probably The Beatles, who were unreal obviously but the thread title is overrated, and the way some people talk about them you'd think all recorded music should have stopped in 1970. Mostly from 'fake' music fans like Ryan Tubridy who like bands he thinks he's supposed to like.

    I would agree with that. Unfortunately there are an awful lot of Beatles and Dylan fans who look down their noses at everyone else. ME? I'm a MUSIC fan. I thought the Stones were way better.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 308 ✭✭Welruc


    The majority of this thread is utter tripe!!!
    Where are ye getting these ratings from anyway? And then how do you decide if it's too high?
    Seems to me like its "lets pick a few bands that have been very successful and then say they are crap" sortra vibe.

    Some of the names that have been thrown in here as been overrated makes my head hurt. :confused::confused::confused:

    Thread should be remaned "Really successful bands that i dont like"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 534 ✭✭✭Donal Og O Baelach


    The Republic of Loose.

    Ohh Yeeeaaawwwwwggghhhh. Oooooooeeeeghhh!.

    Always sounds like he's on the toilet fighting a terminal case of constipation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Sky King


    Coldplay.

    If their music was food it would be ricecakes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 578 ✭✭✭30txsbzmcu2k9w


    Nirvana...never been convinced.

    The old adage that dying can be the best career move springs to mind.

    I was not an angsty teenager so maybe I just don't get it.

    Ugh... Fair enough you're entitled to your opinion but conceited nonsense like this does my head in.
    Plus the career move thing is a bit out of wack with Nirvana being the biggest band in the world for the 2/3 years previous to Cobains suicide.
    Great band IMO. Totally shook up the music industry.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    deuceswild wrote: »
    The majority of this thread is utter tripe!!!
    Where are ye getting these ratings from anyway? And then how do you decide if it's too high?
    Seems to me like its "lets pick a few bands that have been very successful and then say they are crap" sortra vibe.

    Some of the names that have been thrown in here as been overrated makes my head hurt. :confused::confused::confused:

    Thread should be remaned "Really successful bands that i dont like"
    These threads always turn into "xyz I simply dislike personally". Always surprises me how many folks miss a basic point.
    Cher Lloyd and Justin Bieber - wtf?!
    Presume the inclusion of Crystal Swing is a joke.
    And of course the "I can say whomever I want is over-rated but damn anyone who dares say MY favourite acts are over-rated" phenomenon. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,019 ✭✭✭Badgermonkey


    brummytom wrote: »
    Definitely Bob Dylan.
    I saw him at the London Feis in June. Walked off to the Saw Doctors instead - great decision.

    Now I'm no fan of Dylan, but the Saw Doctors are Supermacs in musical form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 110 ✭✭adomino


    most 'The ........' bands


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 257 ✭✭paulosham


    The Hype


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭Junco Partner


    the pistols - fair enough they kicked off the uk punk scene but they folded after eighteen months and their 2nd bassist couldnt even play. they didnt have half the intelligence or message of other groups like the clash who have basically been forgotten even though they brought so much to the table in comparison to the pistols.

    bob marley- how many of you have had this conversation 'hey you ever listen to reggae?" "yeah man i love bob marley like" "ever listen to the maytals or dillinger?" "who.....?" does my head in. yes he was brilliant and i love his music he's in my top five but there's so much more reggae out there if you just listen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭storker


    Not in order of overratedness...

    1. Pink Floyd
    2. The Divine Comedy
    3. Coldplay
    4. The Beatles
    5. Any singer who performs with a backing dance troupe
    6. Boy/girl groups with the exception of those from the Motown era.
    7. Oasis

    Stork


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭newmug


    U2:mad:

    I just cant believe how much they're NOT being mentioned on this thread! Their music is pure sh1te. The Edges "guitar style" sounds the way it does, because he just cant play! Its all single string plucking stuck into an echo machine! They've been playing the same crap 3 songs with different crap lyrics since they started! Bono is the most anti-humble, anti-sound, attention seeking gobsh1te in the music world. He'd eat sh1te and say it was for charity as long as the spotlight was on him, and he can't sing for skins! He "talks" out in a long, breathy, Dylan style, with the odd attempt at hitting high scrapey sounding notes at the end, to just about qualify their noise as a song instead of a talked-out poem


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    Anyone putting The Beatles down as overrated:

    1) Are trying to be different/cool/interesting (you're not)
    2) Have only heard their earlier stuff, 'She Loves You' etc (which is still brilliant)
    or
    3) Have some sort of brain disease

    That is all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭St.Spodo


    Red Hot Chilli Peppers. I can't their their music seriously. What American state are they from, btw? They haven't taken the opportunity to tell us in about 15 songs. I wish they'd bore off with their frivolous music.

    Arcade Fire: Indulgent hipster rubbish.

    In fact any band that aspire to be nothing more than pretentious, elitist and 'indie' have my contempt.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Elvis.
    The Beatles.
    Oasis.
    Beyonce.
    ...And as for Cher Lloyd - PURE SCHITE!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭Junco Partner


    St.Spodo wrote: »
    . What American state are they from, btw? They haven't taken the opportunity to tell us in about 15 songs.
    You have heard under the bridge haven't you? :confused: "the city i live in the city of angels." that should make it fairly obvious where they're from.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Biggins wrote: »
    Elvis.
    The Beatles.
    Oasis.
    Beyonce.
    ...And as for Cher Lloyd - PURE SCHITE!!!
    Anyone into music knows that - she's hardly over-rated. :)

    For me it's REM. I like some sings by them, but overall, I find them really boring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭shamrock55


    bob dylan
    oasis
    rolling stones
    nirvana
    lady gaga
    rhianna

    i could go on...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭boobar


    The Doors
    Stall The Digger
    Joan Armatrading


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,085 ✭✭✭W123-80's


    Dana
    Richie Kavanagh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 308 ✭✭Welruc


    Biggins wrote: »
    Elvis.
    The Beatles.
    Oasis.
    Beyonce.
    ...And as for Cher Lloyd - PURE SCHITE!!!

    Maybe the only time in the history of the internet that cher lloyd is rated along side the beatles :confused:

    I pretty certain she is not over rated as she is hardly rated at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭St.Spodo


    f0ggy92 wrote: »
    You have heard under the bridge haven't you? :confused: "the city i live in the city of angels." that should make it fairly obvious where they're from.

    I know, Californication, Dani California, Under the Bridge, Out in L.A all refer to it. That was my(sarcastic) point!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,351 ✭✭✭Orando Broom


    newmug wrote: »
    U2:mad:

    The Edges "guitar style" sounds the way it does, because he just cant play! Its all single string plucking stuck into an echo machine!

    There is nothing wrong with an echo machine...echo machine...echo machine...echo machine...echo machine...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,351 ✭✭✭Orando Broom


    Dudess wrote: »

    For me it's REM. I like some sings by them, but overall, I find them really boring.

    Some sings staywnge in ze neighbourhudt!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,128 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Surely after 10 pages somebody has said snow patrol?


    Aslan


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Sky King wrote: »
    Coldplay.
    U2 lite.
    Freddie59 wrote: »
    I would agree with that. Unfortunately there are an awful lot of Beatles and Dylan fans who look down their noses at everyone else. ME? I'm a MUSIC fan. I thought the Stones were way better.:)
    I love the Stones. Big fan of a lot of their output, but "better" is very subjective. On the songwriting, innovation, evolution and sheer quality of output year after year for only 7 years front the Beatles were/are objectively better. Plus they did the decent thing and gave up on a high(and turned down crazy amounts of money in the 70's to reform). The Stones and many others became watered down cabaret parodies of themselves. U2 a good example of that. If they'd called it a day 15 years ago, they'd be a lot more liked and respected.

    Pink Floyd I never really "got" TBH. I wouldn't say overrated. Well up to a certain point anyway. Another band who wobbled on after they had passed their best.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,019 ✭✭✭Badgermonkey


    I honestly have no idea who Cher Lloyd is.

    By the sounds of it, I should keep it that way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭Logical Fallacy


    There is nothing wrong with an echo machine...echo machine...echo machine...echo machine...echo machine...

    Oh stop being so heinous....einous....einous....einous.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Adele.
    Yeah we get it.. He broke up with you because you are fat. Build a bridge and run across it a few times. Its the same structure for almost every song. Bores the tits off me.

    Biffy Clyro.
    Syrupy bollox aimed at kids who want to be 'Alt'

    Kings of Leon.
    Immense first and second albums but then they turned into a pop band.

    The Coronas
    My mammy was Mary Black. Give me a record deal roysh so I can sing ****e songs about my J1er and playing songs on my guitar for the girlies at house parties... ****.

    Oasis
    Im a fan but in fairness they are over rated for what they offer musically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭Junco Partner


    St.Spodo wrote: »
    I know, Californication, Dani California, Under the Bridge, Out in L.A all refer to it. That was my(sarcastic) point!
    ah i see text makes sarcasm harder to spot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭markesmith


    Snow Patrol, Mumford & Sons...easy targets really.

    Always felt the Rolling Stones were a bit overrated. I love Beggar's Banquet and Exile on Main Street, but a lot of their stuff is just foppy Englishmen playing ouija board with the Delta Blues masters, and the last decent album they made was in the late '70s.

    The Smiths have two or three good songs, they get way too much credit. The Queen is dead is heralded as a classic, but 'Frankly Mister Shankly' is an abomination and there's several other weak tracks on there.

    Elvis, after his early stuff, was sh1te. The Who, with a couple exceptional tracks aside, aren't all that great in the studio. Prince has some class tunes, but 'Sign O The Times' is not a classic album, despite the critics.

    My Bloody Valentine never did it for me either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭CHealy


    Useless thread.

    Everyone has their own style in music, one persons "best band ever" is anothers headwrecker.

    Im a big big fan of Oasis, Stone Roses, but another person might be big into dubstep or something completely different.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Yeah, never understood the MBV thing, bar the odd number by them.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    W123-80's wrote: »
    Dana
    Richie Kavanagh
    Who over-rates these?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    The Ramones


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,791 ✭✭✭JJJJNR


    White Stripes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Naomi00


    1. Red Hot Chilli Peppers...I mean they are just a joke band IMO....I cannot take them serious.

    2. Foo Fighters....see above.

    It's music for simpletons.


    Have you ever heard an album or read any lyrics?

    I think you're just repeating things you've heard, making you the 'simpleton' :rolleyes:

    Foo Fighters are really talented musicians. You obviously don't know a lot about music because even if they weren't your type of band you'd still admit that they have two of the best drummers in the world. I don't care if you don't like them but calling them overrated is stupid.

    A pop band like Kings of Leon being treated as a proper band is what being overrated is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,075 ✭✭✭Wattle


    Arcade Fire. I'm not saying their rubbish. I actually like some of their songs but their just not as brilliant as some people say they are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 534 ✭✭✭Donal Og O Baelach


    The Manic Street Preachers - pseudo intellectuals playing to the gallery.

    Morrisey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭Logical Fallacy


    Wattle wrote: »
    Arcade Fire. I'm not saying their rubbish. I actually like some of their songs but their just not as brilliant as some people say they are.

    I'd agree with Arcade Fire i must say. I just never really saw what the fuss was about. A lot of their tunes are very similar to stuff that was previously done by the likes of The New Pornographers.

    It's just the same basic guitar music that has been done for a long time by a lot of people, the drum work is normally pretty pedestrian.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,085 ✭✭✭W123-80's


    Dudess wrote: »
    Who over-rates these?

    Anybody who has ever parted with their hard earned cash on either of these websites..!

    http://www.dana-music.com/

    http://www.richiekavanagh.ie/the-music/

    If only 2 people buy from those websites, then its over rated.!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 500 ✭✭✭parrai


    I'd agree with Arcade Fire i must say. I just never really saw what the fuss was about. A lot of their tunes are very similar to stuff that was previously done by the likes of The New Pornographers.

    It's just the same basic guitar music that has been done for a long time by a lot of people, the drum work is normally pretty pedestrian.

    :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Plenty of people know they're sh1t. This thread is about acts you hear nothing but praise for.
    If it was just about sh1t acts, it would be named as such.


Advertisement